No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

University Heights Care Center

656 Dillon Way, Aurora, CO 80011 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (303) 344-0636 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
860 Potomac Cir · (720) 777-1234 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Children Hospital, 860 N Potomac Circle
Grocery
541 Sable Blvd · (303) 761-4430 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13700 E 5th Cir · (303) 361-6768 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
700 Billings St · (720) 260-4154

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.6%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%8.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.2%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.2%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.5%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.7%20.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%75.6%79.4%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.78
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
27.7%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-07)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and treatment to prevent the development of pressure injuries for one (#74) of two residents reviewed of 39 sample residents. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, spinal stenosis (narrowing of spine), dementia, and chronic pain syndrome. The resident was admitted with hospice care and was followed by the wound physician. The resident was admitted with one stage 4 pressure ulcer to her sacrum. On 3/29/22 the resident developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer to her right lateral knee. On 4/19/22 the right lateral knee wound had developed to a stage 4 and a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right scapula had developed. On 5/17/22 the right scapula wound had developed to a stage 4. On 5/31/22 an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right ischium was noted. Interventions to address the wound included dietary supplements, repositioning, weekly wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-09-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#74) of three out of 39 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and to maintain their highest level of physical well being. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, gastro-esophageal reflux, dementia, and chronic pain syndrome. The resident was admitted with one stage 4 pressure ulcer to her sacrum and later developed three additional pressure ulcers. Dietary interventions included Mighty Shakes and Ensure Plus (nutritional supplements) with no additional interventions trialed as the resident's wounds continued to deteriorate (cross-reference F686 for pressure injuries). In August 2022, a 34.2 pound weight loss was noted with a reweight requested to verify weight loss. The 9/13/22 and 9/28/22 weights indicated the resident had a 25.2 pounds (lbs) weight loss over six months, which was 22.7% considered significant. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the environment was free of pests.Specifically, the facility failed to prevent and take adequate measures to eliminate cockroaches within the facility kitchen, the resident dining room, resident rooms, resident shower rooms and in the facility hallways. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised 3/16/24, The premises shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the premises by:-Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies-Routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests-Using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or other means of pest control as specified under; and,-Eliminating harborage conditions. (Chapter 6)II. Facility policy and procedureThe Pest Control policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#6) of three residents reviewed were free from abuse out of 18 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #6 from physical abuse by certified nurse aide (CNA) #7. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse policy, revised September 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/16/25 at 3:42 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.The Resident Rights policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the NHA on 12/16/25 at 3:42 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of alleged misappropriation of funds for two (#1 and #4) of two residents out of 18 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to maintain thorough documentation that an alleged violation was thoroughly investigated for the misappropriation of Resident #1 and Resident #4's funds/property. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Community Standard Operating policy and procedure, dated 9/4/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/16/25. It read in pertinent part, This policy outlines the community's zero-tolerance stance against resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. Resident and family training and education is offered at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed;-Ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration;-Ensure hand hygiene was performed during cleaning of resident rooms; and,-Ensure urine collectors were bagged, dated and labeled when not in use. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Frequently Asked Questions about EBP in Nursing Homes (6/28/24), retrieved on 8/12/25 from: https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/faqs.html, EBP are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for one (#16) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to obtain consent prior to the administration of an antipsychotic antidepressant medication for Resident #16. Findings include:I. Facility policy and proceduresThe Psychopharmacological policy, dated 3/10/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/4/25 at 10:05 a.m. The policy revealed the community supported the appropriate use of psychopharmacological drugs that are therapeutic for residents suffering from mental illness. The interdisciplinary team would proceed to care planning for the use of psychopharmacological drugs, and the care plan for psychopharmacological medications would be implemented. The care plan conference summary (CPCS) would be utilized to document discussions with the resident and/or resident representative about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#59 and #63) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary care and services to maintain their ADL abilities out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #59 consistently received assistance with personal hygiene, such as showering, shaving and trimming his nails; and,-Provide language communication tools for Resident #63 in order for her to effectively communicate her needs.Findings include:I. Failed to ensure Resident #59 consistently received assistance with personal hygiene, such as showering, shaving and trimming his nailsA. Facility policy and procedureThe Supporting Activities of Daily Living policy and procedure, revised March 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/10/25 at 10:46 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide the necessary services for one (#14) of four residents reviewed for services to maintain highest practicable quality of life out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14 consistently received assistance with dining. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Supporting Activities of Daily Living policy and procedure, revised March 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/10/25 at 10:46 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing and grooming) and dining. If residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem.II.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide two (#63 and #31) of three residents reviewed for activities with an ongoing program of activities designed to meet needs and interests and promote physical, medical and psychosocial well-being out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63 and #31 received a personalized activity program.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activity policy, revised 3/14/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/7/25 at 3:25 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will provide daily activities that not only meet the requirements of state and federal guidelines, but also the interests, preferences, hobbies, and culture of the participants and community. Daily activities include community-sponsored group and individualized activities, in addition to assistance with independent daily activities. Activities will be designed to meet and support the participants physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries from occurring or worsening for one (#38) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently provided care planned interventions to Resident #38, who was admitted to the facility with a stage 4 pressure injury to his sacrum (a triangular bone at the base of the spine that is formed by the fusing of the sacral vertebrae).Findings include:I. Professional reference According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, third edition, [NAME] Haesler (Ed.), EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA (2019), retrieved on 8/11/25 from https://www.internationalguideline.com/guideline, Pressure ulcer classification is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters received the appropriate care and services according to professional standards for one (#12) of two residents reviewed for catheter care out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12's catheter tubing and catheter bag were positioned below the resident's bladder. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Urinary Catheter Care policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the director of clinical risk management on 8/6/25 at 3:48 p.m. The policy revealed the purpose of this policy was to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. The staff were to check the resident frequently to be sure he or she was not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks. Staff were to position the drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one (#82) of three residents out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure an assessment was completed to identify potential trauma behaviors for Resident #82, who had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); and,-Develop a care plan for Resident #82's PTSD that included possible escalating triggers (stimuli that cause a person to experience intense emotional distress or for the person to react in ways that were reminiscent of past traumatic experiences) and appropriate interventions.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care policy, revised August 2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#42) of two residents reviewed for medications errors out of 42 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #42 was administered the correct dose of insulin by properly priming the insulin pen before insulin administration.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Administration policy and procedure, revised 8/4/25, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/7/25 at 3:25 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, Medication is to be given in compliance with the physician orders and/or the manufacturer's recommendations.II. Manufacturer's recommendationsThe Lantus Solostar (prefilled insulin pen) medication package insert (2022) was retrieved on 8/11/25 from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in two of four medication storage carts and one of two medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure medications were labeled with the date they were opened; and,-Ensure expired medications were removed and discarded from medication carts. Findings include: I. Professional ReferencePharMerica (1/12/25) Abridged List of Medications with Shortened Expirations Dates, was retrieved on 8/12/25 from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://pharmerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/PMC-[NAME]-Meds-with-Shortened-Expiration-Dates_012025_FINAL.pdf. it revealed in pertinent part, Once certain products are opened and in use, they must be used within a specific timeframe to avoid reduced stability, sterility and potentially reduced efficacy. Product-specific storage and expiration details can be found in the drug product's Package Insert (PI) under the 'How…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the hospice services provided met professional standards and principles that applied to individuals providing services in the facility for one (#14) of two residents reviewed for hospice services out of 43 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the hospice agency notes regarding Resident #14's care were easily accessible to the facility staff in an attempt to effectively coordinate care with the hospice agency.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Hospice Care policy and procedure, revised 2/29/24, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/7/25 at 3:25 p.m. It read in pertinent part, When a facility resident elects to have hospice care, the facility staff communicates with the hospice agency to establish and agree upon a coordinated plan of care that is based upon an assessment of the resident's needs and living situation in the facility. Hospice communication will be reviewed and added to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#13, #1 and #6) of five residents out of 13 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #13 and Resident #1 were kept free from physical abuse by Resident #2; and, -Ensure Resident #6 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #7. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy and procedure, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/27/25 at 2:30 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Physical abuse is defined as abuse that results in bodily harm with intent. It includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment and willful neglect of the resident's basic needs. The facility does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (#4) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of 12 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #4 was provided with the supervision necessary to prevent elopement; and, -Ensure Resident #4's elopement on 3/2/25 was investigated thoroughly. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Elopement and Wandering policy and procedure, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 3:36 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is a goal of the facility to provide a safe environment using the least restrictive measures available in care for residents who are exhibiting elopement behavior. 'Elopers' are defined as residents who make an overt or purposeful attempt to leave the facility and do not have the ability to identify safety risks. II. Resident #4 A. Resident status Resident #4, age less than 65, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#2) of five residents out of 13 sample residents who were diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility staff failed to implement person-centered interventions to prevent Resident #2 from displaying physically aggressive behaviors toward other residents related to her diagnosis of dementia. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dementia-Clinical Protocol policy and procedure, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/27/25 at 2:30 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The staff will review the current physical, functional, and psychosocial status of individuals with dementia, and will summarize the individual's condition, related complications, and functional abilities and impairments. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) will identify a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in two of two nourishment rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure frozen nutritional supplements and thickened liquids were dated appropriately; -Ensure timely cleaning of the ice machine; -Ensure food was labeled and dated in the nourishment rooms; -Ensure food was properly cooled; and, -Ensure food was reheated appropriately. Findings include: I. Ensure frozen nutritional supplements and thickened liquids were dated appropriately A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf, retrieved 1/29/24, read in pertinent part, Marking the date or day the original container is opened in a food establishment, with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises, sold, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly disposed of and the dumpster lid was closed to prevent harborage to pests and insects for two of three dumpster areas. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure garbage and potentially hazardous medical waste was disposed of in the proper receptacles or dumpster. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf., retrieved on 1/30/24, read in pertinent part, Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnable used with materials containing food residue and used outside the food establishment shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers. Cardboard or other packaging material that does not contain food residues and that is awaiting regularly scheduled delivery to a recycling or disposal site may be stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment which included all resources, education, staff competencies and facility based risk assessments. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Facility Assessment policy, dated October 2018, was provided by clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/27/24 at 4:58 p.m. It read in pertinent part, A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our residents during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for our residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. The facility assessment includes a detailed review of the resident population. The facility assessment also includes a detailed review of the resources available to meet the needs of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to infection control. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to infection control. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality Management Plan policy, reviewed on 11/26/19, was received on 1/17/24 from the nursing home administrator (NHA). The policy read in pertinent part, on going quality management program designed to objectively and systematically monitor and evaluate the resident's care and health care services. The comprehensive program is designed to provide care that is optional within resources and is consistent twitch the achievable goals to ensure that monitoring of residents' care is performed systematically and continuously. To identify the organizational components responsible for quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, for 10 (#72, #26, #79, #24, #38, #4, #81, #52, #11, #17 and #56) of 10 residents reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure tracking, offering and administration of the COVID-19 vaccination. Findings include: A. Facility policy and procedure The Immunizations policy, reviewed 7/28/23, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/17/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Purpose: To minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing compilations for influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, and COVID-19 by assuring that each resident is informed about the benefits and risks of immunizations and has the opportunity to be immunized unless medically contraindicated or if refused by the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations for 11 (#72, #26, #79, #24, #38, #4, #81, #52, #11, #17 and #56) of 11 residents out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Administer the pneumococcal vaccination after Resident #72, #79, #4 consented to the vaccination; -Obtain a physician's order to administer the annual influenza vaccination for Resident #72, #26, #79, #24, #38, #4 and #11; -Determine if additional doses of the pneumococcal vaccination were needed and offer the additional doses of the pneumococcal vaccination as needed to Resident #26, #24, #35, #52, #17, and #56; -Document declination forms, document risk versus benefit education and re-offer the pneumococcal vaccination annually for Resident #81 and #11; and, -Document risk versus benefit education for the influenza vaccination for Resident #81, #52 and #56. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for the residents on two of two units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with clean washcloths and hand towels in their rooms on the South and North units. Findings include: I. Observations On 1/17/24 beginning at approximately 9:20 a.m., the following observations were made: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths; -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths; and, -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths. On 1/18/24 at approximately 9:00 a.m., the following observations were made: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths; and, -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths. On 1/18/24 at 3:18 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths. On 1/22/24 beginning at approximately 11:00 a.m., the following observations were made: -room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths; -room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the residents nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents; and, -Follow recipe modifications for minced and moist diets. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diets policy, revised October 2017, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/23/24 at 12:03 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. Diet order should match the terminology used by the food and nutrition services department. A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner or dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet. If a mechanically altered diet is ordered, the provider will specify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive at the appropriate temperatures and met the nutritional needs of the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' food was palatable in taste, texture and appearance. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Meal Preparation for Nutritive Value and Palatability policy, dated April 2023, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/23/24 at 12:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Food is prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. II. Observations A test tray for a regular diet was evaluated immediately after the last resident had been served their room tray for lunch on 1/22/24 at 12:49 p.m.by four surveyors. The test tray consisted of beef stroganoff with egg noodles, broccoli and a fruit cocktail cup. -The beef stroganoff was bland and tasted like raw flour; -The egg noodles were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide food and beverages that accommodated resident preferences for five (#66, #79, #59, #14 and #83) of five residents reviewed food and beverage preferences out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer food choices to residents who preferred to eat in their room for Residents #66, #79, #59, #14 and #83. I. Facility policy The Resident Food Preferences policy, revised July 2017, was received from the corporate nurse consultant (CC) #1 on 1/23/24. It read in pertinent part: Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent. The food services department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. II. Resident interviews Resident #79 was interviewed on 1/17/24 at 10:41 a.m. Resident #79 said he preferred to eat in his room. Resident #79 said there was an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for one (#79) of one out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #79 was assessed for safe self-administration of medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Self-Administration of Medications policy, revised February 2021, was provided by clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/27/24 at 4:58 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents have the right to self-administer medication if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Self-administered medications are stored in a safe and secure place,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve any grievances for one (#16) of one resident reviewed for grievances out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure grievances regarding missing clothing items was followed up timely with a satisfactory resolution for Resident #16. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Grievance policy, dated 5/8/23, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/24/24 at 3:15 p.m. It read in pertinent part, To provide residents and responsible parties with information on the facility grievance procedure. To ensure that residents are afforded their right to file a grievance without discrimination or reprisal and that such grievance shall be responded promptly and in written form. Upon the receipt of a grievance and complaint report or complaint concern form, the social service director or designee will begin an exploration into the allegations/concerns. The appropriate department director will be notified of the nature of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to take steps to protect one (#6) of three residents out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was free from physical abuse from Resident #11. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/17/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Purpose: Communities does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. Intent: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received pre-admission mental health screenings for one (#24) of one resident reviewed for mental health screenings out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to perform a level two pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) for Resident #24. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The PASRR policy, created 9/26/23, was received from the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/29/24 at 12:29 p.m. It read in pertinent part: If a Level II is needed, this will be scheduled and completed and (name of partner with government agency) will provide recommendations that should then be filed in the facility's record along with all other PASRR documents. II. Resident #24 A. Resident status Resident #24, age younger than 65, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the January 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included mild cognitive impairment, depressive episodes, insomnia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan for one (#79) of one resident reviewed for discharge planning out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assist Resident #79 with his discharge planning goals. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Discharge Planning policy, dated [DATE], was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on [DATE] at 12:03 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility will develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals. This will include identifying ways for residents to be active participants and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. Discharge planning is a process that begins on admission and involves identifying the resident's discharge goals and potential barriers, developing and implementing interventions to address them, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for one (#79) of two residents reviewed for vision out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer vision services to Resident #79. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Ancillary services policy, dated 11/4/13, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/23/24 at 1:02 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Purpose: Ancillary services, including, but not limited to, dental, vision, audiology and podiatry will be provided to the resident per state and federal regulatory guidelines; at the resident/responsible family members request; and as needed. Ancillary services are available to all residents requiring routine and emergency ancillary services care. Social Services/Designee will be responsible for ensuring residents needing ancillary services receive needed/requested services in a timely manner. Records of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#38 and #79) of three residents reviewed for pain out of 52 sample residents had an effective pain management regimen in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice, resident-centered care plans and resident preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #79 was referred to a pain clinic in a timely manner after the physician requested a pain clinic referral; -Thoroughly document Resident #38's pain level after administration of as needed (PRN) pain medication and the non-pharmacological interventions used prior to administration; -Ensure prescribed PRN pain medication was administered prior to wound care according to the physician orders; -Thoroughly and accurately complete pain assessments for Resident #38; and, -Ensure Resident #38's pain was managed effectively according to the resident's stated pain management goal. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Pain Management policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were properly stored and labeled in two medication carts and one storage room out of four medication carts and two storage rooms. Specifically facility failed to: -Ensure loose medications in carts were properly disposed of; -Ensure the temperature of the refrigerator was kept within a safe range; -Ensure medications were not poured from one bottle to another; -Ensure medication carts were locked when unattended; and, -Ensure proper disposal of medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Storage policy, undated, was provided by the facility on 9/29/22 at 5:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part,, the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, record review, and the tasting of the test tray, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and at the proper temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste, texture, appearance, and temperature. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #33 was interviewed on 9/26/22 at 10:09 a.m. She said she did not like the food at the facility. She said she liked to eat in her room but her tray would arrive without the right condiments or an item would be missing. She said the food was cold and needed more flavor. Resident #23 was interviewed on 9/26/22 at 10:46 a.m. She said she did not like the food. She said she preferred to eat in her room. She said she had been served food that was still frozen and cold. She said the food tasted bad and needed more seasoning. Resident #50 was interviewed on 9/26/22 at 2:58 p.m. He said he did not like the food because it was greasy and unhealthy. He said he had complained to staff but things never improved. He said he preferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of Coronavirus (COVID-19) and other communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident rooms were cleaned appropriately; -Ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during wound care; and, -Enusure proper infection control procedures during medication administration. I. Failed to appropriately clean resident rooms A. Professional reference Centers for Disease Control and Preventions: Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) 4.1 General Environmental Cleaning Techniques was reviewed on 4/21/2020 and was retrieved on 10/5/22 at https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/cleaning-procedures.html. The document revealed, to clean from a clean area to a dirty area to avoid spreading dirt and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#440 and #339) of two residents reviewed received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident's needs of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #440's room was set up so the resident was able to access items such as her call light, nightstand and bedside table, have access to her television remote and orient the resident on how to work her television, which was her preferred activity (cross-reference F679); and, -Resident #339 had access to her walker which provided independence. Findings include: I. Resident #440 A. Resident status Resident #440, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included orthopedic fracture T11-T12 vertebra (backbone), hypertension, osteoporosis, asthma and depression. The resident had a history of falls. The 9/29/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one (#440) of one resident reviewed for baseline care plans out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to fully develop, review with the resident, and implement within 48 hours of admission, a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident #440 to include resident care focus areas, goals of care and interventions. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #440, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included orthopedic fracture T11-T12 vertebra (backbone), hypertension, osteoporosis, asthma and depression. The resident had a history of falls. The baseline care plan was documented as closed and completed on 9/20/22, however only one focus care plan area was completed under pain management. The 9/29/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#8 and #64) of four residents out of 39 sample residents for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #8 and #64 with bathing according to their plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy and procedure, revised March 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/29/22 at 5:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a program to support residents in their choice activities, designed to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of each resident, encouraging independence for one (#440) of one out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #440 was offered and assisted with independent leisure activities in her room. Cross-referenced to F558 failure to accommodate resident needs. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #440, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included orthopedic fracture T11-T12 vertebra (backbone), hypertension, osteoporosis, asthma and depression. The resident had a history of falls. The 9/29/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. The staff assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#72) of four out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a treatment order was in place for an open area for Resident #72. Finding include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Pressure Injury Prevention policy and procedure, reviewed October 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator on 9/29/22 at 5:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, Weekly, the facility will complete a thorough comprehensive skin evaluation in the electronic medical record on all residents. A skin evaluation may be completed more frequently if deemed necessary by nursing management or plan of care. The facility nursing assistants will complete a skin observation and document findings by completing the every shift skin observation question in the electronic medical record (point of care). The skin observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#44 and #77) of six out of 39 sample residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #44 and #77 were provided braces, for contracture management, according to their plan of care; and, -Ensure parameters were clearly identified to indicate the length of time and how often the braces should be donned and doffed by the Resident #44 and #77. Findings include: I. Resident #44 A. Resident status Resident #44, age younger than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included paralytic syndrome (loss of motor function to the body), contracture of the right hand, and hypertension. The 8/8/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15. He required extensive assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment free of accidents and hazards for two (#44 and #50) of five out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 and Resident #44 did not have medications and supplements in their rooms. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Self-Administration of Medications policy and procedure, revised February 2021, was provided by the director of clinical services on 9/29/22 at 5:45 p.m. It read, in pertinent part, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three residents (#29, #36 and #64) of five out of 39 sampled residents were free of unnecessary medication as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure informed consent was obtained prior to administration of psychotropic medication for Resident #29 and #64; and, -Ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) recommendation was followed for Resident #36. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Psychopharmacological policy and procedure, reviewed 9/28/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/29/22 at 6:00 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, The community supports the appropriate use of psychopharmacological drugs that are therapeutic and enabling for residents suffering from mental illness. The psychopharmacological/behavior review Committee will make recommendations to the primary care physician for gradual dosage reduction of psychopharmacological drugs as recommended by Federal regulations. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drinks and fluids were provided consistent with the preferences and choices for one (#440) of one resident reviewed for hydration out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #440 was provided water and drinks of choice daily and the drinks were within reach when provided in her room. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #440, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included orthopedic fracture T11-T12 vertebra (backbone), hypertension, osteoporosis, asthma and depression. The resident had a history of falls. The resident had a regular diet with thin liquids and did not have any fluid restrictions identified. The 9/29/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. The staff assessment revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LONG PEAK OPERATING COMPANY — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2024
LONG PEAK OPCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2024
HASKELL, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
KORETKE, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
MOSKOWITZ, JAYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
RASKIN, CHAIMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
VALLE, KARLAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
CAUSEVIC, ERVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
BEECAN HEALTH CO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
DERGANCE, JEANNAEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$509K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 1%Other / private 9%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $509K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$296per resident / day
operating cost
$8,987per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065337. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next