Serenity Transitional Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Hoyer lift manual review, interview, and review of the facility's investigation report, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident safety during Hoyer lift transfers. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #174) whose record was reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #174 when a proper Hoyer lift transfer was not provided. Findings include: Joerns Hoyer User Instruction Manual undated, documented under Warnings, always plan your lifting operations before commencing. Resident #174 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. On 7/21/24 at 6:26 PM, Resident #174 fell out of a Hoyer lift during transfer resulting in left superior and inferior pubic fractures. On 4/30/25 at 2:15 PM, the DON stated during the Hoyer lift process with Resident #174 on 7/21/24, one of the Hoyer lift legs became stuck under the closet door causing a sling strap webbing loop to slip off one of the Hoyer lift 6 point loop…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#73, #77, and #79) observed for dignity. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience embarrassment and low feelings of self-worth. Findings include: The facility's Nursing Facility Services and admission Agreement dated 5/14/24, documented on page 24, to protect your right to be treated with dignity and respect include, it is our policy to provide the kind of care to our residents that will maintain and enhance their dignity, individuality, and quality of life. Resident #73 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including multiple fractured ribs and diabetes. On 6/22/26 at 12:07 PM, observed Resident #73 with his hospital name band on his wrist. Resident #73 stated he had recently been at the hospital before coming to this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 4 of 4 residents (#4, #10, #19, and #44) reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when their medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include:a) Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including post-laminectomy syndrome (PLS) (a condition where a patient experiences persistent, new, or recurring back and/or leg pain following spinal surgery) and diabetes.On 6/22/26 at 11:52 AM, Resident #4's medical record documented the following related to bowel care within the last 45 days.- No documented BM from 5/29/26 to 6/7/26- No documented BM from 6/8/26 to 6/11/26- No documented BM from 6/19/26 to 6/23/26Resident #4's medication administration record had no documentation of nursing intervention for BM related issues for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment when staff did not offer or encourage residents hand hygiene prior to meals and follow proper cleaning of medical equipment and handling of linens. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy dated 12/11/25, documented wash hands with soap and water whenever they are visible dirty, before eating, and after using the restroom. The facility's Glucometer Disinfection policy, revision date 12/11/25, documented the glucometers will be cleaned and disinfected after each used and according to manufacturer's instructions regardless of whether they are intended for single resident or multiple resident use. The Quintet AC Blood Glucose Meter Owner's Manual documented: Cleaning and Disinfecting frequency: after each use. 1. Thoroughly wipe the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's preference for bathing schedule was honored. This was true for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for choices. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience a decreased sense of well-being, lack of self-worth, and frustration when their preference for bathing was not accommodated. Findings include:The facility's Resident Shower policy revision date 12/31/25, documented residents would be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility 7/22/25, with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia and chronic kidney disease.Resident #5's care plan documented that she required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathing.Resident #5's task form documented she was to receive showers on Tuesdays and Fridays on the day shift.On 6/22/26 at 9:40 AM, Resident #5 stated she usually only gets one shower a week, and would like two showers a week.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 day use. This was true for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #4) reviewed for psychotropic medication use. This failure created the potential for residents to be subjected to unnecessary psychotropic medication use. Findings include:The facility's Nursing Facility Services and admission Agreement dated 5/14/24, documented on page 24, to protect your right to be treated with dignity and respect include, we will avoid using physical restraints or psychoactive drugs (chemical restraints) except as required to treat a resident's medical symptoms on a temporary basis.The facility's Use of Psychotropic Medication(s) policy dated 3/3/25, documented psychotropic medications used on a PRN basis must have a diagnosed specific condition and indication for the PRN use documented in the resident's medical record and is subject to the limitations as noted: PRN orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer and bed hold policy was provided to the resident or their representative when residents were transferred to the hospital. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial distress if residents and their representatives were not made aware of or able to exercise their rights related to transfers from the facility. Findings include:The facility's Bed Hold Notice policy dated 3/3/25, documented in the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policies to the resident and/or the resident representative within 24 hours or next business day. The facility will keep a signed and dated copy of the bed-hold notice information given to the resident and/or resident representative in the resident's file and/or medical record.Resident #12 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, staff interview, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident's baseline care plan to the resident or his/her representative for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #73) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed and having input in their care plan. Findings include:The facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, dated 12/24/25, documented 5. A supervising nurse or MDS nurse/designee is responsible for providing the written summary of the baseline care plan to the resident and representative. This will be provided by completion of the comprehensive care plan. 6. The person providing the written summary of the baseline care plan shall: a. Obtain a signature from the resident/representative to verify that the summary was provided.Resident #73 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including multiple fractured ribs and diabetes.Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintained a person-centered comprehensive care plan. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #76) whose record was reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This created the potential for harm when staff were not informed of person-centered care and treatment interventions. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Plans policy, date reviewed 12/24/25, documented 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis (the narrowing of the spaces within the spine), anxiety, and acute respiratory failure. On 6/22/26 at 2:06 PM, Resident #76's care plan had not documented his oxygen interventions. On 6/22/26 at 2:07 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were given treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) reviewed for decline in ADLs without services. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased range of motion, functional ability, and decreased quality of life. Findings include:The facility's Restorative Nursing Programs dated 12/20/24, documented restorative aides will implement the plan for a designated length of time, performing the activities, and documenting on the Restorative Aide Documentation Form.On 6/23/26 at 12:33 PM, Resident #12's care plan documented Restorative Nursing Program to provide cues for me to move through tolerated ROM of ALL MAJOR JOINTS. Sci-fit exercise x15 minutes on level 1-2 resistance. x6 to 7 days per week. On 6/23/26 at 11:01 AM, Resident #12's medical record documented restorative services were only provided on 6/15/26, 6/20/26 and 6/21/26, with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that parenteral/IV fluids were administered consistently with professional standards of practice. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for IV therapy. Findings include:The facility's Intravenous Therapy policy revision date 12/29/25, documented:12. A doctor's order is obtained before starting IV therapy.13. IV sites are checked every shift or as per facility protocol and PRN for sign and symptoms of infection or inflammation.15. IV documentation is recorded in the nurse's notes and/or Medication Administration Record.Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and acute respiratory failure.Resident #42's physician's order dated 6/19/26 at 8:45 AM, documented Normal Saline Flush Intravenous Solution 0.9 % (Sodium Chloride Flush). Use 1 liter intravenously one time only for acute chronic kidney injury for 1 Day infuse over 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TANABELL HEALTH SERVICES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $852K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID