No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lake Montgomery Health And Rehabilitation Center

1270 SW Main Blvd, Lake City, FL 32055 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 95 certified beds · (386) 752-7900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (386) 752-7900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
619 S Marion Ave · (386) 755-3016 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
283 SW Baya Dr · (386) 755-2770 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Winn-Dixie<0.1 mi
580 S Marion Ave · (386) 755-4404 · Call to confirm hours
Park
293 SE Hernando Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
365 S Marion Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.7%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%9.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.6%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.8%10.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.7%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.9%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.262.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.121.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.3%CMS range 38.4–60.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 5.9–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified79.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.4%CMS range 3.1–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 82.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified of the resident's refusal of medication administration for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's admission Data documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer; difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified; and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with necrosis of muscleReview of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Evaluation, quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS (Brief Inventory of Mental Status) Score of 09 out of 15, which indicated some cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for 11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025 read, HumaLOG KwikPen (an insulin pen) 100 UNIT/ML (100 units per milliliter) solution pen injector: Inject as per sliding scale: if [blood sugar reading]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans regarding advanced directives were updated for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for accuracy of care plans.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's admission Data documented the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with an Advanced Directive of Full Code status (if a resident is absent of life the health care team is to use all available and necessary life-saving measures to resuscitate).Review of Resident #1's Care Plan read, Focus: Advanced Directives: Resident has an established CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation] (Full Code) order in place. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Created on: [DATE].During an interview on [DATE] at 1:09 PM the DON (Director of Nursing) stated, I see that his [Resident #1] Care Plan was not updated. He came in as a Full Code, and he changed it in October to a DNR [Do Not Resuscitate]. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:14 PM the MDS LPN (Minimum Data Set Licensed Practical Nurse)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate records for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for 11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025 read, HumaLOG KwikPen (an insulin pen) 100 UNIT/ML (100 units per milliliter) solution pen injector: Inject as per sliding scale: if [blood sugar reading] 151 - 200 = 2; 201 - 250 = 4; 251 - 300 = 6; 301 - 350 = 8; 351 - 400 = 10 Call MD, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for DM (diabetes mellites) - Start Date 09/08/2025 0630 (6:30 AM) -D/C (discontinue) Date 12/22/2025 1232 (12:32 PM). Documented for the Hours of 0630 [6:30 AM] dated 11/1/2025, 11/19/2025, and 11/30/2025 the MAR for BS [blood sugar] was documented NA (not applicable). Dated 11/24/2025 the MAR was blank. For the Hours of 1130 (11:30 AM) dated 11/13/2025, 11/16/2025, 11/19/2025, 11/20/2025, 11/25/2025, and 11/27/2025 the MAR was documented as NA. For the Hours of 1630 (4:30 PM) dated 11/25/2025 and 11/26/2025 the MAR documented NA.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for 1 (Resident #19) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services.Review of Resident #19 Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled Quarterly dated 7/10/2025 documented resident did not use oxygen therapy.Review of Resident #19 vital task for oxygen saturations documented on 7/8/2025 at 12:53 PM oxygen via nasal cannula, on 7/7/2025 at 6:05 AM oxygen via nasal cannula, 7/5/2025 at 5:16 AM oxygen via nasal cannula, 7/4/2025 at 12:42 AM oxygen via nasal cannula, and 7/3/2025 at 3:38 AM oxygen via nasal cannula.Review of Resident #19 nurses notes dated 7/8/2025 read, O2 [oxygen] sats [saturation]: 97% Method: Oxygen via Nasal Cannula.Review of Resident #19 physician order dated 4/8/2025 read, Oxygen @ [at] 3 litters via nasal cannula for SOB [shortness of breath] no humidification as needed for SOB.During an interview on 7/31/2025 at 1:58 PM with Staff A MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, [Resident #19's name] Section O for oxygen needs to be updated, the nurses were not documenting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurately completed for 2 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents #11, and #19). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #11’s admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to residual schizophrenia (onset date: 3/26/2019), unspecified mood (affective) disorder (onset date: 3/26/2019), adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (onset date: 3/26/2019), major depressive disorder (onset date: 1/31/2024), generalized anxiety disorder (onset date: 1/31/2024), paranoid schizophrenia (onset date: 3/26/2019), and other specified persistent mood disorders (onset date: 3/26/2019). Review of Resident #11’s PASSR dated 7/10/2025 did not show persistent mood disorder under mental illness or suspected mental illness under Section I: PASSR Screen Decision-Making. Review of Resident #11’s psychiatry subsequent note dated 7/1/2025 read,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by physician for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medication management (Residents #5 and #11). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #5's physician order dated 9/2/2024 read, Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 50 MG [Milligram] (Metoprolol Tartrate), Give 50 mg by mouth every 12 hours for Beta Blocker. Review of Resident #5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2025 for administration of Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 50 mg showed code 4 (vitals outside of parameters for administration) was documented on 6/4/2025 at 9:00 PM for the blood pressure of 115/60 and pulse of 66, on 6/7/2025 at 9:00 PM for the blood pressure of 109/65 and pulse of 80, on 6/8/2025 at 9:00 PM for the blood pressure of 111/69 and pulse of 70, on 6/19/2025 at 9:00 PM for the blood pressure of 107/61 and pulse of 66, and on 6/21/2025 at 9:00 PM for the blood pressure of 111/69 and pulse of 62. Review of Resident #5's MAR for July 2025 for administration of Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 50 mg showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis. Findings include: During an observation on 7/28/2025 at 9:39 AM, nurse staffing information dated 7/27/2025 was posted immediately after entering the residential area (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 7/29/2025 at 2:39 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, The scheduler is the one responsible for updating the staff posting daily. She arrives around 6 AM and by 8 AM, the posting should be updated. During an interview on 7/31/2025 at 8:19 AM, the Scheduler stated, I will normally update the staff posting when I get to the facility that is around 8 to 8:30 AM. I had it ready in the backroom on Monday [7/28/2025] and was trying to still get the numbers correct during the morning routine. I don't have access to the census. I have to wait on payroll or the Business Office Manager. During an interview on 7/31/2025 at 12:45 PM, the Business Office Manager stated, I had no delays on Monday that I recall that would have not allowed me to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #19). Findings include: Review of Resident #19's progress note dated 7/7/2025 at 5:19 PM read, Resident daughter came to nursing reporting that mother is hallucinating, talking to someone that is not there and thinking someone is watching here. Will notify MD [Medical Doctor] and Psych [Psychiatrist]. Review of Resident #19's psychiatry subsequent note dated 7/8/2025 read, Chief complaint: Depression, anxiety, mood disorder, psychosis, and Parkinson's disease. Reason for Today's encounter: Today I saw the patient as it was reported to me that patient is unstable requiring psychiatric assessment. History of present illness . Today I saw the patient as it was reported to me that patient is unstable requiring psychiatric assessment. As per collected information, staff reported increased anxiety. Patient come to front lobby and pray all the time. Dementia is persisting, but no other behaviors noted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in 1 of 2 nourishment rooms. Findings include: During an observation of the nourishment room on C Hall on 7/28/2025 at 9:35 AM, there were two unlabeled and undated plastic bags containing unknown food items in the freezer. There was unlabeled and undated cloth lunch box containing unknown food item in the refrigerator drawer. During an interview on 7/28/2025 at 9:37 AM, the Dietary Manager stated the food should have been labeled and dated. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors with the last review date of 1/31/2025 read, Policy: It is the right of the residents of this facility to have food brought in by family or other visitors, however, the food must be handled in a way to ensure the safety of the residents. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines. 2. All food items that are already prepared by the family or visitor brought in must be labeled with content and dated.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for residents (Photographic evidence obtained). The findings include: During an observation of laundry room on 4/10/2024 at 2:50 PM with the Maintenance Director, Director of Housekeeping and Laundry, and Staff C, Laundry Assistant, one of the two washing machines was not working. In the washing machine room, there were linen cans with no covers, a large buildup of garbage, debris, and lint behind the washing machines, a window screen propped on the floor next to the working washing machine with a large amount of garbage and debris around it, and on debris and lint on the air conditioning unit. In the lint area of Dryer #1 and Dryer #2, there was a large buildup of dust and lint. In the drum of Dryer #2, there was a large buildup of brown, melted, unidentified matter. Dryer #2's door did not latch. In the bottom of the clean linen cart, there was a buildup of garbage and debris. The carts in the dryer room which held the clean linens were uncovered. During an interview on 4/10/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were provided in a timely manner for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #4. The findings include: During an interview on 4/8/2024 at 10:27 AM, Resident #4 stated the food at the facility was cold and over seasoned and that she often asked for a substitute which was normally a sandwich. The resident stated she had lost weight since being admitted to the facility. Review of Resident #4's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and pressure injuries. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #4's care plan, last reviewed on 1/24/2024, showed the resident was at nutritional risk and was experiencing weight loss despite having a fair to good oral intake. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROBERT SCHOENFELD — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAKE CITY HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/11/2023
POLLETT, BRIANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/11/2023
SCHOENFELD, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/11/2023

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$758K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 11%Other / private 13%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $758K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$293per resident / day
operating cost
$8,922per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$258per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105346. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next