Emerald Healthcare & Rehab of Dublin

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 63.5 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in condition for one of seven sampled residents (R) (R1) related to respiratory distress and the need for further medical treatment. On [DATE], R1 exhibited shortness of breath, tripoding (leaning forward to maximize lung expansion), and a decreased oxygen saturation of 83 percent. On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Corporate [NAME] President of Compliance and Regulatory Services were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 4:18 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on [DATE]. At the time of exit on [DATE], an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received; therefore, the Immediate Jeopardy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Freedom of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation; Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by staff for one of seven sampled residents (R) (R1). Specifically, R1 had a significant change of condition while in respiratory distress and required further medical treatment. R1 expired less than four hours after being placed in his bed by staff. On 7/11/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Corporate [NAME] President of Compliance and Regulatory Services were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 7/11/2024 at 4:18 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 6/17/2024. At the time of exit on 7/11/2024, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) job descriptions titled Title: License Nursing Home Administrator and Title: Director of Nursing, the facility Administration failed to ensure that one of seven sampled residents (R) (R1) was free from neglect by staff when R1 was in respiratory distress asking for help. In addition, the facility Administration failed to provide oversight and monitoring of care and services to R1 for further medical treatment. This failure resulted in R1 expiring in his room alone and gripping the handrails. On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Corporate [NAME] President of Compliance and Regulatory Services were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 4:18 pm. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to privacy during shower care for one of 29 sampled residents (R) (R36). This deficient practice had the potential to diminish the resident's quality of life and contribute to emotional distress and reduced trust in facility staff. Findings include:Record review of R36's electronic health record (EHR) revealed R36 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, discitis of the unspecified lumbar region, polyneuropathy, lumbar spinal fusion, and lumbar spinal stenosis without neurogenic claudication.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 in Section C, indicating little to no cognitive impairment. Section GG documented that the resident required a walker for ambulation, supervision or touching assistance for bathing and showering, and touching assistance for most Activities of Daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 sampled residents (R) (R40) did not have unauthorized and unsecured medications at the bedside. This failure had the potential to result in medication errors, improper use, and adverse drug events for the residents. Findings include:Review of R40's Electronic Health Records (EHR) revealed R46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic systolic heart (congestive) failure, and suicidal ideations.Review of R40's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Patterns) revealed, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment, and Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) revealed, impairment on one side to the upper and lower extremities, required substantial/maximal assistance with activities of daily living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's Advance Directives policy, the facility failed to ensure residents/representatives/guardians were informed of and provided written notice of the right to accept or decline medical and surgical treatments and their right to formulate an advance directive for two of two sampled residents (R) reviewed (R9 and R42). Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directives dated September 2022, revealed under Determining Existence of Advance Directives2. The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so.Review of R9 and R42's medical records revealed no documented evidence or signed statement of acknowledgment, the resident and his/her representative were informed or received written information advising of their right to accept or decline medical and surgical treatments and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents on two of five halls. Specifically, tripping hazards in front of resident toilets, drawers with chipped and missing paint, and uneven, bulging baseboard tiles along the walls of the shower room on one hall. These conditions created an environment that was not safe or homelike and had the potential to negatively affect residents' safety, dignity, and overall quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Quality of Life-Homelike Environment undated, revealed 2. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include A. cleanliness and order C. Inviting colors and décor. Observations on 03/13/2026 at 8:16 AM and 03/14/2026 at 8:30 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — widespread
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988(CLIA) regulations, the facility failed to ensure a current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) CLIA Certificate of Waiver. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the CDC CLIA website revealed The CLIA of 1988 regulations apply to all United States (US) facilities or sites that test human specimens for health or disease assessment. Review of the CLIA of 1988 regulations revealed .Certification of Laboratories . (b) Certificate Requirement: No person may solicit or accept materials derived from the human body for laboratory for laboratory examination or other procedure unless there is effect for the laboratory a certificate issued by the Secretary under this section applicable to the category of examinations or procedures which includes such examinations or procedure. Review of the facility-provided CLIA waiver…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to employ a qualified dietitian. This deficient practice had the potential to place the 56 residents residing in the facility at risk of unmet nutritional needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A job description for the Registered Dietitian was requested and was not provided. Review of the facility-provided document titled Dietary Manager included, Job Summary: The primary purpose of the Dietary Manager position is to assist the Dietitian in planning, organizing, developing, and directing the overall operation of the Dietary Department. An interview on 4/4/2025 at 8:30 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed the facility did not have a Registered Dietitian (RD). She stated that the facility has been without an RD for the past two months. She stated that she communicated with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse about residents' diets. In an interview on 4/4/2025 at 8:52 am, the Administrator revealed the former RD was offering support until an RD was hired. In an interview on 4/5/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-06 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Social Service Worker on a full-time basis to provide services for the residents in the facility. The facility was licensed for 126 beds. Findings include: Review of the facility's licensure revealed that the facility was licensed for 126 beds. Review of the facility personnel files revealed there was no Social Services Worker employed by the facility to provide consultation or oversight of the facility's resident population. In an interview on 4/5/2025 at 9:28 am, the Human Resources Director revealed that the last day the previous Social Services Director worked at the facility was on February 28, 2025, and there had not been any person working in the capacity of the Social Worker in the facility since that day. In an interview on 4/5/2025 at 1:28 pm, the Administrator revealed that she was aware the facility had not employed a qualified Social Service Worker since February 28, 2025. In an interview on 4/5/2025 at 1:45 pm, the Building Manager revealed that he was unaware that the facility did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of the facility-provided document titled CNA/STNA (Certified Nursing Assistant/State Tested Nursing Assistant), the facility failed to provide the required in-service training for the CNAs employed by the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility-provided document titled, CNA/STNA, dated 11/2023, revealed the Specific Educational/Vocational Requirements section included, Must attend a minimum of 12 continuing education programs provided by the center in order to maintain certification. During an interview on 4/4/2025 at 2:30 pm, the Human Resource Director (HRD) revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for submitting CNA in-service hours to the State Agency to determine compliance. She further stated the DON had not submitted the 2024 in-service hours. During an interview on 4/5/2025 at 10:15 am, the HRD stated she had contacted the State Agency, and the 2024 CNA training hours had not been received by the agency.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold, the facility failed to provide the resident or representative with written information that included the duration of the bed hold policy and the reserve payment amount at the time of transfer to an acute care hospital for one of three residents (R) (R30) reviewed. This failure had the potential to place R30 at risk of denial of re-admission and loss of their room following hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold, dated 12/1/2014, revealed the Policy section included, All residents are given the option of reserving their bed when leaving the facility with the intent to return. A Bed Hold Authorization Form should be completed and signed by the resident/responsible party each time a resident leaves the facility. The Procedure section included, . 2. Bed Hold Policy and Bed Hold Authorization Form: All residents/responsible parties are given a copy of the State Specific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen, Administration-Nasal Canula, the facility failed to follow a physician order for oxygen (O2) therapy for one of 11 residents (R) (R1) receiving O2 therapy. The deficient practice had the potential to place R1 at risk of medical complications and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen, Administration-Nasal Canula, dated October 2023, revealed the Procedure section included, 1. Check the resident's clinical record for the physician's order. 5. Turn the flow meter to the ordered flow rate. Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure, unspecified asthma, other specified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $6,500 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
• $10,301 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-17 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REGIONAL HEALTH PROPERTIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $400K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA