Medical Management Health And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 16.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.99 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards when water temperatures were not maintained at a safe temperature level for five residents (Resident (R) 67, R53, R47, R14, and R22 who resided on one of four halls (B hall). The water temperatures on the facility's B hall ranged between 138.9 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 149.1 degrees F on 6/16/2025. On 6/16/2025, the Maintenance Supervisor failed to notify the Administrator, nursing staff, and residents and implement interventions to protect the residents on the B hall when the water temperatures became excessively hot after they were adjusted and checked around noon on 6/16/2025. The facility's failure to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards by not maintaining safe water temperatures placed residents at continued risk of serious injury, harm, or impairment. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 483.25(d) - Accidents, at a Scope and Severity of a J, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage Guideline, the facility failed to discard expired food items and failed to properly label, and date food products as required. The facility also failed to maintain sanitary practices during the handling of dishware and utensils, resulting in wet nesting and cross contamination risks. These deficient practices had the potential to place 69 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk for contracting a foodborne illness.Findings Include:A review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage Guideline dated 03/2024 documented that non perishable food was required to have a delivery date and once opened, an open date. Items were to be discarded by the expiration or use by date listed on the product. The policy stated that prepared foods received upon delivery, such as cheese, salads, and luncheon meats, were required to have a delivery date and once opened, an open date and discard date. Food prepared in the facility was required to have a prepared date and a discard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policies Resident Rights and Smoking Policy-Residents the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of one of 11 resident (R) (R28) related to smoking. The facility census 71.A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights (revised 02/2021) documented under Policy Interpretation and Implementation stated that residents were to be free from corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion, and from physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's symptoms. It further stated that residents had the right to exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility.A review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents (dated 2001) documented under Policy Interpretation and Implementation stated that any smoking related privileges, restrictions, and concerns (e.g., need for close monitoring) were to be noted on the care plan, and all personnel caring for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of resident medical records for one of 71 sampled resident (R) (R 67).Findings include:Observation on 04/18/2026 at 10:57 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA locked the medication cart and walked away from the medication cart leaving the computer screen open and with the R67's medication list and information exposed. LPN AA entered R67's room and placed the glucometer on R67 bedside table without a barrier. LPN AA dropped the test strip on the floor and left the room to retrieve another test strip. LPN AA returned to the medication cart, unlocked the cart and retrieved a test strip. LPN AA again walked away from the med cart then turned around and looked at the computer screen and closed the screen.Interview on 04/18/2026 at 11:15 AM with LPN AA revealed that she should have locked the computer screen before she walked away from the med cart. She stated that when she came back to the cart it was too late.Interview on 04/19/2026 at 2:30 pm with Registered Nurse (RN) KK revealed that her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, the facility failed to conduct a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II assessment for one of 24 sampled residents (R28). This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents who required Level II PASARR specialized services.Findings include:A review of the facility policy dated 12/19/2022 titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program revealed:Policy: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. 6. The Social Services Director shall be responsible for keeping track of each resident's PASARR screening status, and referring to the appropriate authority.Record review revealed R28 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide effective infection control practices related to fingerstick blood sugar checks for one of 24 sampled resident(R) (R67).During medication administration on 04/19/2026 at 10:57 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA removed the glucometer from the medication cart, sanitized her hands, cleaned the glucometer, and placed it in her gloved hand. LPN AA entered R 67 room and placed the glucometer directly on the resident's bedside table without a barrier. LPN AA wiped R67's right index finger with an alcohol pad and performed the blood glucose fingerstick. After completing the procedure, LPN AA cleaned the glucometer with a disinfectant wipe and placed the wet glucometer directly on top of the medication cart to dry without a barrier.An interview conducted on 04/18/2026 at 11:15 AM with LPN AA revealed she had no explanation for why she did not place a barrier between the resident's bedside table and the glucometer.An interview conducted on 04/19/2026 at 2:30 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) KK revealed that her expectation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide education on the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to the initiation of such medication to one of five residents (Resident (R)38) reviewed for unnecessary medication out of a total sample of 22. This had the potential to cause R38 not to be able to give informed consent for the use of a psychotropic medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), dated 4/01/2025 revealed, . Psychotropic drugs include, but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics . Prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risk, and alternatives for the medication, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase . Review of R38's undated Face Sheet,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to follow current standards of practice for flushing a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line for one of one resident (Resident (R)73) observed with a PICC line during the medication administration observation out of a total sample of 22. This failure had the potential to cause R73 to not receive the whole dose of an intravenous antibiotic and increased the risk of occlusion of the catheter. Findings include: Review of the Lippincott Nursing Center's article titled, Topics in Progressive Care: Peripherally inserted central catheters: What you should know , located at https://www.nursingcenter.com, revealed, . Adequate flushing is essential to prevent catheter occlusion. All catheters require flushing with normal saline before medication administration to clear the lumen and assess catheter function, between each medication administered to prevent drug precipitate, and after medication administration to again…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for one of two residents (Resident (R) 38) reviewed for dialysis out of a total sample of 22. This had the potential for R38's care needs to not be met. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, End Stage Renal Disease, Care of the Resident with dated 10/2010, revealed, . Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD [End Stage Renal Dialysis] facility include all aspects of how he resident's care will be managed including . How information will be exchanged between the facilities . Review of the Nursing Facility Dialysis Contract, dated 10/24/2017, revealed, . Emergency and non-emergency changes in a resident's medical condition will be immediately communicated by the party having primary knowledge of the change to the other party. Center will communicate with Nursing Facility [sic] via the Dialysis Communication Form, including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacist Consultant identified and reported to the facility and to the prescriber that a PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication did not have a duration of use for one of seven residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 22. This failure placed the resident at risk for not being reevaluated for the medication necessity. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist, revised October 2022, revealed, A qualified Consultant Pharmacist is to be retained for the purpose of coordinating, supervising, and reviewing the facility's pharmacy services . The Consultant Pharmacist is expected to be conversant with all State and Federal laws and codes related to pharmacy services. The Consultant Pharmacist will be responsible for the following activities . Review the drug regimen of each resident at least monthly and report any irregularities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident (R) 7) observed during the medication administration observation, was free from a significant medication error. The medication error occurred when the licensed nurse failed to recognize the physician ordered insulin was not expired and could have been administered to R7. This failure had the potential for R7 to experience hyperglycemia and if left untreated could have led to diabetic ketoacidosis. Findings included: Review of R7's undated Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab in the EMR and with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE], indicated R7 was coded as receiving insulin on seven of seven days during the look back period. Review of R7's Care Plan, dated [DATE] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,316 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $41,316 — penalty dated 2024-02-11
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-10 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to C. ROSS MANAGEMENT — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $354K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA