No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eagle Lake Nursing And Rehab Care Center

1100 66th St N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33710 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (727) 345-9331 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Aug 20232 immediate-jeopardy citations$312,600 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $312,600 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-29)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6560 9th Ave N · (727) 384-4060 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1600 66th St N · (727) 344-1286 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix0.3 mi
1600 66th St N · (727) 344-1216 · Call to confirm hours
Park
701 66th St N · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.5%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.0%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.4%9.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication47.9%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.0%99.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.7%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.3%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.9%8.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine19.2%94.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission38.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days5.302.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.771.151.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 86% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.0%CMS range 29.7–54.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.4–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.6%CMS range 4.9–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 36.0 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.548 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-29)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-02 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a safe and effective discharge planning process for three (#8, #3, and #1) of five residents sampled for discharge. Resident #8, a dialysis dependent resident, was discharged to his condemned mobile home with no arrangements for dialysis or home health services. Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment and was discharged in a taxi cab to live with a family member who was not present or prepared to care for the resident in the home. Resident #3 had no way to access the home upon his arrival and the taxi cab driver contacted law enforcement for assistance. Resident #1, who was dependent on oxygen, was discharged home without medical equipment to maintain her respiratory status. The facility's system failure placed Resident #8, Resident #3, and Resident #1 at serious risk of injury or death and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 09/23/2023. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to advocate and provide medically related social services to ensure three (#8, #3, and #1) of five residents sampled for discharge had the community supports, services, and equipment to ensure a safe discharge to a safe and habitable location. Resident #8, a dialysis dependent resident, was discharged to his condemned mobile home with no arrangements for the continuation of life-saving dialysis treatment, home health services, or community support to ensure food availability and food preparation for special dietary needs. Resident #3, who suffered from severe cognitive impairment, was placed in a taxi cab by himself and sent home to live with family who was not present or prepared to care for the resident. Resident #3 had an invalid order for home health services and no way to access the home upon his arrival. The taxi cab driver contacted law enforcement and Resident #3 was transported to a higher level of care. Resident #1, who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-09-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F623 and F626 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document in the medical record the reasons why they could not meet the needs and readmit one (#1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility in June of 2023 with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (MS), dysphagia, autistic disorder, dysarthria, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), irritability, bipolar disorder, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. The Face Sheet showed Resident #1 was discharged on 9/9/24 at 9:25 AM. Review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's care plan for discharge with an original start date of 06/13/2023, and last reviewed/revised on 06/29/2024, revealed the resident's mother has chosen to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-09-18 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F622 and F623 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit readmission from the hospital for one (#1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. Findings included: Review of the undated facility Policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, revealed: When residents are sent emergently to an acute care setting, theses scenarios are considered facility-initiated transfers, NOT discharges, because the resident's return is generally expected. Residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting such as a hospital, are permitted to return to the facility. If discharge is initiated by the facility after an emergency transfer to the hospital, the reason for discharge is based on the resident's status at the time the resident seeks return to the facility (not at the time the resident was transferred to acute care). If the facility determines that the resident cannot return to the facility, the medical record will indicate that the facility made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-08-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to prevent multiple significant medication errors for 1 resident (#347) out of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #347 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for intravenous antibiotic administration due to intracranial abscesses and with diagnosis of opioid abuse with withdrawals. She was transferred to the facility with orders to treat the opioid abuse with withdrawals with buprenorphine and naloxone 8-2 mg (Suboxone) sublingually three times a day. The facility failed to provide Resident #347's her Suboxone medication for two and a half days. Resident #347 arrived at the facility with hospital orders to take buprenorphine and naloxone (Suboxone) 8-2mg sublingually film three times a day. The medication was ordered as buprenorphine 2mg sublingually twice day. This failure resulted in Resident #347 being sent back to the hospital two times for opioid withdrawal symptoms and each time the resident returned with orders to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee developed and implemented action plans to correct deficient practices identified during an intervening complaint survey conducted on 9/18/24 and the recertification survey originally conducted on 8/26/24 to 8/29/24 as evidenced by: 1) failure to ensure discharge and readmission requirements were met and documentation in the medical record was completed (F622, F623 and F626) for two residents (#1 and #3) of two residents reviewed, 2) a safe, clean and homelike environment for two of two units (F584), 3) failure to ensure the accuracy of the Resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one (#3) of three residents reviewed (F641), 4) failure to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of seven sampled residents (#53, #54, and #9) related to wound care and enhanced barrier precautions (F656), 5) failure to ensure oxygen was provided according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F622 and F626 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer and discharge notice to the resident representative, and a copy to the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for one (#1) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility in June of 2023 with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (MS), dysphagia, autistic disorder, dysarthria, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), irritability, bipolar disorder, anxiety, insomnia, and depression. Review of Resident #1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's care plan for discharge with an original start date of 06/13/2023, and last reviewed/revised on 06/29/2024, revealed the resident's mother has chosen to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1. Maintain an infection prevention and surveillance program for 6 out of 6 months reviewed. 2. The facility also failed to ensure their infection control guidelines policy was reviewed yearly and was revised with current evidence-based practices. 3. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during lunch meal service for one out of three meal observations. 4. The facility also failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place for two residents with intravenous lines (#347 and #31) out of two residents sampled for intravenous lines. Findings included 1. An interview was conducted on 08/26/24 at 10:41 AM with the Nursing Home Administer (NHA). She said the facility does not have any staff who have completed or started the infection prevention training. She said the current Director of Nursing (DON) started her position the last week of July of 2024 or first week of August 2024 and there has not been any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a qualified infection Preventionist who was qualified by education, training, experience or certification for one of one staff member acting as the infection Preventionist. Findings include: An interview was conducted on 08/26/24 at 10:41 AM with the Nursing Home Administer (NHA). She said the facility does not have any staff who have completed or started the infection prevention training. She said the current Director of Nursing (DON) started her position the last week of July of 2024 or first week of August 2024 and there has not been any infection surveillance and the NHA was unsure when the last time any infection surveillance had been conducted. An interview was conducted on 08/29/24 at 11:10 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) she said she started at the facility mid-July as the Unit Manager and became the interim DON two weeks after she started and two weeks ago, she said she would accept the DON position. She said she does not have any formal training in infection control, and she is not certified in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary homelike environment for two out of two units in the facility. Findings include: On 08/26/2024 at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealing a hole in the wall next to the window and the wall border trim separated from the wall. The bathroom was dirty with paint chipped off the shower stall floor, rusted grab bars and yellow staining on the walls. room [ROOM NUMBER] were observed with broken, and missing blinds on the sliding doors and broken dressers in the resident's room. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with cable cords unattached from the wall, hanging down in the resident's room. On 08/29/2024 at 5:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director. He stated he conducts room audits once a month, but he has not done any room audits since he has started in the position. He knows he has to do some painting. Next week he will come up with a scheduled to repair the broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnoses were accurate for nine residents (#25, #27, #24, #26, #7, #4, #35, #28, #39) out of 20 residents sampled. 1. Review of Resident #4's admission Record showed Resident #4 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a readmission date of 06/18/2024 after returning to the facility from a hospitalization. Resident #4's admission Record showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Psychoactive Substance Dependence and Alcohol Dependence. Review of the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Process (PASRR) for Resident #4 dated 04/12/2024 revealed an incomplete PASRR with the qualifying diagnosis of Substance Abuse not checked in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making. A 04/17/2024 psychiatric evaluation completed in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed in a timely manner for two (#20 and #33) residents out of 20 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 08/29/2024 it was observed the Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #33 was due to be completed on 07/15/2024, however the Quarterly MDS Assessment was not completed and transmitted until 08/20/2024. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #20 electronic medical record showed an admission to facility on 04/06/2022. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a status of finalized. Section Z assessment administration part Z0500 Verifying Assessment Completion was signed by Staff A and dated 08/20/2024. An interview was conducted on 08/28/24 at 4:05 p.m. with Staff A. She stated if an MDS assessment status showed finalized it had been completed, but has not been transmitted. She confirmed Residents #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents (#10, #9) of 20 residents reviewed. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #10's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to obstructive and reflux uropathy and diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic nephropathy. A review of Resident #10's physician's order dated 10/28/2023 revealed foley/supra-pubic: change catheter PRN (as needed) leakage, blockage or dislodgement. A review of Resident #10's nursing progress note dated 10/30/2023 revealed: Alert and oriented resident able to make all needs known to staff. Tolerated all medications administered no adverse effects noted. Resident advised nurse during medication pass that she had broken her catheter. Upon examination nurse found catheter bulb out. Catheter remained out. Nursing notified physician and are awaiting further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and/or implement an effective care plan for two (#35 and #24) residents out of 20 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 08/26/2024, 08/27/2024, 08/28/2024 and 08/29/2024 at various times of the day Resident #35's bed was observed to be in the high position. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record revealed diagnoses not limited to diffuse traumatic brain injury, nightmare disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, postconcussional syndrome. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment, dated 07/29/2024, Section C-Cognitive Patterns, showed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, showing he has moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals, showed Resident #35 needs Partial/Moderate Assistance to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair, or on the side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (#7) out of one sampled residents received assistance to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's Face Sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of cerebral palsy, lack of coordination, dysphagia, dementia, major depressive disorder, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. An observation and interview were conducted on 08/26/24 at 10:09 AM with Resident #7 he was observed to be lying in bed with his facial hair grown out and his fingernails on both hands grown out past his fingertips with black and brown substance under the majority of his nails on both hands. Resident #7 said he gets a bed bath, and they will shave him but he has not been shaved for about two weeks and he likes to be clean shaven. He looked at his nails on both of his hands and said he wanted his nails trimmed he does not like them long. An observation was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review 1. The facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for one resident (#7) out of 2 sampled residents, and 2. the facility failed to ensure flammable products (petroleum jelly) were not used during oxygen use for one resident (#25) out of 2 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #7's Face Sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (COPD), cerebral palsy, lack of coordination, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, and dementia. An observation and interview were conducted on 8/26/24 at 10:09 AM with Resident #7. He was observed to be lying in bed, with an oxygen concentrator on and set to 3.5 liters per minute (LPM). The nasal cannula was located behind his head and not in his nares. Resident #7 said he was breathing fine and was not sure why he had the oxygen, but he had been on it for a while, and he was not sure how much oxygen he was supposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed, and twelve errors were identified for two residents (#35, #25) out of three residents observed. These errors constituted a 48.00% medication error rate. Findings included: 1) On 08/28/2024 at 9:41 AM a medication administration observation was conducted with Staff M, LPN for Resident #35. Staff M, LPN dispensed the following medications: -Ativan (lorazepam) 1 mg (Milligram) 1 tablet -Famotidine 20 mg 1 tablet -Lactulose 20 gram/30 mL (milliliter) solution 25 mL -Sodium chloride 1 gram 1 tablet -Valproic Acid 250 mg 1 tablet Staff M, LPN stated she did not have the other ordered medications in her cart, and she would have to find them or order them. The missing medications included: -B complex vitamin C-folic acid 400 mcg (Microgram) 1 tablet -Potassium citrate 10 mEq (milliequivalent) extended release 1 tablet Staff M, LPN was observed administering the medications to Resident #35. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure bed rails were secure for 1 resident (#9) of 5 sampled. Findings included: On 8/26/24 at 2:39PM bilateral enabler rails were observed installed on Resident #9's bed. An interview and observation were conducted on 08/26/24 at 2:43p.m. with Resident #9. He stated his bed rail is loose as he physically shook the rail laterally. The right enabler rail was observed to be loose and could be moved out from the side of the bed and back easily. The resident stated he notified the NHA and maintenance multiple times, and nothing has been done to fix it. He stated he used the rail all the time to aid in his mobility but was fearful to use due to the rail not being secure. Review of electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #9 showed an admission to facility on 12/04/23 with diagnoses including lymphedema, unspecified convulsions, restless agitation, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were functioning properly in resident rooms and bathrooms for one resident (# 24) out of six residents sampled Findings include: On 08/26/2024 at 2:00 p.m., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER] with Resident # 24. She was observed in her bathroom turning on the call light which did not turn on to alert staff to come to her room. During the observation Resident # 24 stated her call light has not worked for a long time. Every time she turns on her call light in her room or in her bathroom it turns on in the resident room next door. She stated sometimes she has to wait for an hour to get assistance due to her call light not working properly. Review of an admission Record dated 8/29/2024 showed Resident # 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 08/26/2024 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff S, the Receptionist. Staff S was observed knocking on Resident # 24's door. She stated she is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent flying insects in resident rooms and resident common areas for four of four days. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 08/26/24 at 10:05 AM, Resident #22 was observed to be sitting on the side of his bed, dressed in day clothes. There were four flying insects observed flying around the resident and landing on his jacket. Resident #22 said the flying insects come and go and they have been that way for months. He said he does not see anyone coming to spray for pests. (Photographic evidence obtained) An observation was conducted on 08/26/24 at 11:56 AM of a bedframe in the resident hallway with 2 fly insects flying around and landing on the bedframe. An observation was conducted on 08/27/24 at 9:13 AM of Resident #22 in bed, eyes closed with two flying insects flying around the resident and landing on his arm and shirt. An observation and interview were conducted on 08/28/24 at 11:00 AM. A bedframe was outside Resident #11's room in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess with an Interdisciplinary Team approach, obtain physician orders and develop a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for two of two sampled residents (#50 and #51) related to administering their own medications. Findings included: 1. Resident #51 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Resident Face Sheet showed diagnoses including acute bronchitis, shortness of breath, and anxiety disorder. An observation was conducted on 10/30/2024 at 9:08 a.m. with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #51's medication administration. Resident #51 was sitting in his bed. A bottle of Normal Saline Nasal Spray was sitting on the bedside table as well as lotion. A second observation occurred on 10/30/2024 at 1:40 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON asked the resident where the nasal spray came from. He stated his family brought it in for him. She informed him they would need to get an order for the spray and place it in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure and safe manner for one resident (Resident #2) of one resident allowed to self-administer medications, and leaving medication unattended on one (North) of two medication carts . Findings included: 1. On 12/26/24 at 9:13 a.m., Resident #2 was observed lying in bed with an over-bed table hovering over the bed and a table next to the bed with a nebulizer machine sitting on it. A nebulizer pipe was connected to the machine. The observation revealed a foil container labeled Anoro Ellipta on top of a pharmacy bag and a vial of clear liquid under the bag sitting on the over-bed table. A vial of clear liquid was observed lying on top of the nebulizer machine. The resident stated the vial on the nebulizer machine was the 6:00 a.m. dose of Albuterol and they were able to self-administer medications, but hadn't woken up to take the 6 a.m. dose, and the vial on the over-bed table was the noon dose (of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to monitor one diabetic resident (#5) out of three residents sampled for blood glucose levels as ordered. Findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses to include but not limited to osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral, and sacrococcygeal region, adult failure to thrive, weakness, Pressure Ulcer Stage IV of the left hip, dysphagia, hypoglycemia, history of Bacteremia, Diabetes Mellitus, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and gastrostomy tube. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed in Section C: Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment; in Section G: Functional Status, resident required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility, extensive assistance of one for toileting, and totally dependent regarding eating; in Section K: Nutritional Status, resident had a feeding tube, and had a mechanically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management for one resident (#6) of three residents sampled. Findings included: On 10/17/23 at 09:15 a.m. an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #6 who reported experiencing increased pain when the facility Ran out of his pain medicine. Resident #6 stated he was Always in pain pain intensity increases and decreases; currently his pain level is okay. Review of the resident face sheet showed Resident #6 latest return to the facility on 6/29/22, with diagnoses including Stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, osteomyelitis (inflammation of the bone), paraplegia, chronic nephritis (inflammation of the kidney) and chronic pain. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C - Cognitive Patterns showed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #6's Care Plan initiated on 6/21/2017, showed the following: Problem: Resident #6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was available for 8 consecutive hours every day, seven days a week, for a two-week period from 10/01/23 to 10/14/23. Findings included: A review was conducted of the form entitled, Calculating State Minimum Nursing Staff for Long Term Care Facilities, for the two-week period from 10/01/2023 to 10/14/2023. The instructions read, Enter the number of RN and LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) hours actually worked per day for the dates above. The document revealed on Sunday 10/01/23, Saturday 10/07/23, Sunday 10/08/23, and Saturday 10/14/23, there were no Registered Nurse (RN) hours recorded. An interview was conducted on 10/17/2023 at 11:50 a.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator. The Administrator confirmed there had not been an RN in the building on 10/01/23, 10/07/23, 10/08/23, and 10/14/23. The Administrator stated the facility was advertising for an RN but did not have a consistent ability to have an RN present on the weekends.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to 1) establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled substances in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and 2) determine that drug records are in order and an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for two residents (#4 and #6) of three residents sampled. Findings included: On 10/17/23 at 09:15 a.m. an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #6 who reported experiencing increased pain when the facility Ran out of his pain medicine. Resident #6 stated he was Always in pain pain intensity increases and decreases; currently his pain level is okay. Review of the face sheet showed Resident #6 latest return to the facility on 6/29/22, with diagnoses including Stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, osteomyelitis (inflammation of the bone), paraplegia, chronic nephritis (inflammation of the kidney) and chronic pain. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical record had complete and accurate documentation related to meals and wounds for two residents (#2 and #5) out of nine residents sampled. Findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses to include but not limited to osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral, and sacrococcygeal region, adult failure to thrive, weakness, Pressure Ulcer Stage IV of the left hip, dysphagia, hypoglycemia, history of Bacteremia, Diabetes Mellitus, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and gastrostomy tube. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed in Section C: Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment; in Section G: Functional Status, resident required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility, extensive assistance of one for toileting, and totally dependent regarding eating; in Section K: Nutritional Status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to evaluate a resident by an Interdisciplinary team (IDT), including the physician, for self-administering of medications via a gastrostomy tube for one of two sampled residents (#1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but were not limited to nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, dysphagia after Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), weakness, dysphasia, epilepsy, gastrostomy tube (g-tube), right below knee amputation, anxiety, hypertension, depression, and asthma. Record review of the 5-day, Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section E, Behavior showed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurred 1 to 3 days. Section G, Functional Status showed he needed supervision with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Section N, Medications showed he was taking the following medications: antianxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect related to administration of medications inappropriately for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but were not limited to nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, dysphagia after Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), weakness, dysphasia, epilepsy, gastrostomy tube (g-tube), right below knee amputation, anxiety, hypertension, depression, and asthma. Record review of the 5-day, Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section E, Behavior showed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurred 1 to 3 days. Section G, Functional Status showed he needed supervision with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Section N, Medications showed he was taking the following medications: antianxiety, antidepressants, diuretics, and opioids.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including administration of all drugs accurately for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) related to crushing of Cymbalta before administering via gastrostomy tube and /or administering it whole. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but were not limited to nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, dysphagia after Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), weakness, dysphasia, epilepsy, gastrostomy tube (g-tube), right below knee amputation, anxiety, hypertension, depression, and asthma. Record review of the 5-day, Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section E, Behavior showed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurred 1 to 3 days. Section G, Functional Status showed he needed supervision with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Section N, Medications showed he was taking the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control protocols related to medication administration and transmission based isolation protocol on one (08/07/2023) of one survey days. Findings included: Medication observation on 08/07/2023 at 9:25 a.m. with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #1. She was located at the end of the hallway. She pushed her medication cart down the hallway to Resident #1's room. She removed Clonazepam (Klonopin) 1 mg (milligrams) via g-tube three times a day for anxiety; Lacosamide (Vimpat) 100 mg twice a day via g-tube for seizures; and Levetiracetam (Keppra) 500 mg/5 milliliter (ml) via g-tube for seizures. The resident refused all other medications. She handed the resident the crushed medications in the same cup and he administered them himself via his g-tube in the hallway. She was then seen pouring up Resident #10's medications at 9:40 a.m., Amlodipine 10 mg daily and Duloxetine 60 mg daily and handing them to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation of an effective performance improvement action plan ongoing for 15 months related to care plans. Failures included not ensuring consistent audit process and not analyzing and tracking data from audits that were conducted to implement correction. This resulted in five residents (#144, #147, #39, #145, and #146) out of five residents sampled not having comprehensive care plans developed by the interdisciplinary team and within required timeframes. Findings included: 1. A review of the medical record conducted on 09/06/22 for Resident #144 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 2:27 p.m. There was no baseline care plan in her record. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #147 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. There was no baseline care plan in his record. 3. A record review for Resident #39 indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] from the hospital,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure code status (type of emergent treatment a person would or would not want to receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) was identified and confirmed upon admission for two residents (#146, #144) out of four sampled residents. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #144 was conducted on 09/06/22. The Resident Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 2:27 p.m. There were no orders entered in the medical record for code status and no advance directive documentation was found identifying code status. An interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 09/06/22 at 3:35 p.m. She confirmed she was the assigned nurse for Resident #144. She reviewed the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) and confirmed no code status had been identified and no orders for code status had been entered in the record. She confirmed there should be a physician order entered for code status when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans with the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care according to professional standards of quality care were developed for two newly admitted residents (#147 and #144) out of four sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the medical record conducted on 09/06/22 for Resident #144 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 2:27 p.m. There was no baseline care plan in her record. Review of the medical record for Resident #147 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. There was no baseline care plan in his record. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/06/22 at 3:50 p.m. She reviewed the medical record for Resident #144 and confirmed there was no baseline care plan. She said, What is supposed to happen there, is I do the observations and I do the 48-hour care plan .this one I am negligent on that, I'll admit that I did not get to it. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, facility policy and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident centered care plan was developed and implemented related to behavior monitoring for use of a psychotropic medication for one (Resident #39) of five residents sampled. Findings included: On 09/6/2022 at 9:41a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #39 lying in bed, with Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) sitting in a chair next to Resident #39's bed performing a one on one (1:1). Staff E, CNA was interviewed and she revealed Resident #39 did not have any behaviors at the time. A review of Resident #39's Face Sheet indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder and Wernicke's Encephalopathy (degenerative brain disorder). A review of the Physician Order Report, dated 7/01/2022 - 09/08/2022, indicated Seroquel (Quetiapine) Tablet 50 Milligram (MG), One tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed by the interdisciplinary team within required timeframes for two newly admitted residents (#145, #146) out of four residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #145 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident face sheet revealed diagnoses upon admission included pneumonia due to SARS-associated coronavirus, COVID-19 acute respiratory disease, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, urinary tract infection, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Active physician orders for September 2022 revealed the resident was receiving the following treatments: physical, occupational, and speech therapy; a mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors related to a psychotropic drug regime for one resident (#39) of five sampled residents. Findings included: On 09/6/2022 at 9:41a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #39 lying in bed, with Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) sitting in a chair next to Resident #39's bed performing a one on one (1:1). Staff E, CNA was interviewed and asked if the resident is having any behaviors. She revealed he did not have any behaviors, but her assignment is to watch the resident due to his aggressive behaviors in the hospital, and that he tried to elope from the hospital and leave. On 09/07/2022 at 3:17 p.m. Resident #39 was observed to be lying in bed, an unidentified CNA was in the room performing a 1:1. On 09/08/2022 at 9:41a.m. Resident #39 was observed to be walking with a CNA and a nurse by the nursing station. Resident #39 was observed to be dressed appropriately for the time of day, and pleasantly smiled at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record reviews, the facility did not ensure that 1) medications were available for 2 residents, (Resident #3 and Resident #17), and 2) did not ensure eye drops orders were clarified for 1 resident, (Resident # 2) of 21 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An electronic medical record (EMR) review for Resident #3 on 03/18/21 revealed that Resident #3 missed a scheduled medication (Lorazepam 0.5 mg (milligram) schedule 1 tablet) from 3/1/21 to 3/6/21, missing 12 administration opportunities. A current prescription order revealed that Resident # 3 should receive the medication as follows: Lorazepam 0.5 mg; amount one tablet; oral; frequency twice a day at 06:00 a.m. and 06:00 p.m. Diagnosis: Generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis to include; Parkinson's disease, neuroleptic parkinsonism, feeding difficulties, acute respiratory disease, muscle weakness, respiratory TB, Dysphagia, oral phase, insomnia unspecified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-seven medication administration opportunities were observed, and twenty-four errors were identified for four (#16, #7, #19, and #13) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 64.86% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 3/15/21 at 11:31 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff Member H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #16. The staff member reported the residents previous obtained blood glucose level of 347 and stated the resident was to receive 8 units of Novolog. She removed a Novolog Flexpen that was opened on 3/12/21 and dialed it to 8 units. Prior to entering the resident's room, when asked how she primed the Flexpen, she asked, you mean by 2 units?. She reported no I did not when asked if she had primed the Flexpen. The staff member entered Resident 16's room and interjected the Novolog insulin into administered 8 units into the resident's right arm, without priming…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-18 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to designate a healthcare professional with specialized training as the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) for the facility. Findings included: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 3/18/21 at 2:11 p.m., she stated she does not have Infection Control Preventionist credentials. The DON further stated one of the nurses, Staff Member Q, Registered Nurse (RN) had a certificate, but 'was not technically the ICP.' The DON offered to obtain a copy of the certificate but was unable to provide it. When asked who did staff education related to infection control, she stated that the previous Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) did but she left in December 2020 and the new ADON started at the facility one week ago. The DON stated she did spot-on education if she observed an issue. She further stated that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was the Department of Health contact. During an interview, on 3/18/21 at 3:00 p.m., the NHA identified the facility's Infection Control Preventionist as the DON, stating I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (#20) of 21 sampled residents was provided with linens to cover a mattress. Findings included: On 03/15/21 at 10:58 AM, Resident#20 was observed to have four covers/blankets; however, the mattress was bare and had no sheet over it. The resident was alert but confused and unable to understand the surveyor's questions when asked about his missing linens. A review of Resident #20's clinical record revealed he had resided in the facility since 2018 and had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) according to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. On 03/15/21 at 11:31 AM, a second observation was conducted. The resident was lying in bed with covers on but again, no linens were on the mattress. On 03/17/21 at 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with the resident's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Staff C, who was shaving the resident. She stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, policies and resident council minutes review, the facility failed to act upon resident's concerns and grievances as evidenced by: (1) same grievances reported and documented without resolution for 6 out of 6 resident council meeting minutes. (2) Facility not having social services personnel available. (3) Nursing home administrator (NHA) failure to attend resident council meetings per the request of council participants. (4) NHA failure to respond to grievances and complaints. Findings included: A review of resident council meeting minutes was conducted with the following items marked as unresolved and action needed for the following dates: 2/10/21: 1/13/21: 11/18/20: 12/2/20: 10/4/20: 9/9/20. Grievances are not always being resolved satisfactorily and or resolution is not relayed to residents. Communication from NHA and Director of Nurses (DON) is not satisfactory to the residents. DON sends unit manager, NHA is very difficult to access. Residents concerned with use of agency staff stating that meds are not given correctly at times and treatments are not always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it developed skin assessments for two residents (#5, and #45) of 21 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Resident#5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 11/23/2020 and multiple diagnosis that included respiratory failure, pressure ulcers unstageable, Seborrhea capitis and dysphagia. On 03/15/21 at11:44 AM Resident#5 was observed with a skin rash on his right elbow, and a size approximately 3x3inches. In a subsequent interview, Resident#5 stated that it wasn't being treated, and no medication or ointment was applied to his rash on his elbow. He further said it has not been looked at or treated. An interview with staff member B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted on 03/16/21 at 3:27 PM. She stated the resident's rash that was noted yesterday on his right elbow. She confirmed that she had not documented any skin assessments/notes regarding the rash on his elbow. The medical record revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one (#99) of 21 residents sampled. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Care Plans and Care Plan Meetings, dated 10/5/18, revealed: Baseline Care Plan- A preliminary plan of care that includes the minimum healthcare information necessary and instructions will be started and the facility will enable the resident to be informed of and participate in the development and implementation of the care and treatment regimen which will provide effective and person-centered care to properly care for the resident that meets professional standards of quality of care and meets the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident. The baseline care plan summary must be provided to the resident and/or their representative between the 48th hour and completion of the comprehensive care plan . The policy identified that nursing staff will review the Attending Physician's orders (e.g. dietary needs, medications, and routine treatments, etc.) with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident and resident representative were involved in care planning for one (Resident #3) of nine residents reviewed for care planning. Findings included: In an interview with Resident #3's Power of Attorney (POA) on 03/15/21 at 4:22 p.m., the POA stated that she had not participated in a care plan meeting in a long time. The POA reported that the facility did not have a social worker and that care planning and care coordination was lacking. The POA stated that before COVID-19, they would send a letter inviting the Resident Representative to the meeting. When asked if during COVID-19 she had participated in a conference call or video conference call care plan meeting, Resident #3's POA answered, No. It's been at least a year. An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 03/17/21 at 2:52 p.m. The NHA stated that they started care plan meetings recently. The NHA said that they just got a conference call number probably a week ago. The NHA reported that the social worker had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure three (#3, #14, #20) of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) received assistance with showers and nail care. Findings included: 1. Observation on 3/15/21 at 11:30 a.m., 3/15/21 at 4:22 p.m., and 3/16/21 at 3.39 p.m. revealed Resident #3 was laying in bed with hair that appeared unkept. A review of Resident #3's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Continued review of the MDS revealed Resident #3 required extensive physical assistance with one person physical assistance for personal hygiene and total dependence with bathing with one person physical assistance. An interview was conducted with Resident #3's Power of Attorney (POA) on 03/15/21 at 4.22 p.m. revealed that Resident #3 had not a shower. The POA reported that, they wash her up, and her hair has not been washed in months. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and records review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activities program to support the comprehensive assessment and care planned choices and preferences for one (#3) of three residents sampled for activities. Findings included: Observations of Resident #3 were conducted on 03/15/21 at 11:23 a.m. and 12:21 p.m., 3/16/21 at 10:23 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 3:31 p.m., and on 3/17/21 at 10:00 a.m. and 4:20 p.m. Resident #3 was observed sleeping or laying in her bed with her eyes closed. There was no evidence of either a radio, Television (TV) or mobile device being used or provided in Resident #3's room. Additionally, there were no observations of any one on one activities provided to Resident #3. Resident #3 was not noted to be assisted out of bed to attend any socially distanced group activities during the course of the survey conducted 03/15/21 to 03/18/21. On 03/16/21, 03/17/21 and 03/18/21, the Activities Director was observed sitting at the front desk screening incoming…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the reach in freezer at appropriate temperatures and ensure staff kept personal items separate from food storage on 2 of 2 days observed (3/15 and 3/17/21). Findings included: On 03/15/2021 at 9:39 AM, an initial kitchen tour was conducted with Staff P, Cook. The reach-in freezer at this time was found to be 2 degrees Fahrenheit. A review of the freezer's temperature log for the month of March revealed that the freezer was consistently above the 0 degree Fahrenheit threshold. Staff P was unaware of the freezers temperature. A review of the facility's temperature log revealed the logged temperature on the morning of 3/15/2021 was 4 degrees. On 03/17/2021 at 11:37 AM, during a tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), a staff member's personal jacket was found on a dry food storage shelf along with a staff member's N95 mask sealed in a plastic bag. The CDM stated that neither of those items were supposed to be there and that this was something that he had not seen before. In addition, a second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one (#18) of 21 sampled residents had an accurately documented code status in the medical record. Findings included: On [DATE] at 11:16 AM, a review of Resident #18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was identified as a full code. Further review revealed the resident had a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Order. A review of the facility's nurses' stations Full Code and DNR books revealed Resident #18 was identified by the facility as both a full code and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), despite the documentation of the DNR order. An interview on [DATE] at 11:25 AM with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), revealed that to check a resident's code status she would look at the resident's EMR or the Full Code/DNR books. When asked to look for Resident #18's Advance Directive, Staff B referenced the resident's face sheet on the EMR and stated that she would perform CPR. On [DATE] at approximately 11:30 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$312,600 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $152,887 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
  • $159,713 — penalty dated 2023-11-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BLUE RIDGE HEALTHCARE — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EAGLE LAKE NURSING AND REHAB HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2024
NAJMAN, EDENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2024
NAJMAN, PAZIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2024
BUSH, SHERRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
SABA, FADIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$806K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 10%Other / private 16%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $806K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$364per resident / day
operating cost
$11,056per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105292. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next