Redwood Healthcare Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 44.1 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly -0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) received scheduled pain medications as prescribed by the physician when Resident 1 did not receive Hydromorphone (brand name Dilaudid, a strong pain medication) and Lidocaine Patch (a topical patch used to relieve localized pain) as ordered for multiple days, from 3/20/26 to 3/29/26.This failure to administer the prescribed pain medications resulted to Resident 1 experienced uncontrolled pain and was sent back to the hospital on 3/29/26 for pain evaluation and management.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed on 6/15/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of spinal cord (a long, tubular bundle of nervous tissue that runs from the brainstem down to the lower back) injury.A review of Resident 1's facility document After Visit Summary, printed on 3/20/26, indicated Resident 1 underwent a cervical (neck area) spinal fusion (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), was provided physician-ordered physical therapy (PT) five times per week. Multiple PT sessions were not provided to Resident 1 during the first three weeks of admission from 3/20/26 through 4/9/26.This failure to provide PT sessions to Resident 1 had a potential risk for delayed recovery following a spinal cord surgery. During a review of Resident 1's facility document admission Record (AR) printed on 6/15/26, AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of spinal cord (a long, tubular bundle of nervous tissue that runs from the brainstem down to the lower back) injury.A review of Resident 1's facility document After Visit Summary (AVS) printed on 3/20/26, AVS indicated Resident 1 underwent a cervical (neck area) spinal fusion, a surgical intervention involving the spinal cord.During a review of facility document Order Listing Report (OLR) printed on 6/15/26, OLR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to reduce the risk of elopement (leaving the facility unauthorized, without notifying staff), for three out of three sampled residents, when their wander guards (electronic monitoring devices, usually worn as a bracelet or anklet) were not being consistently monitored for functioning (performance of the system).1. For Resident 1, there was no documented evidence that the wander guard was monitored for functioning, every shift, from 12/15/25 until 4/17/26 (approximately four months).2. For Resident 2, there was no documented evidence that the wander guard was monitored for functioning, every shift, from 3/13/26 until 3/17/26 (13 days).3. For Resident 3, there was no documented evidence that the wander guard was monitored for functioning, multiple times on various days, in September 2025, and on 8/8/25 for functioning and placement of the wander guard.These deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to direct care) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was completed and coded accurately for wander guard [an electronic monitoring device, usually worn as a bracelet or anklet]. This failure placed Resident 2 at risk of not receiving the care and services appropriate to his needs, due to an inaccurate reflection of Resident 2's clinical status on the MDS assessment.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR) printed on 4/16/26, the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficits, and other psychoactive substance dependence.A review of Resident 2's MDS dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment to detect cognitive impairment) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated, code '0' for Wander/Elopement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall risk care plan interventions were implemented for two out of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) who were at risk for falls, when their call lights were not within reach.This deficient practice had the potential to result in falls, injury, and harm to the residents.1.A review of Resident 1's admission record, undated, indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses that included compression fracture of the vertebra (a break in a vertebra - a bone in the spine, which may be caused by a fall or accident), and repeated falls.During an observation on 3/16/26 at 11:55 a.m. in Resident 1' room, Resident 1 was observed from the hallway. Resident 1 stood up from her bed, grabbed her walker, held onto it, and went to the bathroom unassisted. Resident 1 appeared unsteady on her feet.During concurrent observation and interview on 3/16/26 at 12:03 p.m. in Resident 1's room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated Resident 1 needed staff assistance to the bathroom as she was at risk of falling. She stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-23 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comply with Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time dietician and the requirements were not met as specified in established standards (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC S 1265.4) for food service managers which required, employment of a full-time, qualified dietetic supervisor when the dietitian was not full time. The lack of qualified, full-time person to supervise the Food and Nutrition Services Department had the potential to result in unsafe food practices and food borne illness for 43 residents eating facility prepared foods. Findings: According to the California Code, Health, and Safety Code - HSC S 1265.4: A licensed health facility shall employ a full-time, part-time, or consulting dietitian. A health facility that employs a registered dietitian less than full time, shall also employ a full-time dietetic services supervisor who meets the requirements of subdivision (b) to supervise dietetic service operations. Subdivision (b)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to trim and clean fingernails for three out of four sampled residents when Residents 30, 32, and 33 had long fingernails with dirty substances underneath them. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 30, Resident 32, and Resident 33's poor personal hygiene and risk for infection. FINDINGS: 1a. During a review of Resident 30's Face Sheet, dated August 2024, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes Hemiplegia (the loss of muscle function on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (a relatively mild loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) and Diabetes (a long-term chronic disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). During a review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan) dated July 2024, the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of drugs and biologicals when: 1. Outdated or expired medications were stored in the medication room 2. A discontinued medication, including food items were stored in the medication cart These failed practices could contribute to unsafe medication use and storage in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 11:24 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) present, in the facility's medication room, the IP stated that the following items should have been discarded or placed in the designated discontinued or discard box next to sink inside the medication room: 1 Tube Feeding Formula, use by date 3/23/24 1 Box of COVID-19 Test Kit containing 34 test cards, kit lot number 192047, expiry date 4/30/23 3 Boxes of Sample Specimen Collection Kits containing individually packaged tubes and swabs, expiry dates 11/9/22 1 first aid kit, expiry date 1/31/22 27 Dextrose 5% Injection Bags 250 ml (milliliter), expiry dates 1/1/24 6 Normal Saline Pre-filled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to meet food safety requirements for food storage and kitchen sanitation when multiple surfaces had dust, food particles and/or granular particles, two cans were dented, two items were missing use by dates, and one bag potatoes contained potatoes with roots. These failures has the potential to compromise the safety of the food served through cross contamination and cause illness or hospitalization to residents who consume it. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 8/8/22 at 10:15 a.m. with Dietary Manager 1, (DM 1), the following was observed: 1. The cart used to transport various food products to residents was observed to have a granular substance on the shelves and imbedded in the grip on the handle of the cart. 2. The stainless-steel lip on the walls surrounding the dishwasher area was observed to have substantial dust over the length of the wall mounted lip. 3. The stainless-steel counter on the dirty side of the dishwasher was observed to be very wet with food particles on the surface. 4. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction), and availability of routine and emergency drugs when: 1. Two out of 2 medication cart controlled drug sign-in/sign-out sheets (a sheet used to reconcile inventory of controlled medications in the medication cart by the outgoing and incoming nurse during a shift change) were missing signatures of the outgoing and incoming nursing shift; 2. There was no record of controlled drug destruction available upon request; 3. One out of 5 emergency kits (e-kit, a kit containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) was not replaced in a timely manner in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P); 4. Two out of 5 e-kits expired; and 5. Expired and discontinued medications were not removed from active stock These failures had the potential for the facility to not have accurate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CRYSTAL SOLORZANO — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $349K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA