Norridge Gardens
7001 West Cullom, Norridge, IL 60634 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 292 certified beds · (708) 457-0700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,836 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-29)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 94.7% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.91 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 30.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.9%CMS range 40.1–52.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.6–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 30.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.6–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 292 beds and averages 215.6 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 76 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to supervise a resident that ingested another resident's medication. This failure resulted in R1 being hospitalized for drug overdose, fast heartbeat, and altered mental status. This applies to one out of seven residents (R1) reviewed for supervision with medication. The findings include: On 1/9/2024 at 12:50 PM, V4 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing) said an incident occurred between the hours of 4:30 AM to 5:00 AM. He said V19 (RN-Registered Nurse) received a delivery from pharmacy on 12/17/2023 at 1:13 AM. Soon after delivery, V19 left the medication on top of V20's (RN) medication cart which was inside a locked unit. V19 did not inform V20 of the delivery. Around 4:30 AM, V21 (CNA-Certified Nurse Assistant) saw R1 walking around the unit and holding a bingo card of medication (Chlorpromazine 25 mg (Milligrams), 30 tablets). The medication she was holding was for another resident. V21 noticed that 18 tablets were popped. V21 found 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safeguard and properly store a medication that led to a confused resident ingesting that medication. This failure resulted in R1 being hospitalized for drug overdose, fast heartbeat, and altered mental status. This applies to one out of seven residents (R1) reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 1/9/2024 at 12:50 PM, V4 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing) said an incident occurred on 12/17/2023 between the hours of 4:30 AM to 5:00 AM. He said V19 (RN-Registered Nurse) received a delivery from pharmacy on 12/17/23 at 1:13 AM. Soon after delivery, V19 left the medications on top of V20's (RN) medication cart which was inside a locked unit without informing V20 of the delivery. R1 was noted holding one bingo card of Chlorpromazine (Antipsychotic) 25 mg (milligrams) with 30 tablets. It was noted that 18 tablets were missing. R1 was noted to have a whitish substance on her mouth. R1 was brought to her room and was assessed. R1's heart rate was 116 beats per minute. R1 became lethargic and she was sent to a local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a current UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) had orders for an indwelling catheter and failed to change the indwelling catheter. This resulted in R26 experiencing chronic UTIs with the need for IV (intravenous) antibiotic treatment. The facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to meet professional standards. These failures apply to 2 of 7 residents (R26, R95) reviewed for catheter and bladder care in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. On 1/24/23 at 11:09 AM, R26 was lying in bed with an IV antibiotic connected to the IV site in his right hand. R26 had an indwelling catheter. The tubing of the catheter was hazy, and it was difficult to visualize the urine in the tubing. R26's catheter drainage bag was draining dark, amber urine with copious amounts of white sediment. On 1/25/23 at 2:39 PM, V5 (Wound Care Coordinator) and V13 (Wound Care Nurse) were providing incontinence care and wound care to R26.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-01-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R56's admission sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). The facility assessment of 11/8/22 shows R156 to have severe cognitive impairment. The order summary sheet for active orders of January 2023 shows R56 to have a monthly weight. The weights and vitals summary shows a documented weight of 158.9 pounds in January 2022, March and April 2022 she was 148. 6 pounds. No further weights were documented until August 2022, and R56 was 144.8, and the next weight was November 2002 and R56 was down to 136 pounds. No further weight was documented. On 1/26/23, V22 and V23 (Restorative Nurses) said the restorative department was responsible for monthly weights and monitoring. V22 said the restorative aides do the monthly weights and if there is a daily weight, nursing will complete those weights. V22 said For new admits we do the initial weight and the first 4 weekly weights. V23 said Every resident should be weighed every month with or without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-01-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R137's admission Record printed by the facility on 1/26/23 showed she had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (paralysis and weakness affecting one side following a stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), following cerebral infarction aphasia (a disorder that affect how you communicate. It can impact your speech, as well as the way you write and understand both spoken and written language), and gastrostomy status (g-tube). R137's facility assessment dated [DATE] section C does not show a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score. The assessment showed R137 had modified independence with her cognitive skills for daily decision making. The assessment also showed R137 was dependent on staff for eating (includes intake of nourishment by tube feeding). R137's Order Summary Report, provided by the facility on 1/26/23, showed Enteral Feed Order every shift {Name brand} 1.2 at 77 cc/hr (cubic centimeter an hour-cc measurement is the same as ml…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, facility failed to implement fall precautions to prevent falls with injuries. This applies to 2 out of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for fall precautions.The findings include:1.On 8/19/25 at 10:25 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2's left arm was in a bandage. R2 was alert with some confusion. Bed was at average height and not at its lowest position. There were no landing pads next to the bed. R2's call light was tied to the grab bar and was hanging downwards. R2 searched for her call light and stated she cannot find her call light. R2's table was towards the lower half of her body and she could not reach her cup of water. On 8/19/25 at 10:40 AM V6 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) verified R2's bed was not in the lowest position and her call-light was out of her reach. On 8/19/25 at 11:30 AM V10 (CNA- Certified Nursing Assistant) observed and stated R2's water was out of her reach and bed was not in lowest position. On 8/20/25 at 8:45 AM, R2 was lying in bed. R2's bed was at average height and not at the lowest level. R2's call light was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Water Management Program, failed to follow their policy for PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during care of a resident in contact isolation, and failed to follow their policy for hand hygiene and glove use during provisions of care. This applies to all 206 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated December 16, 2024, by V1 (Administrator) showed there were 206 residents residing in the facility. On December 17, 2024, at 8:57 AM, V14 (Maintenance Director) said for the facility's Water Management Program for legionella, the facility receives a yearly water report from the village. V14 continued to say a monthly water quality test is performed with a TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) probe. V14 said sometimes while performing the monthly TDS test, he does a chemical test of the water but V14 does not document those test results. V14 said the facility submitted water samples for testing for legionella…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care, oral care, and grooming to residents who depend on the facility for care. The facility also failed to shave female and male resident's long facial hair and trim and clean resident's long fingernails. This applies to 13 of 13 residents (R16, R21, R42, R61, R77, R80, R106, R115, R134, R160, R167, R190, R199) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R160's face sheet showed him to be a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the Left Dominant side, Dysphagia, Anxiety Disorder, Seizures, and Dementia with Moderate Agitation. R160's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C dated November 12, 2024 showed R160 to be severely cognitively impaired. The same MDS section GG showed R160 to be dependent or require substantial/maximal assistance for self-care activities. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date medication to determine the expiration date once it was opened and failed to ensure narcotic medications were accounted for. This applies to 9 of 11 residents (R4, R11, R18, R36, R38, R89, R90, R134, R136) reviewed for medication storage and labeling in the sample of 35. The findings include: On December 18, 2024, inspections of 6 of the facility's 11 medication carts and 2 of their 3 medication rooms were conducted with each of the assigned staff nurses (V10, V11, V24, V29, V31, V32). The following was observed: 1. On December 18, 2024, at 1:26 PM, there was a Basaglar Kwik Pen (insulin solution) in the 4th floor center 1 medication cart that was unlabeled, opened, and not dated. The pharmacy recommendation shows to discard this medication 28 days after it was opened. R4's Lorazepam (antianxiety) 1 milligram (mg) tablet card/container had a seal broken and taped over for number 30. In addition, there were three water cannister or tumblers stored inside this medication cart. V29 stated that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and treat a resident with a contracture of the left hand and failed to apply a splint in accordance with physician orders. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R117 and R160) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R160's face sheet showed him to be a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the Left Dominant side, Dysphagia, Anxiety Disorder, Seizures, and Dementia with Moderate Agitation. R160's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C dated November 12, 2024 showed R160 to be severely cognitively impaired. The same MDS section GG showed R160 to be dependent or require substantial/maximal assistance for self-care activities. On December 16, 2024 at 10:14 AM, R160's left hand was contracted closed,with fingers touching the palm, and no splint or positioning device was in his hand. On December 17, 2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transfer and feeding supervision to residents who required assistance for activities of daily living care. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R24, R42, R58) reviewed for safety during ADL assistance in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows R58 is 84 years-old who has multiple diagnoses which include displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Parkinson's disease, unspecified fall, reduced mobility, needs for assistance with personal care. On December 17, 2024, at 4:35 PM, V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) assisted R58 to the bathroom. V18 propelled R58 to the bathroom, R58 held onto the grab bar as she was standing up unsteadily while V18 supported her by holding on to the waistband of her pants. After R58 completed toileting, R58 stood up while V18 cleaned her perineum, and was assisted back to the wheelchair without use of a gait…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide double protein portion as ordered by the physician. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R95 and R168) observed for dining in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. On December 17, 2024 at 12:05 PM, during tray line service on the 4th floor, V12 (Dietary Aide) was platting the food and V13 (Dietary Manager) was checking meal trays. R168's meal ticket showed regular consistency, double protein and he received one serving portion (2 oz (ounces) with #16 scoop) of mechanical soft polish sausage and V13 was notified of the same. R168's diet order on POS (Physician Order Summary) showed LCS (Low Concentrated Sweets) diet, Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency, double protein at lunch. R168's care plan initiated March 6, 2024 included that R168 requires a therapeutic diet and interventions included to provide ordered therapeutic diet. 2. On December 17, 2024 at 12:22 PM, R95 received one serving portion (2 oz with #16 scoop) of mechanical soft polish sausage. The facility diet order listing showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to offer residents the pneumococcal vaccine. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R63, R79, and R118) reviewed for immunization in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. On December 17, 2024, at 2:26 PM, V3 (Infection Preventionist Nurse) said the facility offers the PCV20 (20-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine) to eligible residents. V3 continued to say R63 had only received the PCV13 (13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine) and had not been offered the PCV20. V3 said R63 should had already been offered the vaccine. R63's Immunization Audit Report dated December 17, 2024, at 2:50 PM, showed R63 received the PCV13 on March 19, 2022. The report did not show R63 had been offered or refused another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers twice a week per facility policy. This applies 2 of 5 residents (R3, R6) reviewed for showers in the sample of 7. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated 10/30/24, shows R6's diagnoses include Parkinson's disease, cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, depression, difficulty walking, encephalopathy, need for assistance with personal care, reduced mobility, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, and chronic diastolic heart failure. MDS (Minimum Data Sheet), dated 9/20/24, shows R6 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for bathing. Care plan, as of 10/28/24, showed R6 was to be provided a sponge bath if she was unable to tolerate a full bath or shower. On 10/29/24 at 1:15 PM, R6 was lying in bed and her hair appeared to have an oily substance throughout. R6 stated stated she was only getting baths once a week because the staff told her they did not have time to provide her baths. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff remained with a resident until all of the resident's medications were administered per facility policy. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R2) reviewed for medications left at bedside in a sample of 7. Findings include: Facility Incident report, dated 8/25/24, shows on R1's family observed medications at R2's bedside. The report shows R2 denied that they were her medications and stated she already took her medications. The report shows the medications were removed immediately and the resident was assessed with no concerns. The report shows R2 was monitored for changes in condition on 8/25/24. The incident investigation shows a re-education regarding medication storage and administration was given to facility nursing staff. On 10/29/24 at 10:41 AM with V2 (Director of Nursing), V3 (Infection Peventionist Nurse / Manager on Duty) stated she was the Manager on Duty on 9/25/24 when a nurse supervisor informed her a family found medications inside a resident room. V3 stated she investigated and spoke with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide personal care to dependent residents. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for activities of daily living care in a sample of 4. Findings Include: 1. R2 is a [AGE] year-old female with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 5/30/24 at 10:10 AM, R2 was observed with V10 (LPN-Licensed Pratical Nurse) in her room. R2 was noted with a strong urine odor. V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) checked on R2, and R2 was observed to be dirty and soaked incontinent brief with urine and discoloration (blackish). On 5/30/24 at 10:10 AM, V10 stated, The CNAs are supposed to change residents every two hours. I don't think R2 was changed today, and I will check with my CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) to change R2. A review of R2's care plan documents that R2's care is planned for the risk of impaired skin integrity, with interventions including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter insertion was completed to prevent potential cross contamination. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infection in a sample of 4. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with cognition intact as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R1 was admitted with an admitting diagnosis, including spina bifida, chronic idiopathic constipation, bladder dysfunction, and a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). A review of R1's physician order sheet (POS) indicates that R1 has an order to perform a straight urinary catheterization every four hours. V4 (Nurse) was observed on 5/30/2024 at 2:35PM with V5 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) performing a straight catheterization procedure on R1. V4 did not to clean the left and right labia area of R1. V4 was also observed holding the catheter and directing the urine into the collection chamber without using sterile gloves.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living assistance was provided for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for requiring extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living on the sample list of eight. Findings include: 1. R1's admission Record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, heart failure, dermatitis, and malnutrition. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 19, 2024 shows R1 is not cognitively intact, is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. R1 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's Care Plan initiated December 20, 2021 shows R1 requires total assist with personal hygiene and dressing. R1 has bowel and bladder incontinence and to check resident every two hours and assist with toileting as needed. On April 8, 2024 at 9:59 AM, R1 was still laying in bed. There was a notable odor outside of R1's room. At 10:28 AM, V3 CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comfortable temperatures for 3 of 8 residents (R1, R2, and R3), a comfortable bed mattress for 1 of 8 residents (R1), and odorless air for all 93 residents third-floor residents. Findings include: On 03/14/2024, during the investigation, the writer entered the third floor via elevator five different times from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM. The third-floor entrance from the elevator, dining room, and 300 wing had a strong urine odor. Though the facility's third-floor flooring, residents' rooms, and bathrooms were clean, the mentioned areas had a strong odor of urine. 1. R1's face sheet showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including catatonic disorder, schizophrenia, depression, encephalopathy, and urinary retention with acute kidney failure. At 11:28 PM, R1 was in bed, withdrawn, staring at the writer, and did not respond to the writer's interview. R1's bed was sagging in the center, urine odor was present by his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care and provide Activities of Daily Living care to residents. This applies to 8 of 8 residents (R3-R10) reviewed for incontinent care and Activity of Daily Living Care on the sample list of 10. Findings include: 1. On 2/28/24 at 10:57 AM, R3 was sitting up in bed in hospital gown watching TV. R3 said she wears an incontinent brief and needed to be changed. R3 said the last time she was changed was at 5:30 AM (over 5 hours earlier) this morning and she does not know which CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) was assigned to her. At 10:59 AM, R3 pushed her call light and V5 (Restorative Aide) answered the call light at 11:02 AM. V5 said she does not know who R3's CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) was, but will inform her that R3 needed to be changed. At 11:06 AM, V6 (Restorative Aide) came in to change R3. During R3's incontinent care, it was observed that R3's incontinent brief was soaked with urine to the point the incontinent pad that R3 was laying on was also wet. R3's buttocks were noted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form to meet a residents needs which applies to 5 of 5 residents (R76, R84, R153, R213, R222) reviewed for puree diets in a sample of 35. Findings include: The facility's weekly dietary menu showed the noon meal to be a chicken soft taco, Spanish rice, seasoned corn, and fruit mix on 11/28/23. On 11/28/23 at 10:00 AM, V32 [NAME] stated puree foods should have a smooth consistency like pudding. During the puree prepping, V30 Dietary Manager stated the food processor they have does run at a slower speed so it does take a while to puree the foods. After the puree foods were prepared V32 and V28 Assistant [NAME] did not sample the food items prior to packaging it for serving. On 11/28/23 12:31 PM, A test tray was sampled for the pureed food. The puree chicken was gritty with particulates in it. The puree corn still had parts of the corn kernal shells in it. On 11/28/23 at 1:00 PM, V30 Dietary Manager tried the pureed food, and said the chicken needed to be blended more, and the corn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the food service areas were sanitized prior to serving food. This failure affects 5 of 5 residents (R84, R124, R153, R213, R380) reviewed for food service in a sample of 35. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at 11:50 AM, V29 Dietary Aide opened the 3rd floor kitchenette where the steam tables are kept for meal serving. There were seven dirty meal trays in the kitchenette. The trays had used, dirty plates, cups, silverware, and paper garbage on them. V29 stated they had no idea why the trays were there. V29 removed the trays from the kitchenette, set up the steam tables, and started serving the noon meal without sanitizing the food serving area. On 11/28/23 at 1:00 PM, V30 Dietary Manager stated the dirty trays should not be stored/left in the kitchenette. They are supposed to be put on the dirty tray carts and brought down stairs to the dishwasher area. The dirty trays could cause cross contamination. The food serving areas should be kept clean. The facilities Kitchen Sanitation Policy dated 12/2015 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff donned and doffed Personal Protective Equipment PPE when entering and leaving rooms with residents who were on isolation due to testing positive for the COVID-19 virus. The facility also failed to ensure doors were kept closed for rooms with COVID-19 positive residents, failed to ensure a COVID-19 positive residents remained isolated in their rooms. The facility also failed to implement enhance barrier precautions. These failures affect 16 of 35 residents (R129, R48, R73, R89, R18, R5, R139, R62, R79, R173, R159, R58, R6, R43, R134 and R100) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. On 11/27/23 at 9:50 AM, R129, R48, R73's room had a sign on the doorway of droplet contact isolation precaution. V4 (Infection Control Nurse-IP) said the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak and R129, R48 and R73 were all COVID-19 positive residents that were on isolation. V7 (License Practical Nurse-LPN) entered and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who require extensive assist received assistance with incontinence care and toileting. This applies to 3 of 25 (R124, R41, R76) residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. On 11/27/23 at 9:49 AM, R124 was observed lying in bed, a strong foul smelling odor was present. V15 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) provided incontinence care to R124. R124's disposable incontinence brief was heavily saturated with urine and stool. Large amounts of stool soaked through her incontinence pad. R124's buttocks were covered with stool and stool was down her right leg. V15 (CNA) said the facility is short staffed today. She did not have time to change R124 until now and R124 still needs to eat breakfast. It's hard to have this many residents. R124's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows her cognition is severely impaired, requires extensive assist with toileting and frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dressings and pressure relieving interventions were in place for residents with pressure injuries and at risk for pressure injuries. This applies to 3 of 8 (R3, R213, R84) reviewed for pressure in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. On 11/27/2023 at 9:59 AM, R3 said she did not have a dressing in place on her right side. R3 said she hasn't had a dressing in place for a couple of days. On 11/27/2023 at 10:30 AM, V5 Wound Nurse and V31 Wound Nurse were observed providing wound care to R3. No dressing was observed on R3's pressure injury on her right gluteal fold when R3 was checked by V5 and V31. V31 measured the area and stated it was 8cm (centimeters) x 6cm. V5 said a dressing should be in place. V5 said the order for dressing changes was every 3 days and as needed when soiled or loose. R3's 11/27/2023 Progress Note shows R3 had a deep tissue pressure injury to the right gluteal fold with no signs and symptoms of infection. R3's Order Summary Report Dated 11/28/2023 shows an order for the Right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to safely transfer residents. The facility also failed to supervise a resident who is at a high risk for falls and has history of falls for 3 of 35 residents (R76, R68, R41) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R76's electronic medical record accessed on 11/28/23 show R3 has diagnosis of dementia and in need of 2 plus staff for transfer. On 11/27/23 at 12:25 PM, V5 (Wound Nurse) and V6(Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) were transferring R76 from his wheelchair to bed. V5 (Wound Nurse) applied a gait belt to R76 while V6 (CNA) held onto R76 who was unable to sit up in his wheelchair. R76 was leaning back. During the transfer, R76 was unable to bear weight. R76 was lifted under his arms and transferred to bed. When R76 was being transferred back to his wheelchair, R76 was unable to hold himself up and again kept leaning back. V5 held R76's back for R76 to sit upright. A gait belt was again applied. V5 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag was below the level of the bladder for 1 of 8 residents (R380) reviewed for urinary catheter care in the sample of 35. Findings include: R380's Face sheet shows R380 has diagnoses of hyrdonephrosis with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and retention of urine. R380's Care Plan shows R380 has a history of urinary tract infections requiring antibiotic treatment. On 11/27/23 at 10:16 AM, R380 was in bed leaning on her left side. R380's urinary catheter tubing was coming from R380's urethra and draped over R380's upper right leg close to her hip. There was yellow urine in the tubing that was unable to drain into the drainage bag. R380 said she had just returned from the hospital and had problems with the shunt in her kidneys and they put the urinary catheter in. On 11/28/23 at 9:12 AM., R380 was in bed with the urinary catheter drainage bag hanging on bed rail even with mattress. There was yellow urine in tubing all the way to R380's urethra. The tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia that is exhibiting behaviors,, was provided necessary care and services. This applies to 1 of 10 residents (R68) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R68's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarct, bipolar disorder and repeated falls. R68's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows her cognition is severely impaired, has little interest or pleasure in doing things, trouble concentrating on things, being so fidgety or restless that have been moving around a lot more than usual, being short tempered, easily annoyed, has behaviors of hallucinations, delusion, physical, verbal and other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, and wandering behaviors daily. On 11/27/23 at 10:51 AM, R68 was observed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's narcotic controlled substance record for was in place for 1 of 1 residents (R213) reviewed for controlled substance medications in the sample of 35. Findings include: On 11/28/23 at 09:31 AM, V11 Registered Nurse was reviewing controlled substance medications in the medication cart with this surveyor. R213 had an opened bottle of liquid morphine (narcotic pain reliever) with approximately 25 ml (milliliters) left. There was no controlled substance proof of sheet/form for R213's morphine. V11 stated there is no sheet for this. There should be a sheet to sign off when the medication is given. R213 had a dose once and he did not like it so we don't give it to him. V11 said she did not reconcile/count R213's morphine with the night nurse at shift change. On 11/29/23 at 9:59 AM, V10 RN stated liquid morphine should have a medication reconciliation sheet to sign off when a dose is given and to verify that what's left in bottle matches the amount given. All narcotics are checked shift to shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication regimen reviews (MRRs) were being completed and documented on a monthly basis. The facility also failed to ensure those recommendations were being followed up on by a physician. This applies to 2 of 5 (R3, R50) reviewed for MRRs in the sample of 35. Findings include: On 11/29/2023 MRRs for the last 6 months was requested for R3 and R50 from V1 Administrator. 1. On 11/29/2023 at 1:15PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) attempted to pull up MRR records for R3 for the last 6 months in the computer charting under progress notes and was unsuccessful. V2 said the pharmacist was going to send the records for [R3]. The facility failed to provide copies of monthly medication reviews from individual months for R3. On 11/29/2023 at 12:22PM, V25 Pharmacist said the MRRs are completed monthly and should be visible in the computer charting system under progress notes under pharmacy. V25 said he is unsure why they wouldn't be showing up in the computer charting system. R3's MRRs provided were all dated 11/29/2023. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the failed to implement a pharmacy recommendation of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident who is receiving a antipsychotic medication. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R185) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R185's Physician Order Sheets (POS) shows he has diagnoses including unspecified psychosis, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance and generalized anxiety. The POS shows orders dated 8/3/2023 for Olanzapine (anti-psychotic) 15 mg (milligram) at bedtime for psychotic behavior. The Pharmacy Medication Report dated 11/21/23 shows R185 is due for a GDR and recommends to decrease Olanzapine 15 mg at bed time to Olanzapine 12.5 mg at bedtime. The form is not completed or signed by the physician regarding the recommendation. On 11/29/23 at 1:26 PM, V13 (ADON) said pharmacy sends the recommendation and we fax the form to the physician to review and sign. V13 confirmed R185's GDR was not sent over to the physician until today (11/29/23.) The facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin administration pens were labeled with an opened date and failed to dispose of expired insulin for 2 of 8 residents (R160, R181) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 35. Findings include: On [DATE] at 09:31 AM, the 3rd floor medication cart 2 contained R160's lantus insulin pen that was opened and not labeled with an open date or an expiration date. The same cart contained R160's insulin aspart solution bottle that was dated as opened on [DATE], which expired [DATE] and R181's levemir insulin solution bottle with an open date of [DATE] and an expired date of [DATE]. V11 Registered Nurse (RN) said R181's levemir and R160's insulin aspart are expired and should have been thrown out. V11 said R160's lantus insulin solution pen should be dated with the date is was opened. V11 said insulin is good for 28 days once opened. R160's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for [DATE] shows an order for lantus 30 units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have adequate staff to provide assistant with activities of daily living in a timely manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 248 residents residing in the facility. The Findings include: The facility census sheet dated 10/17/2023 documents 248 residents reside in the facility. On 10/17/23 at 11:25 AM, V14 (Registered Nurse / RN) stated, We have four nurses and six CNAs working on the floor for a census of 101 residents on the fourth floor. Most of the time, we are short of staff. On 10/18/23 at 3:10 PM, V14 added, You come to the weekend to see the accurate staffing picture. We are really short on weekends. On 10/19/23 at 10:20 AM, V12 (Staffing Coordinator) stated, We have low staffing on weekends due to many call-offs and agency staff didn't show up. We tried to replace the call-off staff with restorative aides, but we are short sometimes on weekends. Last Tuesday (10/17/23), I had four CNAs on the third floor, six on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu items as planned. This failure has the potential to affect all 235 residents consuming food from the kitchen. The Findings include: On 10/19/23 at 1:00 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated, We have 235 residents eating from the Kitchen. Record review on lunch menu dated 10/19/23 document Shepherd's Pie for resident lunch. On 10/19/23 at 11:55 AM, the kitchen tray line contained baked ham that was being served to the residents instead of shepherd's pie as per the menu. On 10/19/23 at 12:00 PM, V16 (Cook) stated, We didn't receive the shipment for [NAME] Pie to serve for resident today (Thursday). We are serving baked ham and au gratin potatoes today instead of [NAME] Pie. On 10/19/23 at 12:15 PM, V17 (Dietary Manager) stated, We are planning menus four weeks ahead and should be followed. The order for ground beef to make Shepherd's Pie was placed for Monday (10/16/23) delivery, and somehow, we didn't receive that. If we put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve hot food to residents at a palatable temperature. This failure has the potential to affect all 235 residents consuming food from the kitchen. The Findings include: On 10/19/23 at 1:00 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated, We have 235 residents eating from the Kitchen. On 10/19/23 at 11:50 AM, the lunch meal tray line was observed, and a test tray was requested. The test tray was the last tray loaded into the food cart to the last serving unit (Third floor). On 10/19/23 at 12:59 PM, V16 (Cook) checked the food temperature from the test tray (on the Third floor) using the facility thermometer. The temperatures were as follows: Au gratin potatoes - 136.2 F Steamed broccoli - 108 F Baked ham - 95F On 10/19/23 at 12:59 PM, V16 stated, The serving temperature for hot food should be a minimum of 135F. We may have to use ceramic food warmer instead of plastic to maintain the food temperature during delivery. R2 is a [AGE] year-old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide personal care to residents requiring assistance with ADL (Activities of Daily Living) needs. This applies to 6 of 9 residents (R4-R9) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) from a sample of 9. The Findings include: 1. R4 is an [AGE] year-old female with mild cognitive impairment as per MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/24/23. The MDS also document two-person total dependance with toilet use. On 10/17/23 at 11:00 AM, R4 was in her bed with a urine odor. R4 stated, They haven't changed me yet, and I think I am wet. They changed me last night, and nobody changed me after that. On 10/17/23 at 11:07 AM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant / CNA) and V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) checked R4 for incontinence. R4 was observed with a double incontinent brief with an inner one with blackish discoloration. Record review on R4's care plan documented that R4 was care planned to prevent UTI with interventions including Checking at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing in order to: answer call lights timely, provide incontinent care, and provide showers/bed baths. This failure has the potential to affect all 245 residents who reside in the facility. The findings include: On 9/30/23 at 10:31 AM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated, We are okay with staffing. Some days we are short. We are using 2 agencies. We are especially short on the weekends. We ask staff to stay over. We do have call offs and no show no calls. On the 2nd floor, in the morning shift (7am to 3pm), there should be 3 nurses in the morning and 3 nurses in the evening (3pm to 11pm). In the overnight shift (11pm to 7am), there should be 2 nurses. In the morning, there should be 4 CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) in the morning and evening. In the night shift, there should be 3 CNA's. On the 3rd floor, there should be 4 nurses in the morning and 4 nurses in the evening. In the night shift, there should be 2 nurses. In the morning and evening, there should be 6 to 7 CNA's. On the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with incontinence care and toileting, and showers/bed baths. These failures affect 4 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R5, R8) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of 8. The findings include: 1. On 9/30/23 at 9:37 AM, V3 and V8 (LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) went to R2's room. R2 was sleeping in bed. She was wearing a gown and her hair was greasy and not combed. Both V3 and V8 checked (R2)'s brief and she was wet. R2 stated, I think the last time they changed me was at 4 AM. It was still dark outside. Since then, they didn't check me. I fell asleep. They don't check on me every 2 hours. It's like this all the time, I'm always soaked, and they never check on me. Even when I press my call light, I have to wait 8 or 9 hours to be changed. There's not enough staff here, especially on the weekends. It's like there's only one nurse and one CNA for 50 residents, especially on the evening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide care and services for all residents in the facility. The findings include: The CMS 672 Resident census and conditions of residents report dated 1/25/23 shows the facility has 239 residents. The report shows 191 residents are occasionally or frequently incontinent of bladder and 150 are incontinent of bowel. The report also shows the facility has 19 facility acquired pressure injuries. The CMS staffing data report for the 3rd quarter of 2022 documents the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. On 1/26/23 at 8:07 AM, V38 (Ward Clerk/Scheduler) said normally there are 4 aides on 2nd floor, and 6 for both the 3rd and 4th floors, that is minimal staffing. V38 said on the weekends she tries to over staff, but there are call offs. The 2nd floor has less residents, so an aide is moved to cover another floor with more residents. Currently the facility uses only one agency to fill the shortage of staff. V38 said there are a lot of call offs on the weekends, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist who completed the specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control. This has the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility. The findings include: The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form (form CMS-672) dated 1/25/23, showed 239 residents resided in the facility. On 1/24/23 at 9:56 AM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) identified V4 as the facility's Infection Preventionist. V2 said V4 was on vacation and would return on 1/25/23 or 1/26/23. On 1/25/23 the document titled Resident Vaccination Status as of 1/18/23 was reviewed. The document had 74 residents that had no record of having a COVID-19 vaccine. On 1/26/23 at 9:45 AM, V4 (Infection Preventionist) said she just started working for the facility 2 months ago. V4 said she received no training for the job, adding I have had no guidance or direction on what I am supposed to do. V4 said Today is my last day at the facility. I gave them at least a 2 week notice, and they do not have anyone hired yet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain vaccination status for residents. This has the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility. The findings include: The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form (form CMS-672) dated 1/25/23, showed 239 residents resided in the facility. On 1/24/23, the facility provided a list titled Resident Vaccination Status (as of 1/18/23). The list showed 74 residents that had no record of vaccination status in their medical record. The list showed 7 residents showing only dose one in their medical record and 41 residents with no information regarding boosters in their medical record. The NHSN (National Health Safety Network) website data for the facility, for the week ending 1/8/23, showed the residents with their primary vaccination was 84%. On 1/26/23 at 9:45 AM, V4 (Infection Preventionist) said on 1/17/23 she swept all of the residents' charts for vaccination status. V4 said all of the residents that show no record on the list that was provided do not have any information regarding their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents, who are dependent on staff, received assistance with basic ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), such as feeding, toileting, oral hygiene and changing of adult garments in a timely manner. This applies to 5 of 8 resident (R345, R343, R45, R85 and R220) in the sample of 35. The finding include: 1. R345's Face Sheet shows his admission date was on 1/18/23, and his diagnoses include cerebral palsy, pressure ulcer (admitted with), Parkinson's disease, and a need for assistance with personal care. On 01/25/23 at 1:02 PM, R345's breakfast tray was placed on a dresser beyond R345's ability to reach (R345's lunch tray had not yet arrived). R345's breakfast tray was untouched, including his liquids. R345 was alert and made eye contact with this surveyor and gestured to his tray, then to his mouth. When this surveyor pointed to his tray, R345 nodded his head 'yes.' R345 indicated he did not speak English. On 1/25/23 at 1:30 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, failed to ensure residents' air mattresses were inflated according to their weight; failed to ensure residents' pressure relieving interventions were implemented; and failed to identify a resident at risk for pressure injury for 6 of 15 residents (R124, R220, R224, R45, R26, R68) in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R124's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including sepsis, malignant neoplasm of anus and rectum, severe protein calorie malnutrition, gastrostomy, colostomy and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). On 01/24/23 at 01:29 PM, R124 said, The state lady said I should have an air mattress on my bed. I wish I did. I can't lay on my back because it's too painful. I've had buttock wound for about two years from the cancer. On 01/26/23 at 09:26 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing/DON) said, Residents should be checked and changed every hour. We do rounds to check on them. It's important to do this to ensure they're clean, dry, reposition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their range of motion programs for 1 of 1 resident (R43) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 35, and for 3 residents (R59, R55 and R90) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. R43's admission Record, printed by the facility on 1/26/23, showed he had diagnoses including cerebral palsy and age-related osteoporosis. R43's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he was cognitively intact. The assessment showed he was dependent on staff for transfers and bathing. The assessment showed R43 required extensive assist of staff for dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. R43's care plan titled Restorative: AROM (Active Range of Motion) Program showed he requires AROM to all of his extremities daily related to decreased mobility, decreased muscle strength and endurance. R43's restorative program documents, provided by V22 (Restorative Nurse) on 1/26/23, showed he was at risk for impaired range of motion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bedtime snacks were distributed to 4 of 4 residents (R220, R343, R350, and R228) reviewed for bedtime snacks in a sample of 35. The findings include: The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents (Form CMS-672), dated 1/25/23, documents there are 239 residents residing in the facility. 1. On 1/25/23 at 2:20 PM, R220 was alert and oriented to person and place. R220 said she has never been offered a snack in the evening. R220's Face Sheet shows her diagnoses to include fracture of the right pelvis, femur, and sacrum. 2. On 1/25/23 at 2:25 PM, R343 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. R343 said he has never been offered a snack in the evening. On 1/26/23 at 9:03 AM, R343 said he was not offered a nighttime snack last night. R343's shows, his diagnoses to include Type 2 diabetes mellitus. 3. On 1/26/23 9:01 AM, R350 was alert and oriented to person, and time. R350 said she has never been offered a nighttime snack. R350 said she asked for a milk the evening of 1/25/23 and was told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a dignified manner for 2 of 2 residents (R139, R65) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. On 1/25/23 at 10:40 AM, V21 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was providing incontinence care to R139. R139 was on her back with her vaginal and rectal areas exposed. R71 (R139's roommate) was sitting in her wheelchair at the foot of the bed watching R139's care. V21 did not intervene. R71 watched the remainder of the incontinence care from the foot of R139's bed. R139's Face Sheet printed 1/25/23 showed diagnoses to include, but not limited to: chronic non-pressure ulcer to the right foot, diabetes, contractures of bilateral lower extremities, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Stage 3 CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease), dementia, depression, and personal history of strokes. On 1/26/23 at 9:31 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, Residents are supposed to be provided privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there were no discrepancies with resident advanced directives for 3 of 3 residents (R193, R439, R177) reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R193's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old female with admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R193's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, gastrostomy, and seizures. On [DATE] at 9:50 AM, R193 was in her room and in bed. R193 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. On [DATE] at 09:26 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing/DON) said, There shouldn't be a discrepancy between a resident's POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment) and other information in the medical record. The POLST is a legal document, and we need to honor the resident's wishes. There shouldn't be any discrepancies. The correct information should be readily available in the resident's record. R193's medical record showed a [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to supervise residents with swallow precautions while eating for 2 of 6 residents (R3, R95) reviewed for safety in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R3's face sheet dated 1/25/23 showed diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and dementia. R3's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and staff assistance of one person for eating. R3's physician orders showed an order start dated 7/17/22 for Mechanical soft texture diet. On 1/24/23 at 11:00 AM, R3 was in bed and her breakfast tray was still in front of her on the bedside table. R3 stated she eats her meals alone in her room. R3's diet ticket showed Aspiration Precautions/Mechanical Soft. The ticket listed interventions of tray set up, cut up solids, fully upright, slow rate, and small bites/sips. On 1/26/23 at 9:50 AM, V27 (Speech Therapist) stated she (R3) needs a mechanical soft texture diet to prevent aspiration. V27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a midline intravenous dressing was changed for 1 of 3 residents (R177) reviewed for intravenous fluids and dressings in the sample of 35. The findings include: On 1/24/23 at 10:15 AM, R177 was observed lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. She had IV (Intravenous) access to the right antecubital area. The IV site had a small circular pad at the entry point of the catheter, and a clear dressing over the site. The clear dressing was coming off at the edges and rolled up at the corners. The dressing was only covering half of the IV site, and the dressing was not dated. On 1/24/23 at 10:18 AM, R177 said she has had antibiotics through the IV but not for a while. She said the nurses have not done anything with it, such as change the dressing or flush the line. R177's progress notes show on 12/14/22 a midline single catheter was placed to the right brachial vein. The December 2022 nursing progress notes show R177 was receiving IV antibiotics for an upper respiratory infection. R177's December 2022 and January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a manner to meet professional standards for 1 of 5 residents (R112) reviewed during medication administration. The findings include: On 1/25/23 at 8:54 AM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) began preparing R112's medications at the medication cart in the hallway. V10 had 10 pills in a medication up and one liquid medication prepared. V10 stated, I need to check his vital signs before I give the metoprolol (heart medication). V10 turned her back to the medication cart (leaving the pills and liquid medication) and walking into R112's room. R112 was located in the bed farthest from the door and his privacy curtain was pulled. V10 positioned herself near R112's bed so her back was to the privacy curtain and doorway. R112's medications were not under direct visualization while she checked R112's vital signs. R112's Face Sheet dated 1/25/23 showed diagnoses to include, but not limited to pneumonia, thrombocytosis, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, gastrointestinal bleed, CHF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to offer, track, monitor, record and re-offer immunizations for influenza and pneumonia for 3 (R220, R22, R99) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R220's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included COVID-19, malignant neoplasm of the left breast, need for assistance with personal care, malignant neoplasm of the bone, erosive osteoarthritis, fracture of the sacrum, pathological fractures of the right femur and pelvis. On 1/26/23 at 12:07 PM, V4 (facility identified Infection Preventionist) said R220 was not offered the pneumonia vaccine that she was aware of. V4 said there were no immunization refusals documented and she does not know if R220 was offered the influenza vaccine this season. V4 said there was no pneumonia vaccine history documented for R220 and it was not offered that she knew of. V4 said, If residents aren't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-12-19 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the results of survey were readily available for residents to view. This failure has the potential to affect all 206 residents who reside in the facility. The findings include: On December 17, 2024 at 11:03 AM, during a resident council meeting, all seven attendees (R24, R73, R89, R100, R162, R174, and R178), stated they had never seen a book/binder with the results of the survey. There was no folder/binder in the facility lobby, library, dining hall, or theatre room that had the reports of the surveys. On December 17, 2024 at 11: 20 AM, V1 (Administrator) looked for the binder with the results of surveys but could not find it. On December 17, 2024 at 12:51 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated they could not find the binder with the survey results.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,836 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $7,918 — penalty dated 2023-11-29
- $7,918 — penalty dated 2023-11-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PREMIER HEALTHCARE OF ILLINOIS — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 35% | since 05/16/2018 |
| BAVER, BARAK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 65% | since 02/21/2021 |
| CUBIS, SANDRA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/14/2019 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $7.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145329. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.