No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brio of Johnston, LLC

6901 Peckham Street, Johnston, IA 50131 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 36 certified beds · (515) 253-2501 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (515) 253-2501 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$6,923 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • the CMS record shows $6,923 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-14)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
101 SE Destination Dr · (515) 986-4524 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2150 E 1st St · (515) 986-3657 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.4 mi
2055 E 1st St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10325 Catalina Dr · (515) 727-8091 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8701 Lyndhurst Dr · (319) 939-6788

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.4%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury12.5%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.6%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.8%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.3%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.7%19.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%73.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.1%20.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%13.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.411.491.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.472.081.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 185 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

70.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF70.0%CMS range 62.2–74.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.6%CMS range 6.3–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.7–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.661.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.00
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
55.1%
Total nursing turnover
73.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 34.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy review and Pharmacist interview, the facility failed to assure narcotic medication was in a secure location and not accessible to a dependent resident resulting in the possible ingestion of up to 18 Hydrocodone/APAP (Tylenol) 5-325 milligrams (MG) unsupervised in less than 24 hours for 1 of 1 residents with a history of drug seeking behavior (Resident #1). This failure resulted in 72 hours of monitoring of Resident #1 causing an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health, safety and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the IJ that began on April 27,2023 on September 13, 2023 at 4:30 PM. The facility staff removed the IJ on April 28, 2023 through the following actions: a. All team members from all departments will be educated as they come on for shifts starting immediately, including agency started 4/28/23 and ongoing. b. Daily huddles and shift to shift huddles- educate and obtain signatures with dates. Started 5/10/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to protect residents from accident or hazards by transferring residents in a wheelchair without foot pedals for 3 out of 12 residents observed in wheelchairs (Residents #26, #31, and #29). The facility reported a census of 34.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 3/2/26 revealed Resident #29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS reported Resident #29 utilized a wheelchair and required staff assistance to operate. During an observation on 4/6/26 at 12:55 PM, Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), pushed Resident #29 from the dining area to the common area without securing their feet on the attached foot pedals. Resident #29's feet dangled between the two pedals. 2. The MDS Assessment completed on 3/13/26 revealed Resident #26 had a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #26 didn't use a wheelchair for ambulation but walked with staff supervision. The Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, manufacturer's recommendation and staff interview, the facility failed to administer insulin utilizing an insulin pen as recommended for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin administration (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Resident #4's Physician Orders included an order dated 1/27/26 to inject 20 units of Basaglar KwikPen insulin subcutaneously daily. On 4/8/26 at 9:15AM, observed Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), inject 20 units of insulin into Resident #4's abdomen utilizing the Basaglar KwikPen. After the injection, Staff A removed the insulin pen prior to waiting a minimum of 5 seconds. Following the removal of the insulin pen, when asked how long the pen is to remain in place following the injection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to securely store resident medications for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 34. Findings include:1. Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating severely impaired cognition. On 4/6/26 at 12:45 PM, on the Chronic Confusion or Dementing Illness (CCDI) unit, observed Resident #29's medication drawer wasn't securely locked. The drawer opened easily and contained Resident #29's medication administration cards.2. On 4/6/26 at 2:45 PM, on the CCDI unit, observed Resident #19's medication drawer wasn't securely locked. The drawer opened easily and contained Resident #19's inhaler and nebulizer medications.During an interview on 4/6/26 at 3:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) witnessed and acknowledged the unlocked drawers in Resident #19 and Resident #29's rooms. The DON explained medication drawers shouldn't stay unlocked. If a drawer lock broke, the staff should move…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and the 2022 Food Code United States (U.S.) Food & Drug Administration (FDA), the facility failed to protect food from contamination during preparation as evidenced by 3 observed instances of improper glove use and potential cross-contamination. The facility reported a census of 34 residents.Findings include: On 4/8/26 at 10:30 AM: observed Staff B, Cook, preparing the pureed meals for lunch. Staff B removed lasagna from the oven with gloved hands. Without performing changing their gloves or performing hand hygiene, Staff B completed the following:Placed three servings of lasagna in the blender and added a piece of garlic bread to the lasagna with their left gloved hand.Attempted to pureed the lasagna in the blender, which cracked. Staff B wiped the side of the blender off with their right gloved hand.Transferred the pureed lasagna to a second blender and added one piece of garlic bread with their left gloved hand.On 4/8/26 at 12:13 PM: observed Staff B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to apply infection control practices during wound care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 34. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 3/2/26 revealed Resident #29 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses include non-Alzheimer's dementia and stroke. The Care Plan, last revised on 4/6/26, reported Resident #29 developed an unstageable pressure injury (a deep wound where the base is completely hidden by dead tissue) to the right heel. During an observation on 4/8/26 at 10:00 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse, entered Resident #29's room to initiate wound cares and immediately put on a gown and gloves. Hand hygiene was not observed before putting on gloves. After the old, soiled dressing was removed, Staff F cleansed the right heel, as ordered, and began to apply the new dressing. Staff F realized the dressing was not dated and placed Resident #29's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on electronic health record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to document on the Behavior Assessment Record, as ordered, behaviors related to psychotropic medication use (drugs which alter a person's mental state, emotions, or behavior) for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #17, #24, and #25). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/6/25, revealed Resident #17 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the MDS include Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, and depression. The MDS listed the use of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic medication. Summary of Physician Orders for Resident #17, obtained on 3/13/25, listed orders for Divalproex (anticonvulsant used as a mood stabilizer) 125 mg tablet two times daily, Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg tablet daily and Sertraline (antidepressant) 50 mg tablet daily. The Physician Orders direct staff to Monitor and document for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to securely store resident medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 3/10/25 at approximately 10:00 AM, on the Chronic Confusion or Dementing Illness (CCDI) Unit, the medication drawer in Resident #18's room was not securely locked and was easily opened. The unsecured drawer was full of Resident #18's medications. During an interview on 3/10/25 at 10:05 AM, the Director of Nursing, DON, witnessed and acknowledged the unlocked drawer. The DON removed the medications and placed them in another drawer that was securely locked. The DON stated medication drawers are to be locked when actively filled with medications and supplies. The policy Medication Administration, Storage, Disposal, and Nurse Review, revised 09/2020, stated all prescription medications must be kept in a locked cabinet.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the garden gate closed securely allowing 2 residents to leave the garden unnoticed. (Resident#1 and #2) The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings Include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnosis including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease and hypertension (high blood pressure). The MDS documented that the resident was independent with walking. The Care Plan for Resident #1 included a focus area of elopement risk/wanderer related to history of attempts to leave the facility and impaired safety awareness dated 5/2/24. The Care Plan interventions included use of wander guard, provide structured activities, redirect/distract when wandering and provide an assortment of nuts/bolts/washers for resident to sort. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to follow a physician's order for one (Resident #26) of twelve residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #26 dated 4/5/24, included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), urinary tract infection in last 30 days, and anxiety disorder. The MDS identified the resident required partial to substantial assistance for transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident's Order Summary Report dated 4/24/24 documented the following current physician orders: 1. Clonidine (blood pressure medication) 0.1milligrams (mg) every 6 hours as need (PRN) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) (top number of BP) greater than 160 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (lower number of BP) greater than 100 starting 4/1/24. 2. Check BP every 6 hours and administer PRN clonidine per parameters every 6 hours related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on document review and staff interview the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility reported a census of 33. Findings include: Review of facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report (staffing numbers reported to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) for the fiscal quarter of 2024 (October 1, 2023-December 31, 2023) identified a No RN hours trigger for 11/12, 12/9, 12/10, 12/23, and 12/24/23. Review of facility's schedule for the following dates revealed no RN scheduled to work: 11/12, 12/9, 12/10, 12/23, and 12/24/23. Interview on 4/23/24 at 2:42 PM, the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have 8 hours of RN coverage on the days reported on the PBJ report of 11/12,12/9, 12/10, 12/23, and 12/24/23. The Administrator stated there was a RN on call but not in the facility. The Administrator stated they do not have a policy for RN coverage that they follow the federal regulations for RN coverage 8 hours a day and her expectation for RN coverage 8 hours a day/7 days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure staff completed appropriate hand hygiene and glove usage prior to incontinence care for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #26) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings Include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #26, dated 4/5/24, included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), urinary tract infection in last 30 days, and anxiety disorder. The MDS identified the resident required partial to substantial assistance for transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 04/24/24 at 1:32 PM, Staff B, Certified Nurse Aide entered room to assist Resident #26 during toileting. Staff B washed hands, applied gloves, removed the resident's shoes and pants, applied a new attend, reapplied the resident's shoes, touched the dirty trash bag, and with the same gloves on proceeded to complete peri care on the resident. After cares completed, Staff B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$6,923 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $6,923 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WESLEYLIFE — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WESLEYLIFEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/26/2018
ALBERTSON, KERMITIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
GILROY, ABBEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
HOEKSEMA, NICOLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2021
RASMUSSEN, CHADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
RUCH, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2003
STOUT, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
TAYLOR, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
WATSON, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
FLANAGAN, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
KRETZINGER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/27/2007
WESLEY RETIREMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/26/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-90.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$681K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 6%Medicare 16%Other / private 78%

This home reported $681K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$809per resident / day
operating cost
$24,580per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$424per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165624. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next