Health Center At Franklin Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 60.3 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C. Resident #15 1. Resident status Resident #45, under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of falling, generalized anxiety disorder, cerebral infarction (stroke), unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The 9/9/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental health status score of 11 out of 15. According to the MDS assessment the resident required extensive assistance from two people with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and one person assistance with walking in the room, corridor, on and off the unit, personal hygiene, and dressing. The resident was unsteady while moving from seated to standing position, surface to surface transfers, walking, turning around, and moving on and off the toilet. The resident has a manual wheelchair that requires substantial to maximum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide catheter care, treatment and services to minimize the risk of urinary tract infections for two (#60 and #62) of two residents reviewed for catheter care, out of 31 sample residents. Resident #60 admitted to the facility on [DATE] without having a catheter in place. The resident did not have a medical diagnosis to provide clinical indication (reason) for the need for a catheter. While in the care of the facility, the resident fell and fractured a hip and required surgical intervention. The resident returned to the facility on 9/1/22 with the indwelling catheter. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 had orders for the use of an indwelling catheter to assist the resident with bladder function. The facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment to determine if the indwelling catheter was clinically indicated. The facility failed to have order for routine catheter care to maintain a healthy bladder and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide activities designed to support residents' physical, mental and psychosocial well-being were provided for one (#10) of four residents reviewed for meaningful activity programming activities out of 32 sample residents and on one of three units.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Offer and provide a personalized activity program for Resident #10;-Ensure Resident #10 was invited and encouraged to attend activities of the resident's preference; and,-Ensure a meaningful activities program was consistently provided to residents residing in the facility's secured dementia care unit.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities policy, revised 3/24/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/31/26 at 11:47 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. Specifically, the facility failed to employ a qualified activities director in order to provide a program of activities for residents requiring activity and recreational support.Findings include: I. Professional referenceAccording to the National Certification Council of Activity Professionals (NCCAP) (2023), retrieved on 3/31/26 from www.nccap.org, an activity director must meet specific qualifications in education, certification and/or experience,The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the state in which practicing; and,-Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body; or,-Has two (2) years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 (five) years, one of which was full-time in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards in two of three medication carts.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were labeled and dated appropriately with the resident's name and the date the medication was opened.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Storage policy, dated 3/24/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/31/26 at 11:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation and security.II. ObservationsOn 3/26/26 at 8:30 a.m. medication cart #2 on the second floor was observed with registered nurse (RN) #1. The following items were found:There was one umeclidinium-bromide (Incruse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain emergency response carts and equipment in safe operating condition for three of five emergency (crash) carts.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff completed daily equipment checks;-Ensure expired items were removed from the crash cart;-Ensure missing items were replaced on the crash cart; and,-Ensure staff had knowledge of which electrical outlets were connected to the emergency backup generator. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to [NAME], [NAME], May 2022, retrieved on 3/30/26 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360555126_Crash_cart_preparedness_and_Failure_to_rescue_A_case_study_review,A crash cart is a mobile cabinet on wheels that contains equipment required for emergency cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. The carts are individualized and conveniently located throughout healthcare facilities for rapid access in the event of an emergency.A crash cart is typically located in the setting of an unexpected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#28 and #55) of five residents were free from chemical restraints out of 32 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #28's representative was informed of the facility's decision to implement a gradual dose reduction (GDR) after the pharmacist and the physician recommended a GDR of the resident's Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication);-Ensure Resident #55's antipsychotic medication was appropriately monitored and reviewed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT); and, -Ensure Resident #55's care plan included resident-specific non-pharamacological care approaches for the resident's behaviors.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of Psychotropic Drugs policy, revised on [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 11:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure received services and assistance to prevent a reduction in range of motion for two (#6 and #10) of four residents reviewed for range of motion out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure preventative measures were put into place for Resident #6's bilateral hand contractures; and, -Ensure preventative measures were followed for Resident #10 to prevent further body misalignment.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Restorative Care policy and procedure, revised 3/24/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/31/26 at 11:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents will receive services from restorative aides when they are assessed to have a need for restorative nursing services. These services include passive or active range of motion, splint or brace assistance, and bed mobility training and skill practice. Potential candidates for restorative nursing services may be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection in two of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident rooms were cleaned in a sanitary manner; -Ensure manufacturer recommended surface contact times were followed for effective disinfection; -Ensure resident glucometers were cleaned in a sanitary manner; and, -Ensure gloves were worn while administering an insulin injection. Findings include: I. Failure to clean rooms in a sanitary manner and follow disinfectant surface contact times A. Professional reference According to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Environment Cleaning Procedures (5/4/23), retrieved on 2/29/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/cleaning-procedures.html#anchor/1505929362118, Proceed from cleaner to dirtier areas to avoid spreading dirt and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for one (#30) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #165 from physical abuse from Resident #30. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure, revised 10/30/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/22/24 at 8:37 a.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation that achieves: Identifying, correcting and intervening in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of potential abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for one (#21) of three residents out of 23 sample residents investigated for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to report two allegations of verbal abuse of unidentified residents by Resident #21 to local law enforcement and the State Agency on 9/21/23 and 1/7/24. Cross reference F610 for failure to investigate an alleged violation Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure, revised 10/30/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/22/24 at 8:37 a.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, Alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or other but has not yet been investigated and, if verified could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for one (#21) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure two incidents of verbal abuse of unidentified residents by Resident #21 on 9/21/23 and 1/7/24 were thoroughly investigated and documented in a timely manner. Cross-reference F609 for failure to report an alleged violation. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy and procedure, revised 10/30/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/22/24 at 8:37 a.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Written procedures for investigations include: identifying staff responsible for the investigation; exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation (e.g., not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,082 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $10,082 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-29 for 24 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE MIDWEST — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $385K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO