Neighbors Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 99.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3 & R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 41. This failure resulted in R1 being sent to the local hospital and diagnosed with a posterior head laceration and initial CTH with acute SDH (computed tomography with acute subdural hematoma) of the left frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes. The findings include: 1. The facility's final report to the state surveying agency regional office dated December 20, 2023, shows, It was immediately reported to Administrator (V1) that R1 sustained a fall with injury while in the memory care dining room. Staff reported that they heard a female resident say that a resident is moving the chair around and to leave it alone, when the one CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) turned toward the resident she saw R1 and another male resident (R2) both had hold of the chair and due to the momentum of both residents tugging at the chair they both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained during personal care for 1 of 2 residents (R53) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 43. The findings include:R53's face sheet printed on 5/7/26 showed diagnoses including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and senile degeneration of brain. R53's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and total staff assistance required for toilet hygiene, dressing, and transfers. The same assessment showed that R53 is always incontinent of urine and bowel. On 5/5/26 at 9:26 AM, V10 and V11 (Certified Nursing Assistants/CNA) transferred R53 from the wheelchair onto the bed using a mechanical lift. R53's bed was next to the room window. The window looked out to the front parking lot and sidewalk. V10 and V11 removed R53's pants and incontinence brief. Peri care was performed and a fresh brief was put on the resident. R53 was naked from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary drainage bag was off the floor, failed to use a dignity cover, and failed to use personal protective equipment (PPE) during direct catheter care for 1 of 3 residents (R22) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 43. The findings include:R22's face sheet printed on 5/7/26 showed diagnoses including but not limited to right side paralysis following cerebral infarction, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hyperplasia with urinary tract symptoms, retention of urine, and obstructive/reflux uropathy. R22's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed moderate cognitive impairment and staff assistance required for transfers and personal hygiene. The same assessment showed R22 is always incontinent of bowel. R22's May 2026 order summary report showed an order start dated 11/21/24 for a urinary catheter for urinary retention/obstructive and reflux uropathy. The same report showed an order start dated 4/30/25 for enhanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy for food brought in by family or visitors for 1 of 1 resident (R80) reviewed for food safety in the sample of 43. The findings include: On 5/5/26 at 10:05 AM, R80 was seated in a wheelchair in her room. A counter size mini refrigerator was on a stand, next to her bed. The door had a handwritten sign on the front dated 4/1 and it stated do not take anything out of it or throw anything away. The family makes the food for the resident to eat. R80 gave permission for this surveyor to look inside the refrigerator. The small, freezer section was thawed and dripping water over all the items. A plastic storage container with an unidentified liquid was wet and a small baggie of meat was wet. R80 identified the items as soup and lunch meat. There was a baggie of cinnamon bread and a baggie of croissants which were both wet. None of the foods had any dates or labels on them. There was a baggie of grapes and a bottle of syrup on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have enhanced barrier precautions in place for residents with pressure wounds. This applies to three of three residents (R2, R47, R105) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 43.The findings include: 1 On 5/6/26 at 10:50 AM R47 was receiving wound care for her stage 3 pressure injury from V8 (Wound Nurse), V9 (Wound Physician) and V16 (Wound Physician's Assistant). No sign was displayed on R47's door showing she was on enhanced barrier precautions and there was no PPE (personal protective equipment) available near her room. V8, V9 and V16 were not wearing a gown during the treatment. On 5/7/26 at 9:08 AM, V8 said R47 did not need to be on enhanced barrier precautions because her dressing was a band-aid like dressing. V8 said when a new wound is found in the facility, the infection preventionist is notified and she determines if they need isolation or not. On 5/7/26 at 9:33 AM, V2 (Infection Preventionist and Assistant Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident for return from an acute care hospitalization and failed to document specific resident needs that cannot be met by the facility upon a resident's proposed return from an acute care stay for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for involuntary discharge in the sample of 3. The findings include:R1's Nursing Notes on 3/31/26 show that around 5:00 PM, R1 was found in her room cutting her arm with a pair of cuticle scissors. R1 was sent to the hospital. On 4/8/26 at 12:49 PM, V1 (Administrator) said that she filled out an Involuntary Discharge (IVD) Form for R1 on 3/31/26 and it was delivered to the emergency room on 3/31/26. V1 said that it was provided because of the self-harm and she knew that she would require additional support services that the facility was unable to provide to her. V1 said that they haves a psychiatric Nurse Practitioner that comes to the facility every two weeks. V1 said that she received a call from the hospital on 4/2/26 that R1 was ready to be discharged back to the facility. V1 said that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable temperature range of 71 degrees Fahrenheit to 81 degrees Fahrenheit was maintained for 10 of 11 residents (R1, R3-R11) reviewed for a comfortable environment in the sample of 11.The findings include:On March 23, 2026, there were multiple rooms on the 100 hall of the facility that had multiple blankets on the windowsills of residents' rooms and a blanket over the air conditioning units in the residents' rooms.On March 23, 2026, at 8:55 AM, R1 said her room has been cold. R1 said about a month ago, there were portable heaters in the hallways. R1 said she must have three blankets on her bed to stay warm. R1 said it gets colder at night, and it makes her sad that it cannot be warmer. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows she is cognitively intact. R1 has no behaviors of rejecting any care.On March 23, 2026, at 9:08 AM, R5 said it has been cold in the facility for a while. R5 said she has to wear a bunch of blankets when it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide water to residents in a sanitary manner. This applies to 5 of 8 (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) in the sample of 11 reviewed for dietary services. The findings include: On 6/30/2025 at 11:43AM, observations of residents being given ice water by V6 (Activity Aide). V6 used a scoop that was sitting on the water cart holding the cooler with water and ice. V6 opened the lid of the cooler to fill R5's and R2's cup with the scoop, placed the wet scoop back down on the cart, and took the cup back into the resident's room. V6 was observed holding R3, R4, and R1's water cup that was removed from the resident's room above the open water and ice cooler while filling the cup. On 6/30/2025 at 12:06AM, V7 (Food Service Director) said the scoop should not be placed back on the cart due to risk cross contamination. V7 said the resident's water cup shouldn't be held above the water cooler because of the risk of cross contamination. The facility provided Ice Dispensing policy revised 5/20/2014 states, the healthcare community…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for a change of condition of 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for change of condition in the sample of 6. The findings include: R3's face sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4. She also had diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity. The 10/6/24 quarterly resident assessment and care screening shows R3 to have severe cognitive impairment and required supervision/touch assistance for sit to stand and toilet transfers. The same assessment documents her to be occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. On 5/23/25 at 1:40 PM, V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said R3, for the most part, she was confused, and she needed stand by assist. She was always trying to get up out of bed on her own, and she had alarms so we could know when she was moving. V10 said remembers, R3 she was just laying down. We…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure mechanical lift equipment was in good working order for 5 of 5 residents (R8, R19, R36, R40, R41) reviewed for mechanical lifts in the sample of 41. The findings include: On [DATE] at 9:55 AM, V22 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said on [DATE] she was toileting R36 using the sit to stand machine. V22 said she had R36 standing up with her arms above her head attached to the machine with the sling when she attempted to lower R36 to the toilet. V22 said the battery died and the machine wouldn't lower R36. V22 said she got other batteries and none of the batteries she tried were working. V22 said R36 was getting weak and starting to panic, so she tried to use the emergency release on the machine, and it wouldn't release. V22 said she had to put her knees under R36's bottom, and with a gait belt around R36's waist, manually lower R36 to the wheelchair. V22 showed this surveyor a mechanical lift in the resident hallway and pointed out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This applies to 1 of 41 residents (R33) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 41. The findings include: On May 19, 2025, at 1:10 PM, V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, her, V9 (LPN) and V12 (Dietary Manager) got into a verbal altercation at the nurses' station. V9 and her work the night shift. They were giving report to the oncoming day shift when V12 (Dietary Manager) overheard them talking about their concerns with the dinner meal the night before. He was calling us wussies and telling us that the menu is planned out by a dietitian. V14 admitted to calling the dietitian a dumb b. Another staff member (V22 Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) saw what was happening and told her to stop and leave it alone. She admitted to saying 2 cuss words. R33 was up and sitting by the nurses' station. On May 19, 2025, at 1:43 PM, V22 (CNA) stated, V12 (Dietary Manager), V9 (LPN) and V14 (LPN) were arguing at shift change. V12 was punching in the time clock (which is right by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE NETWORK — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL