Vibra Hospital Of Northern California D/P SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 373 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 168 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 26.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.44 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.55 to 1.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. Time/Temperature Control for Safey (TCS) food, (food that requires specific temperature management to prevent harmful bacteria growth and toxin formation), for residents was not stored at appropriate temperatures in one of one nourishment refrigerators; and 2. The dish machine wash and rinse cycle temperatures did not meet manufacturer's temperature specifications; and 3. Black matter was found on the underside of the top surface of the ice machine storage bin located in the facility kitchen; and 4. A butcher block wooden cutting board was not cleaned with soap and water before being sanitized; and 5. [NAME] discoloration was found on the blending blades of two food processors in the kitchen; and 6. One plastic cutting board and three plastic bowls used for food preparation and food service showed signs of excessive wear. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in 30 out of 30 residents who consumed food prepared in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a copy of the discharge notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (assists with conflict resolution and protection of resident rights) for two out of three sampled residents (Residents 14 and 16). This failure had the potential to violate the resident right to appeal their discharge. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer and Discharge Nursing Services, dated, 1/1/24, indicated, when the residents were discharged from the facility, the residents would be notified in writing. The P&P indicated, The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. A review of the, Clinical Record Abstract, dated 5/21/25, indicated, Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar levels) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (an organ that filtered out the body's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and accepted standards of clinical practice for 3 of 31 medication administration opportunities observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 9.7%. This failure placed residents at risk of reduced therapeutic effect and potential harm. Findings: Review of Resident 217's record titled, Discharge Reconciliation Report, dated 5/21/2025, indicated Resident 217 had an order for MiraLAX; 1 packet (medication used for constipation) daily and Trelegy Ellipta inhaler (used to treat asthma and the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) 1 puff daily. The instructions were to breathe out slowly and then fully inhale the dose while taking a slow deep breath through the mouth and hold breath for 10 seconds or as long as long as comfortable, then breathe out slowly. During an observation at 8:25 am, in Resident 217's room, Licensed Nurse (LN) A was preparing Resident 217's morning medications. LN A mixed the MiraLAX in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Self-Catheterization (a procedure where the resident inserts and removes a flexible tube into the bladder and drains urine without the assistance of staff), policy and procedure (P&P) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 13) when: 1. The facility did not maintain adequate self-catheterization supplies; and 2. There was no physician order for Resident 13 to perform self-catheterization; and 3. There was no nursing assessment performed to ensure Resident 13 was able to perform self-catheterization safely. This had the potential to damage the bladder, cause infection, and could cause psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's P&P titled, Self-Catheterization revised 6/1/24, indicated, the facility would ensure residents that performed self-catheterization were provided with supplies and equipment. A review of the Clinical Record Abstract, dated 5/22/25, indicated, Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Metoprolol injectable vials (intravenous medication use to treat high blood pressure, and heart problems), were not stored and protected according to manufacturer recommendations for 1 of 1 pharmacy storage areas reviewed. 2. The nursing staff discarded MediSense (a brand name) glucose control solution (a solution with a specific known concentration of sugar used to calibrate and check the accuracy of a blood glucose meter) vials, when they expired. This failure had the potential to affect the stability and effectiveness of medications administered to residents and produced inaccurate patient blood glucose test results which could have led to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 11:00 am, in the facility's pharmacy, three injectable vials of metoprolol were stored in a small container directly under an overhead light. The vials were not enclosed in an amber bag, or otherwise shielded from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary menus were followed when: 1. [NAME] D did not follow the puree pork recipe; and 2. [NAME] D did not consistently use the required scoop sizes when measuring portions of food. These failures had the potential for under or over nourishment resulting in poor health outcomes for 30 out of 30 residents who received food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's Matrix dated 5/20/25, indicated there were 30 residents residing in the facility who received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. A review of a facility's, Food and Nutrition Services policy titled, Standardized Diets, rev. 01/2025, indicated that regular and therapeutic [specialized] diets are planned to guide patient menu processing, meal production, and preparation. A review of a facility production recipe, undated, for pureed (ground) pork roast specified three ounce servings of pork; the directions indicated that water or stock could be used in the preparation of the recipe, and that the sodium content of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility document review the facility failed to provide a meal substitute equivalent in nutritive value and food preferences were not honored when: 1. Two of two residents (Resident 367 and Resident 9), received a grilled cheese sandwich as a meal substitute for the lunch meal; and 2. Food preferences were not honored for one of one residents (Resident 7) These failures posed the risk for resident nutritional needs not being met which could lead to unplanned weight loss. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's document titled, Diet Spreadsheet dated 5/21/25, showed for the CCHO (carbohydrate controlled) diet and the Low Potassium (K) diet, the lunch meal entrée was three ounces of pork roast. Review of the facility's document titled, Detailed Menu Nutritional Analysis for day four, menu cycle: Summer Menu showed three ounces of pork roast provided 23 grams (gms, a unit of measure) of protein and 173 kilocalories (calories). Review of the facility's document titled, Grilled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F did not perform hand hygiene between resident care. This had the potential to spread infection. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Infection Control, revised 7/1/20, indicated, facility staff would use alcohol-based hand gel upon entering and exiting a resident's room, touching a resident, and, After contact with inanimate objects (bed, curtains, bed rails, etc.) in the immediate vicinity of the patient. During an observation on 5/20/25 at 12:13 pm, CNA F was observed placing a dirty lunch tray into a metal cart. CNA F pulled a pen and paper out of the right leg pocket of her pants, wrote something down, and placed the pen and paper back into the pocket. CNA F walked into room [ROOM NUMBER] and removed a dirty lunch tray and placed it in the metal cart. CNA F pulled a pen and paper out of the right leg pocket of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse was conducted in accordance with the facility's Abuse Policy, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This had the potential to put all residents of the facility at risk for staff to resident abuse. Findings: Review of a facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Management: TCU dated 6/24 indicated, .each resident shall be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse . , Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including .staff of other agencies serving the resident , and The Administrator will: 4) Begin the interviewing process of all involved residents, employees and witnesses , and 7) Start a confidential file including: 1) Resident Statement, 2) Employee Statements 3) Witness Statements . Review of admission records for Resident 1, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including high blood pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to carry out a resident's wishes for end of life treatment when the facility staff performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency life-saving procedure when breathing or heart beat has stopped ), on one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) that chose not to have CPR not be performed. This resulted in Resident 1 receiving CPR and violated her end of life wishes. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, CODE BLUE [means someone is experiencing a life threatening medical emergency where their heart stopped or they are not breathing and staff are to respond immediately] reviewed 5/2021, indicated, Section C: A 'CODE BLUE' will be called on all patients who experience a cardiac and/or respiratory arrest unless a DNR [Do not resuscitate means the same as No CPR] order is written on the patient's chart. Resident 1 was admitted to facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of high blood pressure and congestive heart failure (CHF, when the heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIBRA HEALTHCARE — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA