Country Health
2304 C R 3000 N, Gifford, IL 61847 · Non profit - Other · 89 certified beds · (217) 568-7362 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 8 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $150,053 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-22)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.5% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 35.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 22.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.9%CMS range 38.4–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.6–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 22.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 14.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.0–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 85.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for two (R4 and R6) of three residents reviewed for resident-to-resident physical contact on a sample list of three residents. The facility failed to assess, care plan, and implement effective interventions following repeated altercations. This failure resulted in a physical injury (skin tear) to R6, with actual harm.Findings include:Review of the facility's Abuse Policy, revised 01/29/2026, documented that all residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse. The policy further required that appropriate interventions be implemented and included in the resident's care plan, updated with changes in condition, and communicated to direct care staff.R4's Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R4 had diagnoses including Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder, Dementia with Agitation, Mood Disorder, and anxiety disorder.R4's care plan, initiated 01/20/2026, identified behaviors including agitation, hallucinations, exit-seeking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-22 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate behavioral health services were provided for two (R4 and R6) of three residents reviewed for behavioral concerns, when the facility failed to implement effective behavioral health interventions, failed to provide coordinated behavioral health services, and failed to ensure adequate assessment and communication regarding psychotropic medication management. These failures resulted in continued unsafe behaviors and a resident-to-resident physical altercation that caused actual harm (skin tear) to R6.Findings Include:Facility has no Policy on Behavioral ServicesReview of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R4 had diagnoses including Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder, Dementia with Agitation, Mood Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder.R6's EHR revealed R6 had diagnoses including Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and multiple chronic medical conditions affecting overall health status.Both residents had documented behavioral concerns requiring monitoring and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of three residents. This failure caused R1 to fall sustaining an acute nasal Fracture and a laceration to (R1's) nose requiring five sutures to close.Findings Include:R1's Care Plan updated 10/14/25 includes the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, Heart Disease, Lumbar Disc Displacement, Anxiety, Vertigo, Repeated Falls, Glaucoma, Type II Diabetes, Difficulty in Walking, and Psychotic Disturbance with Hallucinations.R1 Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] document R1 as being at high risk for falls and having a recent history of falls. R1 has current physician's orders for the following narcotics and psychotropic medications: Haldol (Antipsychotic) one mg (Milligram) every eight hours as needed, Dilaudid (Narcotic) two mg every four hours as needed, and Fentanyl (narcotic) transdermal patch 50mcg/Hr (Microgram/Hour). Change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident after providing the resident with a hot beverage. This failure affects one (R504) is one of three residents reviewed for supervision in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R504 spilling hot liquid on R504's lap sustaining redness and 6 blistered areas to R504's bilateral upper extremities requiring subsequent treatment for 3days. Findings Include: R504's Facility Census documents R504 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: Congestive Heart Failure, Reflux Disease, Alzheimer ' s Disease, Dementia, Difficulty in Walking, Age-Related Physical Debility, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Fall, Muscle Weakness, Hypertension, , Cognitive Communication Deficit, Repeated Falls, Personal History of Mental Behavioral Disorders, [NAME] ' s Syndrome, Cerebral Infarction, Pulmonary Embolism without Acute Cor Pulmonal and Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Cerebral Infarction. R504's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide targeted interventions to prevent skin breakdown, failed to assess, evaluate and document resident skin on a regular basis, and failed to obtain appropriate treatment orders for pressure ulcers for two (R20, R58) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers from a total sample list of 44 residents. These failures resulted in one resident (R20) developing a new, unstagable, deep tissue injury and a second resident (R58) developing seven, new stage two pressure wounds. Findings include: The facility Wound and Ulcer Policy and Procedure dated 3/28/24 documents that it is the policy of this facility to provide nursing standard for assessment, prevention, treatment and protocols to manage resident at any level of risk for skin breakdown and for wound management. A skin assessment will be documented daily for resident assessed to be at moderate or high risk for the development of pressure ulcers. When a resident is found to have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level require more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor a resident (R22), with Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), after administering oral medication. This failure affects one resident (R22) of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 44. R22 experienced a choking episode when staff had left R22's room after oral medication administration. Upon staff hearing R22's coughing, staff returned to R22's room and performed the Heimlich Maneuver to expel the tablet from R22. B. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls and document falls in the resident's medical record for one (R17) of nine residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of 44. Findings include: a.) R22's Facility Census documents R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses; Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Muscle Weakness, Anxiety Disorders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide effective pain control and positioning aids for R50. The facility also failed to follow physician orders for R44. R44 and R50 are two of two hospice residents reviewed from a total sample list of 36. These failures resulted in R50 experiencing uncontrolled pain by grimacing, moaning, and closing her eyes while wound treatments were performed on a stage three and an unstageable wound. Findings include: 1.) The facility Hospice Patient Care Coordination Policy dated 7/2005 documents that coordination of care and services will be completed between the facility and the Hospice provider using the interdisciplinary process of the facility. The facility provided, the hospice company agreement dated 2/7/22, documents Hospice responsibilities including but not limited to; providing medical direction and management of the Hospice Patient, nursing, counseling, including spiritual, dietary and bereavement; social work, therapy as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify significant weight loss, prevent significant weight loss, develop/implement a care plan including interventions for weight loss, implement nutritional interventions/recommendations, timely implement physician's orders, and report significant weight loss to the physician and registered dietitian for two of five residents (R45, R83) reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 36. These failures resulted in R45 experiencing a severe weight loss of 13.73 % (percent) in four months. Findings include: The facility's Weight Management Policy and Procedure with revised date of February 2016 documents residents will be weighed at least monthly or more frequently if warranted, residents will be monitored for significant weight changes, weights will be compared at least monthly, dietary staff will review the Weight and Vitals Exception Report weekly, significant weight loss will be addressed at the time identified, significant weight loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse from a staff member to one (R8) resident to the State Agency and failed to report an allegation of resident (R6) to resident (R9) verbal abuse to the Abuse Coordinator out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents. Findings include:1. R8's initial report to the State Agency dated 5/24/26 documents on 5/12/26 V26 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) grabbed R8's wrist 'somewhat forcefully' causing a bruise. The facility is not able to provide documentation this incident was reported to the State Agency prior to 5/24/26. The facility daily staffing sheets dated 5/12/26 documents V26 CNA was assigned to R8 to provide cares. The facility staffing sheets did not show that V26 CNA worked any shift after 5/12/26. On 5/23/26 at 9:22 AM R8 stated V2 Director of Nurses (DON) asked me about my bruise the day after it happened. R8 stated V26 CNA had a 'bear grip' on my wrist. R8 stated she did not think V26 CNA meant to hurt R8 but was 'very rough' with R8. On 5/23/26 at 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigations for allegations of abuse for three (R5, R6, R8) residents out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.Findings include:1. R5 and R6's Final Report to the State Agency dated 4/14/26 documents R5 and R6 were involved in a physical altercation on 4/12/26. This same report and facility investigation file does not include any statements from other cognitively intact residents or any staff member with the exception of V8 CNA who witnessed a portion of the incident. On 5/23/26 at 11:40 AM V6 LPN stated she did not witness the incident between R5 and R6. V6 LPN stated V8 CNA was the one who reported this to V6 and as far as V6 knew, V8 CNA was the only person who actually witnessed anything. V6 LPN stated no one ever asked her what happened or asked her to complete a witness statement. V6 LPN stated she thought that was because she did not witness anything. V6 LPN stated she did document this incident in the progress notes so that if anyone had questions, they could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for one (R9) resident by another resident (R6) out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.Findings include:R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses of Spinal Stenosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Unsteadiness on Feet, Dementia, Scoliosis, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Muscle Weakness, and Abnormal Posture.R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R9 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R9 as dependent on staff for wheelchair mobility and requiring maximum assistance for transfers.R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses of Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, and Heart Failure.R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R6 as moderately cognitively impaired.R6's Nurse Progress Note, dated 5/17/26 at 2:34 PM, documents that R6 was verbally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for one (R8) resident causing a bruise out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.Findings include:R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses as Heart Failure, Osteoporosis, Radiculopathy Cervical Region, Repeated Falls, Muscle Weakness, Atrophy, Difficulty in Walking, Anxiety, Unsteady on Feet, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Abnormal Posture and Bone Density disorder. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R8 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R8 requires moderate assistance with transferring on and off of toilet and is dependent on staff for assistance with toileting personal hygiene, bathing, and dressing.R8's Care Plan intervention dated 3/11/25 instructs staff to utilize gait belt for one assist transfers. This same care plan documents an intervention dated 7/1/2025 instruct staff to encourage R8 to wear protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and failed to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care for one (R2) resident out of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in a sample list of nine residents. Findings include:R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses as Unsteady on Feet, Recurrent dislocation of Right Shoulder, Congestive Heart Failure, Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation, Type II Diabetes mellitus, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Generalized Weakness.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 is dependent on staff for personal hygiene, toileting and requires maximum assistance for transfers. On 5/23/26 continual observations were made from 8:45 AM to 10:53 AM of R2 when V14 and V23 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) assisted R2 to her room. R2 was sitting in her wheelchair facing the wall sized window in the resident common…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered direction and care planning for an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to maintain an accurate and updated care plan reflecting the resident's current clinical condition and skin integrity needs. This deficient practice affected one resident (R1) of three residents on sampled list reviewed.Findings Include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses include Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon, Malignant Neoplasm of the Breast, Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Kidney Failure, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder, Generalized Weakness, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and is receiving hospice/palliative care services. The admission assessment documented an indwelling urinary catheter (16 French) that was patent; however, the electronic health record and staff interviews revealed there was no physician order for catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered as ordered for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 23.Findings include:On 12/11/25 at 10:05 AM R6 stated that in the summer V17 Nurse Practitioner increased R6's pain medication. R6 stated that for a week, R6 was given the original dose and not the higher dose. R6 stated that V2 Director of Nursing did inform R6 that for a week R6 was given the lower dose and not the new prescribed dose.On 12/11/25 at 1:06 PM V2 Director of Nursing stated that on 7/11/25 R6's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen was increased from 5 milligrams to 7.5 milligrams. V2 stated that on 7/19/25 V16 Previous Agency Licensed Practical Nurse informed V2 that R6 was receiving the wrong dose of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen. V2 stated that staff did not remove and destroy the Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams card, they just placed the new Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 7.5-325 milligrams card behind it and continued to administer the 5-325 milligrams instead of reading the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to dignity while dining for R20, and by staff talking on cell phones during resident care for R8, R43, and R58. These failures affected four out of 29 residents (R20, R8, R43, and R58) reviewed for dignified care on the sample list of 31. Findings include:1.) R20's current diagnosis list documents the following diagnoses: Pain in right shoulder; Poly-osteoarthritis, unspecified; Other injury of unspecified body region (unidentified-R20 does have a left-hand amputation noted on observation below); Alzheimer's disease, unspecified; Personal history of other diseases of the circulatory system; Weakness; and [NAME] syndrome (a rare neurological syndrome that affects the eye and surrounding area on one side of the face).R20's current Physician Order Sheet documents the following: regular diet, regular texture, thin-consistency liquids.R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R20 has severe cognitive impairment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to choose their own wake -up time. This failure affected four of 29 residents (R8, R43, R58 and R74) reviewed for resident rights on the sample list of 31.Findings include: R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R8's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment.R43's MDS dated [DATE] documents R43's BIMS Score of 13 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment.R58's MDS dated [DATE] documents R58's BIMS Score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment.R74's MDS dated [DATE] documents R74's BIMS Score of 14 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment.On 09/22/2025 at 10:30 am - 11:50 am during a resident group meeting that R8, R43, R58 and R74 attended, R43 stated This morning at 3:00 am agency staff got me (R43) up, cleaned me up for the day, dressed me, then put me back to bed. R43 said R43 told them, R43…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive to include medications, diagnoses, behaviors, accidents/injuries, and incontinence for three of 18 residents (R6, R8, R45) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 31. The facility's Care Plan policy dated November 2017 documents A Comprehensive person-centered care plan shall be developed and implemented to meet the resident's preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs, while honoring resident rights to choice. This care plan shall include goals, measurable objectives, and interventions to meet identified resident needs. 1.) On 09/21/2025 at 10:32 AM R6 stated R6 used an electric wheelchair up until about three weeks ago when she hit her right leg on the bed frame causing a hematoma that ended up having to be lanced at the hospital. On 9/22/25 at 10:20 AM R6 stated R6 was given enemas while in the hospital and the staff there rubbed R6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility repeatedly failed to follow a physician order to discontinue the administration of a medication, for one of five residents (R69) reviewed for unnecessary medications on the sample list of 31.Findings include:R69's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R69's Brief Interview of Mental Status score as three out of a possible 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment.R69's Medication Administration Sheet (MAR) dated 9/1/25- 9/30/25 documents: Nuedexta (can cause excessive drowsiness), Oral Capsule 20-10 MG (Dextromethorphan HBr-Quinidine Sulfate), Give 1 capsule by mouth every morning, and at bedtime for the diagnoses of Pseudobulbar Disease (neurological disorder, uncontrolled laughter, crying and involuntary movements). This Physician order documents to start R69's Nuedexta 11/19/2024. R69's MARs for May, June, July, and August also documents R69 received Nuedexta every morning and at bedtime.R69's Quarterly Medication assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy instruction for the safe administration of physician ordered medication, for two of eight residents (R66 and R78) reviewed during medication observation. These failures resulted in three errors out of 29 opportunities for a 10.39 percent medication administration error rate. Findings include:R66's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R66's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score as 10 out of a possible 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.R66's current Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents the following: R66 is on a regular diet with regular-texture food and thin-consistency liquids, which indicates R66 does not have difficulty chewing.The same POS documents 15 oral medications scheduled for administration during the morning medication pass. The oral medications include:Potassium Chloride Crystal, ER (Extended Release) 20 mEq tablet, give three tablets by mouth each morning, andAspirin EC (Extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to respond to a resident grievance in a timely manner, for one of four residents (R58) reviewed for grievances in the group meeting, on the sample list of 31.Findings include: On 09/22/2025 at 10:30 am - 11:50 am during the resident group meeting. R58 sat in a wheelchair without a shoe on her left foot. R58 stated she had filed a grievance by sending a letter to V1, Administrator within the last month. R58 stated I haven't been able to wear a shoe, because of a toe ulcer, I have had for about a year. I saw a podiatrist, at an outside the facility four to six months ago. The corn was removed, and my pinky toe never healed. I still can't wear a shoe and the Administrator never responded to the letter.On 9/24/25 at 3:25 pm V1, Administrator provided an undated, handwritten grievance letter from R58. V1 confirmed the letter had been written by R58, and was given to V1, Administrator within the last several weeks. V1 also confirmed she had not put this grievance on her grievance log and therefore had not followed up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the administrator and the state survey agency for one of one resident (R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 8/25/25 documents injuries of unknown origin will be immediately reported to the administrator and the administrator will notify the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). R6's Emergency Department Note dated 8/15/25 at 5:27 PM documents R6 presented with shortness of breath and chest discomfort described as constant pressure that worsens with inspiration. R6's Chest Computed Tomography (CT) dated 8/5/25 at 7:18 PM documents Likely acute/recent T10 compression fracture with approximately 25% central vertebral body height loss. Other chronic compression fractures are demonstrating similar height loss relative to the CT from 10/20/2022. R6's Hospital admission History and Physical dated 8/5/25 documents R6's hospital admission diagnoses included Acute/recent T10 fracture and neurosurgery was consulted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of one resident (R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 31. Findings include:The facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 8/25/25 documents injuries of unknown origin will be immediately reported to the administrator and will be investigated. R6's Emergency Department Note dated 8/15/25 at 5:27 PM documents R6 presented with shortness of breath and chest discomfort described as constant pressure that worsens with inspiration. R6's Chest Computed Tomography (CT) dated 8/5/25 at 7:18 PM documents Likely acute/recent T10 compression fracture with approximately 25% central vertebral body height loss. Other chronic compression fractures are demonstrating similar height loss relative to the CT from 10/20/2022. R6's Hospital admission History and Physical dated 8/5/25 documents R6's hospital admission diagnoses included Acute/recent T10 fracture and neurosurgery was consulted for further evaluation. R6's Neurosurgery Note dated 8/5/25 documents R6 has a T10 compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise a care plan with fall interventions for one of 18 residents (R4) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 31. Findings include:The facility's policy titled Care Plan Process with the revision date of 11/2017 documents a comprehensive person-centered care plan shall be developed and implemented to meet the resident's preferences and goals., and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs, while honoring resident rights to choice All plans of care must be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly assessment.Review of incident report reported to Illinois Department of Public Health on 5/30/25 at 7:50 AM documents R4 sustained a fall on May 30, 2025 at 7:50 AM. R4 was observed sitting in front of her recliner chair, legs extended out, and head resting on the foot of the chair. R4 stated I fell out of this chair right here. R4 complained of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination during catheter care for one of two residents (R53) reviewed for urinary catheter care on the sample list of 31. Findings Include:R53's Medical Diagnoses List dated May 20, 2025 documents R53 is diagnosed with Infection and inflammatory reactions due to indwelling urethral catheter and Retention of urine.R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R53 has severe cognitive impairment, uses a wheelchair, is always incontinent of bowel, and is dependent on staff for toileting, hygiene, and transfers.R53's Care Plan dated 7/29/25 documents R53 has an indwelling Foley catheter.On 9/22/25 at 11:15 a.m., V27, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), wearing a personal protective gown, donned gloves and placed a basin of water on the bedside table, which also contained washcloths and towels. V27 placed a washcloth in the water, wrung out the excess water, and proceeded to wash R53's inner right thigh with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and record weights and meal intakes for one of three residents (R45) reviewed for weight loss in the sample list of 31. Findings include: On 9/21/2025 12:34 PM R45 was in her room eating lunch which consisted of peanut butter and jelly sandwich, cheese puffs, root beer float pie, and high protein ice cream. At 12:59 PM R45 was finished eating and lying in bed. R45 ate one or two bites of the sandwich and cheese puffs, half of the pie, and all of the ice cream. On 9/22/2025 at 11:51 AM V23 R45's Family stated R45's weight loss began in the Spring and R45 also was very sick with Norovirus. V23 stated R45 was getting nutritional shakes, but had a hard time keeping anything down. V23 stated the facility has kept the physician informed and R45 has continued to lose more weight. V23 stated R45 has dementia related to a traumatic brain injury that occurred four years ago and eating is something that R45 doesn't remember. V23 stated R45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle for one (R63) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care on the sample list of 31. Findings include:R63's Facility Census documents R63 was admitted to the facility 4/1/23 and has the following medical Diagnosis; Obstructive Sleep Apnea, and Symptoms and Signs Involving the Circulatory and Respiratory system. R63's Physicians Order Sheet dated 3/27/25 documents oxygen clean filter on concentrator, change the water bottle, nasal cannula and bag on concentrator weekly and as needed. When in use. The facility's Oxygen Administration policy dated 1/15/25 documents to change nasal cannulas, tubing, and humidifiers weekly and label with the date, and store oxygen cannula or mask in a plastic bag when not in use.On 9/21/25 at 9:17 AM R63's oxygen concentrator bottle was dated 8/27/25 and R63's oxygen tubing was not dated. R63's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine (CPAP) was connected to the oxygen concentrator and tubing. R63 was sitting in R63's recliner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately transcribe hospital discharge orders resulting in a significant medication error for one of five residents (R6) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample list of 31.Findings include:R6's Hospital Discharge Orders dated 8/13/25 document to administer Eliquis (blood thinner) 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily for two more days through 8/14/25, then give 5 mg by mouth twice daily starting on 8/15/25 at 9:00 AM. These orders include a hand written notation that these orders were reviewed with V20 Nurse Practitioner on 8/13/25 and V20 signed these orders 8/15/25. R6's August 2025 Medication Administration Record documents R6's Eliquis orders were incorrectly transcribed, with both the 10 mg and 5 mg orders implemented together, and R6 received 15 mg on the evening dose on 8/13/25 and 15 mg twice daily on 8/14/25. There is no documentation that the facility identified this medication error. On 9/22/25 at 2:46 PM V2 Director of Nursing confirmed R6's Eliquis order was transcribed incorrectly.On 9/23/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for elopement risk and the use of a departure alert system. This failure affects two (R1 and R3) of three residents reviewed for supervision in the sample list of three. Findings include: The facility Exit Seeking list dated April 2025 documents R1 and R3 as exit seeking. 1. A Progress Note dated 4/3/25, documents R1 found wandering near door at approximately 10pm with door alarming. Further documents R1 assisted back to bed and departure alert system placed around right ankle. R1's Care Plan (current) does not document R1 as an elopement risk or R1's use of a departure alert system until 4/29/25. R1's Physician Orders (current) documents the following order dated 4/29/25: check placement and functionality of departure alert system daily in evening. R1's Exit Seeking/Wandering Assessments dated 10/15/24 and 4/7/25 documents R1 is at risk for exit seeking/wandering. R1's Behavioral Notes dated 8/29/24, 12/28/24, 3/1/25 and 4/13/25 documents R1's wandering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide one staff assistance to prevent a fall for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of five. Findings include: R1's Facility Census documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnosis, Malignant Neoplasm of Endometrium, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Weakness, Overactive Bladder, Age-Related Osteoporosis, GERD, Encounter for Palliative Care and Anemia. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 8, moderate cognitive impairment, needs substantial/maximum assistance with Activities of Daily Living. R1's Care Plan dated 8/17/23 documents R1 is at risk for falls due to limited physical mobility related to chronic pain syndrome and Osteoarthritis. Interventions. Transfers: R1 transfers with one staff assist/gait belt and rolling walker. R1's Health Status Note dated 4/1/25 at 7:33pm documents V4 Certified Nursing Assistant notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, measure, act on or analyze a performance improvement program project in the last twelve months. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: The facility provided long term care facility application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 10/20/24 documents 85 residents reside in the facility. The facility provided Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Policy dated 12/8/23 documents that the facility quality program will enable a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in the facility while involving all caregivers in practical and creative problem solving. Additionally, the policy documents that a systematic approach to determine underlying causes of problems, and development of corrective actions that will be designed to effect changes at the facility level to prevent quality of care, quality of life or safety problems and to facilitate and monitor the effectiveness of its performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to store, handle, and launder linens that were potentially exposed to scabies. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents who reside in the facility. The facility also failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for two (R4, R39) of six residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions from a total sample list of 44 residents. Findings include: 1.) The facility provided undated Scabies/Crusted Norwegian Scabies infection control policy documents that scabies are infectious diseases of the skin. Transmission occurs from brief skin to skin contact with items such as bedding, clothing, furniture, rugs carpeting, floors and other items that can become contaminated with skin scale and crusts shed by a person with Scabies. To avoid reinfestation, bedding and clothing used by residents with scabies would be collected and transported in plastic bag an emptied directly into the washer to avoid contaminating other surfaces and items. Machine wash and dry using the hot water and high heat cycle temps in excess of 122…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications timely and according to physician's orders and manufacturer's instructions for four (R17, R61, R42, R4) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 44. These failures resulted in eight medication errors out of 25 opportunities, a 32% medication error rate. Findings include: 1.) On 10/21/24 at 10:36 AM V5 Registered Nurse (RN) stated V5 is behind on the morning medication pass, and there are still morning medications that need to be given. On 10/21/24 at 10:59 AM V5 stated V5 still has scheduled morning medications that need to be administered. On 10/21/24 at 10:51 AM V5 administered R17's medications which included Lantus insulin 15 units, Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg), Tylenol 650 mg, and Metoprolol Tartrate (cardiac medication) 25 mg. V5 did not prime the Lantus insulin pen prior to administration. R17's October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents to administer Lantus 18 units daily at 8:00 AM starting on 10/9/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain resident's furniture in a clean manner for two of 24 residents (R74, R61) reviewed for clean, comfortable, homelike environment in the sample list of 44. Findings include: On 10/20/24 at 9:36 AM, there is a light tan fabric chair in the sitting area of R74 and R61's room. This chair has dark brown stains and light brown stains on at least half of the seat of the chair. On 10/23/24 at 3:56 PM, V13 Housekeeping Supervisor stated that they clean resident's chairs in the resident's rooms every once in awhile. V13 stated that she just had most of them cleaned by an outside company a few months ago. V13 stated she was not aware that the chair in R74 and R61's sitting area was stained. On 10/23/24 at 9:05 AM, R74 and R61's chair had been removed from the sitting area in their room. On 10/23/24 at 9:07 AM, V28 Housekeeper stated that she does not know what happened to their chair. On 10/23/24 at 9:27 AM, V13 confirmed R74 and R61's sitting room chair was stained with what she thought was coffee. V13 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from restraint by not having a Physician's Order, a signed consent form for a restraint and to complete restraint reduction attempts. This affects one of one resident(R74) reviewed for restraints in the sample list of 44. Findings include: On 10/20/24 at 10:14 AM and 12:51 PM, R74 was in his wheelchair and had a lap cushion across the front of his lap. On 10/21/24 at 9:35 AM and 10:43 AM, R74 was in his wheelchair and had a lap cushion on his lap. R74's diagnosis list documents diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity with Mood Disturbance, Muscle Weakness, Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. R74's Physician's Orders dated 10/21/24 do not document an order for the use of a soft lap cushion as a restraint nor as a therapeutic intervention. R74's Care Plan dated 10/7/24 documents R74 utilizes a lap cushion as a comfort device. This Care Plan documents R74 is able to place and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement hearing devices and develop a care plan for hearing loss for one (R39) of one resident reviewed for communication in the sample list of 44. Findings include: R39's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R39 has minimal difficulty hearing when using hearing aide/device and R39 has moderate cognitive impairment. R39's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] documents R39 uses left and right hearing aides. R39's Care Plan dated 10/10/24 documents R39 is hard of hearing and only uses one hearing aide to the right ear. There is no documentation that R39's care plan addressed R39's hearing loss and hearing aide use prior to 10/10/24. R39's Concern Form dated 10/15/24 documents R39's family reported R39's left hearing aide has been missing since Sunday (10/13/24) and the right hearing aide was also missing. This form documents the right hearing aide was found on 1016/24, the facility will replace R39's hearing aide, and an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to check and record gastric residual volume to verify gastrostomy tube placement, and administer and record water flushes and enteral feeding amounts for one (R39) of one resident reviewed for gastrostomy tube in the sample of 44. Findings include: On 10/20/24 at 8:58 AM R39 was lying in bed asleep with Osmolite 1.5 Cal (calorie) infusing at 60 milliliters (ml) per hour via gastrostomy tube (g-tube). The mechanical pump also contained a bag of water and was set to infuse 200 ml of water every four hours. On 10/21/24 at 10:27 AM V5 Registered Nurse stated R39's feeding pump is set to administer a certain amount of feeding, and it stops infusing and beeps when it has reached the set amount. V5 stated if the pump is shut off early it is documented, but we don't record the total volume infused. On 10/21/24 at 2:24 PM V5 checked R39's g-tube placement by inserting 20 ml of air via syringe and listening with a stethoscope. V5 dissolved each medication (which were already crushed prior to observation) that was in three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label, store, and change oxygen and nebulizer tubing for three (R17, R39, R84) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 44. Findings include: 1.) On 10/20/24 at 9:55 AM R17 was asleep in his room. The undated and uncovered oxygen tubing was on top of R17's bed and connected to the oxygen concentrator. R17's Physician Order dated 9/30/24 documents titrate oxygen via nasal cannula to keep saturation above 90 %. There is no order to routinely change R17's oxygen tubing and there is no documentation in R17's medical record that R17's oxygen tubing is routinely changed. R17's ongoing oxygen saturation log documents R17 used oxygen on 13 days between 9/23/24 and 10/21/24. 2.) On 10/20/24 at 9:00 AM R39's undated and uncovered nebulizer mask and tubing was on R39's night stand and connected to a nebulizer machine which had splatters of a brown substance. R39's October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents R39 receives Aformoterol Tartrate 15 micrograms per 2 milliliters (ml)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Human Coronavirus Infection) by failing to stock isolation carts with N95 masks, ensure isolation signage was posted, and ensure staff discarded personal protective equipment (PPE) upon leaving COVID-19 positive resident rooms. The facility also failed to complete COVID-19 symptom monitoring for residents having COVID-19. These failures affect five (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6) of six residents reviewed for infection control in the sample list of eight. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19 Testing and Response Plan dated 9/1/24 documents monitor for clinical worsening including assessing for symptoms and vital signs for every four hours for COVID-19. This policy documents to discard respirator or mask and a new one should be applied after caring for a COVID-19 positive resident. The facility's General Approaches to Infection Prevention and Control Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions for Communicable Disease policy dated 10/17/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was not subjected to physical abuse by (R1). R2 is one of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's Facility Census documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: Hospice, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Protein Calorie-Malnutrition, Hyperlipidemia, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Muscle Weakness, Dysphagia, Nonexudative Age Related Macular Degeneration, HTN, Disorders of Bone Density, Personal History of Other Venous Thrombosis and Embolism, GERD, Insomnia, Personal History of Pulmonary Embolism, Long Term Use of Anticoagulants, Adhesive Capsulitis of Left Shoulder, Wandering Disorders, Localized Swelling Mass and lump Upper Limb and Pre-glaucoma. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 99, severe cognitively impairment. R1's Care Plan dated 3/14/24 documents R1 exhibits moods/behaviors as evidenced by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of medications for five (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications from a total sample list of five residents reviewed. Findings include: The facility provided Resident Care Policy and Procedure Regarding Abuse and Neglect, Involuntary Seclusion, Exploitation, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injuries of Unknown Origin and Social Media policy dated 3/15/18 documents that Misappropriation of Resident Property is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident belongings or money without the resident's consent. No person shall misappropriate or steal any resident's property. Any person who becomes aware of any alleged misappropriation or theft of resident property shall report the incident to the Administrator immediately. On 2/27/24 at 3:06PM, V8 (Registered Nurse/RN) said When I began my shift on 2/12/24 I was counting narcotics with the off-going nurse and some of the people's narcotic numbers were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by employing a nurse with a history of disciplinary action on their license. This failure affects five (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) of five residents reviewed for abuse on the sample of five residents. Findings include: The facility provided Resident Care Policy and Procedure Regarding Abuse and Neglect, Involuntary Seclusion, Exploitation, Misappropriation of Resident Property, Injuries of Unknown Origin, and Social Media dated 3/15/18 documents that the facility will not knowingly employ individuals or otherwise engage individuals who have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. This includes individuals who have findings entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry or those who have had disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional licenses by a state licensure board as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of resident or misappropriation of resident property. V3 (Agency Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of narcotics as directed by their policy. This failure has the potential to affect one (R1) of five residents reviewed for medication disposal on the sample list of five. Findings include: The facility Medication Disposal Policy dated 2/2021 documents that unused, unneeded, or expired controlled medication tablets and capsules should be removed from the outer packing and placed into a commercially available controlled drug denaturing kit. R1's physician order dated [DATE] documents an order for Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (Narcotic) Oral Tablet 2.5/325 milligram dated [DATE] with instructions to give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for moderate pain to severe pain for 3 days. The order was discontinued on [DATE]. R1's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form documents V3 (Agency Registered Nurse) signed out R1's discontinued Oxycodone 2.5 milligrams/325 milligrams on [DATE] at 8:00AM and 1:00PM and on [DATE] at 7:00AM, 11:30AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-13 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings included all required committee members. This failure affects all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy dated as reviewed 3/30/23 documents the QAPI program will use a systematic approach to identify underlying causes of problems, develop corrective actions to create changes in order to prevent quality of care, quality of life and safety problems, and monitor the effectiveness of these changes. The QA meetings will be held at least quarterly and lists the Medical Director/Designee, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Prevention & Control Officer, Consulting Pharmacist, Minimum Data Set/Care Plan Coordinator/Restorative Nurse, Business Office Manager, Social Services Director, Activity Director, Certified Dietary Manager, Environmental Services Director, and Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor as committee members. The facility's QA Quarterly Meeting sign in sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely administer pneumococcal vaccines to ensure residents are up to date with pneumococcal vaccinations for five (R52, R12, R44, R64, R45) of seven residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample list of 36. Findings include: The facility's Pneumococcal Pneumonia Vaccination Policy dated April 2022 documents incidents of pneumococcal pneumonia will be reduced by administering pneumonia vaccines to residents who are at high risk or [AGE] years old or older and refers to the Pneumococcal Vaccination in Adults algorithm for the time frames of dose administration. The algorithm documents that pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for anyone over the age of 65. If the patient has no prior pneumococcal vaccination, then administer Prevnar20 or Vaxneuvance. If the patient previously had Pneumovax23 without Prevnar13, then administer Prevnar20 or Vaxneuvance. If the patient previously had Prevnar13 with/without Pneumovax23, then Prevnar20 or Vaxneuvance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess two of two residents (R47, R58) reviewed for safe self-administration of medication in the sample list of 36. Findings Include: The facility's policy Self-Administration of medications reviewed 12/05 states if the resident wishes to self-medicate, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) must assess the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual abilities. 1.) On 9/12/23 at 9:50AM, R47 was in bed finishing breakfast. There was a pill cup with several pills on the bed side table. R47 dumped the pills in R47's mouth and swallowed them with water. R47 stated the nurse leaves my pills here so I can take them after I eat. On 9/12/23 at 10:00AM V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated I left (R47's) medication so (R47) could take it after (R47) was finished eating. I thought I could just keep an eye on (R47) from the hall. At the time R47 was observed taking (R47's) medication, V6 was at the nurse's station where she had no view of (R47). On 9/11/23 V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated (R47) is not on a self-medication program.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete pressure ulcer risk assessments, routinely assess pressure ulcers, update a care plan to include a pressure ulcer and new pressure relieving interventions, and ensure a pressure ulcer was covered with a dressing for resident's wounds. This failure affects three of seven residents (R61, R10, R77) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of 36. Findings include: The facility's Wound and Ulcer Policy and Procedure revised 1/10/18 documents the Braden Scale will be used to determine the resident's risk for developing pressure ulcers and preventative measures may include addressing pressure, moisture, friction, and shearing. This policy documents Braden Assessments are completed upon admission, then weekly for four weeks, and then monthly thereafter. This policy documents residents who are at moderate and high risk will have care planned approaches, wounds assessments will be documented in the resident's medical record at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete fall investigations, develop, and implement fall interventions for one of three residents (R77) reviewed for falls in the sample list of 36. Findings include: The facility's Fall Assessment and Management Policy with a revised date of April 2019 documents, Interventions will be based on the fall risk assessment and the circumstances surrounding the risk for injury or actual injury of fall. R77's Care Plan documents diagnoses including Restless Legs Syndrome, Insomnia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Dizziness and Giddiness, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Muscle Weakness. The Care Plan dated 5/17/23 documents R77 is at high risk for falls and has had actual falls r/t (related to) Confusion, Incontinence, Psychoactive Drug Use and unaware of safety. This Care Plan documents R77 had falls on 5/16/23, 6/5/2023, 6/11/2023, 6/16/2023, 7/17/2023, 7/23/2023, 8/19/2023, 8/24/2023, 9/6/2023 and 9/10/2023. There is no investigation for the fall on 6/16/23 and the investigation for the 9/6/23 fall is incomplete. On 9/12/23 at 2:52…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to secure R24's catheter and failed to provide R24 with hygienic perineal care during catheter care and failed to prevent R77's catheter from dragging on the floor for two of two (R24, R77) residents reviewed for catheter care and urinary tract infections from a total sample list of 36. Findings include: 1.) The facility provided Catheter Care/Incontinent Care Policy dated 8/1/2005 documents that after giving pericare (perineal care) and before starting catheter care, make sure and wash hands and obtain new supplies. If the resident is incontinent of bowels, rectal care may be given before performing incontinent or catheter care. Make sure to obtain new supplies and wash your hands. Catheter care is given every shift by the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) trained in the procedure. Cleanse downward from top to bottom giving care to cleanse the catheter when applicable. Incontinent care will be given with each episode of incontinence. R24's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a gastrostomy (G-tube) site in a clean sanitary manner for one resident (R38) of one resident reviewed for gastrostomy tubes in a sample list of 36. Findings Include: The facility's policy Enteral/ Tube Feeding Policy dated 2/26/15 states Routine care such as cleansing the healed insertion site and provision of oral hygiene may be performed by non-licensed staff under the supervision of licensed staff following facility procedure. This policy also states, To discourage the transmission of infection, residents receiving tube feedings will receive daily hygiene and skin care to site utilized for feeding. R38's Current physician's orders includes an order to Monitor stoma for cleanliness. Clean as needed. Resident (requires) two caregivers for cleaning care, make sure to talk (R38) through care and reassure (R38) that it will not hurt every day shift related to Dysphagia. On 9/11/23 at 11:57 AM R38's feeding tube disc was caked with crusty brown secretions. R38 was lying flat in bed. R38's lower teeth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$150,053 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $76,700 — penalty dated 2026-04-22
- $73,353 — penalty dated 2024-10-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-19 for 23 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-21 for 42 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-10 for 15 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HERITAGE OPERATIONS GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 1.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTRY HEALTH, INC. | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/13/2016 |
| DORSEY, JAMIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/25/2022 |
| FLESSNER, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/25/2022 |
| HARRIS, JACKIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/25/2022 |
| HETHKE, CELIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/24/2022 |
| MCDOWELL, CATHERINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2023 |
| OSTERBUR, DEANNA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/13/2016 |
| OSTERBUR, ROD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/13/2016 |
| RAY, DARRIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| ROSEMAN, KOLEEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/25/2022 |
| VOUDRIE, CANDICE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/30/2025 |
| CURRY, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/07/2022 |
| HERITAGE OPERATIONS GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
| HART, BENJAMIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/05/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145708. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.