Vibra Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 38.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for three of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents 1, 2 and 4), which resulted in actual harm for Resident 2 as evidenced by increased size and surface area of the pressure ulcer.Findings Include: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on June 3, 2026, at 2:41 PM, it was revealed that the facility does not have a pressure ulcer policy. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on May 19, 2026, with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 3 (injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin), hypertension (HTN- persistent high blood pressure), and weakness. Review of Resident 1's hospital records revealed Pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for a resident with hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) in accordance with professional standards of practice that meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 1), which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by Resident 1 becoming unresponsive and requiring hospitalization. Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition where the body either resists the effects of insulin or doesn't produce enough of it) and congestive heart failure (CHF-when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should, leading to a backup of fluid in the lungs and body tissues). Review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated May 2026, revealed an order, with a start date of May 1,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, review of investigation documentation, as well and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse, resulting in actual harm as evidenced by skin tears, bruising, and mental anguish caused by rough treatment, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, effective November 1, 2017, revealed, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation . Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to; Facility staff, other residents, consultants, contractors, volunteers, or staff of other agencies, family members, legal guardians, friends or other individuals .The facility and its staff will: .not use verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic congestive heart failure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, review of select facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent accidents for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings Include: Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression. Review of Resident 5's fall care plan revealed a care plan, dated May 30, 2026, stating that Resident 5 was a high risk for falls related to impulsiveness. Review of Resident 5's ADL (activities of daily living) care plan revealed an intervention, dated May 30, 2026, stating that Resident 5's transfer status was a two moderate assist related to impulsiveness and unsteadiness. Review of Resident 5's incident report, dated June 9, 2026, revealed that at approximately 4:10 AM, Employee 1 (Nurse Aide) was assisting Resident 5 to the bathroom, after Resident 5 activated her call bell for toileting assistance. The incident report further stated that, per nurse aide report, Resident 5 was transferred to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the care plan was reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current status for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings Include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should, leading to a backup of fluid in the lungs and body tissues) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident 4's admission nursing progress note, dated May 13, 2026, revealed the Resident was noted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the coccyx (tailbone). Review of Resident 4's facility form titled IDT admission Evaluation with Baseline Care Plan, dated May 13, 2026, revealed the Resident had a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the coccyx. Review of Resident 4's TAR, dated May 2026, revealed a treatment order, dated May 13, 2026, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 7seven residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 7).Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on May 19, 2026, with diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 3 (injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin), hypertension (HTN- persistent high blood pressure), and weakness. Review of Resident 1's IDT admission Evaluation with Baseline Care Plan assessment revealed it was signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) on May 31, 2026. The assessment noted Resident 1 had a pressure ulcer but did not note the measurements of the pressure ulcer. Review of Resident 1's nursing progress notes failed to reveal any notes or assessments related to her being readmitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that its residents are free of any significant medication errors for two of seven residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 5). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition where the body either resists the effects of insulin or doesn't produce enough of it) and atrial fibrillation (AFib- an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). Resident 2 also had a history of a liver transplant and kidney transplant. Review of Resident 2's physician orders revealed an order, dated to start May 16, 2026, for Tacrolimus (an immunosuppressant medication that prevents the body from rejecting transplanted organs) ER (extended release) oral tablet 4 mg (milligrams), give one tablet in the morning for kidney transplant, give with 2 mg to equal 6 mg. Further review of Resident 2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to treat pressure ulcers for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition where the body either resists the effects of insulin or doesn't produce enough of it) and congestive heart failure (CHF-when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should, leading to a backup of fluid in the lungs and body tissues). Review of Resident 1's nursing progress notes revealed an eMAR note on April 23, 2026, at 5:03 AM, stating that Resident 1 was reporting a 4/10 buttock pain, concern for stage 2 pressure injury. Zinc oxice paste was applied, which provided relief. Review of Resident 1's nursing progress note on April 23, 2026, at 6:00 AM, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete clinical records for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition where the body either resists the effects of insulin or doesn't produce enough of it) and congestive heart failure (CHF-when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should, leading to a backup of fluid in the lungs and body tissues). Review of Resident 1's TAR (treatment administration record) dated April 2026, revealed that on April 24, 2026, a treatment order was received for Resident 1's left elbow skin tear. The order stated to cleanse the left elbow skin tear with normal saline solution and then apply bordered gauze, every day shift. Review of Resident 1's clinical record, including progress notes, revealed no mention of how Resident 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to establish Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on two of two nursing units; and failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the administration of medications for one resident observed during medication administration observation (Resident 63). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), effective 2024 and revised 2024, read, in part, EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: infection or colonization with a CDC [Center for Disease Control] targeted MDRO when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply; or wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. Chronic wounds include unhealed surgical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property by failing to determine residency status in order to perform the accurate criminal history background checks prior to hire for five of five personnel files reviewed (Employees 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14); and failed to validate and verify licensure status for one of two nurse personnel files reviewed (Employee 10).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated November 1, 2017, with a last review date of September 10, 2024, revealed Background, reference and credentials' checks should be conducted on employees prior to or at the time of employment by the Facility in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations. Review of Employee 9's personnel file revealed her hire date was June 3, 2025, and that a Pennsylvania State Criminal Background check was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen, in one of two nourishment centers (300/400 pantry), and in the creamery (an accessible lounge area).Findings include: Review of facility policy, Food Safety Requirements, not dated, read, in part, keep foods covered or in a tight container; and label, date and monitor foods to ensure they are utilized by the use-by date or frozen or discarded. Review of facility policy, Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, not dated, read in part, all food items brought into the facility must be labeled with content and dated. Review of facility policy, Ice machines and Portable Ice Carts, revised and implemented August 27, 2025, read, in part, it is the policy of the facility to ensure that ice machines are clean and maintained. Ice machines will be cleaned at a frequency specified by the manufacturer. Review of manufacturer use and care guide, page 10, read,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0837 — pattern
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility documentation review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the governing body was responsible and accountable for the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.Findings include: Review of the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan undated indicated the following, in part, VibraLife's governing body is ultimately responsible for overseeing the QAPI committee. The owner/president has direct oversight responsibility for all functions of the QAPI Committee and reports directly to the governing body. The QAPI Committee, which includes the medical director, is ultimately responsible for assuring compliance with federal and state requirements and continuous improvement in quality of care and customer satisfaction. Review of QAPI attendance sign-in sheets for January-March 2025, failed to reveal that the facility Medical Director (MD) or the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) attended any of the monthly meetings in the quarter. Review of QAPI attendance sign-in sheets for April-June…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIBRA HEALTHCARE — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA