No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Serenity Estates of Lena

1010 South Logan Street, Lena, IL 61048 · For profit - Individual · 92 certified beds · (815) 369-4561 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (815) 369-4561 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
200-298 N Schuyler St · (815) 369-4541 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
154 W Main St · (815) 369-4111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
201 Dodds Dr · (815) 369-2311 · Call to confirm hours
Park
110 E Provost St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight16.3%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.0%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.6%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.0%91.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.8%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.7%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.6%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine13.7%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.0%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.6%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.282.021.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.442.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.4%CMS range 37.6–58.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.1–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 2.7–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-27)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform safe bed mobility for 1 resident (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a nasal bone fracture, a femoral neck fracture, and a 4x4cm (centimeter) laceration to her forehead that was repaired with 9 sutures. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 8/1/24 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to intracapsular fracture of right femur, localization-related idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndrome with seizures, laceration of head, dementia with agitation, and osteoporosis. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has severe cognitive impairment and requires 2+ staff assist for bed mobility. R1's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 requires 2+ staff physical assist for bed mobility. R1's local hospital records dated 7/28/24 showed, Patient is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident with repeated falls (R55). This resulted in R55 having an two unwitnessed falls, the first fall resulted in a left femur fracture requiring surgical intervention and the second fall resulting in a right humerus fracture. The facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for falls was supervised (R59). This resulted in R59 experiencing an unwitnessed fall and fracturing her lumbar one, spinal vertebrae (lower back fracture). The facility failed to implement their fall protocol and assess a resident for falls (R40), resulting in an unwitnessed fall in R40's room. The facility failed to ensure residents with a history of falls were supervised (R34, R10) and failed to transfer a resident with a gait belt (R11). This applies to 6 of 11 residents (R55, R59, R40, R34 , R10, R11) reviewed for falls in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. On 05/23/23 at 9:28 AM, R55 was sleeping in a low recliner, in her room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin as possible abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.The findings include:R1's Face Sheet printed on 2/25/26 showed he had the diagnosis of dementia and right above the elbow arm amputation.On 2/24/26 at 10:45 AM, V3 (R1's Daughter In-Law) said R1 had a black eye and the facility was unable to explain how R1 got the black eye.R1's Progress Note dated 9/18/25 at 2:08 PM, entered by V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse) showed R1 had bruising to the corner of his left eye that was dark purple in color and approximately 3 centimeters (CM) x 0.5 CM. The same note showed R1 was alert and oriented times one and was unable to explain how the bruising occurred.R1's Progress Note dated 9/18/25 at 11:50 PM showed R1 also had bruising to his left upper arm measuring 10 CM x 5 CM that was light purple/blue in color. The note indicated R1 was unable to explain how the bruising occurred.On 2/25/26 at 12:06 PM, V10 said she was taking care of R1 when the bruising was found. V10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident wasn't administered the wrong medications resulting in a significant medication error. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 5. The findings include:On 2/9/26 at 10:37 AM, R1 stated, an agency nurse gave her the wrong medications. She tried to tell her the medications weren't her pills but the nurse told her they were, so she took them. The nurse did not ask her name or anything else to confirm it was her. She said she had a real hard headache and didn't know how to explain how she felt after taking the medication. They told her one of the medications was risperidone. She wrote it down on a piece of paper. She has never been prescribed that medication or taken it before. The facility's medication error report form for R1 dated 1/29/26 shows, the medication error happened on 1/29/26 at 8:30 AM. V4 agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) gave R1 another residents (R5) medications. R1 received, Norvasc 5 mg (milligram) (blood pressure), iron 325 mg, fiber…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident physical and verbal abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of the 3. The findings include:The facility's Final Report to the local health department (date submitted not provided in report) showed, on 11/8/25 at 4:45 PM, V4 and V5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) entered R1's room, an incontinent resident, to provide cares.and get him ready for dinner. [R1] is resistant often to care, including yelling out when being provided peri care. The report showed V4 indicated V5 became frustrated with [R1's] reluctance of care and quickly pulled the blankets and sheet off him. [R1] then reacted negatively by yelling, again. [V5] then pinched the resident's nose and told [R1] to 'shut up and be quiet' and 'shut the f* up.' The report showed, Allegations made by [V4] against [V5] are founded. [V5] will not be returning to work at [the facility].The facility's investigation included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure cooked foods were cooled in a manner to limit the growth of potentially dangerous pathogens. The failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The CMS 671, dated 3/25/25, showed 52 residents reside in the facility. On 3/25/25 at 9:05 AM, the facility's reach-in freezer had several left-over food items to include but not limited to: 1.) Spaghetti Sauce prepared on 3/18/25 and use by date of 4/18/25 2.) Taco meat prepared on 3/3/25 and use by date of 4/3/25 3.) Beef Barley soup prepared on 3/25/25 and use by date of 3/27/25 4.) Meat Balls prepared on 3/19/25 and use by date of 4/19/25. The facility's reach-in refrigerator had leftover chicken noodle soup with a prepared date of 3/24/25. On 3/27/25 at 11:35 AM, V9 (Dietary Manager) stated the facility does serve leftover foods to the residents. V9 said the leftover chicken noodle soup in the refrigerator and the leftovers in the freezer are for all the residents. V9 said the soups are on the alternative menu and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform interdisciplinary care plan conferences for 1 of 1 residents (R44) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 26. The findings include: R44's electronic face sheet printed on 3/26/25 showed R44 has diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, hemiplegia & hemiparesis affecting left dominant side, dementia with anxiety, and dementia with behaviors. R44's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R44 has severe cognitive impairment. On 3/25/25 at 10:10AM, V13 (R44's power of attorney) stated, I have been leaving voicemails for about 3 weeks at the facility to figure out (R44's) finances and I am getting very angry because you can never reach anyone. When they call me, I answer or call back. A few weeks ago, I went to see (R44), and I wanted to be able to sit down with someone and ask questions about his care. I have never heard of a care plan meeting, and we have never had one. R44's care plan attendance records showed, 6/18/24 no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform incontinence care and activities of daily living care for 1 of 1 residents (R35) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 26. The findings include: R35's electronic face sheet printed on 3/27/25 showed R35 has diagnoses including but not limited to need for personal care, muscle wasting and atrophy, morbid obesity, and edema. R35's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R35 has mild cognitive impairment and requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene. R35's care plan dated 7/27/22 showed, I have an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, limited mobility .personal hygiene: limited assist x 1 at times. On 3/25/25 at 10:46AM, R35 was walking down the hallway and had wet marks on the back of his pants. V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant) took R35 to his bathroom and removed his wet pants and incontinence brief. V14 confirmed R35's incontinence brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facilty failed to ensure a healed pressure injury did not reopen for 1 (R40) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure injury in the sample of 26. The findings include: R40's admission record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure, and need for assistance with personal care. His 2/18/25 resident assessment and care screening documents moderate cognitive impairment. The same assessment documents he requires partial to moderate assistance with rolling side to side, sitting to stand, and transfers. He is occasionally incontinent of urine, and he was admitted with a Stage 3 pressure wound. R40's Wound evaluation and management summary of 2/24/25 documents a Stage 3 pressure wound to the left upper medial buttock was resolved. The 3/10/25 wound evaluation and management summary documents the same Stage 3 wound re-opened and the initial measurements were 2.2 cm (centimeters) (length) x 1.4 cm (width) x…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention measures were in place for 1 of 3 residents (R19) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 26. The findings include: R19's electronic face sheet printed on 3/27/25 showed R19 has diagnoses including but not limited to femur fracture, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, dementia with behaviors, and major depressive disorder. R19's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R19 has severe cognitive impairment and utilizes a bed and chair alarm daily. R19's physician's orders dated 3/25/25 showed, Ensure bed/chair alarm in place & functioning at all times. R19's care plan dated 9/22/23 showed, I had an actual fall 2/17/25 .utilize bed/chair alarms, bolstered mattress, (non-slip pad) when up in wheelchair. R19's care plan dated 10/16/23 showed, I require bed/chair alarm related to I have a history of falls with attempted independent transfers and ambulation. On 3/25/25 at 9:18AM, R19 was laying in her bed with her bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to show a resident was assessed for a psychotropic gradual dose reduction. This applies to 1 of 5 (R33) residents in the sample of 26. The findings include: R33's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an admission date of 5/14/22. R33's Physician Orders showed, as of 3/27/25, she was taking quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) and sertraline (antidepressant). The diagnosis for quetiapine was anxiety and major depression with psychotic symptoms. The diagnosis for sertraline was major depression with psychotic symptoms. R33's Order Listing Report for quetiapine showed she had been taking quetiapine since her admission. R33's Order History showed she had been taking 25 milligrams twice daily since 8/3/23. On 3/26/25 at 2:50 PM, R33's most recent gradual dose reduction (GDR, a lowering of a resident's psychotropic medication) attempt or decline documentation was requested from V2 Director of Nursing. On 3/27/25 at 8:21 AM, V2 Director of Nursing stated V7 Psychiatrist would like to speak over the phone regarding R33's quetiapine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to follow manufacturer instructions regarding the expiration date of in use insulin. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R47, R27) reviewed for insulin in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:00 AM, R47's insulin glargine (long-acting insulin) was in the E hall cart. The insulin vial had a label which showed an open date of [DATE] and a discard date of [DATE]. The cart had no other opened insulin glargine for R47. R47's [DATE] Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed he was to receive 8 units of insulin glargine at bedtime. The MAR showed the insulin glargine was documented as being given on [DATE]. The manufacturer's instructions Learn How to Inject [insulin glargine] showed, The [insulin] vials you are using should be thrown away after 28 days, even if it still has insulin in it. On [DATE] at 12:32 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the facility follows manufacturer instructions regarding the storage and use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform glove changes and hand hygiene during incontinence care for 1 of 8 residents (R5) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 26. The findings include: R5's electronic face sheet printed on 3/27/25 showed R5 has diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease stage 4, urinary tract infection, and anxiety disorder. R5's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R5 has moderate cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 3/25/25 at 12:07PM, V5 and V14 (Certified Nursing Assistants) provided incontinence care to R5. V14 cleansed feces off R5's buttocks with toilet paper, handed the toilet paper to V14 to throw away. This occurred 4 times between V5 and V14 throughout R5's incontinence care. V5 and V14 then applied a clean incontinence brief, touched the mechanical lift remote, R5's bed controls, and R5's wheelchair without removing their soiled gloves. V14 stated gloves are not removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer a resident the flu vaccine for the 2024/2025 flu season. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R7) reviewed for vaccinations in the sample of 26. The findings include: R7's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 2/8/24 with diagnoses to include dementia without behavioral disturbance, influenza, and covid-19. R7's Immunization History (as of 3/27/25) showed she did not receive the 2024/2025 flu vaccine. On 3/26/25 at 1:46 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated R7's Power of Attorney was in the Intensive Care Unit the end of October 2024, and he was not reachable. V2 said R7's (family) was not willing to make decisions for R7. V2 said R7 was not given the flu shot and R7 did have flu early in 2025. On 3/26/25 at 2:50 PM, V2 said if a resident has a diagnosis of dementia, they do not allow the resident to sign consents, only the power of attorney. On 3/26/25 at 3:17 PM, R7 was oriented to date, city, and her medical history. R7 said, Early this year I was sick with both flu and covid; I had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer a resident the covid vaccine for the 2024/2025 covid season. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R7) reviewed for vaccinations in the sample of 26. The findings include: R7's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 2/8/24 with diagnoses to include dementia without behavioral disturbance, influenza, and covid-19. R7's Immunization History (as of 3/27/25) showed she did not receive the 2024/2025 covid booster. On 3/26/25 at 1:46 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated R7's Power of Attorney was in the Intensive Care Unit the end of October 2024, and he was not reachable. V2 said R7's (family) was not willing to make decisions for R7. V2 said R7 was not given the covid booster and R7 did have covid early in 2025. On 3/26/25 at 2:50 PM, V2 said if a resident has a diagnosis of dementia, they do not allow the resident to sign consents, only the power of attorney. On 3/26/25 at 3:17 PM, R7 was oriented to date, city, and her medical history. R7 said, Early this year I was sick with both flu and covid; I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering residents' rooms that were on isolation for influenza. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet printed on 2/11/25 showed R1 was diagnosed with influenza on 2/3/25. R1's Order Summary Report printed on 2/11/25 showed an order for R1 to be on droplet isolation for influenza dated 2/5/25 with no end date. A second order for droplet isolation with a start date of 2/11/25. On 2/11/25 at 8:31 AM, on R1's door was a sign indicating R1 was on enhanced barrier precautions. There was no sign up indicating R1 was on droplet/contact isolation. V9 (Activity Aide) was in R1's room. V9 had on a surgical mask and no other PPE. V9 was within 6 feet of R1. On 2/11/25 at 8:50 AM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) was outside of R1's room placing a droplet/contact isolation sign on R1's door. On 2/11/25 at 9:15 AM, V3 said there was some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis, COPD, weakness, and dehydration. On 9/30/24 at 10:55 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said on 9/19/24 she was receiving report from V5 (CNA). V5 told her rudely, she took away R1's call light last night because his call light was going off frequently. V5 reported R1 had soft touch call light that kept going off and she was not going to go in his room every 15 minutes. When she went to get R1 up from his bed. R1 said the girl last night (V5) took his call light away from him. He said what if I needed help and couldn't get it. R1's call light was under his bed on the floor. Staff should make sure a residents call light is within reach before leaving the room. On 9/30/24 at 12:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer a Physician prescribed medication as ordered. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of six. The findings include: The facility face sheet shows R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, congestive heart failure and hypertension. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to be cognitively intact and requires moderate assistance with his activities of daily living. On 8/27/24 at 9:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said she was the nurse working the floor on 8/18/24. V2 said she was having a very busy night with another resident having a change in condition. V2 said she was running behind in her bedtime medication pass and was also trying to give a shift to shift report to the oncoming nurse. V2 said she looked at the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and saw the order for R1's scheduled insulin and she prepared that and then drew up 40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist attended the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This applies to all residents in the facility. The findings include: The CMS 671 dated 4/11/24 shows 56 residents residing in the facility. On 4/11/24 at 12:55PM, V1 (Administrator) said the facility has a formal QAPI meeting quarterly. V1 said the Medical Director, Administrator, a leader from nursing, and dietary are required to attend the quarterly meetings. V1 said there were a couple meetings the DON had to cover the floor and couldn't attend. V1 did not identify that the Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist should attend all quarterly meetings. On 4/11/24 at 1:15PM, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said she is the Infection Preventionist. V2 said she has attended the quarterly QAPI meetings, but it's been awhile. She would attend if they were scheduled on the days she was in the building, working. If I attended the meeting, I would sign the sheet. I was off for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a resident from falling from a broken beauty shop chair and failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 4 of 5 residents (R43, R3, R20, R50) reviewed for falls in the sample of 23. The findings include: 1. R43's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia with agitation, lack of coordination, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, depressive episodes, and history of falls. R43's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she has moderate cognitive impairment and requires partial to moderate assistance with most cares. R43's 3/19/24 initial fall note showed, Resident was in beauty shop chair and chair broke and resident fell backward and hit head on floor . Interventions: Make sure someone is in the room at all times with residents and fix the chair . R43's 3/22/24 Progress Note showed, Chair that was previously out of service due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for a resident on CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) therapy for 1 resident (R410), failed to store nebulizer and CPAP masks in a sanitary manner for 4 residents (R6, R24, R50, R410). These failures apply to 4 of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 23. The findings include: 1) R410's electronic face sheet printed on 4/11/24 showed R410 has diagnoses including but not limited to pneumonia, history of COVID-19, anxiety disorder, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. On 4/9/24 at 9:58AM, R410 had a CPAP machine on his bedside table with the CPAP mask laying out on top of the table, uncovered. R410 stated his machine came from home and the staff assist him to apply it every night before bed. R410 stated he is unsure of what the settings are supposed to be but thought staff at the facility knew what they were. R410's physician's orders showed no active orders for R410 to utilize a CPAP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to reassess for preferences and nutritional needs after a resident was readmitted with a diet change for 1 of 1 resident (R22) reviewed for dietary services. The findings include: R22's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] (65 days ago) with diagnoses to include dementia without behavioral disturbance, candidal esophagitis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, atherosclerosis, and a non-pressure chronic ulcer of part of the foot. R22's April 2024 Physician Order Sheet showed, . 4/2/24 Regular diet, Full Liquid texture, thin consistency . Dietary Supplements: House Supplement three times a day, 237 mililiters (1 carton) three times a day . R22's care plan initiated 2/9/24 showed, The resident is on a regular diet . Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/Document for side effects and effectiveness. Provide and serve diet as ordered. No changes were made to R22's care plan after his diet change to a liquid diet. R22's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed by a physician within the first 30 days after admission for 2 of 2 residents (R22, R9) reviewed for physician visits outside of the sample. The findings include: R22's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] (65 days ago) with diagnoses to include dementia without behavioral disturbance, atherosclerosis, and a non-pressure chronic ulcer of part of the foot. R22's record showed he was seen by a Nurse Practitioner on 2/15/24, 3/18/24, and 4/1/24. On 4/10/24 at 1:13 PM, R9 and R22 were in the group with the surveyor. R22 said he was upset that the facility does not have a doctor that comes in and sees the residents. R22 said he and R9 have only been seen by a nurse practitioner. R22 said the facility staff told him a nurse practitioner is a doctor. On 4/11/24 at 11:46 AM, V10 RN said the facility has nurse practitioners that come in every week. V10 said R9 and R22's physician does come into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a scheduled medication was available for administration for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for medications in the sample of 23. The findings include: R10's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, pain in right leg, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, anxiety disorder, need for assistance with personal care, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and osteoarthritis. R10's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she has severe cognitive impairment and is requires moderate to substantial assistance from staff for all cares. R10's care plan initiated 5/23/23 showed, I use anti-anxiety medications related to anxiety disorder . Administer Anti-Anxiety medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. R10's August 2023 Physician Order Sheet showed and order dated 5/22/23 for Alprazolam 0.25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure vegetables were not overcooked, leaving them with a soft mushy texture and a bland flavor. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R1, and R13) reviewed for food preparation in a sample of 23. The findings include: On 04/11/24 at 11:48 AM, This surveyor sampled the mixed vegetables from the kitchen as V6 (Cook) was serving them to the residents. This surveyor found the vegetables too soft and was able to masticate (smash up) using my tongue and the roof of my mouth. The vegetables had a bland taste. On 04/11/24 at 12:44 PM, trays throughout the dining area had most of the vegetable uneaten after the residents left the table. 04/10/24 at 01:04 PM, V6 said, he cooks the mixed vegetables by boiling them for 45 minutes in water, then he removes them from the water a puts them in the oven at 275 degrees Fahrenheit to keep them warm. On 4/11/24 at 1:30 PM, V5 (Dietary Manager) said, we don't put salt in like the recipe says to because a lot of residents are on a low sodium diet. On 4/10/24 at 2:00 PM, R13 said, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the correct personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn while providing care for resident in contact isolation with a multi drug resistant organism (MDRO). This applies to 1 of 8 (R54) residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 23. The findings include: R54's admission Record showed an original admission date of 3/28/24 with diagnoses to include a MRSA (an MDRO) (onset date 4/6/24), an abscess, and diabetes. R54's 4/10/24 Infection/Viral Charting showed she was ordered two antibiotics for her MRSA infection. R54's Care Plan showed Contact precautions maintained. Date initiated: 4/6/24. On 4/10/24 at 1:06 PM, V15 Registered Nurse performed wound care for R54's abscess to her upper/middle back. The dressing had bloody and yellow discharge on the dressing. The wound had a 2 inch incision from the 7 O'clock to 1 O'clock position. The wound appeared as if it had been a large abscess that had been surgically drained. The skin surrounding the incision was dark maroon/purple in color and was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of a resident's (R1) advanced directive was present in the medical record, and failed to ensure a residents care plan was updated with current code status. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 9. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on [DATE] showed R1 had diagnoses including but not limited to urinarty tract infection, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right side, dementia without behaviors, hyperglycemia, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms. R1's nursing care plan dated [DATE] showed, Education on advanced directives, end of life care options, and establishing a health care representative was provided. Pursuant to resident rights, (R1) has selected the advanced directive of Full Code .As indicated, my advanced directives code status will be documented on my physician order sheet in the electronic medical system and be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food in the refrigerator was dated, failed to ensure expired food was discarded, and failed to ensure a freezer was monitored. This applies to all 67 residents residing in the facility. The facility Census and Condition of Residents form #672 dated 5/23/23 documents there are 67 residents residing in the facility. On 5/23/23 at 9:15 AM, there was a tub of cottage cheese with an expiration date of 5/2/23 in the refrigerator and a plastic container labeled pork gravy which was undated. During the kitchen tour there was a storage area which had a chest freezer containing cookie dough. The freezer had a significant amount of ice visible. There was no log of temperature monitoring for the freezer. On 5/23/23 at 9:15 AM, V4 said, That is the activity department's freezer. I don't do anything with it. I don't have a log and I'm sure she doesn't either. It needs defrosted. On 5/24/23 at 11:45 AM, V4 said, There was no log for the activities freezer so I gave her one to start filling out. I told her she needs to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents with palatable food for 3 of 3 residents (R40, R47, R59) reviewed for food in the sample of 20 and 3 residents outside the sample (R6, R19, R27). The findings include: On 5/23/23 at 10:03 AM, R47 was lying in his bed. R47 stated, The food sucks here! The meat is so tough, most of the time I can't eat it and I try. If I can't cut it with my knife, then I won't be able to chew it with my teeth. And they won't give me a butcher knife. I still have my own teeth. Last night they served pork and it was so tough I couldn't eat it and I wasn't the only one. I eat in the dining room with other people. Most of the guys at my table couldn't eat it. On 5/23/23 at 12:30 PM, R59 said the food isn't great here. R59 open the lid to her lunch tray. There were two chicken legs with the skin still on them that appeared gray and dry; cheesy potatoes; a vegetable medley; and a slice of cake. R59 stated, This actually looks better than usual. R59 picked up a chicken leg, but this is hard to eat. R59 was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 20 and 1 resident (R28) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. On 5/23/23 at 9:18 AM, R1 was sitting in a recliner in her room. R1 stated she came to the facility for therapy after a broken leg. R1 stated she is tired of being in a nursing home. R1 stated being in a nursing home has changed a lot and she doesn't like it. R1 stated it will take staff a half an hour to answer a call light. R1 stated she can't wait a half an hour to go to the bathroom. R1 stated she has had accidents while waiting for someone to toilet her and it makes her feel bad. On 05/24/23 at 12:25 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated call lights were to be answered as soon as possible. V2 stated there wasn't a policy with a set time for answering call lights V2 stated it was not okay for a resident to wait 30 minutes for their call light to be answered and be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care and facial care to 1 of 2 residents (R10) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care in the sample of 20. The findings include: R10's electronic face sheet printed on 5/25/23 showed R10 has diagnoses including but not limited to Dementia without behaviors, unsteadiness on feet, restlessness & agitation, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, and depression. R10's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R10 has moderate cognitive impairment and requires 2 staff assist with personal hygiene. R10's care plan dated 1/26/22 showed, I have an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia .personal hygiene assist x 1. R10's shower sheets dated 4/30/23-5/21/23 showed R10 did not receive nail care. On 5/24/23 at 8:45AM, R10's fingernails had black and orange matter stuck underneath them and were long past his fingertips. R10 stated he only likes to keep 1 of his thumbnails long so that he can pick up papers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and monitor weights for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) for 1 of 2 residents (R16) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 20. The findings include: R16's electronic face sheet printed on 5/25/23 showed R16 has diagnoses including but not limited to acute combined systolic & diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, edema, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. R16's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R16 has mild cognitive impairment. R16's care plan dated 4/10/23 showed, I am on diuretic therapy related to edema. R16's physician's order dated 4/17/23 showed, check weights weekly. R16's weight log showed, 5/1/23 195.4lbs, 5/5/23 154.3lbs (41lb weight loss in 1 week with no reweigh completed) 5/18/23 186.5lbs. (No weight had been obtained for 13 days and no reweigh had been completed for a 22lb weight gain) R16's progress notes dated 5/11/23 showed, Resident has unusual weights and needs to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received their prescribed pureed diet instead of a regular textured diet for 1 of 2 residents (R15) reviewed for diets in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 5/23/23 at 12:14 PM staff were passing trays in the dining room and gave R15 her lunch tray. R15 was given a regular tray that had chicken on the bone, au gratin potatoes and mixed vegetables. At 12:19 PM V5 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) looked at R15's meal tray that was in front of her and looked upset. At 12:22 PM, R15 was eating the meat off a chicken leg. V2 DON (Director of Nursing) came over to R15 and told her she needed to swap out her lunch tray. There was a menu card next to the resident on the table that stated she was to have a pureed, low concentrated sweets diet with thin liquids. V2 confirmed that the ticket was R15's and she should have had a pureed diet. V2 took the food tray away but left the chicken leg on the bone with R15 who continued to eat it after her tray was taken away. On 5/23/23 at 12:27 PM, V5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure meat was pureed per resident's needs for 3 of 3 residents (R15, R43, R373) reviewed for pureed diets. The findings include: R15's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, and diverticulosis of the intestine. R15's current Physician Order Sheet showed an order dated 2/14/22 for, Diet: Low Concentrated Sweets, Pureed Texture, Thin Consistency. R43's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, need for assistance with personal care, and altered mental status. R43's current Physician order sheet showed an order dated 3/16/23 for Diet: Pureed texture, Thin Consistency . R373's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. R373's Physician Order Sheet showed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent cross contamination of resident contact surfaces by not removing gloves and washing hands after providing incontinence care for 1 of 4 residents (R11) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 5/23/23 at 9:36 AM, R11 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room and her pants were soaked and there was a strong odor of urine in the room. V11 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) had gloves on, took R11 and transferred her to the toilet. V11 removed R11's wet incontinence brief and wet pants. V11 put a clean pair of black pants on R11's lower legs while she was sitting on the toilet. V12 CNA came into R11's room and V11 stated she was going to need help with peri care and R11's transfer. V12 put a clean incontinence brief on R11's lower legs and above her pants. V11 washed R11's vaginal area and buttocks. V11 did not remove or change her gloves. V11 pulled R11's brief and pants up. V11 pulled R11's wheelchair into the bathroom. V11 held onto R11's arm and shirt while sitting her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccinations for 3 of 5 residents (R31,R47,R55) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1) R31's electronic face sheet printed on 5/24/23 showed R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R31's electronic immunization record showed R31 had not refused or received the pneumococcal vaccination. R31's immunization history report dated 3/15/23 showed, Shots overdue: pneumococcal vaccine. On 5/24/23 at 2:33PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, We just offered the pneumonia vaccine to R31 today. I don't know why it wasn't offered on admission but we need to make sure we are doing that to prevent residents from getting pneumonia and infecting other residents. The facility's policy titled, Infection Control Immunization for Residents Influenza and Pneumococcal dated 3/1/2020 showed, .The facility will offer residents a Pneumococcal immunization unless immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SERENITY ESTATES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KOENIG, SUZANNEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 06/01/2007
SAK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
MCDONALD, DUSTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
SCHLEICH, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2017
LENA PROPERTY PARTNERS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/27/2006

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-30.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$942K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 41%Medicare 9%Other / private 50%

This home reported $942K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$357per resident / day
operating cost
$10,855per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146114. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next