Thornton Care Center
501 Thornton Pkwy, Thornton, CO 80229 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 101 certified beds · (303) 452-6101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0566, F0567)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,483 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-19)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.9% | 8.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.2% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.0% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.4% | 20.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.2% | 20.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.6% | 12.1% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.34 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 81.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide four of four residents (#3, #4, #5, and #12) out of 12 sample residents, with the necessary treatment and services to manage pressure injuries and minimize pressure injury risks. RESIDENT #3 Record review and interview revealed Resident #3 was hospitalized seven times and readmitted to the facility six times between January and June 2024. During this time, the resident developed pressure injuries to his sacrum, ischium, left and right heels, left ankle, and scrotum which ranged from stage 2 (partial thickness skin loss) to stage 4 (full-thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle), as well as osteomyelitis (inflammation of the bone due to infection) of the sacral wound. Record review revealed the facility failed to assess the resident's pressure injuries on his readmission to the facility from the hospital on at least five occasions (1/18, 3/7, 3/19, 4/29, and 5/20/24) and failed to obtain and implement treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven residents (#55, #45, #5, #1, #71, #21, and #130), out of a total sample of 47 residents, received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Specifically: The facility failed to take steps to ensure the safety of three residents identified at risk for elopement and/or to require a WanderGuard (#55, #45, and #5) after Resident #55 eloped from the facility. Specifically: -Resident #55 eloped from the facility undetected on 7/10/22, and was discovered a block away from the facility by the police. Resident #55 wore a WanderGuard device, an electronic monitoring system that triggered should he exit the facility through a door armed with the WanderGuard system. Yet, on 7/10/22, the facility investigation revealed no alarm was heard by staff when the resident exited the facility. -The facility failed to take steps following Resident #55's elopement to review, revise and sufficiently educate staff on how to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#1 and #4) of five residents reviewed for accident hazards received adequate supervision out of 14 sample residents.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder, brain injury with loss of consciousness and arthritis. According to documentation, Resident #1 had four falls from 6/6/25 to 7/9/25. Two falls required evaluation and treatment at the hospital emergency department. The fall on 6/21/25 caused a pelvic fracture, and after a fall on 7/9/25, the resident was monitored and was allowed to go on an activity trip to a local restaurant for lunch on the same day. While at the restaurant, the resident had another fall on 7/9/25 and was transferred to the emergency department. The hospital physician determined Resident #1 had fainted due to dehydration. On 6/8/25 at 11:00 a.m., a staff member found Resident #1 on the floor in the main entrance common area. A nurse assessed Resident #1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from physical abuse for four (#7, #8, #9 and #10) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of 12 sample residents. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of mood disorder, depression and alcohol abuse. On 3/9/24 Resident #7 called certified nurse aide (CNA) #1, who was an agency CNA, a racial slur. CNA #1 went to Resident #7's bed, placed his forearm across the resident's left side and leaned on top of the resident. CNA #1 repeatedly told Resident #7 he needed to apologize for calling him a racial slur. CNA #1 then left the room. Resident #7 reported he cried out in pain all night following the incident. On the morning of 3/10/24 Resident #7 was transferred to the hospital when his oxygen saturation level (level of oxygen in the blood) dropped into the 70 percent (%) to 79% range. At the hospital, Resident #7 was diagnosed with multiple rib fractures and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#61 and #53) out of three residents reviewed out of 33 sample residents, as well as other facility residents, were protected from resident-to-resident abuse by Residents #54, #120, and #31. Residents #54 and #61 According to a sexual abuse investigation dated 8/8/23, Resident #61 reported Resident #54 had sexually assaulted her. Resident #54 had a known history of child abuse, was on the sex abuse registry due to an assault of an elderly person, and had recently gotten off parole for crimes he had committed in the past. A 4/12/23 behavioral assessment documented that facility staff reported Resident #54 had made inappropriate sexual comments since his admission on [DATE]. Notwithstanding Resident #54's current and past history, the facility failed to take steps, before Resident #61 reported sexual abuse, to develop and implement person-centered, sufficient, and effective interventions to prevent potential sexual abuse. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement interventions and provide appropriate treatments to prevent the development of pressure injuries for one (#65) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of 47 sample residents. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long term care due to the progression of dementia. The resident was admitted with intact skin and three weeks later, on 7/7/22, she was identified as having two unstageable pressure injuries. Upon admission, the facility identified multiple risk factors for the resident's development of pressure injuries. However, the facility failed to ensure Resident #65 received care and services to minimize her known risk factors and prevent the development of pressure injuries. Further, the facility failed to implement measures to promote healing of the pressure injuries. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Skin Assessment policy and procedure was provided by the nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-07-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to address one resident's dementia care needs in a manner designed to address the resident's known behaviors and cognitive and physical limitations. This failure affected one out of five residents reviewed with dementia (#55), out of a total sample of 47 residents. The failure resulted in Resident #55's inability to achieve his highest level of physical, mental and psychosocial functioning. Record review revealed Resident #55 was severely cognitively impaired. He was known to wander daily, known to be at high risk for falls, and known to be at high risk to elope. His thought processes and memory were impaired, and he could not follow instructions. Record review, observations, and interview revealed the facility failed to develop, implement and revise person-centered care plans with individualized interventions related to Resident #55's behaviors and cognitive and physical limitations. The facility also failed to identify and support ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#10, #11 and #14) of 14 residents reviewed for grievances were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve a grievance out of 14 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to respond to grievances from Resident #10, Resident #11 and Resident #14 when they reported to facility staff that room temperatures were uncomfortable and hot.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Rights policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/18/25 at 1:45p.m. It read in pertinent part, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the right to voice grievances and have the facility respond to the grievances.II. ObservationsOn 8/19/25 at 12:45 the following temperatures were taken throughout the facility:On the west unit: -room [ROOM NUMBER], was 81.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F).-room [ROOM NUMBER] was 83.7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one (#1) of two residents reviewed for medication documentation out of 14 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's electronic medical record (EMR) contained complete and accurate documentation related to the administration of the resident's scheduled levetiracetam (a medication used to treat epilepsy, a seizure disorder) medication.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Administering Medications policy, dated 8/4/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/2/25 at 11:05 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Only persons licensed or permitted may prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications. Record the results of medications administered per facility policy and procedure. Each time a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for two (#2 and #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of six sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #2 and Resident #5 from sexual abuse by Resident #3; and, -Ensure staff report an incident of sexual abuse in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, revised 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/1/25 at 10:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Sexual abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. If resident abuse, neglect, or exploitation is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator. The facility conducts an internal investigation. While the investigation is ongoing, the alleged assailant has interventions implemented to help ensure the safety of the alleged victim as well as other residents. The investigation includes interviewing any staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure dishes were sanitized correctly in the three compartment sink; and, -Ensure safe and appropriate storage of food items in the walk-in refrigerator. Findings include: I. Failed to ensure dishes were sanitized correctly in the three compartment sink A. Professional reference The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, January 2023, was retrieved on 12/24/24 from https://www.fda.gov/food/fda-food-code/food-code-2022. It read in pertinent part, Manual warewashing, sink compartment requirements: The three compartment requirement allows for proper execution of the three step manual warewashing procedure. If properly used, the three compartments reduce the chance of contaminating the sanitizing water and therefore diluting the strength and efficacy of the chemical sanitizer that may be used. Alternative manual warewashing equipment, allowed under certain circumstances and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to operate a quality assurance (QA) program in a manner to identify and address concerns related to quality of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality Management Plan/Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QMP/QAPI) Plan policy, dated 9/29/23, was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/19/24 at 2:43 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility has an on-going quality management and quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program designed to objectively and systematically monitor and evaluate the residents' care and health care services. The comprehensive program is designed to provide care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while changing a resident's bedding who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP); -Ensure the water management program (WMP) identified specific areas where legionella could grow and spread and decided where and how to monitor control measures to prevent legionella and waterborne pathogen growth and document the monitoring; -Ensure staff followed appropriate hand hygiene during resident care and ensure shared vital signs equipment was sanitized between use; and, -Ensure residents were offered hand hygiene at meals and staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during room tray delivery. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY IV. Resident #6 A. Resident status Resident #6, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 CPO, diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, borderline personality disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 10/29/24 MDS assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 out of 15. She was dependent on staff for showers. C. Resident interview Resident #6 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 3:15 p.m. Resident #6 said she had requested a shower three times a week. The resident said she typically received her shower on Sundays, however she did not always receive the other two. She said it was related to staffing. C. Record review The care plan last updated on 7/30/24 identified the resident had a self care deficit related to activity intolerance, morbid obesity and COPD. Pertinent interventions included the resident preferred her showers on Wednesday and every other day in the mid day. The 10/27/23 personal bathing preference form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' personal funds accounts were managed adequately for the facility and accessible to the residents for four (#23, #6, #46 and #47) of four residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to access their personal funds accounts during banking hours, after hours and on the weekends. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #23 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 12:02 p.m. Resident #23 said he did not have access to his money on weekends. Resident #23 said sometimes he also could not access his money on weekdays, including times the facility had run out of money to provide the residents during regular banking hours. Resident #6 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 3:18 p.m. Resident #6 said she was unable to access her money on weekends. Resident #46 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 4:45 p.m. Resident #46 said he was able to access his personal funds Monday through Friday, but the money was not available on weekends. Resident #47 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for 14 out of 65 resident rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Residents were provided clean washcloths and hand towels in their rooms on the East and [NAME] units; -Resident #6's closet was cleaned timely; and, -The clogged toilet in a resident's bathroom was cleaned timely and appropriately. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Homelike Environment Policy, revised 2021, was provided by the director of clinical services (DCOS) on 12/17/24 at 6:58 p.m The policy read in pertinent part, The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: Clean, sanitary and orderly environment, personalized room furniture and room arrangements, clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition, pleasant neutral scents, and comfortable sound levels. II. Failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during use of assistive devices to keep residents free from safety hazards for three (#9, #26 and #24) of seven residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure care planned fall interventions were utilized consistently for Resident #9; -Ensure foot pedals were attached to Resident #9 and Resident #26's wheelchairs when facility staff were pushing the residents in their wheelchairs; -Ensure Resident #26 was transferred appropriately from her chair to her wheelchair using a gait belt (a device used to help prevent falls); and, -Ensure Resident #24 was assessed appropriately for safe smoking. Findings include: II. Resident #9 A. Resident status Resident #9, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included acute kidney failure, history of falling and dementia. The 9/20/24 minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in two of two medication storage rooms and two of four medication storage carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Dispose of medications from the medication storage refrigerators and medication carts after residents had been discharged ; -Ensure medications were labeled with dates opened; -Ensure expired medications were removed and discarded from medication carts and storage refrigerators; and, -Maintain temperature logs for the medication refrigerators. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Storage of Medications policy, revised November 2020, was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/17/24 at 9:39 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Discontinued, outdated, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable and well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences for two (#48 and #61) of six residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide a balanced menu with a variety; and, -Provide alternate items of preference for Resident #61 and #48 when requested. I. Provide a balanced menu with a variety of starch options A. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Food Preferences policy, revised July 2017 was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/18/24 at 9:42 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent. Upon the resident's admission or within 24 hours after his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, were palatable in taste, appearance and temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' food was palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #13 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 10:38 a.m. Resident #13 said the food was not hot. Resident #35 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 2:17 p.m. Resident #35 said the food was never hot. Resident #61's representative was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 2:45 p.m. The resident's representative said Resident #61 told her the food had no flavor. Resident #6 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 3:25 p.m. Resident #6 said the food was not good. Resident #6 said the grilled cheese sandwiches were not cooked correctly and were not grilled, but microwaved instead. Resident #6 said the food was often served cold and had no flavor. Resident #24 was interviewed on 12/11/24 at 4:44 p.m. Resident #24 said the food was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0566 — isolated1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#13) of one resident out of 41 sample residents was compensated for paid services at or above prevailing rates. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was paid in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Therapeutic Stipend Program (TSP) policy, dated 6/1/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/19/24 at 4:55 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The task/duties/activities performed by the resident are appropriate, and the resident has the mental and physical capacity to perform the task/duties/activities. The plan of care specifies the nature of the services performed. All services performed under TSP (therapeutic stipend program) are paid. Duties will be outlined, and the resident must agree to the description of duties prior to starting the program. The resident will be trained/educated on the program duties to be provided, as well as safety protocols and safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of verbal abuse for two (#37 and #21) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of verbal abuse for Resident #37 and #21. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 2/29/24, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/24. The policy read in pertinent part, This community does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge for one (#216) of three residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #216 with an appropriate discharge process. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Discharge Planning policy, dated 2/29/24 was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/19/24 at 1:34 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals. This will include identifying ways for residents to be active participants and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. The ongoing process of developing the discharge plan will include a regular re-evaluation of the resident to identity changes that require modification of the discharge plan, and updating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility following a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital for one (#216) of three residents reviewed for discharge out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to reassess Resident #216's status at the time the resident sought to return to the facility after a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital, and directed the hospital that the resident was not allowed to return to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Discharge Planning policy, dated 2/29/24 was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/19/24 at 1:34 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals. This will include identifying ways for residents to be active participants and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (#32 and #48) of eight residents reviewed out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #32, who was dependent on staff for bathing, received her scheduled showers. -Ensure Resident #48, who was blind, received meal assistance. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Bath, Shower/Tub policy, revised February 2018, was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/17/24 at 6:58 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. Documentation: The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed, the name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident, all assessment data,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#9) of four residents reviewed for activities of 41 sample residents received an ongoing program of activities designed to meet needs and interests, and promote physical, medical and psychosocial well-being. Specifically the facility failed to offer and provide a personalized activity program for Resident #9. Findings include: I. Resident #9 A. Resident status Resident #9, age greater than 65, admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included acute kidney failure, history of falling and dementia. The 9/20/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had both short term and long term memory impairments and had severely impaired decision making skills through staff assessment. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). The 12/23/23 MDS assessment revealed it was very important for the resident to have books, newspapers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#24) of two residents out of 41 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure treatment was provided to Resident #24's skin injury in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Resident #24 A. Resident status Resident #24, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, history of other venous thrombosis (a condition where a blood clot, or thrombus, forms in a vein and blocks blood flow) and embolism (occurs when a blockage, called an embolus, lodges in a blood vessel and prevents blood from flowing). The 11/13/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 The resident was independent with activities of daily living (ADL). B. Observations On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and services to maintain vision abilities for one (#23) of seven residents reviewed for vision services out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23's new glasses were obtained in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Resident #23 A. Resident status Resident #23, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), peripheral vascular disease (disorder of the blood vessels), mood disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease. The 9/26/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #23 had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The resident was independent with eating and dressing and required supervision or substantial assistance with most other activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#1) of two residents out of 41 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Consistently and accurately monitor pre- and post-dialysis weights for Resident #1; -Consistently document Resident #1's post-dialysis weight from the dialysis communication form in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR); and, -Ensure communication forms between the facility and the dialysis center were obtained consistently and completed thoroughly for Resident #1. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hemodialysis Residents policy, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the director of clinical services (DOCS) on 12/17/24 at 10:30 a.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility provides residents with safe, accurate, and appropriate care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for two (#6 and #44) of six residents reviewed for medication errors out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Order and administer the correct medication (hydroxyzine) for Resident #6's itching, and not the incorrect medication (hydralazine), for high blood pressure. -Ensure Resident #44 did not receive excessive dosage of acetaminophen. Finding include: I. Failed to ensure the correct medication was ordered and administered A. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed., E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607. Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment?.? ??Professional Standards such as nursing scope ?and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration?. To…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet all the requirements for the provision of hospice care for one (#9) of two residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the hospice agency notes regarding Resident #9's care were easily accessible to the facility staff in an attempt to effectively coordinate care with the hospice agency. Findings include: I. Resident #9 A. Resident status Resident #9, age greater than 65 was admitted [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included acute kidney failure, history of falling and dementia. The 9/20/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had both short term and long term memory impairments and had severely impaired decision making skills per staff assessment. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS assessment indicated the resident was receiving hospice services. B. Resident representative interview Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#1, #2 and #3) of five residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer pain medications in a timely manner per the physician orders for Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2022), E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607. Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to quality of life and quality of care. Findings include: I. Cross-referenced citations Cross-reference F686: The facility failed to ensure pressure injuries were assessed and interventions were implemented timely to prevent worsening of the wounds and infection. The facility failed to ensure wound treatment was implemented as ordered for a resident who developed a wound infection with osteomyelitis (inflammation of the bone due to infection). The facility's failure to assess and treat pressure injuries created an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation with actual serious harm. Cross-reference F600: The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the residents' nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Menu policy, revised September 2017, was provided by the director of clinical services (DCS) on 10/26/23 at 12:28 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the residents in accordance with established national guidelines. A registered dietitian/nutritionist (RDN) or other clinically qualified nutrition professional reviews and approves the menus. The RDN or other clinically qualified nutrition professional will adjust the individual meal plan to meet the individual requests, including cultural, religious or ethnic preferences, as appropriate. Menus will be served as written, unless a substitution is provided in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special meal. II. Failure to follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable in taste, texture and appearance. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Palatability policy, revised in September 2017, was provided by the director of clinical services on 10/26/23 at 12:28 p.m. It read, in pertinent part: Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The cook(s) prepare food in accordance with the recipes, and season for region and/or ethnic preferences, as appropriate. Cook(s) use proper cooking techniques to ensure color and flavor retention. II. Resident interviews Resident #56 was interviewed on 10/23/23 at 12:24 p.m. Resident #56 said the food did not taste good and he did not like it. Resident #56 said because if he did not like the food served, he did not eat consistently. Resident #14 was interviewed on 10/23/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe practices were implemented to prevent the potential contamination of food and spread of food-borne illness through proper kitchen sanitation procedures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of gloves when handling ready-to-eat foods. I. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised January 2019, read in pertinent part, Employees prevent bare hand contact with ready-to-eat food by properly using suitable utensils such as deli tissue, spatulas, tongs, single-use gloves, or dispensing equipment. If used, single-use gloves shall be used for only one task, such as working with ready-to-eat food. Single-use gloves shall be used for no other purpose, and discarded when damaged, when interruptions occur in the operation, or when the task is completed. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0566 — isolated1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#14) out of 41 sample residents were compensated for paid services at or above prevailing rates. Specifically, the facility failed to for Resident #14: -Ensure the resident was paid a fair and decent wage for a therapeutic work program; -Ensure there was a care plan for the work program; -Ensure the contract matched what workload the resident performed; and, -Allowed the resident to work without a signed contract. Findings include: This deficiency was cited previously during a recertification survey 7/21/22. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. I Resident status Resident #14, age under 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder and diabetes. The 7/5/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#170) of one resident reviewed out of 41 sample residents was provided personal privacy in her room. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain to ensure Resident #170 had privacy while in bed. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Rights policy, revised in February 2021, was provided by the director of clinical services on 10/26/23 at 12:28 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality. II. Resident status Resident #170, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (mild to severe loss of strength) on right side, overactive bladder, localized swelling, mass and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#1 and #53) residents reviewed of five sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have a registered nurse assess Resident #1 after the fall; and, -Administer pain medications on time to Resident #53. Findings include: I. Resident #1 A. Resident status Resident #1, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included history of stroke, atrial fibrillation and diabetes type two. The 10/3/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. He required assistance from one person with most activities of daily living. He did not display behaviors and did not refuse the care. B. Resident interview Resident #1 was interviewed on 10/23/23 at 12:43 p.m. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#15 and #6) of five residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing to maintain good personal hygiene for Resident #15 and Resident #6. Findings include: I. Resident #15 A. Resident status Resident #15, under the age of 65, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, bipolar disease and anxiety disorder. According to the 8/3/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a brief interview for a mental status score of 11 out of 15. The resident required extensive assistance from one person for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was as free from accident hazards as possible for one (#15) of five out of 41 sample residents. Record review revealed Resident #15 fell repeatedly. The facility failed to ensure effective interventions were developed, that care-planned interventions were implemented and that neurological checks were consistently initiated when the resident's falls were unwitnessed. I. Resident #15 A. Resident status Resident #15, under the age of 60, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, bipolar disease, and anxiety disorder. According to the 8/3/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a brief interview for a mental status score of 11 out of 15. The resident required extensive assistance from one person for all activities of daily living (ADLs).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in two out of four medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to label insulin pens with an open date and store them according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Findings include: I. Manufacturer's recommendations Insulin Glargine package insert read in pertinent part: Insulin Glargine pen should be stored at room temperature, below 86°F and must be used within 28 days or be discarded. Insulin Lispro package insert read in pertinent part: Insulin Lispro pen should be stored at room temperature, below 86°F and must be used within 28 days or be discarded. II. Observations of medications stored improperly and interviews 1.Cart #1 on [NAME] hallway On [DATE] at 2:30 p.m. the medication cart was inspected in the presence of the registered nurse (RN)# 2. The following observations were made: -Two open pens of Insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was assisted in making transportation arrangements to and from appointments for two (#52 and #53) of two out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assist Resident #52 and Resident #53 with transportation for ongoing outside medical appointments. Findings include: I. Resident #52 A. Resident status Resident #52, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included peripheral artery disease (circulatory condition) and hypertension. The resident was hit by a car while riding her bicycle before moving to the facility. The 7/5/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for a mental status score of 15 out of 15. She was independent with all activities of daily living. She used a wheelchair. B. Resident interview Resident #52 was interviewed on 10/24/23 at 4:12 p.m. Resident #52 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care for seven (#43, #11, #48, #16, #59, #21 and #30) of eight out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to invite and conduct regular care conferences to review the resident's plan of care with Resident #43, #11, #48, #16, #59, #21 and #30. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Care Planning-Resident Participation policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, This facility supports the resident's right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment (implementation of care). The facility will inform the resident, in a language he or she can understand, of his or her rights regarding planning and implementing care, including the right to be informed of his or her total health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for the residents on eight out of eight hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure temperatures in the hallways and in resident rooms were in the safe range of 71 degrees F (Fahrenheit) and 81 degrees F. Findings include: I. Facility observations A tour was conducted with the environmental services director (ESD) on 7/18/22 at 2:07 p.m. The following was observed throughout the facility: -The lobby of the facility registered at 82.6 degrees F. -The main dining room registered at 81.9 degrees F. A. The [NAME] unit -The hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER] registered 83.0 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] registered at 83.1 degrees F. -The hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER] registered at 81.2 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] registered at 81.9 degrees F. -The hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER] registered at 81.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] registered at 82.9 degrees F. -The hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (#39, #21 and #18) of four residents reviewed out of 47 sample residents for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide Resident #39 bathing in accordance with their plan of care; -Ensure Resident #18 was transferred back to bed upon his request and timely incontience care; and, -Provide Resident #21 with nail care. Cross reference F676: the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided to dependent residents in accordance with their plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care of Residents policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. It read, in pertinent part It is the policy of this facility to provide appropriate treatment and services in relation to ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for three (#11, #30 and #60) of three residents out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow up on optometry services for Resident #11 timely; and, -Ensure optometry services were arranged for Resident #30 and Resident #60. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hearing and Vision Services policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator (INHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents have access to and receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities. The facility will utilize the comprehensive assessment process for identifying and assessing a resident's vision and hearing abilities in order to provide person-centered care. Employees should refer any identified need for hearing or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, in three out of four medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Label insulin pens with an open date and store them according to manufacturer's recommendation; and, -Label eye drops with an open date. Findings include: I. Manufacturer's recommendations Insulin Glargine package insert read in pertinent part:Insulin Glargine pen should be stored at room temperature, below 86°F and must be used within 28 days or be discarded. Latanoprost eye drops package insert read in pertinent part:Store the unopened bottle in the refrigerator. You may keep the opened bottle in the refrigerator or at room temperature for up to 6 weeks. II. Observations of medications stored improperly and interviews 1.Cart on East hallway On [DATE] at 8:30 a.m. the medication cart on the East hallway was inspected in the presence of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine or emergency dental services, as needed for three (#48, #30 and #21) of four out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure dental recommendations were followed up on timely for Resident #48 and Resident #30; and, -Provide dental services for Resident #21. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dental Services policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator (INHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility, in accordance with residents' needs, to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the state plan) and emergency dental care. Routine dental services means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture adjustments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide therapeutic and mechanically altered diets consistent with physician orders for five residents on altered diet and one resident on altered texture out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Serve the appropriate main dish for residents on a consistent carbohydrate diet (CCD) renal, CCD two gram sodium, two gram sodium, or renal diet; and, -Prepare a dysphagia advanced diet texture correctly (an altered diet for residents with difficulty swallowing). Findings include: A. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diet Orders policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. It read, in pertinent part, The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences. Mechanically Altered Diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, monitor and reevaluate its quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program to ensure the unique care and services the facility provided were maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continuously improved. Specifically, the facility's QAPI program failed to systematically self-identify, investigate, analyze and correct problems relating to resident safety, staffing, and quality of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The QAPI Committee plan, dated 6/28/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/21/22, and read in pertinent part: Objectives of the QAPI plan included: -Establish a facility-wide process to identify opportunities of improvement through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety; -Address gaps in systems or process; -Ensure adequate provision of staffing, time, equipment and technical training resources; -Establish clear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents was provided in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced the residents' dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality for one (#42) resident of four residents reviewed for dignity out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 was treated with respect and dignity by other residents. Resident #55 entered Resident #42 's room during a family visit and urinated on the floor. Cross-reference F744 for failure to provide dementia care for Resident #55's wandering into other resident rooms. I. Resident status Resident #42, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), pertinent diagnoses included heart failure, neurogenic bladder, deep vein thrombosis, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), and history of stroke. The 5/31/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of the resident needs and preferences for two (#71 and #21) of three residents out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to -Ensure proper wheelchair positioning at the dining table for Resident #71; and, -Ensure Resident #21 was provided with a bed that was long enough to fit his height. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure proper wheelchair position at the dining table A. Resident #71 status Resident #71, under the age of 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus type two, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder (hallucinations and delusions), anxiety, abnormal posture, and anxiety. The 6/28/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0566 — isolated1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#43) out of 47 sample residents were compensated for paid services at or above prevailing rates. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was paid a fair and decent wage for a therapeutic work program. Findings include: I. Resident #43 A. Resident status Resident #43, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included fusion of the spine, spinal stenosis and depression. The 7/5/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15. He required supervision with all activities of daily living. It indicated it was very important to the resident to have items to read, listen to music he likes, being around animals, keeping up with the news, doing things with groups of people, doing his favorite activities, and going outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#30 and #21) out of 47 sample residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide a resolution to Resident #30 filed grievance form; and, -Provide a resolution to Resident #21's voiced concern during the resident council meeting. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident and Family Grievances policy and procedure, dated 10/2/21, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal. The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tacking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining the confidentiality of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to take steps to protect one (#38) of three residents out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38 was free from physical abuse from Resident #45, on two occasions, when Resident #45 acted with physical aggression towards Resident #38. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator (INHA) on 7/18/22 at 10:00 a.m It revealed, in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes deprivation by an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop an acute/baseline care plan for one (#43) reviewed for baseline care plans out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident involvement in the development, review and provide a copy to Resident #43 of the baseline care plan. Cross reference F553: the facility failed to invite and conduct care conferences. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Care Planning-Resident Participation policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, This facility supports the resident's right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment (implementation of care). The facility will inform the resident, in a language he or she can understand, of his or her rights regarding planning and implementing care, including the right to be informed of his or her total health status. The facility will discuss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#48 and #59) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living of 47 sample residents were provided appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 and Resident #59 received regular bathing in accordance with their plan of care. Cross reference F677: the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided to dependent residents in accordance with their plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Showers policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator on 7/21/22 at 2:00 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice. Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#21 and #8) of five residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #21 received services to help prevent progression of a contracture to his left upper extremity; and, -Ensure Resident #8 received passive stretching to maintain range of motion in his contracted upper extremity. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator (INHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. it revealed, in pertinent part, Residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. Range of motion means the full movement potential of a joint. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one (#130) of one reviewed out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #130 received his tube feeding as ordered by the physician. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Appropriate Use of Feeding Tubes policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator (INHA) on 7/21/22 at 1:33 p.m. it revealed, in pertinent part, It is a policy of this facility to ensure that a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional hydration status. Feeding tubes will be used only as necessary to address malnutrition and dehydration, or when the resident's clinical condition deems this intervention medically necessary. II. Resident status Resident #130, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of three nurses were able to demonstrate skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for one out of five nursing staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure competencies were completed annually for licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3. Findings include: I. Record review LPN #3's personnel record documented LPN #3 was hired by the corporation of the facility in 2013. -A review of LPN #3 personnel record failed to have documentation that indicated LPN #3 had not completed an annual competency for 2021 or 2022, per the federal requirement. II. Staff interviews The interim nursing home administrator (INHA) was interviewed on 7/21/22 at 5:15 p.m. She said competencies for nursing staff should be conducted annually. She confirmed LPN #3's personnel record did not include documentation to indicate she had completed an annual competency for 2021 or yet in 2022. III. Additional information On 7/25/22 at 3:48 p.m., the INHA sent an email with a statement that said LPN #3 was hired in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control and prevention program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in one out of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Conduct proper hand hygiene when administering tube feed; -Administer medications in a sanitary manner; and, -Make sure oxygen tubing was clean prior to application. Findings include: I. Failure to conduct proper hand hygiene when administering a tube feed A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, last updated 1/31/2020, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html on 7/25/22, it included the following recommendations: Multiple opportunities for hand hygiene may occur during a single care episode. Following are the clinical indications for hand hygiene: Use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,483 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $5,684 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
- $12,058 — penalty dated 2024-06-20
- $3,741 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LONG PEAK OPERATING COMPANY — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THORTON SNF HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2024 |
| RASKIN, CHAIM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| BEECAN HEALTH CO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2024 |
| ELYA, ALAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| DERGANCE, JEANNAE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065193. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.