Savannas Park Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 413 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 141 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights for 1of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to assess Resident #20 for self-administration of medications.The findings included:Review of the policy titled, Resident Rights, implemented 11/2020 and revised on 01/2023, documented in part, 1. The right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate. Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission date of 05/06/25. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented Resident #20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 on a 0-15 scale, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the record revealed Resident #20's diagnosis documented in part, Pleural Effusion, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to respond to a resident's request to remove food allergies from the meal ticket for 1 of 8 sampled residents reviewed regarding choices, Resident #34. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 07/09/25 with a diagnosis of Anemia. An review of the care plans, revised on 07/29/25, showed that Resident #34 was at risk for altered nutrition and lab values.On 08/25/25 at 9:19 AM, Resident #34 was interviewed. She voiced her meal ticket recorded that she had allergies to shellfish and shrimp, but she did not have these allergies. She expressed frustration about her attempts to have the facility correct this information, saying, It's like talking to a brick wall.On 08/27/25 at 8:09 AM, the resident was observed lying in bed and her breakfast tray on the table. She reiterated that she does not have allergies to shellfish and shrimp. On 08/27/25 at 1:14 PM, the resident was again observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable homelike environment for 3 of 4 units. The findings included: A tour of the facility was completed on 08/27/25 at 1:45 PM with the Maintenance Director and the Director of Housekeeping. The following was observed, and they acknowledged these findings: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - there was white caulking patches on the wall, the tile in the bathroom below the sink was cracked, there was a metal bar above the toilet that was moved and the holes from the screws remained and the rust stains not repaired, the floor in the bathroom was dirty with black stains on beige tile and floor caulking was black, and the door trim outside the door had come off the wall. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Resident #30 stopped the surveyor and Maintenance Director during the tour on 08/27/25 at 2:45 PM and stated that his left brake on his wheelchair did not lock. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]-A - A water stain was noted on the ceiling tile above…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) antipsychotic medication was addressed in a timely manner for 2 of 7 sampled residents, as evidenced by the Lorazepam (antipsychotic) prescribed to Resident #96 and Resident #85 did not have a discontinue date or documented rationale by the doctor to extend the order.1.Review of the record revealed Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 10 on a 0 to15 scale, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had a documented medical diagnosis history of anxiety disorder and mood disorder. Review of the record revealed an order dated 07/07/25 for Resident #96 to administer Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet every four hours as needed f[PRN] or anxiety with no date to discontinue or documented rationale by the doctor to extend the medication. A second order dated 05/31/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely and appropriate care and services for 5 of 34 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to clarify multiple physician orders and appropriately treat a rash for Resident #8; failure to ensure timely initiation of an antibiotic for Resident #96, who had an infected wound; failure to ensure medications were not provided by mouth for Resident #3, who had orders for nothing by mouth; failure to ensure treatment for a skin cancer wound for Resident #61; and failure to follow physician ordered blood pressure medication parameters for Resident #6.The findings included:1. Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility 03/04/23, with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This same MDS documented the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 sampled residents as evidenced by not applying the splints on Resident #25. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Restorative Nursing Program revised 05/2022 documented in part . It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level. Compliance Guidelines: 6. Residents, as identified during the comprehensive assessment process, will receive services from restorative aides when they are assessed to have a need for restorative nursing services. These services include: a. Passive or active range of motion. b. Splint or brace assistance. Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for nutritional support via a feeding tube for 2 of 2 sampled residents, Residents #3 and #5.The findings included:Review of the policy Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes reviewed 11/27/23, documented in part, 1. Feeding tubes will be utilized according to physician orders, which typically include: the kind of feeding and its caloric value, volume, duration, mechanism of administration, and frequency of flush. 9. Direction for staff regarding nutritional products and meeting the resident's nutritional needs will be provided: . e. Ensuring that the administration of enteral nutrition is consistent with and follows the practitioner's orders.1. Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment lacked a cognitive rating as the resident was rarely or never understood. This MDS also documented the resident was dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen orders and cleanliness of oxygen equipment for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #5, who lacked any order for oxygen, failure of staff to change an oxygen nasal cannula that had been on the floor, and failure to ensure a clean oxygen canister filter.The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Respiratory Failure and dependence upon supplemental oxygen. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS also documented the resident was receiving supplemental oxygen.Review of the current physician orders lacked any order for the administration of the oxygen with an ordered rate of administration. The orders did document to clean the oxygen filter every night shift on Sundays.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication errors for 2 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by a medication error rate of 14.81% with 27 opportunities due to failure to ensure that Resident #22 received medications prescribed to him and was available for him, failure to ensure Resident #86 received medications prescribed to him and was available and failure to follow physician orders for a narcotic prescribed to Resident #86.The findings included:1. An observation of medication administration pass was conducted on 08/27/25 at 5:05 PM with Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who prepared medications for Resident #22. She prepared Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tablets, Vitamin C 500mg 1 tablet, Atorvastatin 40mg 1 tablet, Methocarbamol 500mg 1 tablet. After preparing the medications, Staff J was asked how many pills she had in the medicine cup and she stated, 5 pills. Staff J crushed the medications all together and added applesauce to the cup. Staff J was observed administering the 5 medications to Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the laboratory test was completed as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled resident records reviewed, Resident #5. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #5 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Diabetes and cancer. Review of the care plan, revised on 08/04/25, noted that Resident #5 was at risk for nutritional problems due to type 2 Diabetes, altered nutrition-related lab values, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dependence on enteral nutrition. The intervention outlined in the care plan included reviewing labs as indicated.Review of physician orders dated 08/22/25 revealed that a blood laboratory test for A1C (a test that measures the average blood glucose levels over the past two to three months) was ordered. There was no evidence that the A1C test was completed, as the test result could not be found in the records. There was no documentation revealing that the test was refused. On 08/28/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROBERT SCHOENFELD — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL