No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Integrity Hc Of Anna

315 South Brady Mill Road, Anna, IL 62906 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (618) 833-6343 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$353,579 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $353,579 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
608 S Main St · (618) 833-7980 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
745 E Vienna St · (618) 833-7236 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
515 E Vienna St · (618) 833-3500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.4%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.1%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms98.2%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened34.8%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.9%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.2%91.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.8%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.8%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.4%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.3%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.0%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.092.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.862.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
12.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 12.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.5%CMS range 22.8–41.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.3–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge12.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge12.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified86.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.4–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.461.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
67.7%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 63.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.63 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.77 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-25)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to ensure a resident's highest level of practicable functioning for 1 (R4) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 20. This failure resulted in R4 not receiving timely follow-up and treatment of known suspicious masses which have since metastasized. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 1/30/26 when the facility failed to follow through with referrals to an outside provider. V1 (Administrator), V3 (Senior Regional Administrator), and V7 (Regional Director of Clinical Services) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 4/9/26 at 11:25 AM. The immediacy was removed on 4/9/26, but non-compliance remained at a Level Two because time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of in-service training. Findings include: R4's admission Record documented an admission date of 8/12/25 and included diagnoses of chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired residents were adequately supervised and failed to implement interventions to prevent elopement for 2 (R1, R2) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 exiting the facility on 2 occasions, accompanied by R2 on one of those occasions, without staff knowledge. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 10/26/25 when the facility failed to prevent R1 from exiting the facility without staff knowledge and failed to put effective interventions in place to prevent a second occurrence on 3/6/26 when R1 and R2 exited the facility without staff knowledge. V3 (Senior Regional Administrator), V22 (Chief Executive Officer/CEO), and V7 (Regional Director of Clinical Services) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/19/26 at 3:24 PM. The immediacy for both examples was removed on 3/20/26, but non-compliance remained at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety of 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 20. This failure resulted in R5 falling out of his wheelchair when the van made a sudden stop, resulting in R5 sustaining fractured ribs and clavicle.This past non-compliance occurred between 2/13/26 and 2/16/26.Findings Include:R5's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation.R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R5 has a Brief Interview Mental Status Report score of 13, indicating R5 is cognitively intact.R5's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, ADLs: (R5) has limited physical mobility r/t (related to) COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and being on oxygen. Date Initiated: 01/14/2026. This same Focus area includes the Intervention of, Ambulation: (R5) requires a wheelchair to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a fall during transport and failed to implement interventions to prevent future falls for 3 (R11, R18, R49) of 6 residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 52. This failure caused R18 to fall backwards in her wheelchair while being transported in a facility van requiring R18 to be taken to the emergency room, given pain mediciation, suffering a skin tear, a knot to the head, bruising, and pain to the back and shoulders. Findings Include: 1.R18's admission record documents an admission date of 09/25/24 with diagnoses including: acute on chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, seizures, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and chronic pain syndrome. R18's Minimum Data Set,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide supplements or provide supplements in an accessible manner for 2 (R8 and R16) of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 52. This failure further contributes to continued harm to R16, who has a documented history of severe weight loss.Findings include: 1.R16's admission record documents an admission date of 01/26/22 with diagnoses including: laceration without foreign body of right great toe without damage to nail, rhabdomyolysis, muscle weakness, flaccid neuropathic bladder, and anxiety disorder. R16's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a brief interview of mental status of 04 indicating severely impaired. Section GG for eating documents setup or clean-up assistance. R16's order summary report documents a dietary order of: regular diet, mechanical soft texture, thin liquids consistency, health shake three times a day, nutritional ice cream two times a day and likes fruit with an order date of 07/22/24 with no end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity by not providing incontinence products for 4 of 6 residents (R3, R5, R6 and R7) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 16. This failure resulted in R3, R5, and R7 feeling embarrassed after incontinence episodes. The findings include: 1. R3's admission record dated 06/06/25, documents an admission date of 03/07/22 to the facility with diagnoses in part of pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of other site stage 3, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of buttock with unspecified severity. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicates moderately impaired cognition. Section GG documents that R3 is dependent for toileting. Section H documents R3 is occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. R3's Care Plan documents a focus area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent future falls for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 16. This failure resulted in R2 falling and sustaining a laceration on his face requiring sutures. Findings include: R2's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 12/10/20 and a discharge date of 5/23/25 with diagnoses including in part Alzheimer's disease, legal blindness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and lack of coordination. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating that R2 is rarely/never understood. R2's most recent Care Plan documents a focus area of Falls: R2 is at risk for falls related to severely impaired mobility and very poor safety awareness with an initiation date of 12/16/20. Interventions documented include R2 is to be promptly laid down after all meals to reduce sleeping in his wheelchair, thus reducing risk of fall dated 2/6/25, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed identify, evaluate and intervene to prevent or improve a resident with significant weight loss's nutritional status in 1 (R42) of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 30. This failure resulted in R1 continuing to lose weight over the next 9 months. The findings include: R42's admission record notes he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The same admission record lists some of his diagnoses as mild protein- calorie malnutrition, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms. R42's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/28/24 note that R42 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 08 which indicates R42 has moderate cognitive impairment. Section K of the same MDS note that R42 has not had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or greater that a 10% weight loss in 6 months. Section K also notes that R42 has had no nutritional approaches provided while a resident at the facility. R42's Care Plan has a focus area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and implement treatment and interventions for pressure ulcers for 2 (R1, R2) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 developing a stage III pressure ulcer area to her left buttock. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Sepsis, Unspecified Organism, Urinary Tract Infection, Site not specified, Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified, Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities, Unspecified Glaucoma, Acute Embolism, and thrombosis of superior vena cava. R1's Face Sheet documents a discharge date from the facility on 3/25/24. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating that R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, of the same MDS documents that R1 is dependent with all activities of daily living. R1's hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for self-injurious behaviors and obtain necessary behavioral health services for 1 (R1) of 1 resident reviewed for behavioral health in a sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 developing cellulitis to a self-inflicted wound to the chest wall. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified, and Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities. R1's Face Sheet documents a discharge date from the facility of 3/25/24. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1's Functional Abilities and Goals as Dependent with all activities of daily living. R1's baseline care plan, dated 2/22/24, the section Active diagnoses contributing to admission is left blank. There is no documentation of R1's self-injurious behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient amount of staff to meet the needs of the residents in a timely manner. These failures have the potential to affect all 67 residents living in the facility. Findings include:1. R4's admission Record documented an admission date of 8/12/25 and included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, primary hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, other fatigue, abnormal findings on diagnostic imaging of lung, and bilateral hearing loss. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R4's Order Summary Report documents a referral to oncology due to abnormal results from CT (Computed Tomography, diagnostic imaging procedure) of the abdomen and abnormal results of x-ray of left shoulder with an order date of 1/30/26, stat referral to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Quality Assurance meetings were held and failed to ensure the Medical Director attended the Quality Assurance meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:The facility's Quality Assurance Meeting Sign-in List and Minutes dated 1/23/25, 3/13/25, 7/30/25, and 1/9/26 did not document a signature from the facility's medical director affirming the medical director's attendance. On 3/24/26 at 11:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated they did not have a QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting for the 4th quarter in 2025. V1 stated they only had one in January 2025, March 2025, and July 2025 in 2025. V1 stated the medical director has never attended the QAPI meetings. On 4/13/26 at 3:00 PM, V1 stated they do not have a policy related to quarterly quality assurance meetings, but they are to be held quarterly, and the medical director should be in attendance. The facility Daily Census report dated 3/17/26 documented there were 67…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained on effective communications. This has the potential to affect all 67 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include:On 3/24/26 at 11:00 AM, staff training in-services provided to this surveyor by V1 (Administrator) were reviewed. Training subjects that were missing included communication, behavioral health, and nursing aide annual required training. On 3/24/26 at 12:50 PM, V7 (Regional Director of Clinical Services) stated he was only able to find staff training on QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement), infection control, resident rights, and abuse. V7 stated he was unable to find any staff training on communication, compliance and ethics, behavioral health, and any nursing aide required training. On 3/24/26 at 1:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the staff have not been trained on communication, behavioral health, and the nurses' aides have not received their required number of annual training hours. V1 stated she wasn't aware those were required. On 4/13/26 at 3:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents with timely ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for diabetic toenail care and shaving for 5 of 5 residents (R4, R11, R17, R18, R25) reviewed for ADL assistance in a sample of 25. Findings include: 1. R4's admission Record documented an admission date of 8/12/25 and included diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, other fatigue, and bilateral hearing loss. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Under Functional Goals and Abilities, this MDS documents R4 needs supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene. R4's Care Plan documents an ADL self-care performance deficit related to chronic disease process. R4's Order Summary Report documents may see podiatrist with an order date of 8/12/25. On 4/16/26 at 11:01 AM, V4 (License Practical Nurse/LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to pass water to 4 of 4 residents (R4, R7, R21, R22) reviewed for hydration in a sample of 25. Findings include:1. R4's admission Record documented an admission date of 8/12/25 and included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, primary hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R4's Order Summary Report documents Furosemide oral tablet 20 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth in the morning related to primary hypertension. R4's Care Plan documents R4 has potential/actual impairment to skin integrity related to fragile skin (initiated 8/22/25) with a corresponding intervention to encourage good nutrition and hydration to promote healthier skin (initiated 8/22/25). On 3/19/29 at 9:29 AM, R4 did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to answer call lights in such a manner to promote resident dignity and provide timely assistance for 2 of 2 residents (R6 and R24) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 25. Findings include:1. R24's admission Record documented an admission date of 7/16/25 and included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and essential tremors. R24's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R24's Care Plan documents R24 is a fall risk (initiated 8/22/25) and included corresponding interventions to be sure R24's call light is within reach and encourage R24 to use it for assistance as needed. R24 needs prompt response to all requests for assistance (initiated 8/22/25). On 3/31/26 at 1:35 PM, R24's call light was observed to be already activated at 1:35 PM. Continuous observation revealed the call light to be answered by V6 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of an elopement event for 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for notifications in a sample of 25. Findings include:1. R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 9/5/25 and included diagnoses of dementia, osteoarthritis of knee, and hypertension. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating R1's cognition is severely impaired. Section E of this same MDS assessment, titled Wandering-Presence and Frequency documents, this behavior occurred daily. R1's document titled Risk Management dated 3/6/26 at 11:30 AM documents under Nursing Description resident noted to be up the street pushing her friend to go look at cemetery, no s/s (signs/symptoms) of injury noted, resident brought back to facility in company van. Under Resident Description, it documents I was just going to show her my Mom and Dad's grave and under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that includes interventions to effectively communicate with a hearing-impaired resident for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 25.Findings include:R4's admission Record documents an admission date of 8/12/25 with included diagnoses of bilateral hearing loss.R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R4 has moderate cognitive impairment. Section B documents R4's hearing is highly impaired, absence of useful hearing and under ability to understand others it documents R4 usually understands, misses some part/intent of message but comprehends most conversation.R4's Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section B that R4's hearing is highly impaired, absence of useful hearing and under ability to understand others it documents R4 usually understands, misses some part/intent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was kept clean for 4 of 5 (R2, R3, R13, and R15) residents reviewed for safe and home like environment in the sample of 20. Findings Include: 1.R2's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and fatigue.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating a moderate cognitive deficit.R2's current Care Plan does not address R2's activities of daily living (ADL) status in a Focus area or intervention.On 2/25/26 at 9:45 AM, R2 stated the facility staff clean, ok. R2 stated later in the day the room does not get clean. R2 stated someone made a mess on the commode in the shared bathroom last night, he asked an unknown staff member to clean it and was told it wasn't their job.On 2/25/26 at 9:48 AM, R3 who was alert to person, place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were honored for 5 of 5 (R3, R4, R12, R13, and R18) residents reviewed for preferences in the sample of 20.Findings Include: 1.R4's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease, spondylolysis, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit.R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, indicating R4 has a moderate cognitive deficit.R4's Order Summary Report dated 2/26/26 includes the following physician order with a start date of 11/21/25, NCS (No Concentrated Sweets) diet Mechanical soft texture, Thins Liquids consistency, SC (super cereal) at breakfast, Health Shakes TID (three times daily) with meals. Fortified foods TID for diet.R4's current Care Plan Report documents a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the food was served at a safe temperature. This has the potential to affect all 63 residents currently residing at the facility.Findings Include: The facility Daily Census dated 2/24/26 documents 63 residents currently reside at the facility.R13's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R13 was admitted to the facility on with diagnoses that include diabetes, morbid obesity, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.R13's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14, indicating she is cognitively intact.R13's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, Nutritional: She is on a NAS (no added salt), regular texture, thin liquids, two liter fluid restriction. She also is given protein supplement BID (twice daily). Date Initiated: 08/12/2025. This Focus area includes the intervention of, Prepare/serve the resident's nutritional diet as ordered. Date Initiated: 08/12/2025.On 2/26/26 at 12:43 PM, R13 stated the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure they maintained linens to fit specialty mattresses for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 20.Findings Include: R1's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and morbid obesity.R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating she is cognitively intact.R1's current Care Plan does not address R1's linens/mattress in a Focus area or Intervention.On 2/25/26 at 9:40 AM, R1 was sitting in her wheelchair near her bed. Her bed had a flat sheet on the mattress that was partially tucked in under the mattress. There was no fitted sheet on the mattress, and the flat sheet was only partially covering it. R1 stated, They don't have sheets for my bed. R1 stated they have two sets that fit her mattress, and they can't always find…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure supplements were served as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 (R4) residents reviewed for nutritional supplements in the sample of 20. Findings Include:R4's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease, spondylolysis, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit.R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, indicating R4 has a moderate cognitive deficit.R4's Order Summary Report dated 2/26/26 includes the following physician order with a start date of 11/21/25, NCS (No Concentrated Sweets) diet Mechanical soft texture, Thins Liquids consistency, SC (super cereal) at breakfast, Health Shakes TID (three times daily) with meals. Fortified foods TID for diet.R4's current Care Plan Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure diets were served in the consistency ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 (R4) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 20.Findings Include: R4's admission Record with a print date of 2/26/26 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease, spondylolysis, repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit.R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, indicating R4 has a moderate cognitive deficit.R4's Order Summary Report dated 2/26/26 includes the following physician order with a start date of 11/21/25, NCS (No Concentrated Sweets) diet Mechanical soft texture, Thins Liquids consistency, SC (super cereal) at breakfast, Health Shakes TID (three times daily) with meals. Fortified foods TID for diet.R4's current Care Plan Report documents a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement intervention to promote safety and healing of a diabetic ulcer for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for wounds in a sample of 7. The findings include:R1's admission Record documents an admission date of 1/26/2025 and documents that R1 was discharged to an acute care hospital on 1/22/26. This admission Record documents diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute Respiratory Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of other parts of Right Foot with Fat Layer Exposed, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Lymphedema, Congestive Heart Failure, and Hypothyroidism. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG documents R1 requires Partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathing, Substantial/maximal assistance with rolling left to right to back while in bed, sitting to lying, lying to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions for preventing deterioration of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for wounds in a sample of 7. The findings include:R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 8/10/2020 and includes diagnoses of Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, Pressure Ulcer of Right Buttocks (7/2/2025), Anemia, Hypertension, Schizoaffective Disorder, Psychosis, Vitamin D Deficiency, Hyperlipidemia, Vascular Dementia, Muscle Weakness, and Cognition Communication Deficit.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in section C, Cognitive Patterns, that R2 is rarely/never understood. There was no Brief Interview for Mental Status completed for R2. R2's cognitive skills for daily decision making is documented as severely impaired. Section GG, Functional Abilities, documents R2 is totally dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Section H, Bladder and Bowel, documents R2 is always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide a pest free environment. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents residing at the facility. 1.On 08/18/25 at 12:16PM observed R68 in the dining room she was waving her hands in the air she was trying to wave the flies away from her hair and face. R68 stated she is so tired of these flies being all over her and on her food. R68's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 07/17/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 which indicates R68 has moderately impaired cognition. On 08/18/25 at 12:18PM observed R14 sitting at the table in the dining room she had pork, au gratin potatoes, zucchini with tomatoes and frosted cake. R14 was trying to take a bite of her frosted cake and she was waving over her cake trying to get the flies off of her cake. Observed 2 flies on top of the frosting on the cake. On 08/18/25 at 12:32PM. R14 stated that she is so tired of all the flies in the dining room. R14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 4 of 4 (R11, R38, R41, and R49) residents reviewed for call lights on the sample list of 52.Findings include: 1. R11's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/6/24 with diagnoses including in part: end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and diabetes. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 08, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R11's recent Care Plan document R11 is a fall risk with an intervention documented as be sure R11's call light is within reach and encourage R11 to use it for assistance as needed. R11 needs prompt response to all requests for assistance.R11's Fall Risk Assessment fated 8/16/25 documents R11 is a high risk for potential falls. On 8/18/25 at 10:12 AM, R11 was lying in her bed sideways with legs hanging off bed and her head against the wall with her pants pulled down to her knees. R11's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to dispose of medications properly and failed to check expiration dates for 5 of 5 (R3, R7, R31, R45, and R61) residents reviewed for medication expiration and storage in the sample of 52.Findings include: 1. R7's admission record documents an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE] with diagnoses including in part: diabetes, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. On [DATE] there was an expired inhaler for R7 in the medication cart, Ventolin HFA 108 mcg/act (micrograms per actuation aerosol inhaler) 2 puffs inhaled orally every 4 hours as needed for shortness of breath, with an expiration date of 07/2025 with 177 doses left. On [DATE] at 10:11 AM, V21 (License Practical Nurse) confirmed the medication was expired and stated R7 was using that medication prior to his discharge on [DATE]. 2. On [DATE] at 8:48am, a review of the facility medication storage was done. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene while performing eating and drinking assistance for 4 (R52, R57, R8 and R68) of 6 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 52.Findings include:1. R52's admission Record documents an admission date of 6/10/2020 with the following diagnoses in part, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, Major Depressive Disorder and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease without esophagitis.R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed because resident is rarely/never understood. Section GG- Functional Abilities documents that R52 is dependent on staff for eating.R52's current Care Plan document's that R52 requires extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living.2. R57's admission Record documents an admission date of 2/23/23 with the following diagnoses in part, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease without esophagitis, unspecified hearing loss, unspecified ear, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review the facility failed to provide Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations for 4 of 5 residents (R17, R51, R59 and R66) reviewed for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations in the sample of 52. Findings include:Findings include:1. R17's Transfer/Discharge Report documents a date of birth that indicates R17 is [AGE] years old. This report also documents an admission date of 7/25/25, with the following diagnoses listed in part; acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified.R17's current complete medical record has no vaccinations listed in the immunization record or refusals of immunizations documented. 2. R51's Transfer/Discharge Report documents a date of birth that indicates R51 is [AGE] years old. This report also documents an admission date of 8/6/25, with the following diagnoses listed in part, bullous pemphigoid and essential primary hypertension.R51's complete medical record has no vaccinations listed in the immunization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement Covid-19 immunization policies and offer and/or provide Covid-19 immunizations for 4 residents of 5 residents (R17, R51, R59, and R66) reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 52. Findings include: 1. R17's Transfer/Discharge Report documents a date of birth that indicates R17 is [AGE] years old. This report also documents an admission date of 7/25/25, with the following diagnoses listed in part; acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified.R17's current complete medical record has no vaccinations listed in the immunization record or refusals of immunizations documented.2. R51's Transfer/Discharge Report documents a date of birth that indicates R51 is [AGE] years old. This report also documents an admission date of 8/6/25, with the following diagnoses listed in part, bullous pemphigoid and essential primary hypertension.R51's complete medical record has no vaccinations listed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 3 of 4 residents (R21, R35, R48) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 52. Findings include: 1.R21's admission Record documents an admission date of 7/16/25 with the following diagnoses in part, Parkinsonism, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and repeated falls. R21's only completed Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] does not document a Brief Interview for Mental Status. R21's current care plan only documents one focus area, Nutritional. On 8/20/25 at 12:31pm, R21 was observed in the dining room with a puddle under her and her jeans appeared wet. On 8/20/25 at 12:40pm, R21 was observed still sitting in the dining room with a puddle under her and wet pants. On 8/20/25 at 12:44pm, R21 was observed wheeling back to her room with her pants still wet. On 8/20/25 at 2:23pm, R21 was observed laying in her bed, still in wet pants. On 8/20/25 at 2:26pm, V4 (CNA/ Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an initial comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (R21) reviewed for assessments in a sample of 52. Findings Include: R21's Transfer/Discharge Report documents an admission date of 7/16/25 with the following diagnoses in part, Parkinsonism, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and repeated falls. R21's medical record only contains the entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], it does not document a Brief Interview for Mental Status. There was no admission assessment for R21 in R21's medical record. On 8/21/25 at 12:00pm, V1 (Administrator) stated under the assessment tab, there is a baseline assessment that should be completed by nursing on admission, and they believe that staff are mistaking this for other things. V1 stated staff have been educated. V1 stated they do not have a policy for MDS assessments. On 08/21/2025 at 2:45 PM, V8 stated that R21's entry MDS had been completed, but not her admission. V8 stated the reason R21's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan and failed to develop a plan of care for indwelling urinary catheter use for 2 of 4 residents (R11, R21) reviewed in a sample of 52. Findings include: 1. R21's Transfer/Discharge Report documents an admission date of 7/16/25 with the following diagnoses in part; Parkinsonism, major depressive disorder, anxiety and repeated falls.R21's only completed Minimum Data (MDS) Set dated 7/16/25 does not document a Brief Interview for Mental Status.R21's current care plan only documents one focus area, Nutritional.On 8/21/25 at 12:00pm, V1 (Administrator) stated the care plan for R21 that only contains one focus area is the current care plan. V1 stated under the assessment tab, there is a baseline assessment that should be completed by nursing on admission, and they believe that they are mistaking this for other things. V1 stated staff have been educated.2. R11's Transfer/Discharge Report documents an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with meal supplements, toenail care and incontinence care for 3 of 3 (R38, R48 and R50) residents reviewed for help with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) in a sample of 52. Findings include: 1.R38's admission record documents an admission date of 12/19/23 with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, overactive bladder, dementia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and iron deficiency anemia. R38's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a brief interview of mental status of 02 indicating severe cognition impairment. Section GG documents R38's eating ability as supervision or touching assistance needed. R38's order summary report documents a diet order of regular diet, mechanical soft texture, thin liquids consistency, and health shakes two times a day with an order date of 07/22/24 with no end date listed. R38's care plan documents a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation the facility failed to handle cups/glasses in a manner to prevent contamination for 2 (R38 and R48) of 6 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 52. Findings include: On 08/19/25 at 7:50 AM, V17 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) delivered R48's drinks by transferring them by the rims where the resident would drink from, after touching a wheelchair handle and her scrub pants. On 08/19/25 at 8:13 AM, V18 (CNA) transferred R38's drinks from the tray to his table by the rim, where the resident would drink from, after touching a wheelchair handle and a resident's shirt. On 08/21/25 at 2:32 PM, V12 (Dietary Manager) stated drinks should not be transferred by the rims of the glasses where the residents drink from, especially after touching any unclean surface. V12 stated, he does not know who trains the CNAs or other staff for dietary procedures.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident's needs. These failures have the potential to affect all 63 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1.R1's admission Record, dated 06/06/25 documents an admission date of 04/28/25 to the facility with diagnoses in part of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diarrhea, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and heart failure. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/05/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents that R1 is dependent for toileting, showers, and personal hygiene. R1's Care Plan dated 05/28/25 documents a focus area titled Activities: R1 is dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation and social interaction r/t (related to) limited mobility. On 06/03/25 at 10:49AM, R1 stated that sometimes it takes staff 30 minutes or more to answer his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review facility failed to maintain a clean comfortable home like environment for 5 of 5 residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11) reviewed for environment in a sample of 16. Findings include: 1. R7's admission Record documents an admission date of 5/20/25 with diagnoses including in part hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side and aphasia following cerebral infarction. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R7's cognition is intact. R11's admission Record documents an admission date of 3/27/25 with diagnosis including in part mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, anxiety, and depression. R11's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS of 15 indicating R11's cognition is intact. A facility Midnight Census Report dated 6/3/25 documents that R7 and R11 are roommates. On 6/5/25 at 10:08AM, R7 stated he has had problems with not having bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who require assistance receive a shower for 4 of 6 residents (R1, R3, R5, and R6) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living assistance in the sample of 16. Findings include: 1.R1's admission record, dated 06/06/25 documents an admission date of 04/28/25 to the facility with diagnoses in part of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diarrhea, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and heart failure. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/05/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents showers/bathing as dependent. R1's Care Plan dated 05/28/25 documents a focus area titled Activities: R1 is dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation and social interaction r/t (related to) limited mobility. On 06/05/25 at 8:30AM, R1 stated that he believes the facility is short on staff. R1 said he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that assessments were transmitted timely for 2 of 2 (R12 and R31) residents reviewed for assessments timely transmitted in a sample of 30. The Findings Include: 1. R12's face sheet documents an admission date of 12/7/21 and includes the following diagnosis: cognitive communication deficit, dementia, anxiety and weakness. R12's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) which was a quarterly documents it was completed 8/22/24. 2. R31's face sheet documents an admission date of 5/8/24 and includes the following diagnosis: cognitive communication deficit, depression, Parkinson's, and diabetes. R31's most recent MDS which was a quarterly documents it was completed 8/21/24. On 09/25/24 at 11:00 AM, V3 (MDS Coordinator) stated that the R12'S Quarterly MDS was complete by 8/22/24 when it was due but she didn't know how to transmit them until she called today to speak with her supervisor. At this same time V3 confirmed that R31's Quarterly MDS was due and completed on 8/21/24 but was submitted late also due to this error. On 9/26/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder for 3 (R37, R46, R47) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR Screening in the sample of 30. Findings Include: 1. R37's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date to the facility as 7/11/2024. Diagnoses listed on this form included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. R37's Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome dated July 8, 2024, documented No Level II Required- No SMR (Serious Mental Illness). On 9/26/2024 at 9:23 AM, V4 (Business Office Manager) stated, she does complete the PASRR screening for residents in the facility. V4 stated, R37 did not get referred for a PASRR level II evaluation because he did not have a diagnosis that would qualify for a PASRR Level II. V4 stated, it is her understanding that the dementia diagnosis overrules the unspecified psychos diagnosis. 2. R46's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date to the facility as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to meet resident needs. This failure has the potential to affect all 56 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 04/15/24 at 3:15PM, R1 On 04/15/24 at 3:15PM, R1 stated he has had to wait on several occasions to be laid down after getting back from dialysis. R1 stated that he is always so sick and very tired after he gets back from dialysis and just wants to lay down right away. R1 stated that one day last week it took staff a very long time to lay him down because they didn't have enough staff to help lay him down. R1 wasn't sure how long he had to wait, but he knows it took a very long time before they came and laid him down. R1 stated that they could use more staff at nighttime. R1's Face Sheet, dated 04/17/24, documents an admission date of 03/14/23 to the facility with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, and Arthritis. R1's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of abuse to the Administrator for 4 of 13 residents (R14, R15, R16, and R17) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 17. Findings include: On 4/16/24 at 11:40AM, V9 (Certified Nurse Assistant/ CNA) stated that the V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) has been rude and yells at R16 and R15. V9 said that R15 will touch other resident food and V11 will tell R15 to get his nasty fingers out of other residents' food. V9 said that V11 will yell at R16 to get away or move out of the way. V9 stated that she did not know who the abuse coordinator was and that she didn't know who to report abuse to. V9 said she wanted the number for public health to report the abuse to, but she said the administrator wouldn't give her the number for public health. V9 said that she wasn't aware of any other staff being verbally or physically abusive to any other resident. On 04/16/24 at 1:00PM, V7 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that V11 (LPN) has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who require assistance with transfers into bed were assisted in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in the sample of 17. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet, dated 04/17/24, documents an admission date of 03/14/23 to the facility with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, and Arthritis. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating that R1 has moderately impaired cognition. Section GG documents R1 is dependent for transfers, toileting, showers, and personal hygiene. R1's Current Care Plan, documents a focus of Skin at risk for skin complications r/t related to incontinence, potential for friction/shearing and weakness. At increased risk for further skin breakdown due to refusal of pressure relieving boots with intervention of turn and position per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete baseline care plans for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R4, R6) reviewed for assessments in a sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1'S Face Sheet documented R1 is a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses listed on this document are Sepsis, unspecified organism, Urinary Tract Infection, site unspecified, bipolar disorder, unspecified, unspecified intellectual disability, unspecified glaucoma. V13 (Physician) is listed as being R1's Primary Care Physician. The only emergency contact listed for R1 on this document is V30 (Guardian/Emergency Contact # 1). R1 was discharged on 03/25/2024, after being sent to (Local hospital) emergency room on [DATE]. R1's Physician order sheet dated 04/02/2024 documents: Clonazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for bipolar with an order date of 02/20/2024. Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for blood thinner with an order date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R4, R6) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented R1 is a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was discharged on 03/25/2024, after being sent to (Local hospital) emergency room on [DATE]. Diagnoses listed on this document are Sepsis, unspecified organism, Urinary Tract Infection, site unspecified, bipolar disorder, unspecified, unspecified intellectual disability, unspecified glaucoma. V13 (Physician) is listed as being R1's Primary Care Physician. The only emergency contact listed for R1 on this document is V30 (Guardian/Emergency Contact # 1). On 03/25/2024 during a review of R1's Electronic Medical Record the following were noted: An undated baseline admission care plan, a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a completion date of 02/27/2024 were present. A Comprehensive Care Plan had not yet been initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor for proper physical restraint use for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, R5) reviewed for restraints in a sample of 6. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified and Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities. R1's Face Sheet documents discharged from the facility on 3/25/2024. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 13, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, documents that R1 is dependent with all activities of daily living. On 3/26/2024, at 10:40 AM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated that she remembers seeing multiple scratch areas to R1's chest like she had dug into her chest. V11 stated that the staff would put socks over her hands to help keep her from scratching. On 3/27/2024, at 8:45 AM, V29 (Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) coding was completed for 3 of 4 (R1, R2 and R4) residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented R1 is a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was discharged on 3/25/2024, after being sent to (Local hospital) emergency room on 3/21/2024. Diagnoses listed on this document are Sepsis, unspecified organism, Urinary Tract Infection, site unspecified, bipolar disorder, unspecified, unspecified intellectual disability, unspecified glaucoma. V13 (Physician) is listed as being R1's Primary Care Physician. The only emergency contact listed for R1 on this document is V30 (Guardian/Emergency Contact # 1). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, that R1 is cognitively intact. Section A, question A1500 of R1's MDS documents: R1 is currently considered by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and seek timely treatment for a self- inflicted injury for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for skin impairment in a sample of 6. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified and Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities. R1's Face Sheet documents a discharge date from the facility of 3/25/24. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating that R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, of the same MDS documents that R1 is dependent with all activities of daily living. R1's hospital notes Discharge summary dated [DATE], and prior to R1's admission to the facility, under Physical Exam documents in part .There was a circumferential sore on the left forearm, believed to be related to ischemia from a bracelet; No other sores or rashes noted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were following the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) protocols for residents in isolation. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents living in the facility. The findings include: On 10/4/23 at 8:45am, V1 (Administrator) said that they had 27 positive COVID residents, 16 exposures and 14 staff that tested positive also. V1 said that the first positive case was a staff member on 9/22/23 and the last positive case was on 10/3/23. V1 said that each resident was placed on droplet precautions and signs posted on the door. 1. On 10/4/23 at 10:00am, Observations were made of signage outside of R4's door indicating the sequence for putting on personal protective equipment (PPE) noting: 1. gown. 2. mask or respirator 3. goggles or face shield 4. gloves. On 10/4/23 at 10:00am, V5 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) was observed in R4's room pulling R4 backwards through the door. V5 was wearing a N95 mask and gloves. V5 was not wearing a face shield or a gown. R4 was not wearing a mask. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility is free of flies. This has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 10:45 AM during the lunch preparation, several flies were observed to be flying over the stove, the steam table and landing on the countertops. V4 (Dietary Supervisor) stated that he wishes that they could get rid of the flies. V4 went on to state that he believes that the residents going in and out the front door is part of the reason they are so bad inside the facility. On 7/25/23 at 12:00 PM, during lunch observation in the dining room several flies were observed flying throughout the dining room and landing on resident dining room tables while waiting for their lunch to be delivered. On 7/25/23 during initial tour of the facility from 9:00 AM - 2:00 PM, several flies were observed throughout the entire facility flying in all areas of the facility. On 7/25/23 at 1:00 PM, R26 stated that the flies are terrible and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) as recommended for 2 (R46 and R7) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR's in the sample of 30. Findings Include: 1. R46's Face Sheet documents an initial admission date to the facility as 1/27/23, with diagnoses including but not limited to Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury without loss of consciousness, subsequent encounter, Depression, Unspecified, and Anxiety, Unspecified and Other Seizures. R46's Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome documents under the section labeled Ascend Outcome with a review date of 01/25/2023, Level I Outcome: Exempted Hospital Discharge. Rationale: Exempted Hospital Discharge 30 Day Approval- A 30 day or less stay in the NF (nursing facility) is authorized. Re-screening must occur by or before the 30th day if the individual is expected to remain in the NF beyond the authorization timeframe. The individual meets criteria for a 30-day hospital exemption admission, due to known or suspected Serious Mental Illness diagnosis indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$353,579 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $226,600 — penalty dated 2026-04-22
  • $25,515 — penalty dated 2026-02-19
  • $42,435 — penalty dated 2025-08-25
  • $44,530 — penalty dated 2025-06-09
  • $14,499 — penalty dated 2024-10-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INTEGRITY HEALTHCARE COMMUNITIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DUCKWORTH, CHRISTIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2026
HANSON, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
IRNI, ALANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2010
KELLEY, KELLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2013
BLISKO, STEVENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$831K
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 10%Other / private 0%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $831K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$255per resident / day
operating cost
$7,766per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$255per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146006. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next