Maple Crest Health Center
2824 North 66th Avenue, Omaha, NE 68104 · For profit - Corporation · 175 certified beds · (402) 551-2110 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.5% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 4.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.5% | 19.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.5% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 75.9% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.4% | 20.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.8% | 11.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.56 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 1.92 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 39.1–62.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.5–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.2–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 175 beds and averages 150.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.22 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change of condition for 1(Resident 1) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 151. The findings are:A.Record review of the facility policy titled Change in Condition dated 05-21-2023 revealed it is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident representative, according to their authority, and reported to the attending physician or delegate. The resident and/or their representatives will be educated about treatment options and supported to make an informed choice about care preferences when there are multiple care options available. All pertinent information will be made available to the provider by the facility staff. Requirements for notification of resident, the resident representative and their physician:-an accident involving the resident, which results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.04Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to resolve grievances and provide grievance resolution response for 1 (Resident 10) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 151.Findings are:A. Record review of facility policy entitled Grievances dated reviewed/revised 08/25/2026 revealed: - 9. Upon receipt of a written grievance/complaint, Social Services and Department Managers will investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the administrator. The investigation and report will include, as each may apply: -a. The date and time of the alleged incident; -b. The circumstances surrounding the alleged incident; -c. The location of the alleged incident; -d. The names of any witnesses and their account of the alleged incident; -e. The resident's account of the alleged incident; -f. The employee's account of the alleged incident; -g. Accounts of any other individuals involved (i.e., employee's supervisor, etc.); and -h. Recommendations for corrective action. -9. The administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to law enforcement within the required timeframe for 1 (Resident 6) of 3 sampled residents. Facility staff identified a census of 151.Findings are:A. Record review of facility policy entitled Abuse Reporting dated revised 08/08/2024 revealed in accordance with the Elder Justice Act, the facility administrator or designee would immediately notify, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involved result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury the following persons or agencies of such an incident: the state licensing authority, the Ombudsman, the resident's representative; Adult Protective Services; law enforcement officials; the resident's attending physician; and the facility medical director. Further review of the abuse reporting policy identified if the allegations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) to reflect the current resuscitation status for 1 (Resident 10) of 15 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 151.Findings are:A. Record review of facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plans dated reviewed/revised 09/02/2025 revealed the CCP would be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly Minimum Data Set ((MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) assessment.B. Record review of Resident 10's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the facility admitted Resident 10 on 09/23/2024. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident 10 had a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(3). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement physician's orders to prevent altered skin integrity for 1 (Resident 5) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 151. The findings are:A. Record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-24-2026 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-Had a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)-dialysis dependent, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Chronic Heart Failure. -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment.-required set up and clean up assistance with eating.-required total assistance with hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers.-was receiving dialysis services. Record review of Resident 5's Order Listing Report (OLR) printed on 04-28-2026 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) & 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement and reevaluate interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcer development and to promote wound healing for 2 (Resident 1 and 7) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 151. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management dated 09-25-2025 revealed the facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, unless clinically unavoidable, and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries. Licensed nurses will conduct a pressure injury risk assessment, using the Braden Scale Score, on all residents upon admission/re-admission, weekly for 4 weeks, then quarterly or whenever the resident's condition changes significantly. The facility shall establish and utilize a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.09 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate the provision of medication administration with dialysis services and failed to adhere to physician ordered fluid restriction for 1 (Resident 5) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 151. The findings are:A.Record review of the facility policy titled Guideline for Care of the Dialysis Resident dated 02-20-2022 revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure dialysis residents would be provided care and services in a manner that promotes the resident's quality of life, and to attain or maintain the resident's highest possible physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The attending physician orders all diets served to dialysis residents. Dialysis residents are given fluid based on the fluid restriction as ordered by the physician. The nursing and dietary staff will organize the division and distribution of fluid. Medications will be administered as ordered prior to departure and after arrival from the dialysis center. These hours will not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely response to call lights as evidenced by call light response times, greater than 30 minutes for 3 (Residents 4, 5 and 7) of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 151. The findings are:A. An interview conducted with Resident 4 on 04-29-2026 at 9:00 AM revealed Resident 4 had been left on the toilet for a very long time in mid-January of this year. The interview further revealed on 04-26-2026 Resident 4 was left on the toilet for a long time, but not as long as in January.Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 1/15/2026 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 4's Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as a 13. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact.Record review of Resident 4's Alarm Average Response Time Report (AARTR) for 01-10-2026 to 01-17-2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident 5) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 151. The findings are:A.Record review of Medication Errors in Nursing Homes Fact Sheet from the Long-Term Care Community Coalition dated 01-2023 revealed a medication error means an observed or identified preparation or administration of medications which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order, the manufacturer's specifications, or accepted professional standards or principles. A significant medication error is an error which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes their health and safety. Common medication errors include taking medication dose late, omitted dose, dispensing the wrong medication, giving the medication through the wrong route, and a wrong or extra dose of medication.B.Record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-24-2026 revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility staff failed to change gloves between residents during the provision of blood glucose monitoring, perform hand hygiene after doffing (removing) gloves, and handle glucose strips in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 2 (Residents 14 and 15) of 6 sampled residents; and the facility failed to use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition [e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices]) to prevent the potential for cross-contamination for 1 (Resident 5) of 2 sampled residents. Facility staff identified a census of 151.Findings are:Record review of facility policy entitled Glucometer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
No Licensure Reference Number Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information contained the required information related to the total number of hours worked per discipline. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 143. The findings are: Record review of a facility policy entitled Facility Posted Nurse Staffing dated 7/24 revealed the following information.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information:a. Facility nameb. The current datec. Facility's current resident censusd. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: i. Registered Nurses ii. Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses iii. Certified Nurse Aides Observation on 08/27/25 at 10:00 AM, 08/28/25 at 10:40 AM, and 09/02/25 at 9:40 AM revealed the posted nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff 1) failed to utilize hand-washing and gloving techniques to prevent potential food contamination during food preparation and meal service and 2) store foods in a manner to prevent potential food borne illness. This practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who ate meals from the kitchen. The facility also failed to monitor refrigerator temperatures daily on resident personal refrigerators. This had the potential to affect all residents that used the unit refrigerator on [NAME] and [NAME] Units. The facility census was 143.Findings are: A. Review of the 7/21/2016 version of the Food Code, based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Food Code and used as an authoritative reference for food service sanitation practices, revealed the following: -2-301.14 Food employees shall wash hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii) The facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative when ordered daily weights were not obtained or documented for 1 ( Resident 58) of 1 sampled resident and failed to notify physician of changes in skin condition for 1 (Resident 15) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 143.A. A record review of Resident 58's Weights & Vitals on August 28, 2025 revealed 86 missed daily weights from April 1 through August 26, 2025. No refusals or provider notifications were documented. A record review of facility's Change in Condition policy with, revised date April 2023 revealed staff are required to immediately notify the physician/resident representative of significant changes in condition or failure to implement treatment orders. No evidence of such notification was found. A record review of Resident 58's monthly weight logs for April through August 2025 revealed multiple gaps: April 2025: 17 missed days of daily weights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.05(H)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the potential for verbal abuse for 2 (Resident 8 & 59) of 2 residents sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 143.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Abuse Prohibition Program dated revised 8/8/2024 revealed: -Policy Statement: residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and involuntary seclusion by anyone, including by not limited to - facility staff, other residents, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, and friends. Our facility will not condone any form of resident abuse and will continually monitor our facility's policies, procedures, training programs, and systems to assist in preventing resident abuse. -2. Our abuse prevention/intervention program includes, but is not necessarily limited to the following: -b) The protection of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse within the required timeframes for 2 (Resident 8 & 59) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 143.The findings are:Record review of a facility policy entitled Abuse Reporting dated revised 8/8/2024 revealed: -3. All personnel, residents, family members, visitors, etc., are encouraged to report incident of resident abuse or suspected incidents of abuse. Such report may be made without fear of retaliation from the facility or its staff. -4. Employees, facility consultants and/or Attending Physicians must immediately report any suspected abuse or incidents of abuse to the Administrator/Director of Nursing/Social Services director. -5. Any individual observing an incident of resident abuse or suspecting resident abuse must immediately report such incident to the Administrator/Director of Nursing/Social Services director. The following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(D)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) within the required time frames for 2 (Resident 14 & 119) of 35 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 143.The findings are:Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 1.18.11 effective 10/01/23 revealed a quarterly MDS must be completed and signed no later than 14 days from the assessment reference date.A. Record review of Resident 14's MDS with a reference date of 8/6/2025 revealed the MDS was not signed as completed until 8/26/2025 which is 20 days after the reference date.B. Record review of Resident 119's MDS with a reference date of 6/23/2025 revealed the MDS was not signed as completed until 7/24/2025 which is 31 days after the reference date.An interview on 9/3/2025 at 11:53 AM with MDS Coordinator (MDSC)-A confirmed the MDS's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3)Based on record review, observation and interview; the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for Resident 15. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 143. Findings are:Review of the facility policy titled Shower and Bathing with a revised date of 5/17/22 included the following:-The facility would provide routine personal hygiene for the residents and assess the condition of the resident's skin on a weekly basis. -The resident fingernails would be cleaned and trimmed on resident bath day. Review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident care plans) dated 6/19/25 revealed the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, bathing, upper and lower extremity dressing, rolling left to right, going from sitting to lying position, chair/bed to chair transfer, tub transfer and wheelchair mobility and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(3)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 The facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed by not obtaining and documenting daily weights for Resident 58, and failed to perform weekly skin evaluations for Resident 15, and weekly wound evaluations for Resident 5, and failed to implement interventions to prevent skin breakdown for Resident 62. The facility census was 143. The findings are:A. A record review of Resident 58's Weights & Vitals on August 28, 2025 revealed 86 missed daily weights from April 1 through August 26, 2025. No refusals or provider notifications were documented. A record review of facility's Change in Condition policy with, revised date April 2023 revealed staff are required to immediately notify the physician/resident representative of significant changes in condition or failure to implement treatment orders. No evidence of such notification was found. A record review of Resident 58's monthly weight logs for April through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct weekly skin evaluations to prevent the potential for pressure ulcer development for 2 (Resident 5 and 12) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 143. The findings are: A.Record review of the facility policy titled Skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed it the facility policy to perform a full body skin assessment as part of our systemic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed nurse upon admission/readmission, for 3 days and weekly thereafter.Record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-14-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at a 12. According to the MDS Manual a score of 8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment.-Had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.12E1 Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to secure one medication for 1 (Resident 55) of 4 sampled residents and failed to secure a medication cart on the first floor. The facility identified a total of 102 residents resided on the first floor and identified 8 residents who were self-mobile and had poor safety awareness. The facility census was 150. Findings are: A. Record review of clinical census in resident's electronic medical record revealed Resident 55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), Congestive Heart Failure (a serious condition when the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Chronic Kidney Disease (means a gradual loss of kidney function over time), Morbid (severe) Obesity due to excess calories (a complex chronic disease in which a person has a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the nutritive value of pureed food. This had the potential to affect 18 residents. The facility identified a census of 150. Findings are: Observation on 7/9/24 at 9:10 AM revealed [NAME] B scooped with a slotted spoon an indeterminate amount of cooked green beans into the blender. [NAME] B measured 2 teaspoons of salt and put it in the blender with the green bean. [NAME] B added 2 scoops of liquid butter to the blender and added boiling water of indeterminate amount. After this mixture was blended, [NAME] B added 4 ounces of thickener. Observation on 7/9/24 at 9:30 AM [NAME] B placed an indeterminate amount of cooked ground beef into the blender. [NAME] B added 2 scoops of country gravy and 2 cups of boiling water into the blender. After this mixture was blended, [NAME] B added 4 ounces of thickener. A interview was conducted on 7/10/24 at 8:40 AM with [NAME] B. During the interview [NAME] B reported having already pureed the meat for lunch. [NAME] B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.07(C) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to identify and offer the Pneumococcal immunization to 4 (Resident 122, 138, 130, and 80) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 150. Findings are: A. Record review of Facility Policy dated 8/2016 Pneumococcal Vaccine: Policy Statement: All residents will be offered Pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/Pneumococcal infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. 2. Assessment of Pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within 5 days of the resident admission if not conducted prior to admission. 3. Before receiving a Pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04 (F)(i)(5) Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a missed dialysis appointment for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 54). The facility identified a census of 150. Findings are: Record review of Resident 54's Census Sheet revealed an admission date of 3/12/2019 to the facility and had the diagnoses of Renal Dialysis Record review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care-planning) dated 5/8/2024 revealed Resident 54 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) with a score of 15. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. Resident 54 required set up/clean up assist with eating, substantial/maximum assist with bed mobility and toileting, and was dependent for transfers and had the diagnosis of renal insufficiency, renal failure, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough written investigation and report an allegation of staff to resident abuse within the required timeframe to the Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] for 1 (Residents 143) of 3 facility self-report investigations reviewed. The facility census was 150. Findings are: Record review of 2 facility policies entitled Abuse Investigations and Abuse Reporting dated August 2006 revealed the following information: Abuse Investigations: 1. When the incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, neglect, or injury of unknown source is reported, the administrator will appoint a staff member to investigate the incident. 2. The person conducting the investigation will, as a minimum: a. An interview with the person reporting the incident. b. Interviews with any witnesses to the incident. c. An interview with the resident. d. An interview with the attending physician when deemed appropriate and a review of the residents' medical record. e. Am interview with staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.09 (B) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately identify Special Treatments in Section O-Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care-planning) for 2 (Residents 54 and 122) of 30 reviewed. The facility staff identified a census of 150. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 54 Census Sheet revealed an admission date of 3/12/2019 to the facility with the diagnoses of Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Record review of Resident 54's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the Resident 54 had renal insufficiency, renal failure, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) marked on the MDS. Section O, Question J 1 Dialysis revealed the MDS was not coded for Dialysis treatment. A interview on 07/10/24 at 2:38 PM was conducted with the MDS Coordinator. During the interview the MDS Coordinator confirmed the MDS dated [DATE] should have had Section O-Question J 1 marked for Dialysis While a Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, a screening to determine the presence of a mental illness or intellectual disability) referral had been completed after a diagnosis of a mental disorder was identified for 1 (Resident 57) out of 3 reviewed for PASRR screens. The facility census was 150. Findings are: Record review of a facility policy entitled Admissions and PASRR update policy dated 5/25/23 revealed the following information: 4. PASRR process: - a. Screening: The discharging hospital or nursing home staff or designated PASRR coordinator shall conduct an initial screening of all individuals seeking admission to determine if there is a reasonable suspicion of serious mental illness, intellectual or developmental disabilities, or both. Screening may involve a review of medical records, assessments, and interviews with the individual or their authorized representative. Re-screens or status updates of residents may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I PASARR screen (PASARR, a federally mandated screening process to ensure Nursing Home residents will mental illness and/or developmental disabilities receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting) for 1 (Resident 23) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 150. Findings are: Record Review of PASARR screen dated 05/04/2018 revealed Resident 23 was assessed as having no diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or Intellectual Disability or Related Condition (ID/RC). Record Review of Facility's Diagnosis Report for Resident 23 revealed the following admission diagnoses which would have triggered a Level II screen: -Vascular Dementia, mild, with mood disturbance -Moderate intellectual disabilities -Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, moderate -Generalized Anxiety Disorder -Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition Record Review of Resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide position changes and incontinence care for 1 (Resident 33) of 4 residents. The facility census was 150. Findings are: Record Review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05-27-2024 revealed Resident 33 had the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), Lewy body Dementia (a disease associated with abnormal deposits of a protein called alpha-synuclein in the brain. These deposits, called Lewy bodies, affect chemicals in the brain whose changes, in turn, can lead to problems with thinking, movement, behavior, and mood.), Schizophrenia (Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions), and Depression. The MDS also indicated Resident 33 was not able complete a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(1) Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement assessed interventions to prevent skin injuries for Resident 105 and falls for Resident 63. A total of 4 residents were reviewed for accident prevention. The facility census was 150. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 105's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 4/7/24 identified an admission date of 7/7/24. The MDS Identified that Resident 105 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a brief screening tool that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified that Resident 105 exhibited inattention and disorganized thinking, physical and verbal behavioral symptoms, and rejection of care 1-3 days per week, required wheelchair use for ambulation, required substantial to maximum assistance with transfers from the bed to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.14 Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 55) of 1 sampled residents received follow up dental services. The facility census was 150. Findings are: An interview with Resident 55 was conducted on 07/08/2024 at 9:54 AM. During the interview, Resident 55 reported that they had no teeth, was seen and fitted for dentures in April (2024) and that they were still waiting for their dentures. A record review on 07/09/2024 of a Doctor Referral Form for Resident 55, dated 05/20/2024 revealed Resident 55 was seen by the dentist with the following notation tried in teeth in wax. Patient approved. Next Visit-Deliver Dentures. A review of Resident 55's medical record revealed there was not any evidence that the facility had any contact with the dentist from 05/21/2024 through 07/08/2024. An interview with facility's Social Worker (SW) on 07/09/2024 at 2:22 PM confirmed that the facility was unaware that Resident 55 hadn't received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 178 NAC 1-005.06(D) Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene and gloving to prevent cross contamination in 2 residents (Resident 122 and Resident 33) of a sample size of 30. The facility identified a census of 150. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 122's Census Sheet revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 122's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care-planning) dated 4/21/2024 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) with a score of 6. A score of 6 indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident required substantial/maximal assist with eating and was dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Record review of Resident 122's Care plan revealed an intervention dated 3/5/2024 for catheter cares every shift. Care plan entry dated 5/3/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.17D Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.17B Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.17E Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed handwashing in a manner to prevent cross contamination (transfer of bacteria from one surface to another), ensure expired items were removed from the facility's stock, ensure the floors in the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer were clean, and ensure kitchen equipment was clean and in good working order. This had the potential to affect 144 residents that consumed (ate) food from the kitchen. The total facility census was 146. Findings are: A. A record review of the undated Maple Crest Hand Washing Policy revealed the staff should have washed their hands to prevent the spread of infection and disease by washing hands thoroughly with soap for 20 seconds. An observation on 07/12/2023 at 9:02 AM revealed the facility's [NAME] (CO)-C completed the process of pureeing (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to report and thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse and submitted the investigation to the require state agency within 5 working days for 1(Resident 68) 1 residents. The facility staff identified a census of 147. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility Abuse Reporting policy dated 8-2006 revealed the following information: -Policy Statement: -It is the responsibility of our employees, facility consultants, attending Physican's, family members, visitors, etc, to promptly report any incident or suspect incident of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and theft or misappropriation of resident property to facility management, which will then be immediately reported to the appropriate state agencies and other entities or individuals. -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -2c. Verbal abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents, or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D2c Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Prevalon Boot (a heel protector designed with an open, floated-heel design) was applied while at rest to prevent the potential for skin breakdown for 1 (Resident 406) of 2 sampled residents and the facility failed to monitor bowel movements and implement a bowel management program to prevent the potential for bowel complications for 1 (Resident 148) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for bowel management. The total facility census was 146. Findings are: A. A record review of the undated Maple Crest Skin Care (General) Policy revealed preventative skin care would be used whenever possible for residents at risk for skin breakdown. A record review of Resident 406's Clinical Census dated 07/11/2023 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 406's Medical Diagnoses dated 07/11/2023 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D7a Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's footrests were applied to resident wheelchairs to prevent potential accidents while being transported (pushed or pulled) for 3 (Residents 24, 7 and 85) of 3 sampled residents. The total facility census was 146. Findings are: A record review of the Assistive Devices and Equipment Policy dated July 2017 revealed that equipment that assist with resident mobility, safety, and independence included wheelchairs. Staff can assist residents if wheelchair pedals are not present only if resident can independently lift their legs and maintain positions, if they cannot then foot pedals need to be added to the resident's wheelchair before transfer process occurs. To decrease the risk of avoidable accidents associated with a wheelchair, the facility would assess the resident for lower extremity (legs and feet) strength, range of motion, balance, and cognitive (thinking, reasoning,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.14 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to follow up on dental care for 1 (Resident 112) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 147. Findings are: Record review of Resident 112's Progress Note dated 12-07-2022 revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) M notified Social Services (SS) M Resident 112 needed to see a dentist. Review of Resident 112's medical record that included PN's, practitioner orders, referral section and assessment sections of the medical record revealed no indication follow up with a dentist had been completed. Observation on 7-10-2023 at 8:23 AM revealed Resident 112 was seated in a wheelchair in Resident 112's room. Further observation revealed Resident 112 had broken and blackish looking teeth. On 7-10-2023 at 8:23 AM during the observation, Resident 112 reported needing and wanted to see a dentist. Resident 112 reported not being aware if staff were attempting to assist in Resident 112 being able to see a dentist. On 7-11-2023 at 11:25 AM an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.17B Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 406 and 123) of 3 sampled resident's nebulizer (a machine used to deliver liquid medicine to the lungs) administration set (neb kit) and 1 (Resident 35) of 1 sampled resident's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)(a machine used to deliver pressure to the resident's airway to keep it open) mask was cleaned and stored in a manner to prevent potential cross contamination. The total facility census was 146. Findings are: A. A record review of the Medication Administration - Nebulizer Policy dated 05/13/2020 revealed after the treatment was complete the staff should have disassembled and cleaned the neb kit in warm soapy water after each treatment and stored the neb kit in a clean plastic bag. A record review of Resident 406's Clinical Census dated 07/11/2023 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 406's Medical Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE MIDWEST — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE MIDWEST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/19/2010 |
| KOTZ, CHRISTINA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| ALLEN, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| FORD, ASHLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| HANSON, PHILLIP | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| JOHNSON, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| KILLIAN, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| PETERS, MARSHALL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| VANOSTRAM, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| WAGONER FORD, ANNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| WHITAKER, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| BLATNIK, ANDREA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| DAVIDSON, ROGER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| JOHNSON, DOROTHY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| JOHNSON, LARS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/05/2023 |
| NEIMAN, RUTH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| VAN DER BEEK, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| VAUGHN-GRAY, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $826K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285149. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.