Meadows of Corsicana, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 44.8 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not store, cook, and give out food in a safe and clean way for 1 of 1 kitchen for kitchen task.The facility failed to ensure food safety by not consistently monitoring, discarding, labeling, and storing food items in the refrigerator and storage areas.These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: In the observation on 9/30/2025 9:10AM of the initial walk through of kitchen revealed the following: -Dried egg noodles with open date 6/1/2025 and expiration date 9/1/2025-Dried ziti noodles with open date of 6/2/2025 expiration date 9/2/2025-Dried spaghetti in a plastic bag that was not sealed properly. In the walk-in refrigerator: -A personal size of pudding was fully covered in a bowl. There was no label indicating what the dish contained, the date it was prepared, or the date it should be consumed by. -A plastic storage container of leftover chicken noodle soup. The container was not labeled with its…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program for 6 (Resident #56, Resident #47, Resident #51, Resident #21, Resident #35 and Resident #8) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA D did not conduct hand hygiene between residents (Resident #56, Resident #47, Resident #51, Resident #21, and Resident #35) when passing hallway lunch trays. 2. CNA E did not conduct hand hygiene and glove change when performing peri-care when going from front to back and pulled adult wipes from the package with soiled gloves when providing peri-care for Resident #8. These failures could place the residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection and re-hospitalization. Findings included: Observation on 09/30/25 at 12:16 PM of hallway lunch tray pass with CNA D, said she did not conduct hand hygiene when passing a lunch tray to Resident #47's room. CNA D then took a lunch tray to Resident #56's room, and no hand hygiene was conducted.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure that drugs are stored properly, and only authorized persons have access for 1 of 4 medication carts (MC A) reviewed for drug storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure the F-hall medication cart was locked and medications were secured and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included:Observation of F-hall on 09/30/2025 at 9:05 a.m., revealed MC A was unattended and unlocked. LVN A was in room F50. The medication cart was partially in front of room F50. The locking mechanism was protruding outward on the medication cart. The state surveyor opened drawers and captured pictures. LVN A was in the room with a resident with the privacy curtain pulled closed. During an interview on 09/30/2025 at 9:10am, LVN A stated she was trained on medication storage. She said the policy was to make sure the narcotics were locked, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: The facility failed to ensure expired milk in the walk-in refrigerator was discarded in a timely manner. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: In an observation on 8/26/24 at 10:02 AM, revealed one-gallon of milk that was half-filled had best-by date of 8/19/24 in the facility's walk- in refrigerator. In an interview with the Dietary Manager on 8/26/24 at 10:06 AM, revealed she conducted morning walk-in rounds every Monday to check for expired products since new inventory was delivered every Tuesday. She further added she had forgotten to conduct her morning rounds on Monday, 8/26/24. She stated that the use-by date on the milk gallon was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had physician's orders for the resident's immediate care for one (Resident #3) of six residents observed for physician orders for oxygen. The facility failed to provide physician orders for Resident #3, while resident was on oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services that could result to worsen condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 08/27/2024 reflected that resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included pleural effusion (fluid accumulation around the lungs), muscle weakness, dyspnea (the sensation of difficult or uncomfortable breathing), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident #3's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #3 had an intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15. Review of Resident #3's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #18) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 had her fingernails and facial hair trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #18 was an [AGE] year-old female with initial admission date to the facility on 1/17/2019. Resident #18's relevant diagnoses included Anemia, Hypertension, Renal insufficiency, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, senile degradation of brain, severe stage bilateral Glaucoma. Resident #18 needed substantial assistance for bathing and needed setup assistance with ADLs. Resident #18 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #42) of six residents observed for infection control. CNA B failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes, and when she went from dirty to clean during incontinence care for Resident #42. These failures placed residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet dated 08/27/2024 reflected she was [AGE] years old female. She was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She was admitted with the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hypertension (high blood pressure), morbid obesity. Review of Resident#42's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident#42 had an intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property when Housekeeper A charged Resident #1 $10 for gas to purchase items from the store. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation which could lead to further exploitation of other residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/22/23, documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 04/12/23 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle tissue), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (systolic or diastolic heart failure, conduction arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, and increase risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for enteral nutrition (Resident #2). LVN A failed to follow the physician orders for enteral feedings on 09/07/23 at 6:00pm (a form of nutrition that is delivered into the digestive system as a liquid form via the feeding tube) for Resident #2. This failure could affect residents receiving enteral nutrition and hydration by placing them at risk of health complications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2 face sheet dated 09/21/23, documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and communicating) , dysphagia oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 3 of 17 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to repair deep scratches that exposed the sheetrock on the wall behind the head of the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility failed to repair crater-like damage on the wall by the recliner in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility failed to repair multiple dark reddish stains were on the wall above the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. These failures could place the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean well-kept environment. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 06/26/2023 at 8:03 AM, Resident #28 was in her bed, in room [ROOM NUMBER], an observation was made of deep scratches that exposed the sheetrock on the wall behind Resident #28's head of the bed. Resident #28 said she was unable to see the deep scratches because she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TANABELL HEALTH SERVICES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX