No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Auburn Village

1751 Wesley Road, Auburn, IN 46706 · For profit - Corporation · 111 certified beds · (260) 925-5494 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (260) 925-5494 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jan 2024
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1316 E 7th St, Door 2 · (260) 425-5500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1314 E 7th St Ste 104 · (260) 925-8000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
109 E 5th St · (260) 272-8367 · Call to confirm hours
Park
800 S Duesenberg Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.0%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.7%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.0%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.9%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.0%95.4%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.8%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.6%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.4%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.7%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.101.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.761.441.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.9%CMS range 43.1–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.9–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge20.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge20.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 4.5–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.84
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
57.1%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 77.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-17)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely family notification of a resident's death for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident C). Findings include:On [DATE] at 12:13 P.M., Resident C's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included cancer and diseased arteries. The resident admitted to the facility with hospice services due to expected decline and had orders to not resuscitate if found without a pulse or respirations. Resident C's face sheet had a Power of Attorney (POA) listed as the 1st contact for notifications of changes in condition and a family member as his 2nd contact for notifications of changes in condition. A nurse note, dated [DATE] at 3:40 a.m., indicated the resident was observed lying in bed without a pulse or respirations. A second nurse verified he was deceased and the hospice nurse contacted. The note indicated Resident C's POA was aware of the resident's death. An on-call Nurse Practitioner (NP) note, dated [DATE] at 4:10 a.m., indicated facility staff reported Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure respectful and dignified communication and care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident A)A record review for Resident A's began on 10/16/25 at 9:30 AM. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, and respiratory failure.A review of Resident A's current quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated their BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score was 15 (cognitively intact). The MDS indicated the resident had a tracheostomy and ventilator. A review of Resident A's current Care Plan indicated Resident A had potential to be manipulative, exhibit attention-seeking behaviors, and display emotional overreaction to minor events. Interventions included calm, consistent communication with firm boundaries.A review of Resident A's current Care Plan indicated Resident A had a problem of an anxiety disorder. Resident A could have racing thoughts, feel overwhelmed, and stressed. Interventions included encourage Resident A to engage in deep breathing exercises,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen cleanliness was maintianed. 70 of 81 residents residing in the facility ate food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation, on 06/11/25 at 09:13 AM, there was moisture in 2 of 3 pans on drying rack, the stand mixer located in the cooking and clean storage area had yellow particles and yellow discoloration on the bowl, paddle, and on the main unit. An unlabeled fruit cup had a red liquid puddle underneath on the top drawer of the mini fridge in the south hall. Employee 9 had their hair unrestrained During an interivew, on 06/11/25 at 10:25 AM, The Dietary Manager indicated the kitchen staff needed to restrain their hair with a hairnet. During an observation, on 06/11/25 at 10:30 AM, Employee 9 took the lid off the food processor and placed it right side up on top of the toaster next to it. The top of the toaster had crumbs and dry brown particles on the top surface. The rim of the lid is an interior surface and touches the food inside the food processor. Food and liquid were transferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dining choices were respected for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: During an observation on 6/11/25 at 11:35 AM, Resident 60 was observed seated at a table in the assisted dining room with two other residents. Three staff members were seated at the table assisting the residents with their lunch. During an observation on 6/12/25 at 11:56 AM, Resident 60 was observed seated at a table in the assisted dining room with two other residents. Three staff members were seated at the table assisting the residents with their lunch. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 10:47 AM Resident 60 indicated he had notified staff during a resident council meeting he wished to dine in the main dining room, so he had the opportunity to meet more residents and increase his socialization. He indicated he had expressed to staff he would like to have the choice of where to dine. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 11:32 AM, Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the treatment to maintain or prevent further loss of range of motion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: In an interview, on 6/11/25 at 10:23 AM, Resident 7 indicated they were unable to participate in bingo due to limited use of their hands. On 6/11/25 at 10:25 AM, Resident 7 was observed to have contractures (rigid joints) of both of their wrists. Resident 7's record was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 9:36 AM. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (a condition that causes stiff joints) and Parkinson's Syndrome (a condition that affects movement and coordination due to stiffness and tremors). Resident 7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS)dated 5/20/25 indicated their Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 2 (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 7 required substantial to maximum staff assistance for eating. The MDS indicated Resident 7 was dependent on staff assistance for oral care, mobility, bathing and toileting. The MDS indicated Resident 7 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-medication pain interventions were implemented as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: Resident 30's record was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 10:56 AM. Diagnoses included chronic pain syndrome, low back pain, right leg pain and polyneuropathy (damage to multiple nerves). Resident 30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) date 4/11/25, indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 (no cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 30 had not been administered routine pain medication. The MDS indicated Resident 30 had been administered pain medication as needed. The MDS indicated Resident 30 frequently had pain. The pain frequently interfered with Resident 30's sleep at night. The MDS indicated Resident 30 had not been offered non-medication pain interventions. Resident 30's care plan, dated 3/10/25, indicated the resident was at risk for pain due to impaired mobility, diabetes with polyneuropathy, chronic pain syndrome, low back pain, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure massage therapy was provided for 1 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: During an interview on 6/12/25 at 10:17 AM, Resident 60 indicated he had notified facility staff of desire to receive massage therapy services for discomfort related to muscular dystrophy. He indicated he could receive the services for free at the Veterans Affairs Hospital. He indicated he had inquired about massage therapy during a Resident Council meeting. After the meeting, the facility driver had told him the facility could not assist him with transportation due to it not being a medically necessary service, but the facility might be able to offer massage in house. He indicated the conversation was several weeks ago and he had not received any further information from the facility. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 1:32 PM, Resident 60 indicated he had not received any massage therapy from facility staff or heard of any plans to be provided with this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify, assess and determine underlying cause of specific expressions of distress of a trauma survivor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: On 6/27/24 at 12:10 PM, Resident 3 was observed sitting in the doorway of their room in their wheelchair. Resident 3 greeted a staff member pleasantly. Resident 3 greeted this writer, then quickly looked away. Resident 3 began to speak softly in nonsensical terms while looking at the palms of their hands. Resident 3's record was reviewed on 7/1/24 at 11:36 AM. Resident 3's diagnoses included anxiety, major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, insomnia, obsessive compulsive disorder, morbid obesity, tracheostomy, (surgical opening for breathing) mechanical ventilator (breathing machine) at night. Resident 12 was a survivor of childhood sexual trauma. Resident 3's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education about and follow public health authority recommendations during investigation of a communicable disease outbreak. This alleged deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident M).and had the potential to affect of 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An anonymous complaint to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 6/25/24, indicated Legionella bacteria had been found in water samples collected at the facility and recommendations made to prevent disease were not being followed. Legionnaires' Disease, retrieved from CDC.gov (Centers for Disease Control) on 6/27/24, indicated Legionnaires' disease was a very serious type of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria. Legionnaires' disease could cause pneumonia symptoms of cough, muscle aches, fever, shortness of breath, and headache. Legionella bacteria lived in fresh water and man-made settings such as large or complex water systems found in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of injuries of unknown origin for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident B). Findings include: An Indiana report form, dated 1/7/24 at 12:17 p.m., indicated the local police had come to the facility for a reported assault on a dependent resident. The resident had an injury to her pubic area which had been determined to have been caused by incontinence and skin allergy. A head to toe assessment had been completed with no suspicious areas identified. On 1/10/24 at 2:43 P.M., Resident B was observed lying in bed attended by the facility wound nurse and Nurse 5. Upon hearing Nurse 5's voice, she opened her eyes, raised her eyebrows and smiled in response. Per Nurse 5, the resident was non-verbal and had the mentality of an infant due to her condition. The resident was observed to have multiple fading bruises that were brown, yellow, and green in color and were in discrete round shapes. She had 2 round bruises on her left upper arm that appeared about 1 inch long. Her right knee had 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of bedtime for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident P). Findings include: An Indiana report, dated 10/9/23, indicated on 10/8/23 at 8:15 p.m., Resident P had been wandering in the facility and refused to go to bed. She was put into bed against her wishes. On 10/26/23 at 10:18 A.M., Resident P's daughter was interviewed. She indicated on 10/8/23 around 8:06 p.m., the nurse caring for her mother called and indicated the resident had been going into other resident's rooms and had been taken back to her room where staff were trying to get her into bed. She tried to speak to her mother via the nurse's cell phone but the resident indicated she wanted to go home and hadn't wanted to go to bed. The nurse indicated the resident had to go to bed because of her wandering and she was transferred into bed. On 10/26/23 at 11:40 A.M., Resident P's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, anxiety and depressive disorders. A significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 9/1/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene procedures were performed during meal service during 1 of 3 observations. Findings include: In an observation on 7/26/23 at 11:24 AM, 14 residents were in the 300 hall dining room for lunch. During the observation, Dietary Aide 3 gloved both her hands. Dietary Aide 3 touched her glasses, moved around food containers, touched the tortillas, touched the handle of 2 utensils, then plated shredded cheese and lettuce without a utensil with both gloved hands. Dietary Aide 3 handed the 2 plates of food to another dietary aide to be served to residents. The Surveyor then intervened. In an interview on 7/26/23 at 11:28 PM, Dietary Aide 3 indicated she should have only touched food with one gloved hand. Dietary Aide 3 also indicated she should have used hand hygiene or changed her gloves after touching other items with her gloved hands. A current policy, dated 5/17, titled Hand Hygiene, was provided by the Administrator on 7/26/23 at 2:51 PM. The policy indicated hand hygiene is performed before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE NETWORK — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DECATUR COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2019
BARKER, SUMMERIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/02/2018
KECK, CATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2019
MCKINNEY, REXIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2019

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$428per resident / day
operating cost
$13,015per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$428per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155666. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next