Magnolia Manor Of Columbus Nursing Center - East

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 95.9 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 114 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of three residents (R) (R3) reviewed for falls. R3's care plan instructed staff to use two people for bed mobility. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)1 provided care alone, and as a result, R3 fell from the bed during care, sustaining a hematoma and laceration from the fall.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, revised October 2016, revealed, A comprehensive person-centered care plan shall be developed and implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames that meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment.A review of the electronic medical record EMR) revealed that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]with diagnoses that included disease of the spinal cord, rheumatoid arthritis, and spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 sampled residents (R) (R3) was safe from accidents and hazards resulting in injuries. Harm was identified as having occurred on 3/24/2025, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)1 failed to follow the plan of care for R3, resulting in R3 falling from the bed and sustaining a hematoma and laceration from the fall.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Management, updated 9/2014, revealed, It is the intent of Magnolia Manor facilities to provide an environment which remains as free of hazards as possible. This facility utilizes previous evaluation and current data to assist staff in identification of residents' specific risks and causes in an effort to identify appropriate interventions to reduce the likelihood of the resident falling and to try to minimize complications from falling .A review of R3's undated Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control, the facility failed to ensure that infection control hand hygiene practices were followed by three of three Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) (LPN BB, LPN CC, and LPN AA) observed during medication administration. The deficient practice had the potential to contribute to the transmission of infectious diseases among residents and staff. Findings included:A review of the policy titled Infection Prevention and Control, last revised February 2021, revealed that it is the intent of the facility to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. It was further documented that the facility requires staff to wash their hands after each direct resident contact. During an observation on 10/2/2025 at 8:25 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB prepared and administered medication on the North 2 Low cart. LPN BB did not perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for one of 97 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). Specifically, the self-contained wall-mounted air conditioning unit (PTAC) displayed heavy substance buildup on the filter and had the potential to affect patient comfort and safety. Findings included:An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 9/30/2025 at 11:30 am revealed that the PTAC unit filter was covered with a gray, flaky substance.An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/1/2025 at 1:45 pm revealed that the PTAC unit filter was covered with a gray, flaky substance.An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/2/2025 at 12:25 pm revealed the PTAC unit filter was covered with a gray, flaky substance.An interview on 10/2/2023 at 12:50 pm with the Interim Maintenance Director (IMD) confirmed the PTAC unit had a gray flaky substance on the pull-out filters. The IMD stated that the filter cleaning task should have been completed on 9/30/2025 and that all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a facility-wide effective pest control program for the current facility population of 89 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to further pest infestation in the facility and feelings of discomfort or spread of infection among the residents.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control dated 12/2012, revealed, . It is the intent of (name of facility) to ensure that all facilities have an effective Pest Control Program .A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes for the past year, provided by the facility, revealed:2/11/2025 - One resident's family complained of rodents in the facility. The facility's response was to schedule an exterminator monthly.2/20/2025 - List of old business: Exterminator for bugs and rodents.7/18/2025 - under list of old business (resolved): Pest control-resolved and on-going.A review of the facility's Pest Control Checklist revealed the following pest/rodent sightings:3/27/2025- three residents' rooms on South 2 unit.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for five of 19 sampled residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, R5, and R6). Failure to conduct a thorough investigation could result in further incidents occurring due to unknown factors.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition/Reporting and Investigation, dated 10/2016, revealed, . Once a complaint or situation is identified involving alleged mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source/origins and misappropriation of resident property, the following investigation and reporting procedures will be followed . An Interview will be conducted with all pertinent parties. Statements will be gathered from the suspect, the person making accusations, the resident involved, reliable residents who may have witnessed the incident, and any other persons who may have some information.1. A review of R1's undated Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II after a new mental health diagnosis was added for one of three residents (R) (R17) reviewed for PASRR Level II. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the level of care and services provided for R17. Findings include: The Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there was no facility policy for PASRR. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R17 was admitted on [DATE] without a significant mental health diagnosis. Review of R17's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed section A (Identification Information) documented the resident had not been evaluated by Level II PASRR, section I (Active Diagnoses) included and documented bipolar disorder, and section O (Special Treatments and Programs) documented no therapies or treatments were received. Review of R17's Face Sheet revealed current diagnoses included bipolar disorder, current episode…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled, Assessing Vital Signs, and Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive Care Plan regarding weekly weights for one of 33 residents (R) (R82) in the sample. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Assessing Vital Signs dated February 2019 revealed Weight: Each resident should be weighed upon admission and re-admission to the facility. All weights should be recorded in designated location of the residents Chart. Residents shall be weighed monthly or more often when clinically indicated. Review of the facility policy titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, updated October 2016, under Intent, it is the intent of Magnolia Manor facilities to provide care to our residents that is person-centered, and consistent with Resident Rights. The facilities Interdisciplinary Team shall be responsible for the development and implementation of a person-centered comprehensive care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Scope of Assessments, the facility failed to complete an admission nutrition assessment for one of five residents (R) (R82). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent R82 from receiving required nutrients in accordance with the resident's nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Scope of Assessments dated March 2014 revealed under Procedural Guidelines number 11. Nutritional assessments should be completed on admission, at least quarterly, and as needed based on the resident's condition and dietary needs. Review of the medical record revealed R82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included but not limited to, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the physician orders revealed R82 had a diet order of CCD (controlled carbohydrate diet) renal. R82 was also ordered Prostat nutrition supplement 30 mL (milliliters)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered according to physician order for two of 15 residents (R) (R5 and R59) receiving oxygen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner for one of 15 residents (R11) receiving oxygen. The deficient practices had the potential to place R5, R59, and R11 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, dated March 2024, revealed the Intent was, It is the intent of Magnolia Manor facilities to ensure that oxygen is administered appropriately to residents to improve oxygenation and provide comfort to residents experiencing respiratory difficulties. The Procedural Guidelines, Oxygen Therapy - Mask and Nasal Cannula section stated 5. The external filter on the oxygen concentrators should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, the facility failed to ensure that the Pneumococcal vaccine was administered to three of 18 residents (R) (R12, R13, and R16). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control revision and approval date of February 2020. Under section titled, Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization number 1. Each resident or resident representative must receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects from the Pneumococcal immunization. 3. Each resident will be offered the vaccine on admission, and 5b. documentation must include if the resident received the immunization. 1. Review of R12's clinical record and facility vaccination information revealed a Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPSV23) Informed Consent, signed and dated 10/14/2022. The form documented that R12 consented to receiving the pneumococcal vaccine. However, there was no evidence in the clinical record that the vaccine had been administered. During the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as care planned and ordered, for one of three residents (R) (R1). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent R1 from obtaining care in accordance with their care needs. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the clinical record revealed that R1 had a nutrition care plan, dated 1/17/2023, that included the diagnosis of diabetes. The nutrition care plan included an intervention, dated 2/22/2024, for nursing staff to administer medication as ordered. Review of R1's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 12/18/2023, for 6 units of Novolog insulin to be administered before meals. There was also an order, dated 12/18/2023, for 30 units of Lantus insulin to be administered daily, in the morning for a diagnosis of diabetes. However, facility nursing staff failed to administer insulin medication as ordered and as care planned on 6/10/2024. Review of a Patient Instructions for Hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,394 — penalty dated 2025-08-29
• $4,394 — penalty dated 2025-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAGNOLIA MANOR SENIOR LIVING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $812K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA