New Harmony Health Care Center
251 Highway 66, New Harmony, IN 47631 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (812) 682-4104 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.9% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 70.0% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.9% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.8% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.8% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.0% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.0% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 4.9% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.9% | 10.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.09 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.06 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.0%CMS range 32.8–59.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.9–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.4–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 39.6 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) that resulted in hospitalizations for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter and UTI. This failure resulted in 11 UTIs which resulted in 5 hospital admissions and treatment with 12 antibiotics over the past year. (Resident 21) Finding includes: On 6/7/23 at 10:13 A.M., CNA 14 and CNA 19 were observed to provide catheter care for Resident 21. Both staff entered the room and put on gloves. Two basins of water and folded washcloths were observed prepared on a bedside table. CNA 19 moved the bed to the side by grasping the footboard. CNA 19 shut the door. CNA 19 obtained a trash bag from supplies on bed side table. CNA 19 raised the bed using the handheld bed remote and then moved the call light off of the bed. CNA 19 and CNA 14 pulled Resident 21's blanket down to his ankles. At that time Resident 21 only had on a brief. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. (Dietary Manager)Finding include:During an interview on 12/1/25 at 9:15 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated she did not have a Certified Dietary Manager Certification. She indicated that she had the course books for two years but had not had the time to complete the certification. During an interview on 12/3/25 at 8:06 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated the Dietary Manager was required to take the certification test within six months to a year of being hired. On 12/3/25 at 2:03 P.M., employee files were reviewed. The Dietary Manager was hired on 3/5/24. On 12/4/25 at 1:00 P.M., the Administrator provided a current undated Director of Dietary Services job description. The job description indicated Required Education and Experience.Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) Credential. 3.1-20(e)(2)
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) dedicated part time hours to the role of IP for 1 of 1 staff members reviewed for IP. The full time Director of Nursing (DON) also served as the Infection Preventionist. Finding includes:On 12/4/25 at 10:13 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was also serving as the facility's Infection Preventionist, and indicated she dedicated around two hours each work day to infection control tasks. During an interview on 12/4/25 at 11:50 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated she had been serving as the Director of Nursing and the Infection Preventionist since September 2025. On 12/4/25 at 1:11 P.M., the Administrator provided an Infection Preventionist job description that indicated The Infection Preventionist is responsible for developing, implementing, and monitoring the facility's Infection Prevention and Control in alignment with federal, state, and local regulations. Position type and hours: full time. On 12/4/25 at 1:11 P.M., the Administrator provided a Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs, that were ordered beyond 14 days, indicated a specific duration of use for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for hospice services. (Resident 1, Resident 4, Resident 35, and Resident 40) Findings include:1. On 12/2/25 at 1:18 P.M., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/17/25, indicated Resident 35's cognition level was unable to be assessed because the resident was rarely understood, was dependent on staff (staff does all the work) for showering, toileting, and transfers, and was taking an antianxiety medication. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: lorazepam intensol oral concentrate (an antianxiety medication) 2 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) - Give 0.25 mL by mouth every four hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate supervision on the dementia unit during 1 of 1 random observations. (Cardinal hall dining room) Finding includes:During a random observation on 12/1/25 at 11:45 A.M. in the Cardinal unit (dementia unit), residents seated in the dining room participated in activities.At 11:59 A.M, the activities staff left the unit.At 12:29 P.M., two residents seated across the table from each other appeared to have a verbal altercation about one resident who knocked on the table. No staff members were observed on the dementia unit or at the nurses' station of the unit.At 12:33 P.M., the dining cart was delivered near the nurses' station by dietary. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 was observed exiting a resident's room on the East hall adjacent to the dementia unit. Seven residents were currently residing in Cardinal Hall at the time of meal service. On 12/4/25 at 10:29 A.M., the facility's Alzheimer's/Dementia Special Care Unit form was reviewed. The form indicated the unit should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection prevention measures for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters and 1 random dining observation. Catheter bags were observed on the floor and hand hygiene was not offered to residents prior to eating. (Resident 3, Resident 39, and Cardinal Unit)Findings include: 1. On 12/1/25 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 3's catheter bag was observed laying on the floor while the resident was lying in bed. On 12/1/25 at 1:15 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis, disorganized schizophrenia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/6/25, indicated Resident 3 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 3 was dependent on staff for transferring, hygiene, and dressing. Resident 3 had a suprapubic catheter. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:Insert Suprapubic Catheter French (FR) size 20FR, balloon size 3 milliliter (mL). Change Suprapubic catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for care plan conferences. (Resident 34)Finding includes: During an interview on 12/1/25 at 12:15 P.M., a family member indicated that she had not had any care plan conferences with the facility since Resident 34 was admitted to the facility. On 12/3/25 at 11:18 A.M., Resident 34's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/12/25, indicated Resident 34 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for transfers, toileting, and bathing. The most recent care plan conference was completed on 7/9/25 with Resident 34's family member in attendance.The clinical record lacked documentation to indicate that a care plan conference had been completed since 7/9/25.During an interview on 12/3/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan with a new intervention following a fall for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 23 and Resident 1)Findings include: 1. On 12/3/25 at 9:36 A.M., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persistent dementia. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/17/25, indicated Resident 23 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and had two or more falls with injury and two or more falls without injury since the prior assessment on 7/17/25. A current fall risk assessment, dated 9/11/25, indicated that Resident 23 was at risk for falls. A care plan conference was completed on 10/23/25 with Resident 23's Power of Attorney (POA) in attendance. The care plan was reviewed. A current risk for falls care plan, initiated 7/21/25, included the following interventions:Assist the resident with transfers. Date Initiated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure practitioner's diagnostic practices met professional standards of care for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medication review. Residents had new diagnoses of schizophrenia over [AGE] years of age after admission to the facility. (Resident 4 and Resident 35) Findings include:1. On 12/1/25 at 10:30 A.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance and schizoaffective disorder. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/14/25, indicated Resident 4 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 4 was dependent on staff for transferring, toileting, and hygiene, received an antipsychotic medication during the 7-day lookback period, and had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) - Give 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Qualified Medication Aides (QMAs) were providing services within their scope of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication use. A QMA administered as needed (PRN) medication without prior authorization from a licensed nurse. (Resident 7)Finding includes: On 12/2/25 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, pain, and migraine headaches.The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/29/25, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact, was independent in all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and received an opioid medication during the 7-day lookback period.Physician orders included, but were not limited to:tramadol (an opioid pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) - Give 50 mg by mouth every eight hours as needed (PRN) for pain, dated 7/2/25sumatriptan succinate (a medication used to treat migraine headaches) 25 mg tablet - Give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours PRN for migraine headaches, dated 11/16/23Resident 7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation was available in resident clinical records for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 17 and Resident 35)Findings include:1. On 12/2/25 at 9:14 A.M., Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/30/25, indicated Resident 17 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff (staff does all the work) for bathing and was independent for transfers, and had two or more falls since the previous MDS assessment with one fall injury. The current care plan included, but was not limited to: Had an actual fall incident: Fall on 5/7/24, actual fall 9/4/24, actual fall 8/25/25, actual fall 10/16/25, actual fall 10/27/25; Date Initiated: 11/27/2023 A health status progress note, dated 10/28/25 at 8:01 A.M., indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision, monitor behaviors, update the plan of care, and document relevant information to prevent accidents and then following an accident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and dementia care. A resident (Resident C) with a history of wandering behaviors was not observed to enter another resident's room (Resident D) which led to a resident-to-resident altercation and a bite wound. (Resident C, Resident D)Findings include:1. During record review on 10/15/25 at 9:30 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbance.Resident C's most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/8/25 indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, a behavior of wandered daily during a 7-day review period, and that the wandering did not significantly intrude on the privacy or activities of others.Resident C's physician orders included, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received only the medications ordered by a physician and that medications were properly labeled for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. A resident was self-administering an antacid medication without the medication being properly labeled or ordered by a physician. (Resident D) Finding includes: During an interview and observation on 3/4/25 at 10:30 A.M., Resident D was sitting in a reclining chair in her room. A clear plastic cup was approximately two-thirds full of multi-colored tablets. The cup contained no labels or information that indicated what the contents of the cup were. Resident D indicated that her stomach had been bothering her and that the Tums (motioned towards the cup of tablets)(calcium carbonate medications) had not helped. Resident D was holding a sheet of paper and indicated that a nurse had just brought her the results of a scan completed the previous day. During record review on 3/4/25 at 2:00 P.M., Resident D's diagnoses included but were not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised quarterly in 12 of 13 residents reviewed for care planning and conferences, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for UTI (Urinary Tract Infections) catheters, and 2 of 3 for siderails. (Resident 7, Resident 9, Resident 11, Resident 12, Resident 13, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 12, Resident 23, Resident 37, Resident R) Findings include: 1. On 9/12/24 at 10:35 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were limited to, hypertension and Deep Vein Thrombosis. The current annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident needed supervision with toileting and set up with dressing, eating, and transfer. During the 7 days look back period the resident was on the following types of medications antiplatelets, anticoagulant, antidepressant, diuretic, opioid, and hypoglycemic. Care conferences were offered but declined by the POA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for 3 of 3 medication carts, 1 of 1 treatment cart, and 1 of 1 medication storage room observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication cart drawers, medication was not labeled, and medication room refrigerator temperature logs were not completed. (200-M Hall, 400 Hall, 300 Hall, [NAME] Medication Storage Room) Findings include: 1. On 9/9/24 at 9:18 A.M., the 200-M Hall medication cart was reviewed. The following loose pills were observed in the bottom of the drawers: 1 white circle pill with marking TCL 340 1 white circle pill with marking 44 157 2. On 9/9/24 at 9:23 A.M., the 200-M Hall treatment cart was reviewed. The following items were observed opened, without labels, and not in a resident bag: Triple Antibiotic Ointment Ready Prep Therahoney Gel At that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 indicated that once house stock items were opened, they were stored in individual resident bags. 3. On 9/9/24 at 9:58 A.M., the 400 Hall medication cart was reviewed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and dated properly in accordance with professional standards for food service and ensure chemical sanitization was monitored for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Findings include: On 9/9/24 at 8:57 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following items were observed: In the dry storage area,1 bottle apple cider vinegar labeled open 1/24/24 use by 4/24/24 In the walk in freezer: 1 bag of spanish rice labeled 5/14/24 use by 6/14/24 2 bags of coffee cake; 1 labeled 7/24/24 use by 8/24/24 and 1 with no dates/label 4 plastic containers labeled jalapeno's 8/16 use by 8/20 1 plastic container with foil covering top labeled tomatoes 8/13 to 8/18 1 unlabeled/undated package of raw meat 1 bag labeled pizza sauce 6/29 use 7/29 1 bag labeled biscuits 7/23/24 use 8/23/24 In the walk in fridge: 2 unlabeled/undated pitcher of brown liquid 2 unlabeled/undated pitchers of orange liquid 2 unlabeled/undated pitchers orange juice 1 box of black bananas with no dates 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the documentation was completed and accurate for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for accuaracy of falls documentation. (Resident 9, Resident 12, Resident 19, Resident 7, Resident 11) Findings include: 1.On 9/11/24 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/7/24, indicated Resident 9 was not assessed for cognitive impairment because the resident was rarely or never understood, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half) for transfers, and had no falls since the prior assessment. A falls risk assessment, dated 9/13/23, indicated the resident was at high risk for falls. A potential for falls and injuries care plan, dated 6/23/21, included the intervention ensure well lit/clutter free area. Fall 1: On 10/7/23 at 6:15 P.M., Resident 9 had a witnessed fall. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was on EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters, for 3 of 3 random observations reviewed for hand hygiene during incontinence care and medication administration, and for 2 of 2 random observation for cleaning equipment in between residents (Resident 11, Resident 2, Resident 19, Resident 5, Resident 6 Findings include: 1. On 9/9/24 at 9:30 A.M., there was no Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Sign observed on a Resident 11's door for indwelling catheter. On 9/10/24 at 10:00 A.M., there was no Enhanced Barrier Sign observed on Resident 11's door for and indwelling catheter. On 9/11 at 12:46 P.M., there was no Enhanced Barrier Sign observed on Resident 11's door for and indwelling catheter. On 9/13/24 at 9:07 A.M., there was no Enhanced Barrier sign observed on Resident 11's door for and indwelling catheter. On 9/10/24 at 10:12 A.M., Resident 11's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safety of resident's by not utilizing an emergency call system for 6 of 6 days during survey. (Public Restroom) Finding includes: During random observations throughout the week of survey from dates September 9 to September 16, 2024. The visitor restroom located in the main hallway across from the beauty shop lacked an emergency call system. During an interview on 9/16/24 at 9:55 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated that residents from the beauty shop used that restroom and there was no emergency call light system in the visitor restroom. A current nondated policy was provided by the Regional Clinical Support Nurse at 10:00 A.M. The policy Personal Property-Home Like Environment lacked information concerning call lights. 3.1-19(b)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public for 9 random observations on 6 of 6 days. Urine odors in entrance hallway, conference room and [NAME] unit hallways. (Entrance Hallway, Conference Room, [NAME] Unit Hallways) Findings include: 1. On 9/9/24 at 8:50 A.M., the odor of urine was observed in the entrance hallway and the conference room. On 9/10/24 at 8:55 A.M., the odor of urine was observed in the entrance hallway and conference room. On 9/12/24 at 6:55 A.M., the odor of urine was observed in the conference room. On 9/13/24 at 8:20 A.m., the strong smell of urine was observed in the Entrance Hallway and the Conference Room. 2. On 9/10/24 at 12:48 P.M., the odor of urine was observed by the [NAME] Hall Unit Nurses Station. 3. On 9/11/24 at 8:20 A.M., the odor of urine was observed in hallway outside of the conference room. On 9/11/24 at 11:00 A.M., the strong odor of urine with air freshener was observed in the hallway by the conference room 4. On 9/12/24 at 7:04 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had medication at bedside had a physician order for the medication to be kept at bedside and self-administer, a completed assessment to self-administer, and a care plan based on 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. (Resident 14. Resident 36) Findings include: 1. On 9/10/24 at 9:22 A.M., Resident 14 was observed having 1 bottle of eye relief drops and 1 bottle of cooling pain relief medication sitting on the bedside table. On 9/12/24 at 11:23 A.M., Resident was observed having 1 bottle of eye relief drops and 1 bottle of cooling pain relief medication sitting on the bedside table. On 9/16/24 at 10:25 A.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, and depression The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 14 was cognitively intact. Resident 14 needed partial assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a Resident's representative during change in condition for 1 of 2 Residents with severely impaired cognition reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 37) Finding includes: On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and visual/auditory hallucinations. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 37's cognition was below measurable, was completely dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers, and was receiving antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, and opioid medications during the seven day lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Olanzapine Oral Tablet 10 MG Give 10 mg by mouth two times a day for schizophrenia behavior disorder. Start date 7/12/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper clinical documentation was sent with a resident during a transfer for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. (Resident 37) Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 37's cognition was below measurable, was completely dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers, and was receiving antiphychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, and opioid medications during the seven day lookback period. A nurses progress note, dated 8/1/24 at 8:00 P.M., indicated Resident 37 was transferred from the facility to the emergency department by ambulance. The clinical record lacked documentation sent with Resident 37 during the transfer.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer was provided during a transfer for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. (Resident 37) Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 37's cognition was below measurable, was completely dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers, and was receiving antiphychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, and opioid medications during the seven day lookback period. A nurses progress note, dated 8/1/24 at 8:00 P.M., indicated Resident 37 was transferred from the facility to the emergency department by ambulance. The clinical record lacked documentation provided to Resident 37 or her representative. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold was provided upon transfer for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. (Resident 37) Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 37's cognition was below measurable, was completely dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers, and was receiving antiphychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, and opioid medications during the seven day lookback period. A nurses progress note, dated 8/1/24 at 8:00 P.M., indicated Resident 37 was transferred from the facility to the emergency department by ambulance. The clinical record lacked documentation provided for Resident 37. During an interview on 9/13/24 at 1:07 P.M., the ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for restraints (Resident 11, Resident 19), 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications(Resident 37) and 1 of 6 residents review for falls(Resident 37). (Resident 11, Resident 19, Resident 37) Findings include: 1. On 9/10/24 at 10:12 A.M., Resident's 11 clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The Current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment date 7/23/24 indicated Resident was cognitively intact and was dependent to transfer and toilet. The assessment indicated that the resident had a restraint of bed rails and used daily Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, Bilateral 1/2 siderails every shift related to weakness. For resident to assist with positioning and turning dated 6/12/24. 2. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for UTIs and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A care plan was not developed for residents with new diagnoses and new medication orders. (Resident 12 and Resident 7) Findings include: 1. On 9/11/24 at 11:26 A.M., Resident 12's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection (UTI). The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/17/24, indicated Resident 12 had severe cognitive impairment, required setup assistance for toileting, and did not have a UTI. Current physician orders included, but was not limited to: Ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) - Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for UTI until 09/13/24, dated 9/8/24 A Nursing progress note, dated 9/7/24 at 2:17 P.M., indicated Resident 12 returned from the hospital on that date with antibiotics for a UTI. The clinical record lacked a care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure practitioner's diagnostic practices met professional standard of care for 1 of 1 Resident reviewed for a schizophrenia diagnosis over [AGE] years of age after admission. (Resident 37) Finding includes: On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and visual/auditory hallucinations. On 7/12/24 Resident 37 was given a new diagnosis of schizophrenia. The clinical record lacked any documentation related to that diagnosis, why the diagnosis was given, or any assessment that lead to the diagnosis. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 37's cognition was below measurable, was completely dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers, and was receiving antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor progression of pressure ulcers and document assessments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident 23 and Resident 18) Findings include: 1. On 9/11/24 at 10:21 A.M., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 23 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis and peripheral vascular disease. The most recent Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/20/24, indicated Resident 23 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting, showers, and transferring, and had two stage four pressure ulcers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Right Ischium: Cleanse area with wound cleanser, pat dry, skin prep peri wound, apply Leptospermum Honey and Calcium Alginate to wound bed, cover with bordered dressing every day shift. Start date 8/28/24 Sacral wound: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, skin prep peri wound, apply Leptospermum honey and Calcium Alginate to slough areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to provide care, services, and supervision to prevent accidents, lacked thorough and complete assessments post fall, and failed to update interventions after falls for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 37) and 1 of 1 for unsafe wandering. (Resident 201) Resident 37 experienced an unwitnessed fall and sustained a nose fracture. Findings include: 1. On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A physician order for antipsychotic medication monitoring was started on 4/18/23. A care plan, created on 4/19/23 and last revised on 4/19/23, and indicated (Resident) is risk for falls. Interventions: Be sure (Resident's) call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Ensure that (Resident) is wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly labeled and respiratory services were provided according to the care plan for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 15 and Resident 11) Findings include: 1. On 9/9/24 at 10:53 A.M., Resident 15 was observed receiving 3 Liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula. There was no date on the oxygen tubing or humidification bottle. An oxygen tubing storage bag was not observed in the resident's room. On 9/10/24 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 15 was not in her room. The oxygen concentrator was turned on to 3L and the nasal cannula tubing was lying across the resident's recliner. There was an oxygen tubing bag attached to the concentrator with no date. There was no date on the oxygen tubing. The date on the humidification bottle was 9/8/24. On 9/10/24 at 10:53 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications of dialysis by completing Pre Dialysis Assessments, Post Dialysis Assessments, and Dialysis Communication Records for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis management. (Resident 15) Finding includes: On 9/9/24 at 10:51 A.M., Resident 15 indicated she went to dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, and sometimes received an extra dialysis session during the week. On 9/10/24 at 10:53 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease. The most current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/25/24, indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half) for toileting, and received dialysis. A current hemodialysis care plan, dated 8/3/23, indicated Resident 15 received dialysis related to renal failure. Current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure medication side effects were properly monitored and pharmacy recommendations were considered for 1 of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 37) Finding includes: On 9/10/24 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and visual/auditory hallucinations. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 37's cognition was below measurable, was completely dependent on staff for eating, bathing, toileting, and transfers, and was receiving antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, and opioid medications during the seven day lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML (milligrams/milliliter) Give 0.25 mL by mouth every 2 hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an intravenous (IV) antibiotic was administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for IV therapy. This deficient practice resulted in a resident being re-hospitalized to receive intravenous (IV) antibiotics. (Resident R) Finding includes: On 9/12/24 at 1:28 P.M., Resident R's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and bacteremia. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/14/24, indicated Resident R was cognitively intact, required setup assistance of staff to eat, and was not receiving IV therapy. The most current Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 6/30/24, indicated Resident R had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision of staff to eat, and was not receiving IV therapy. Nursing progress notes from 9/1/24 at 2:28 P.M. to 9/3/24 at 12:22 P.M. indicated R was sent to the hospital on 9/1/24 for evaluation and treatment of pneumonia. Resident R returned to the facility on 9/3/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and labeled appropriately, and the areas free of food and debris in 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Food containers were found not labeled in the dry storage area, walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and shelving for spices in food preparation area in the kitchen. Food debris and paper were located in the walk-in freezer, drink refrigerator, refrigerator and dry storage. Findings include: On 2/6/24, during the initial tour of the kitchen at 8:32 A.M. the following were viewed in the walk-in refrigerator: Dry onion skins on the floor Orange Juice jug was not dated Lemonade container not dated 1 gallon of 2% milk gallon jug no open date Cucumbers in a box with no open date At 8:46 A.M. the drink refrigerator included: 1-gallon sized container of with an open date of 1/23/24 1 jar of chopped garlic in water with no open date 2 pre-made bottles of dressing with no preparation or open date 1 bottle of raspberry vinaigrette dressing no open or expiration date 1 bottle of lemon juice that was separated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right of self-determination was promoted for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notifications. A resident's scheduled appointment was rescheduled by the facility without notifying or including the resident in the change of plan. (Resident B) Finding includes: During a review of facility grievances on 10/2/23 at 10:45 A.M., a grievance form was filed on 7/2/23 by Resident B with a concern regarding her appointments and a request that included, .Would like for staff to schedule appointments with [Resident B] . During record review on 10/3/23 at Resident B's diagnoses included but were not limited to; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. Resident B most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/19/23 , included that the resident was cognitively intact. Resident B's physician orders included but were not limited to; Follow up with [MD] Friday October 6th at 2:45 P.M. (order date 6/6/23 and discontinued date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and food was prepared in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen, and 1 of 1 meal preparations observed. Food was open to air in the freezer, holes were observed in the walls of the kitchen, an expired label was observed on a container of flour, and food was touched with soiled gloves. (Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the initial kitchen observation on 6/5/23 at 8:09 A.M., the following was observed: A box of sliced carrots was open to air in the freezer. A tub of flour under a preparation table had a label on the side that indicated use by 5/20/23. The same was observed on 6/8/23 at 12:18 P.M. A basketball sized hole (approximately 12 inches in diameter) was observed in the wall under the oven, with several layers of drywall missing, and concrete with black spots exposed. The same was observed on 6/8/23 at 12:18 P.M. The paint around the electrical box was chipped. The same was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment was maintained in 1 of 4 resident halls. Cracks and missing tiles were observed in the floor, the floor was sticky, a toilet paper roll was broken off, window blinds were broken, privacy curtains were torn and missing, and the walls were observed with layers of paint and wall missing. (Secured Hall floor, Secured Hall small dining area, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: 1. On 6/6/23 at 9:23 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a bad odor in the room. The call light pull cord in the bathroom was observed with a brown substance on it, the back of the toilet seat was chipping and rusted brown. A string was missing from the right side of the window blinds. The same was observed on 6/9/23 at 10:27 A.M. 2. On 6/6/23 at 9:27 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 residents observed during medication pass had a self administration assessment and order. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 6/7/23 at 8:03 A.M., QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 8 was observed leaving Resident 8's medication on the food tray and left the room without watching the resident take the following medications: 1 Loratidine 10 mg (milligrams) 1 Baby Aspirin 81 mg 1 Carvedilol 25 mg 1 Diltiazem HCL ER 240 mg 1 Farxiga tablet 5 mg 1 Furosemide 40 mg 1 Levetiraceta 500 mg 1 Losartan 100 mg 1 Omeprazole 20 mg 1 Preservision capsule 1 Tradjenta 5 mg tablet On 6/8/23 at 9:00 A.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cardiovascular disease and heart failure. The current quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 4/18/23, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact. Current physicians orders lacked a self administration order. Current care plan lacked self administration interventions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification of change for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's representative was not notified prior to anti-anxiety or narcotic pain medication as requested by the representative. (Resident 48) Finding includes: Interview on 6/5/23 at 1:31 P.M., Resident 48's daughter (power of attorney) indicated she had spoken with the Director of Nursing (DON), as well as Resident 48's hospice team related to a new prescription of Ativan (an anti-anxiety medication) and Morphine (a narcotic pain medication). She indicated she had requested she be called prior to administration of these medications, as they were prescribed on an as needed basis, and she wanted to speak with staff about implementing other interventions prior to giving the medications. On 6/6/23 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 5/22/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received supervision and consistent implementation of interventions to prevent falls for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall interventions were observed out of place, and care plans were not updated following falls. (Resident 40, Resident 48) Findings include: 1. On 6/6/23 at 1:42 P.M., Resident 40's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and depression. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimal data set) Assessment, dated 3/29/23, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, and was on hospice. Resident 40 required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and eating, supervision of one staff for toileting, and was totally dependent on one staff for bathing. Resident 40 had two or more falls since the prior assessment with no injury. A current risk for falls care plan, dated 5/18/22, included, but was not limited to, the following interventions: apply non skid strips to floor in front of the recliner, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure attempt for management of pain was provided for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident 28). Finding includes: During an interview on 6/8/23 at 10:57 A.M., Resident 28 indicated they were experiencing pain following a recent surgery on 5/11/23, had told staff on multiple occasions they were experiencing pain, and had not received any treatment for the pain in weeks. During an interview on 6/8/23 at 1:45 P.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated that Resident 28 had a positive drug screen on 5/23/23, and the facility physician had discontinued all narcotics, but Resident 28 should still be receiving alternative pain management treatment. On 6/8/23 at 1:55 P.M., Resident 28's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain, fracture of right humerus, and encounter for orthopedic aftercare. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/20/23, indicated resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfer, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate social services were provided to meet the resident's needs for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for vision and dental services. (Resident 48) Finding includes: On 6/5/22 at 10:03 A.M., Resident 48 was observed sitting in the dining room. He was not wearing eyeglasses or dentures. Interview on 6/5/23 at 1:18 P.M., Resident 48's daughter indicated Resident 48 was currently eating without his dentures, as they had been in the nurses cart since 9/2022. She indicated speech therapy was supposed to work with him wearing the dentures, but to her knowledge had not done so yet. She further indicated his glasses were missing and staff was aware, but had not assisted to replace them. On 6/6/23 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 5/22/23, indicated Resident 48 was severely cognitively impaired and was on hospice. Resident 48 had adequate vision with no corrective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered appropriately for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. An antianxiety medication and narcotic pain medication were administered without rationale. (Resident 48) Finding includes: Interview on 6/5/23 at 1:31 P.M., Resident 48's daughter (power of attorney) indicated she had spoken with the Director of Nursing (DON), as well as Resident 48's hospice team related to a new prescription of Ativan (an anti-anxiety medication) and Morphine (a narcotic pain medication). She indicated she wanted to speak with staff about implementing other interventions prior to giving the medications. She indicated about a month ago, a staff member had given Ativan and Morphine both without notifying her first. A nurse that was there at that time indicated to her that the staff that administered the medication had indicated I gave him enough meds to knock over a horse. He'd better find a couch soon. On 6/6/23 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Residents had PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medications that were ordered for greater than 14 days without a rationale included in their clinical record (Resident 21, Resident 48). Findings include: 1. On 6/7/23 at 8:40 A.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, major depressive disorder. The most recent annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/2/23, indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact and an anti-anxiety medication was administered for 7 of 7 days during the look back period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Xanax Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Alprazolam) 0.5 mg by mouth at bedtime for restlessness/tearfulness/anxiousness, dated 4/19/23. Xanax Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Alprazolam) by mouth every 24 hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide proper storage of medications in 3 of 4 medication carts and 3 of 3 wound/treatment carts. Loose pills were found in the bottom of the medication cart drawers in 2 of 4 medication carts (Cardinal Hall and East Hall). There were improperly labeled bulk medications and over the counter medications in 3 of 3 wound/treatment carts (Wound/ treatment cart for East/Cardinal Hall, [NAME] Treatment Cart I/M Hall, Big Cart Wound Cart). Findings include: 1. On 6/7/23 at 6:12 A.M., the medication cart in the M Hall was observed to have the following unlabeled medications and bulk medications in a drawer: Nicotine gum. Active liquid protein [Patient Name], date present, but no MD (Medical Doctor) listed. 2. On 6/07/23 at 6:47 A.M., the medication cart on the Cardinal Hall was observed to have the following loose pills laying in 2 drawers: 1 green pill. 1 red with #(number) 242 pill. 1 1/2 oblong pill with # l1nvr. 1 small white pill with L #1. 1 large yellow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared to meet resident's needs according to the plan of care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental care. A resident was not provided a diet as ordered. (Resident 48) Finding includes: On 6/6/23 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 5/22/23, indicated a severe cognitive impairment. Resident 48 required limited assist of one staff with eating, had no swallowing disorders, and required a mechanical soft diet. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular/thin consistency, double portions with gravies on ground meats, dated 10/21/22. House shake mixed with ice cream at meals. Dietary to mix and provide on tray at meals, dated 3/13/23. A current nutrition care plan, dated 8/31/22, included, but was not limited to, the following interventions: provide house shake mixed with ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the appropriate antibiotics were prescribed in 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The resident was prescribed antibiotics on 3 occurrences that were resistant (ineffective) to the organism found in the culture and sensitivity (C&S). (Resident 21) Findings include: On 6/7/23 at 8:40 A.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 21's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and retention of urine. The most recent annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/2/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had an indwelling catheter, was always incontinent of bowel, and an antibiotic medication was administered for 5 of 7 days during the look back period. Previous orders included, but were not limited to: Ceftriaxone Sodium Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-06-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed staffing sheets were posted daily for 5 of 5 days during the survey. Finding includes: On 06/05/23 at 9:10 A.M., a nurse staffing sheet was observed across from the front desk hanging on the wall, dated 6/5/23. The sheet included, but was not limited to, the following information: Shift hours for RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), and QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) Total number of RN, LPN, CNA, and QMA for each shift Total hours of RN, LPN, CNA, and QMA for each shift The sheet did not specify which actual hours were worked by each discipline during the specified shift when the total hours were not equal to the number of staff. On 06/06/23 at 8:24 A.M., a nurse staffing sheet was observed across from the front desk hanging on the wall, dated 6/6/23. The sheet included, but was not limited to, the following information: Shift hours for RN, LPN, CNA, and QMA Total number of RN, LPN, CNA, and QMA for each shift Total hours of RN, LPN, CNA,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PREMIER HEALTHCARE OF ILLINOIS — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2017 |
| MORGAN, DEBORAH | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| STEINER, DERON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| CONROY, TRACY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| RODEWALD, AMANDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2017 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $673K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155370. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.