Mountain View Health Care
547 Warwoman Road, Clayton, GA 30525 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (706) 782-4276 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.5% | 15.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.6% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 31.0% | 11.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.7% | 15.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 44.9% | 20.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 5.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 39.1% | 19.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 78.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.9% | 25.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.1% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.90 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.54 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.4%CMS range 38.0–62.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 16.3%CMS range 11.8–20.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.0–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 76.0 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-09-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician for a change in condition for one of two residents (R) (R#41) reviewed for change in conditions. Specifically, R#41 suffered harm as result of staff administering insulin and medications with a sedative effect when resident was difficult to arouse, requiring treatment for unresponsiveness in the emergency room. The sample size was 31. Findings include: Review of the Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised May 2017, revealed number 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): c. adverse reaction to medication; d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; e. need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. Review of the clinical record revealed R#41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and chronic pain. The resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-09-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, review of job descriptions, policy review, and Rule 410-10-.02 Standards of Practice for Licensed Practical Nurses, the facility failed to maintain professional nursing standards of quality regarding medication administration. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C administered insulin and medications with sedative effects for one resident (R) (R#41) when resident didn't eat breakfast or lunch and was difficult to arouse. In addition, the facility failed to notify the physician for change in condition for R#41. Harm was identified on 9/6/22 when R#41 required treatment with Narcan for unresponsiveness and opioid overdose in the emergency room. Findings include: Review of the Charge Nurse- LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse]) job description for drug administration and documentation, undated, revealed prepare and administer medications under the direction of an RN (Registered Nurse) and as ordered by the physician in accordance with nursing standards and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R) (R#41) was free from significant medication error. Actual harm occurred when insulin and medications with sedative effects were administered to R#41, who was lethargic and difficult to arouse, resulting in emergency room visit and treatment with Narcan for unresponsiveness and opioid overdose. The sample size was 31. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled Medication Incidents and Adverse Reactions revealed 1. In the event of a medication discrepancy, medication error, or adverse medication reaction, immediate action is taken, as necessary, to protect the patient's safety and welfare. 2. Report the incident immediately to the director of nursing or acting supervisor. 3. The attending physician is notified promptly of the error or significant adverse medication reaction. 9. Significant medication errors and significant adverse drug reactions are defined as unintended, undesirable, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, the facility failed to issue the notice for termination of Medicare Part A benefits, with correct information, for three of three residents (R) (R65, R43, and R131). Findings include: 1. Review of R65's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the profile tab indicated that the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R65's EMR titled significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/8/2024 located in the survey shell, indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15 which revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of documents provided by the facility titled Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), for R65, indicated the notice informed the resident that skilled services would end on 1/13/2025. Review of a document provided by the facility titled Physical Therapy PT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper hair restraints in the kitchen, ensure proper temperatures of the dishwasher, ensure staff wore gloves during food preparation, ensure food items were dated and discarded on or before expiration dates, ensure sanitary conditions in the kitchen, prevent cross-contamination of food items, and ensure hot food temperatures were monitored and documented, These deficient practices had the potential to place the 77 residents who received meals from the kitchen at increased risks of a foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, dated 11/1/2022, revealed Hairnets should be worn when cooking, preparing, or assembling food. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Safety Requirements, dated 11/1/2022, revealed Staff shall not touch food with bare hands, exhibiting appropriate use of gloves, tongs, deli paper, and spatulas. Review of the facility's policy titled, Date and Label, dated 3/2025, revealed 3. Write the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment in the kitchen and laundry room was functioning. Specifically, one reach-in refrigerator in the kitchen, one of two washing machines, and two of three clothes dryers in the laundry were not in operable order. This deficient practice had the potential to affect adequate food production and laundry production in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 6/25/2025 at 11:14 am, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that the tall reach-in refrigerator, located to the left when walking into the kitchen, was broken. She stated the refrigerator malfunctioned on 6/24/2025. The DM checked the interior temperature of the refrigerator, and it was 48 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The DM further stated that the kitchen got very hot. At 11:18 am, Cook3 confirmed the temperature in the kitchen was 90 degrees F. During an interview on 6/25/2025 at 1:36 pm, the Maintenance Supervisor stated the reach-in refrigerator was working on Monday, and the morning after, it went down. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Pest Control Policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen remained free from pests in one of one kitchen. This failure had the potential to affect the sanitary environment in which food was prepared for 77 residents who consumed food in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Pest Control Policy revealed Facility will utilize a variety of methods in controlling certain seasonal pests .These will involve indoor and outdoor methods that are deemed appropriate by the outside pest service and state and federal regulations. During an observation and interview on 06/25/2025 at 10:32 am, the observation revealed a very large fan to the right back of the kitchen area. The fan was built into the wall. The fan appeared to be blowing air into the kitchen with no screen or cover, completely open to the outside. The fan was covered in lint and leaves along the bottom inside. There was a blending station for the mechanically altered diets on a table directly in front of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Dignity, the facility failed to ensure 34 of 81 residents' meals were served on dinner ware instead of disposable Styrofoam food containers and hydration in disposable cups. The deficient practice had the potential to diminish the resident's quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each residents' quality of life.Review of the facility policy titled, Dignity, with the revised date of February 2021, revealed under Policy Interpretation and Implementation number 5e. provided with a dignified dining experience.Observation on 8/12/2025 at 10:30 am revealed there were 47 eight-inch round plastic re-usable plates on warmers stacked on top of a cart next to the steam table as well as a stack of disposable black Styrofoam hinged-lid food containers. During an interview on 8/12/2025 at 10:30 am, Dietary [NAME] 4 (DC4) confirmed that these were the only re-usable plates in the facility to serve 81 residents. During the interview DC5 revealed that there were not enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to protect three residents (R) (R62, R18, and R40) of four residents reviewed for abuse were free from physical or verbal abuse out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, R62 was physically abused by R6, and R18 and R40 were verbally threatened by R6. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 2017, indicated .Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to; facility staff, other residents, consultants, contractors, volunteers, or staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within two hours for two of three residents (R) (R18 and R40) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 37. Specifically, R6 verbally abused R18 and R40. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated 7/2017, indicated .All alleged violations involving abuse .will be reported to the facility Administrator.All alleged violations of abuse.will be reported immediately, but not later than.two (2) hours of if the alleged violation involves abuse. 1. Review of R6's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R6's Behavioral Note, dated 12/12/2024 and located in the resident's EMR under the Prog (Progress) Note tab, indicated R6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure two of 37 sampled residents (R) (R65 and R20) had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This deficient practice had the potential to place R65 and R20 at risk of inaccurate care plans and not receiving care according to their needs. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual, dated 10/2024 and located at Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual | CMS, revealed .It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the MDS items on the assessment, and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT [Interdisciplinary] completing the assessment. As such, nursing homes are responsible for ensuring that all participants in the assessment process have the requisite knowledge to complete an accurate assessment. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, the facility failed to conduct a thorough and accurate fall investigation for one of four residents (R) (R41) reviewed for falls. This failure had the potential to place R41 at risk of further falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated 3/2018 indicated .Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Review of R41's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review R41's 5-day MDS, with an ARD of 12/8/2024, indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15, which indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure adequate interventions were provided to establish proper nutrition for gradual weight loss for one of six residents (R) (R38) reviewed for nutrition. This placed the resident at risk for further weight loss. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Nutrition, dated 4/29/2019 indicated .Each resident will maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight.unless the resident's condition reflects that this is not possible. There was no information in the facility policy that addressed gradual weight loss. Review of R38's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/17/2025 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (R) (R44) reviewed for respiratory services received oxygen as ordered by the physician out of a total sample of 37 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving insufficient oxygen to meet the assessed respiratory need. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, dated October 2010, stated Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration .Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered .After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: .(3) The rate of oxygen flow, route, and rationale. Review of R44's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R44 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, the facility failed to ensure three of 37 sampled residents (R) (R78, R38, and R41) were appropriate for the use of quarter side rails on their beds. This failure had the potential to place R38 and R41 at risk for injury related to potentially unnecessary side rail use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated 2001, indicated . Resident beds meet the safety specifications established by the Hospital Bed Safety Workgroup. The use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met.prior to the instillation or use of a side or bed rail, alternatives to use of side or bed rails are attempted. Alternatives may include. roll guard. foam bumpers. lowering the bed. use of a concave mattress to reduce rolling off the bed.If attempted alternatives do not adequately meet the resident's needs the resident may be evaluated for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Administering Medications and Hypertension- Clinical Protocol, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (R) (R23 and R35) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, when R23 did not receive glargine (insulin medication) on four occasions, Novolog (insulin medication) on five occasions, and hydralazine (blood pressure medication) on three occasions, and when blood pressure medication was not held according to the physician's order for a low blood pressure for R35. These failures had the potential to place R23 and R35 at risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised 4/1/2019, provided by the facility, revealed Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . Review of the facility's policy titled, Hypertension- Clinical Protocol, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer package insert, and review of the facility policies titled Medication Storage in the Facility and Administering Medications, the facility failed to discard an expired insulin vial for one of three medication carts and failed to monitor the temperatures of one of one medication storage refrigerators. The deficient practice could result in decreased or altered effectiveness of the medication and worsening of the resident's symptoms. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated [DATE], revealed Medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees and 46 degrees Fahrenheit (F) are kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised on [DATE], revealed The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. Review of the Novolog package insert titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, recipe review, and review of the facility's policies titled Standardized Recipes and Preparing Pureed Foods, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed to ensure the food was palatable for four of 37 sampled residents (R) (R60, R56, R45, and R25). This failure had the potential to place R60, R56, R45, and R25 at risk of decreased oral intake and weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Standardized Recipes, dated 3/2025, revealed 1. Recipes contain the following: a. Ingredients and amounts required for the recipe. b. Preparation method. c. Other preparation information .2. Dietary Manager will provide recipes for the foods to be prepared. Review of the facility's policy titled, Preparing Pureed Foods, dated 3/2025, revealed 1. Prepare food following the recipe for the regular texture foods. Pureed food should have the same flavor as their regular texture counterpart. 2. Specific pureed recipes included in the menu system may be used. 3. If the specific pureed recipe is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained for one of three residents (R) (R68) observed during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were not touched with bare hands or dropped during medication administration, which increased the risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated 4/1/2019, included, Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable. During observation and interview on 6/25/2025 at 9:23 am of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3, the LPN opened multiple pill packs of medications for R68 and poured them into the pill cup. Two of the pills dropped on top of the medication cart. LPN3 picked up the unknown pills with her bare hand and placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, ''Date Marking for Food Safety'' and ''Food Safety Requirements,'' the facility failed to date, label, and/or cover food, and discard food with expired expiration dates or signs of spoilage stored in the facility's kitchen and the facility's ''Diet Room.'' Additionally, the facility failed to serve [NAME] stew from the kitchen's tray line at an internal temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher. This failure had the potential to affect all 67 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, ''Date Marking for Food Safety,'' indicated, ''Policy: The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for food safety . 2. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. 3. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, ''Resident Dining, and Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner to ensure a dignified existence for six of six residents (R) (R64, R118, R11, R50, R31, and R47) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience by serving desserts and beverages in disposable bowls and cups and serving disposable plastic eating utensils at meals for four of four residents (R64, R118, R11, and R50) reviewed for dignity while dining. Additionally, the facility failed to assist and encourage R31 and R47 to dress in clothes other than a hospital gown. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, ''Resident Dining,'' indicated, ''Resident dining should take place in an environment and in a manner that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respects his or her individuality . Provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and sexual abuse for one of five Residents (R) R52 by R219. Specifically, the facility failed to intervene after multiple incidents of verbal sexual abuse towards female residents by R219, that resulted in physical sexual touching towards R52, who was a target of prior verbal abuse by R219. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2017, stated Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation .Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to; .other residents .5. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation-The facility will consider utilization of the following tips for prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents: .b. Observe resident behavior and their reaction to other residents, roommates, and tablemates .m. Assess,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of facility's policy titled, ''Restraint Free Environment Policy,'' the facility failed to ensure one of one Resident (R) (R4) reviewed for physical restraints was free from an unnecessary physical restraint. Specifically, R4 did not have the necessary consent or an assessment in place for seatbelt to be applied and used with use of wheelchair. Findings include: The facility's ''Restraint Free Environment Policy'' dated 2/2023 read, ''It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraints;'' and ''3.Behavioral interventions should be used and exhausted prior to the application of a physical restraint;'' and ''5.Before a resident is restrained, the facility will determine the presence of a specific medical symptom that would require the use of restraints,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation,, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of verbal abuse was reported immediately, but no later than two hours of the alleged verbal abuse for two of six Residents (R) (R31, and R218) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2017, stated .13. In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: a. Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment .are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made .to other officials (including State Survey Agency and adult protected services where the state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law. Review of R218's Departmental Notes, dated 9/22/2023 at 11:03 pm, provided by the facility, stated At or around 1800 [6:00 pm] it was reported to this nurse by hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation the facility failed to ensure a thorough and complete investigation was conducted following a resident-to-resident altercation, involving two of six Residents (R) (R7 and R9) reviewed for alleged abuse. This failure not to conduct a thorough abuse investigation had the potential to result in other residents not being identified as potential victims of abuse. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 2017, stated .7. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation- When suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur, an investigation is immediately warranted. Once the resident is cared for and initial reporting has occurred, an investigation should be conducted. Components of an investigation may include .c. Interview all witnesses separately. Include roommates, residents in adjoining rooms, staff members in the area, and visitors in the area . Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, ''Comprehensive Care Plans,'' the facility failed to ensure two of 26 Residents (R) (R11 and R219) reviewed for care plans had a complete and comprehensive care plan. Specifically, R11 care plans did not address the resident's prescribed psychotropic medication problem area and/or interventions. Additionally, R219 known inappropriate sexual behaviors was not identified on the resident's care plan. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, ''Comprehensive Care Plans,'' indicated, ''Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.'' 1. Review of R11's undated ''Face sheet'' located in the ''Basic Information'' tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R11 admitted with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, ''Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Policy,'' the facility failed to ensure one of three Residents(R) (R56) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received ADL assistance according to his plan of care. Specifically, staff did not ensure the resident received consistent nail care. Findings include: The facility's ''Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Policy'' dated 10/2022 read, in pertinent part, ''The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable;'' and ''Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care.'' R56's ''Face Sheet'' dated 10/26/2023 and found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the ''Basic Information'' tab, indicated R56 was admitted with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy and chronic pain. R56's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, ''Activities Policy the facility failed to ensure three of four Residents (R) (R17, R31, and R47) reviewed for activities were provided with an activities program to meet their individual needs. Specifically, staff did not ensure residents who were room and/or bed bound were provided with consistent activities. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, ''Activities Policy dated 10/2022 read, in pertinent part, ''It is the policy of the facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choices of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. 1. Review of R17's ''Face Sheet'' dated 10/26/2023 and found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the ''Basic Information'' tab, indicated the R17 admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, ''Catheter Care Policy,'' the facility failed to ensure consistent infection control for one of three Residents (R) (R56) reviewed for urinary catheters. Specifically, staff failed to ensure sanitary maintenance of the resident's catheter bag and tubing. Findings include: The facility's ''Catheter Care Policy'' dated 10/2022 read, in pertinent part, ''It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use.'' R56's ''Face Sheet'' dated 10/26/2023 and found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the ''Basic Information'' tab, indicated the R56 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy and obstructive uropathy. R56's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference (ARD) date of 8/22/2023 and found in the EMR under the ''MDS'' tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, ''Food Safety Requirements,'' the facility failed to maintain and ensure the kitchen's three door reach-in freezer operated at zero degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below for safe food storage for one of two freezers used to store food. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy entitled, ''Food Safety Requirements,'' indicated, ''Refrigerated storage - foods that require refrigeration shall be refrigerated immediately upon receipt or placed in the freezer, whichever is applicable. Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include i. Monitoring food temperatures and functioning of refrigeration equipment daily and at routine intervals during all hours of operation .'' Review of the facility's ''Maintenance Log'' revealed an entry dated 8/1/2023 which specified to measure gaskets for all coolers in kitchen and get replaced. The entry was not marked as completed. Review of the October 2023 ''Temperature Log'' for the kitchen's three door reach-in freezer revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of the kitchen to prevent cross contamination by ensuring the kitchen surfaces of shelving, ceiling, floors, and appliances were easily cleanable. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 60 of 61 residents who received meals prepared in the facility's only kitchen. Findings include: Review of the Kitchen Environment policy, revised 9/17, revealed All food preparation areas, food service areas, and dining areas will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Review of the United States Federal Food & Drug Food Code 2017: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/RetailFoodProtection/FoodCode/, revealed: 4-101.11 Characteristics. Materials that are used in the construction of utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment may not allow the migration of deleterious substances or impart colors, odors, or tastes to food and under normal use conditions shall be: P (A) Safe; P (B) Durable, corrosion-resistant, and nonabsorbent. 4-101.19 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of maintenance records, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that it was maintained in a safe, clean, and comfortable home-like environment in six resident rooms (A2, A3, A5, A6, C11, C13). The census was 62. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled Work Orders revealed the facility uses a clip board at the nursing station to document environmental problems. Policy Interpretation and Implementation number 1. In order to establish a priority of maintenance service, work orders must be fille out and forwarded to the Maintenance Director. Number 4. Work order requests should be placed in the appropriate basket at the nurse's station. Work orders are picked up daily. Number 5. Emergency requests will be given priority in making necessary repairs. Observation on 9/6/22 at 2:54 p.m. in room A2 revealed a hole under the window approximately one foot long by three inches high; the bedside table of bed-1 had large sections of paint/finish missing on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (SNFABN) were completed with the estimated potential liability for continued services not covered by Medicare, for two of three residents (R) (R#18 and R#17) who were discharged off Medicare Part A services and remained in the facility. Findings include: A policy for beneficiary notices was requested but not provided during the survey. Review of a facility-completed worksheet Beneficiary Notice-Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months, revealed that R#18 and R#17 were discharged from a Medicare-covered Part A stay and remained in the facility after their last covered day. 1. Review of R#18 SNFABN dated 3/26/22, revealed that the effective date of coverage for Skilled Part A Nursing Services/Advanced Physical Therapies would end as of 3/29/22. The notice of a cut or change in services did not describe the estimated liability to the resident if services were continued. The form was verbally consented per phone conversation by resident's representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure bilateral side rails were not used as a restraint for one resident (R) R#8 reviewed for physical restraints. The sample size was 31. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Use of Restraints, revised April 2017, revealed restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. Policy interpretation and implementation. Number 1. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. Number 4. Practices that inappropriately utilize equipment to prevent resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent (5%). A total of 29 medication opportunities were observed, and there were two errors for one of five residents (R) (R#23), by one of two nurses observed giving medications, for a medication error rate of 6.9%. The sample size was 31. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled Medication Administration revealed .Medications are administered as prescribed .using the six rights [right patient, right drug, right route, right times and right documentation] .Only the person who prepares the medication may administer it . Review of the undated policy titled ORAL INHALATION ADMININSTRATION revealed .To allow for safe, accurate, and effective administration of medication using .nebulizer .instruct the resident to take a deep breath .repeat the pattern throughout treatment .remain with resident throughout treatment .Approximately five minutes after treatment begins .obtain resident's pulse .Monitor for medication side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two of five residents (R) (R#2 and R#45) reviewed regarding code status to ensure code status was consistent throughout the electronic medical record (EMR). The facility's deficient practice increased R#2 and R#45's risk for incorrect life sustaining treatment to be provided by the facility's clinical staff. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Advance Directive, revised 12/16, revealed .Information about whether or not a resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record .Do Not Resuscitate-[DNR] indicates that, in the case of respiratory or cardiac failure .has directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation .or other life-sustaining treatments .are to be used . 1. Review of R#2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnose to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow and implement the antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotics for two of three residents (R) (R#24 and R#63), who received antibiotics for a urinary tract infection (UTI) without having met the criteria for the use of an antibiotic. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Infection Prevention/Antibiotic Stewardship Guide, dated 8/28/22, revealed the primary mission of antibiotic stewardship is to achieve the best possible improved antimicrobial resident outcomes by ensuring the optimal selection, dose, and duration of antimicrobials for treatment or prevention while minimizing the impact of possible side effects and antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics are frequently over or inappropriately prescribed, a concerted effort to decrease or eliminate inappropriate use can make a big impact on resident safety and reduction of adverse events. Leadership will communicate annually with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to C. ROSS MANAGEMENT — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| R DAVIS HOLDINGS INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2016 |
| MARTIN, LAURA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| WINGET, BRANDON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| WINGET, BYRON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| WINGET, MICHAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| MOUNTAIN VIEW HR PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/28/2019 |
| CANNON, CYNTHIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2025 |
| HAMILTON, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2025 |
| C. ROSS MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $368K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115688. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.