Integrity Hc Of Carbondale
120 North Tower Road, Carbondale, IL 62901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 131 certified beds · (618) 549-3355 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $369,760 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 19.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.2% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.1% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.77 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.2%CMS range 35.7–74.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.4–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.7–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level require more than one deficienct practice statement. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia and a diffuse traumatic brain injury was adequately supervised to prevent elopements and failed to develop and implement new interventions to prevent elopements for 1 (R22) of 2 residents reviewed for supervision in a sample of 42. This failure resulted in R22 exiting the facility multiple times without staff knowledge, including on an unknown date in October or November of 2024 in which R22 walked approximately 0.8 miles from the facility down a busy street and across a busy highway in town, and was later located by facility staff walking around a business parking lot. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. An Immediate Jeopardy situation identified to have begun on 06/15/2024, when R22 exited the facility without supervision and the facility failed to investigate the incident and failed to implement new interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed, for 1 of 5 residents (R55) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 30. This failure resulted in R55 missing three doses of long- acting insulin from 1/17/25 to 1/19/25, causing R55's blood sugars to be extremely elevated. This has the potential to lead to ketoacidosis which could result in coma and possible death. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified to have begun on 01/17/25 at approximately 9:00 PM when the facility was unable to provide R55's scheduled long-acting insulin and did not notify the physician. The facility also failed to administer R55's long-acting insulin as ordered on 01/18/25 and 01/19/25. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing), were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 02/04/25 at 3:13 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on 02/04/25, but the noncompliance remains at Level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect when they failed to assess, treat, and implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers, accurately assess for skin breakdown, discontinue psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician, and provide oral care for 1 of 5 (R12) residents reviewed for neglect in the sample of 19. This failure resulted in R12 being transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] for altered mental status and possible sepsis. Once at the hospital it was determined R12 had received Haldol and Clonazepam without a physician order from 11/23/24 until 12/01/24. R12 had developed 15 new wounds including a Stage 2 and Stage 3 to his buttocks, a Stage 2 to the left knee, and two deep tissue injuries to his bilateral heels. R12 also had a buildup of a hardened yellow/brown coating with cracking and fissures noted to be covering the tongue from lack of oral care. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2025-10-09 · tag F0627 — patternEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop individualized discharge plans that incorporated input and preferences from the resident, resident representative, and the interdisciplinary team to ensure safe and orderly transfer/discharge planning for 13 (R13, R14, R17, R18, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R27, R28, R30, and R31) of 27 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge in the sample of 46. This failure resulted in R27 and R30 experiencing feelings of upset/worry, sadness, or distress and would cause a reasonable person to feel the same emotions when given the news of having to relocate to another facility on very short notice. Findings include:On 9/15/25 at 1:35PM, V1 (Former Administrator) provided a list of residents still in the facility and stated there were still 19 in house as of this date/time. V1 said they have provided the IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) regional office a list of those residents that have been discharged to date and plan to send weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed was in the lowest position and the fall mat was in place on the floor next to the bed for 1 (R42) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 46. This failure resulted in R42 falling out of a high bed with no floor mat beside the bed and sustaining multiple dark purple contusions to her face, neck, wrist, hand, and forearm, swelling to her eye, eyebrow and forehead area, along with skin tears to the right forearm and left hand. This past non-compliance occurred between 9/1/25 and 9/1/25. Findings include: This past non-compliance occurred between 9/1/25 and 9/1/25.Findings include:R42's admission Record documented an admission date of 1/5/22 and a discharge date of 9/3/25 and included diagnoses of dementia, cognitive communication deficit, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, chronic pain, and low back pain.R42's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating the BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice after a fall for 1 (R1) of 3 residents in a sample of 26. This failure resulted in R1 not getting immediate treatment for a hip fracture after a fall. A reasonable person would experience feelings of discomfort and distress due to not receiving timely after fall care. This past noncompliance occurred between 8/25/25 and 8/26/25. Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 4/27/2023 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, gastrostomy status, dysphagia, unspecified, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, muscle weakness and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition.R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating R1 had severe cognitive impairment. This same document under section GG0120 Mobility Devices documented a walker used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess and provide pain medication after a fall for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pain in a sample of 26. This failure resulted in R1 not receiving any pain medication for a hip fracture for several hours after a fall. A reasonable person would experience feelings severe pain and discomfort due to not receiving pain relief medication. This past noncompliance occurred between 8/25/25 and 8/26/25. Findings include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 4/27/2023 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, gastrostomy status, dysphagia, unspecified, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, muscle weakness and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition.R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating R1 had severe cognitive impairment.R1's Physician Order Summary documented Acetaminophen Oral Suspension. Give 5 ml via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide dietary supplements, and the appropriate protein portion size to prevent further weight loss or weight maintenance for 9 of 11 residents (R1, R2, R3, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13) reviewed for weight loss in a sample of 18. This failure further contributes to continued harm to R2 and R10, who have a documented history of severe weight loss. Findings include:1. R2's admission record documents an admission date of 01/09/22 with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute osteomyelitis of left ankle and foot, malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, anemia, protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit.R2's order summary report documents a dietary order of regular diet with mechanical soft texture. Thin liquids consistency, ground meat extra gravy, (nutritional shakes) two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure oral care was provided for 2 of 5 residents (R2 and R12) reviewed for oral care in the sample of 19. This failure resulted in R12 having a buildup of a hardened yellow/brown coating with cracking and fissures noted to be covering the tongue from lack of oral care. This failure would cause a reasonable person to suffer humiliation with physical and emotional discomfort. Findings Include: 1. R12's admission Record with a print date of 12/5/24 documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include fracture of left femur, hypotension, diabetes, schizophrenia (diagnosis added on 11/07/24), bipolar disorder (added on 11/07/24) difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/17/2024 documents R12 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R12 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R12 requires set up or clean up assistance with oral care. R12's current Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, treat, and implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers, and failed to accurately assess for skin breakdown for 4 of 5 (R1, R2, R3, and R12) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 19. This failure resulted in R12 developing a Stage 2 and Stage 3 pressure ulcer to his buttocks, a Stage 2 pressure ulcer to his left knee, and two deep tissue injuries to bilateral heels. Findings Include: R12's admission Record with a print date of 12/5/24 documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include fracture of left femur, hypotension, diabetes, schizophrenia (diagnosis added on 11/07/24), bipolar disorder (added on 11/07/24) difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/17/2024 documents R12 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R12 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R12 required partial to moderate assist for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives timely written notification of the reason for transfer out of the facility and failed provide notice to the Ombudsman of resident transfers for 9 (R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R27, R28, R30, R31) of 9 residents reviewed for discharge process in the sample of 45. On 9/15/25 at 1:35PM, V1 (Former Administrator) provided a list of residents still in the facility and stated there were still 19 in house as of this date/time. V1 said they have provided the IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) regional office a list of those residents that have been discharged to date and plan to send weekly updates. V1 said the list includes resident names, the location they were transferred to and the date/time they left. V1 stated the facility has plumbing issues that need addressed and the kitchen will need to have 3 feet of concrete dug up in order to replace old cast iron plumbing that has collapsed. V1 stated other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote independence and autonomy with toileting by neglecting to utilize an available room with a functioning toilet for 1 (R40) of 3 residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs/preferences in a sample of 46. Findings include:R40's admission Record documented an admission date to the facility on 7/7/25 and included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating the BIMS assessment was unable to be completed. On 9/22/25 at 4:00 PM, V36 (Family Member) stated the bathroom in R40's room did not work from the time she was admitted there in early July of 2025. V36 stated R40 was able to take herself to the bathroom when she needed to go, but since the restroom was out of order in her room she would get confused and urinate in odd places. V36 stated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to assess adaptive equipment and pressure alarms in order to ensure safety and freedom for normal movement for 4 of 4 residents (R3, R5, R9, R18) reviewed for physical restraints in the sample of 26. Findings include:1. R5's “admission Record” documents an admission date of 7/17/25 and a discharge date of 8/25/25 with the following diagnoses in part; other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, frontotemporal dementia, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with agitation, history of falling, muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty in walking. R5's care plan documents that R5 is at risk for falls related to dementia, impaired cognition/safety awareness, use of antidepressant, antianxiety medications, history of falls, impaired gait/balance. This same document lists the following interventions, Lap [NAME] (positioning device) to be ordered and placed on delivery, until arrives staff to increase monitoring,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to use person centered behavior interventions and attempt less restrictive alternative treatments prior to administering as needed psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for psychotropic medications in a sample of 26. Findings include:R5's admission record documents an admission date of 7/17/25 with the following diagnoses and a discharge date of 8/25/25 with the following diagnoses in part; other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, frontotemporal dementia, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with agitation, depression, unspecified, and anxiety disorder. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating that R5 was not able to complete the interview. Section N-Medications documents that R5 receives antipsychotics on a routine basis only.R5's Care Plan documents R5 uses medications with black box warnings. With interventions including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) services 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The facility's June, July, and August 2025 licensed nurse's schedules documented on June 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22, 28, and 29, July 6, 12, 13, 19, 20, 26, and 27, [DATE], 9, 10, 16, and 17 there was no RN working in the facility for a consecutive 8 hours.On 8/22/25 at 9:38 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON) verified on June 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22, 28, and 29, July 6, 12, 13, 19, 20, 26, and 27, [DATE], 9, 10, 16, and17 there was no RN working in the facility for a consecutive 8 hours.On 8/22/25 at 2:13 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the facility did not have a policy pertaining to 8 consecutive hours of RN services. V1 said the facility followed Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) staffing guidelines.The facility's 9/20/25 Resident List Report documented 50 residents residing in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain floors and equipment in a safe and sanitary condition. This failure has the potential to affect all 50 residents living in the facility.Findings include:On 8/16/25 at 7:15 PM, the kitchen was observed to have various pieces of food lying on the floor around the cooking area. Black dirt/ debris was noted on the floor in various areas in the kitchen. The dishwashing area had various pieces of food on the floor with black dirt/ debris and dead cockroaches on the floor.On 8/20/25 at 10:28 AM, the kitchen was observed to have various areas of the floor with black dirt/ debris on it. The backsplash of the stove appeared to have a buildup of grease and other debris. The grease trap emptying from the griddle area of the stove had a large amount of grease on the floor under it measuring approximately 1 foot in diameter. On 8/20/25 at 10:15 AM, V6 (Dietary Manager) said she had only been employed in the facility for about a week. V6 said the kitchen was having some cleanliness problems because staff would not listen to her and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow dietitian approved recipes and textures an failed to provide ordered supplements for 5 (R4, R5, R6, R7 and R12) of 12 residents reviewed for dietary services out of a sample of 12.Findings include:The facility's Diet Spreadsheet Week 1 day 7 for Dinner, documented residents receiving a mechanical soft diet should have been served ground swiss cheese sandwich with mayonnaise, soft cooked vegetables soft chopped ambrosia, and a soft garlic breadstick. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet Week 1 day 7 for Dinner, documented resident receiving a pureed diet should have been served pureed cheese pizza, pureed soft, cooked vegetables, pureed ambrosia, and pureed garlic breadstick.1. R12's admission Record documented an admission date of 8/6/25 with diagnoses including: sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, muscle weakness. R12's 8/15/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide hot palatable foods for 4 (R2, R3, R7, and R9) of 12 residents reviewed for dietary services out of a sample of 12.Findings include:1.R7's admission Record documented an admission date of 6/23/21 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome. R7's 6/5/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R7 was cognitively intact.R7's Order Summary Report printed 8/21/25 documented a 1/20/23 diet order for low concentrated sweets, regular texture, thin liquid consistency, and offer double protein portions with all meals.On 8/16/25 at 5:55 PM, R7's evening meal tray was delivered containing 1 piece of cheese pizza, salad, breadstick, and ambrosia. R7 said the pizza was cold and unappetizing. R7 said he bought his own frozen hamburgers in case he did not like the main course being served. R7 said he was angry because for the noontime meal he had ordered 2 hamburgers, and the cook had burned them. R7 provided a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dietary supplements for at risk residents or residents who have experienced weight loss for 3 (R1, R4, and R6) of 12 residents reviewed for dietary services out of a sample of 12. Findings include:1. R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 9/26/25 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, aftercare following surgical amputation. R1's 7/17/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating R1 was severely cognitively impaired.R1's Order Summary Report documented a 10/19/24 diet order for regular diet, regular texture, thin liquids, health shakes at lunch and supper, offer extra butter/ margarin and sauces/ gravies at all meals.R1's Care Plan documents a goal as 10% and no signs or symptoms of malnutrition, with a revised date of 7/24/25. Interventions include: Provide and serve supplements as ordered with an initiation date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide an adequate number of dietary staff to serve dinner in a timely manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 51 residents that reside at the facility.Findings include:The Resident List Report dated 07/17/25 documents 51 residents currently reside at the facility.On 07/17/25 at 2:47 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, dinner is at 5:15 PM.On 07/17/25 at 2:47 PM, V3 (Business Office Manager/Acting Dietary Manager) stated, lunch is at 12:30 PM and dinner is at 5:15 PM.On 07/21/25 at 3:40 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated they had two kitchen staff members (V8 and V9 (Dietary Aides) not show up for work Sunday night (07/20/25). V1 stated, V6 (Dietary Aide) was called in to work.On 07/21/25 at 4:05 PM V6 (Dietary Aide) stated, she was called in to work on 07/20/25 and there were no other dietary staff present. V6 stated there were Certified Nurse Aides in the kitchen cooking grilled cheese and spaghetti sauce with meatballs. V6 stated, she received a text at 3:16 PM on 07/20/25 to see if she could come into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards of food safety and failed to maintain appropriate sanitizer levels in the dish machine to prevent foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 51 residents living in the facility. Findings include:The facility, Resident List Report dated 07/17/25 documents there are 51 residents currently residing at the facility.On 07/17/25 at 11:45 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the kitchen is currently closed down by the health department for pests and needing cleaning. V1 stated they are hoping the health department will open the kitchen today. V1 stated, the health department stated they could grill outside, they could just not use the kitchen.The Food Establishment Inspection Report dated 07/15/25 documents item #38 observation: live roach observed at time of inspection that crawled into the square mechanical/electrical compartment above the dish machine drain. General Comments: due to the number of foodborne illness risk factors and public…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, sanitary environment for 14 residents of 14 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15 and R16) reviewed for environment in a sample of 18.Findings include:On 07/17/25 at 3:10 PM, the air vent in the ceiling in the hall right outside a room where the meal trays were being staged and approximately 20 feet from the dining room on the North Hall, had a black substance covering approximately 50 % of the vent. On 07/17/25 at 2:58 PM, there was a black substance on the ceiling tiles around the air vent and on the air vent after the doorway leading to the North Hall. The black substance went from the vent to the wall on the right side of the ceiling on the other side of the entryway to the North Hall.On 07/17/25 at 4:40 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, she has seen mold or a black moldlike substance on the North Hall. She believes she brought it to V1's (Administrator) attention Tuesday (07/15/25) morning. V2 stated, it should be cleaned.On 07/21/25 at 10:05 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide food that appeared palatable and attractive for 7 of 7 residents (R2, R3, R6, R8, R10, R15, and R16) reviewed for dining in a sample of 18.Findings include:1. On 07/17/25 at 1:10 PM the individual serving of pureed ham was microwaved in a paper product bowl, the pureed ham was dry looking, crusty around the edges and a grayish color after being microwaved to be heated to a servable temperature. The microwaved pureed ham was served to R3, R10, R15, R16. R3's order summary report documents a dietary order of regular diet with a pureed texture with an order date of 05/20/25 and no end date listed.R10's order summary report documents a dietary order of regular diet with a pureed texture, whole milk three times a day, health shake three times a day, nutritional ice cream with lunch and supper, super cereal at breakfast, ice cream two times a day, melted margarine to hot sides at lunch and supper, offer pudding three times a day, 1 scoop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at palatable/preferred, appetizing temperatures for 5 (R27, R28, R35, R51, R105) of 22 residents reviewed for appetizing food temperatures in a sample of 42. Findings include: R51's admission Record documents an admission date of 01/09/25. R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 09, indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 01/27/25 at 10:17 AM, R51 stated the food is not good and is typically cold. On 01/28/25 at 7:30 AM, a digital metal stemmed thermometer used for taking temperatures for this survey was checked for accuracy using the ice-point method and was accurate within +/- 2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 01/28/25 at 7:45 AM, the dietary hall cart was starting to be filled. On 01/28/25 at 8:26 AM, V21 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) had two hall trays left to deliver. R35's tray was delivered and R35 refused her tray. V21 immediately returned the tray to the dietary cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide safe and sanitary food and dietary services. This failure has the potential to affect all 54 residents that reside at the facility. Findings include: 1. On 01/27/25 at 9:30 AM, a container of sugar was observed on the counter between the kitchen and dining room. The container of sugar was sitting by the coffee and tea on the dining service counter within residents' reach. There was a small plastic portion cup in the sugar container that was utilized by both staff and residents to get sugar for the drinks. On 01/27/25 at 11:30 AM, R12 was observed getting sugar from the container with the small plastic portion cup. On 01/27/25 at 11:53 AM, V21 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) used the portion cup in the sugar container to get sugar for a resident's drink. After touching the counter and the lid to the sugar container, V21 placed the portion cup back into the sugar container. On 01/29/25 at 10:15 AM, during Resident Council meeting, residents were asked if the container of sugar that sits on the counter by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for Enhanced Barrier Precautions and for Covid-19 infections as recommended by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 9 residents (R5, R24, R36, R47, R49, and R51) observed for infection control in the sample of 42. Findings include: 1. R47's admission Record printed on 01/30/25 documents an admission date of 12/03/24 and included diagnoses of dysphagia, muscle weakness, gastrostomy status, hyponatremia, colostomy, pressure ulcer sacral region stage 4, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to internal left hip prothesis. R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating R47 has severe cognitive impairment. Under Functional Abilities and Goals, the MDS documents R47 is dependent with turning and repositioning, eating, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained during dining when staff remained standing to provide feeding assistance for 1 (R205) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 42. Findings include: R205's admission Record dated 01/30/25 documents an admission date of 01/15/25 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, altered mental status, Parkinson disease, and muscle weakness. R205's Baseline Care Plan with a date of 01/15/25 documented under functional ability and goals self-care of eating set-up. R205's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating R205 has severely impaired cognition. Under Functional Abilities, the MDS documented R55 required set-up and supervision with eating. On 01/27/25 at 12:35PM, V21 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) walked over to assist R205 with eating. V21 stood up next to R205 and attempted to feed R205 her meal. V21 never sat down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's and/or resident representative's preferences for room accommodations and showers to ensure dignity were maintained for 2 (R55 and R51) of 4 residents reviewed for reasonable accommodations/preferences in a sample of 42. ' Findings include: 1. R55's admission Record documents an admission date of 01/17/25 and included the following diagnoses: vascular dementia, mild with psychotic disturbances, history of falling, depression, muscle weakness and difficulty walking, not elsewhere classified. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/24/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 11, indicating that R55 is moderately cognitively impaired. Under Functional Abilities, the MDS documents that R55 requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. In the section for indoor mobility R55 needs some help-Resident needed assistance from another person to complete any activities. Under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of missing medications and a change in resident's condition for 1 of 5 residents (R55) reviewed for physician notification in the sample of 42. Findings include: R55's admission record documents an admission date of 01/17/25 and list the following diagnoses in part; vascular dementia, mild with psychotic disturbances and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/24/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11, indicating that R55 is moderately cognitively impaired. Section I-active diagnoses documents an active diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. R55's care plan documents an initiation date of 01/28/25 for a focus area that states R55 is at risk for complications r/t (related to) dm (diabetes mellitus). R55's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents an order with an order date and a start date of 01/17/25 for Toujeo Solostar Subcutaneous Solution pen-injector 300 Units/ML, (Insulin Glargine) (long-acting insulin), Inject 70 units at bedtime for diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during wound care treatment or urinary catheter treatment for one (51) of 4 residents reviewed for personal privacy in the sample of 42. Findings include: 1. R51's admission Record documents an admission date of 01/09/25 and included the following diagnoses: muscle weakness, retention of urine and secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain. R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, indicating R51 has moderate cognitive impairment. Under Functional Abilities, the MDS documents R51 is dependent for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing and bed mobility. R51's Care Plan documented a focus are of at risk for skin breakdown r/t frequently incontinent of bowel, has Foley catheter, requires assist with bed mobility. Has open area to left buttock and skin tear to right buttock. On 01/29/2025 at 02:26 PM, wound care was provided to R51 by V4 (Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse from staff for 1 of 3 residents (R55) reviewed for abuse and neglect in the sample of 42. Findings include: R55's admission record documents an admission date of 01/17/25 and list the following diagnoses in part; vascular dementia, mild with psychotic disturbances and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/24/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 11, indicating that R55 is moderately cognitively impaired. On 01/27/25 at 10:03am, V36 (Family member) stated on 01/17/25, the first day R55 was in the facility, there was a nurse who was being terribly mean to her for no reason, he stated they reported it to staff a couple times, but nothing was done until they had her care plan meeting. V36 stated that V1 (Administrator) told them that they were not going to do anything with the nurse that did it because she was moving back to the Philippines soon, but she wouldn't be caring for R55 anymore. On 01/27/25 at 10:04am, V35 (Family member)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident verbal/mental abuse resulted in an accurate conclusion and failed to ensure corrective action to prevent further potential abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R55) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 42. Findings include: R55's admission record documents an admission date of 01/17/25 and list the following diagnoses in part; vascular dementia, mild with psychotic disturbances and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/24/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 11, indicating that R55 is moderately cognitively impaired. On 01/27/25 at 10:03am, V36 (Family member) stated the first day R55 was here, there was a nurse who was being terribly mean to her for no reason, he stated they reported it to staff a couple times, but nothing was done until they had her care plan meeting. V36 stated that V1 (Administrator) told them that they were not going to do anything with the nurse that did it because she was moving back to the Philippines soon, but she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for 1 of 3 (R105) residents reviewed for care plans in the sample of 42. Findings include: R105's admission Record with a print date of 1/28/2025 documents R105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include fracture of femur, falls, epilepsy, and muscle weakness. R105's facility medical record does not document a baseline care plan. On 01/28/25 at 3:50 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated the nurse who responsible for completing it upon R105's admission to the facility had forgotten to do it and it was being completed now.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter care in accordance with facility policy and standard of practice for 1 (R47) of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 42. Findings include: R47's admission Record printed on 01/30/25 documented an admission date of 12/03/24 with diagnoses in part of dysphagia, muscle weakness, gastrostomy status, hyponatremia, colostomy, pressure ulcer sacral region stage 4, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to internal left hip prothesis. R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG of the MDS documented R47 is dependent with toileting and turning and repositioning. Section H documented indwelling catheter. R47's Care Plan documents a focus area of R47 is at risk for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) r/t (related to) use of (Urinary) Catheter (Indwelling Catheter) with date initiated of 01/29/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow facility policy and procedure by failing to check the placement of a gastrostomy tube prior to administering medication and flusing with water and feeding for 1 of 1 resident (R47) reviewed for gastrostomy tube use in the sample of 42. Findings include: R47's admission Record printed on 01/30/25 documents an admission date of 12/03/24 with diagnoses that included dysphagia, muscle weakness, gastrostomy status and hyponatremia. R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicates severely impaired cognition. Under Functional Abilities and Goals, the MDS documents R47 is dependent with eating. Under Swallowing/Nutritional Status, the MDS documents R47 has a feeding tube. R47's Care Plan dated 12/23/24 documents a focus area of R47 is at risk for nutritional deficit r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) dysphagia, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). Has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per current standards of practice for 5 of 7 (R9, R15, R16, R17, R18) residents reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 19. Findings Include: 1. R9's admission Record with a print date of 12/02/24 documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include esophageal obstruction, dysphagia, fracture of sternum, gastrostomy, bipolar disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. R9's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 13, which indicates R9 is cognitively intact. R9's Order Summary Report with Active Orders as of 12/02/2024 includes the following physician orders, valproic acid oral solution 250 milligrams (mg)/5 milliliters (ml) give 10 ml via G-tube (gastrostomy tube) three times a day for anti-seizure, sucralfate oral suspension give 10 ml via G tube four times a day for GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), hydroxyzine 25 milligrams (mg) one tablet three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications when they failed to discontinue psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 (R12) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 19. Findings Include: R12's admission Record with a print date of 12/5/24 documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include fracture of left femur, hypotension, diabetes, schizophrenia (diagnosis added on 11/07/24), bipolar disorder (added on 11/07/24) difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/17/2024 documents R12 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R12 is cognitively intact. R12's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of (R12) uses psychotropic medications (Escitalopram) r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) depression, anxiety, schizophrenia. 10/9/24 Clonazepam for agitation. 10/27/24 Clonazepam increased. 10/29/24 Escitalopram…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer tube feeding as ordered for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for gastrostomy tube care in a sample of 3. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:29 AM, V12 (R1's State Guardian) said the facility was not completing R1's tube feedings as ordered. V12 said she had spoken with the facility wanting R1's tube feeding orders to be changed from bolus feeding to continuous due to R1's decline and weight loss during a hospitalization prior to R1 being admitted to the facility. V12 said the facility had told her they would speak with the dietitian to see if R1's tube feeding orders could be changed. V12 said she had been notified the dietitian had recommended R1's tube feeding orders be changed to continuous. V12 said 8 to 10 days, V12 was unsure of the exact dates, she received a call from someone visiting R1 and was told R1 was still receiving bolus tube feedings. V12 said on [DATE] she arrived at the facility and saw R1 was still receiving bolus tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document narcotic medication administration according to facility policy, and failed to consistently and accurately reconcile narcotic medication counts in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 (R1, R4, R5, and R6) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 9. This failure has the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. R5's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 7/1/20 with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, Barrett's Esophagus, acquired absence of right leg below the knee. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R5 was moderately cognitively impaired. R5's Order Summary Sheet documented a 2/15/23 order for hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325mg (milligram) tablet give 1 tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure prevention of misappropriation of resident property for 6 (R1, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. Findings include: 1. R5's admission Record documented an admission date of 7/1/20 with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, Barrett's Esophagus, and acquired absence of right leg below the knee. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R5 was moderately cognitively impaired. R5's Order Summary Sheet documented a 2/15/23 order for hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325mg (milligram) tablet give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain. On 9/24/24 at 3:20 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the pharmacy had sent her the hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325mg refill request for R5 from 9/1/24 by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). V1 verified V3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and misappropriation of property within the required time frames for 4 (R1, R2, R3, and R7) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. Findings include: 1. R3's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 6/23/21 with diagnoses including: anxiety disorder, Charcot's Joint, chronic pain syndrome. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R3 was cognitively intact. On 9/19/24 at 12:17 PM, R3 said he had a laptop computer stolen about a month prior to this investigation. R3 said he had purchased a rose gold laptop and had kept it on top of the microwave in his room. R3 said when he had returned to his room from the dining room, he had noticed it was missing. R3 said he had reported it to V1 and had given V1 the receipt and serial number in hopes it could be found. On 9/19/24 at 12:27 PM, V1 (Administrator) said she was aware of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate and complete investigations of abuse allegations in accordance with required time frames for 4 (R1, R2, R3, and R7) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. Findings include: 1. R3's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 6/23/21 with diagnoses including: anxiety disorder, Charcot's Joint, chronic pain syndrome. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R3 was cognitively intact. On 9/19/24 at 12:17 PM, R3 said he had a laptop computer stolen about a month prior to this investigation. R3 said he had purchased a rose gold laptop and had kept it on top of the microwave in his room. R3 said when he had returned to his room from the dining room, he had noticed it was missing. R3 said he had reported it to V1 and had given V1 the receipt and serial number in hopes it could be found. On 9/19/24 at 12:27 PM, V1 said she was aware of R3's missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide resident care in a timely and dignified manner for 2 (R1, R3) of 3 residents reviewed for timely assistance in the sample of 3. The Findings Include: R1's admission Profile documents an admission date of 8/21/23 with diagnoses to include: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, spinal stenosis, obesity, difficulty in walking, bipolar, and anxiety. R1's care plan documents a focus area of being at risk for falls due to bilateral lower extremity weakness with diagnoses of neuropathy, cervical spondlyosis, spinal stenosis, use of anti anxiety and antidepressant medication and opoid use. The goal date of initiation documents 9/8/23 and states R1 is to have falls/injuries minimized through management of risk factors while maintaining maximum independence/quality of life through the next review. Interventions are as follows: be sure her call light is within reach and encourage her to use it for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rights and dignity by not providing adequate grooming and providing food on non-disposable ware for 15 of 16 residents (R24, R6, R39, R33, R36, R41, R49, R5, R8, R11, R29, R17, R50, R28 and R12) reviewed for resident rights and dignity in a sample of 53. The findings include: 1. R24's Face Sheet, undated, documents R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, unspecified atrial fibrillation, asthma, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Morbid Obesity due to excessive calories, Bipolar Disorder, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Dominant side, Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent, and Essential Hypertension. R24's Care Plan dated 12/21/22 documents that R24 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care Performance Deficit r/t (related to) Disease Process (Asthma),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe sanitary bathroom/shower room for 24 (R4, R32, R52, R8, R11, R26, R6, R2, R23, R1, R34, R53, R44, R48, R51, R16, R50, R31, R28, R47, R30, R12, R18 and R38) of 24 residents reviewed for environment in a sample of 53. Findings include: On 02/05/24 at 8:45 AM, the community shower/bathroom on the North hall across from room N16 was observed. The shower/ bathroom did not contain any soap in the soap dispenser by the handwashing sink. The shower stall had mold and dirt where the wall met the floor on all three sides approximately 1 inch up from the floor. There was a soiled washcloth hanging on the safety grab bar that was dry and the shower stall was dry. On 02/05/24 at 8:45 AM, the community shower/bathroom on the North hall across from room N5 was observed. The shower/ bathroom was missing 53 one inch by one inch tiles on the floor of the shower stall. On 02/06/24 at 7:35 AM the community shower/bathroom on the North hall across from room N5 did not contain any paper towels by the handwashing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care, showers, and assistance with eating for 6 (R24, R25, R35, R38, R40, and R43) of 11 residents reviewed for activities of daily living in a sample of 53. The findings include: 1. R24's face sheet documents that R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease. R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 14, indicating that R24 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, documents that R24 requires setup/clean up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, dependent with toileting hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with showering, bed mobility, dependent with upper body dressing, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. R24's Care Plan dated 12/21/22 documents that R24 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care Performance Deficit r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide a call light system near the toilet in the hall bathroom for 24 (R4, R32, R52, R8, R11, R26, R6, R2, R23, R1, R34, R53, R44, R48, R51, R16, R50, R31, R28, R47, R30, R12, R18 and R38) of 24 residents reviewed for call light systems in a sample of 53. The findings include: On 02/05/24 at 8:45 AM, the tub room next to the shower/bathroom on the North hall contained a toilet, with urine in it, and no accessible call light. The call light activator was approximately six feet up from the floor with no attachment hanging down not allowing the light to be activated when seated or from the floor. On 02/07/24 at 11:15 AM, R32, R23, R26, R52 and R11 stated, they use whichever bathroom is open on the north hall. R32, R23, R26, R52 and R11 are alert and oriented. On 2/5/24, V1 (Administrator) provided the Midnight Census report with a print date of 2/5/24, that documents the residents that reside on the north hall and can utilized the shower/bathroom are R4, R32, R52, R8, R11, R26, R6, R2, R23, R1, R34, R53, R44,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of a wheelchair to assist in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning for 1 of 6 residents (R24) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 53. The findings include: R24's Face Sheet, undated, documents R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, unspecified atrial fibrillation, asthma, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Morbid Obesity due to excessive calories, Bipolar Disorder, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Dominant side, Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent, and Essential Hypertension. R24's Care Plan dated 12/21/22 documents that R24 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care Performance Deficit r/t (related to) Disease Process: Asthma, Impaired balance and muscle weakness. R24 is occasionally incontinent of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer gastronomy tube water flushes per physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents (R45) reviewed for tube feeding in a sample of 53. Findings include: R45's face sheet documents an admission of 05/20/2023 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, Anoxic Brain Damage, not elsewhere Classified, other seizures, other recurrent Depressive Disorders, Anxiety Disorder, unspecified, Encephalopathy, unspecified, Gastronomy Status, Pneumonia, unspecified organism, Insomnia, unspecified, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified, and Aphasia. R45's Care Plan documents a Focus area with an initiation date of 5/25/23 that R45 is at risk for nutritional deficit related to a diagnosis of Dysphagia, is NPO (nothing by mouth), has G-tube bolus feedings TID (three times a day). The care plan documents interventions to provide feedings and flushes as ordered. R45's Order Summary Report, with a date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in a residents condition for 2 of 3 (R1 and R2) residents reviewed for physician notification in the sample of 15. Findings Include: 1.R2's admission Record with a print date of 11/01/23 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, heart disease, hypertension, anemia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and muscle weakness. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/16/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area initiated 10/25/23 of (R2) is at risk for complications r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) of HTN (hypertension). The interventions for this care area include give antihypertensive medications as ordered, avoid taking the blood pressure reading after physical activity or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored, assessments were documented, and physicians were notified of a significant change in condition for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for change of condition in the sample of 15. Findings Include: R2's admission Record with a print date of 11/01/23 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, heart disease, hypertension, anemia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and muscle weakness. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/16/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area initiated 10/25/23 of (R2) is at risk for complications r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) of HTN (hypertension). The interventions for this care area include give antihypertensive medications as ordered, avoid taking the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Transfer for one hospitalized resident (R17) of one resident reviewed for transfer/discharge in the sample of 24. Findings include: On 03/07/23 at 10:34 am, R17 was interviewed in his room. R17 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R17 stated he has been hospitalized three times within the past three months. R17 stated the facility did not provide him with a written notice of transfer at the time of any of these transfers to the hospital. R17's Nursing Progress Notes documented the following: 01/2/23: Labs were reported to the nephrologist and orders received to send resident out to hospital for further evaluation. 02/04/23: Resident (sent) out of facility on transfer to (local hospital). 03/01/23 (Physician) .gave order to send to ED(Emergency Department). On 03/09/23 at 8:52 am, V18, Regional Nurse Consultant, acknowledged that the facility has not been providing residents with a written notice of transfer at the time of their transfer to the hospital. V18 confirmed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$369,760 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $65,975 — penalty dated 2025-10-09
- $100,632 — penalty dated 2025-07-23
- $203,153 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-15 for 40 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-22 for 64 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INTEGRITY HEALTHCARE COMMUNITIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANSON, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| IRNI, ALAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2010 |
| KELLEY, KELLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/14/2013 |
| SIMMONS, MARILYNN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2026 |
| BLISKO, STEVEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $776K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145757. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.