No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brooke Knoll Village

1108 Kingwood Drive, Avon, IN 46123 · Government - County · 117 certified beds · (317) 271-7052 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (317) 271-7052 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 29 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1115 N Ronald Reagan Pkwy · (317) 217-2100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1111 Ronald Reagan Pkwy # M105 · (317) 217-3355 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Fruitboot0.8 mi
9840 Countryside Ct
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
9201 E County Road 100 N · (317) 271-9103

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.4%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%1.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms42.5%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.0%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.7%23.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.1%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.7%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.701.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.301.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.68U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.6%CMS range 60.9–79.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.2–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.3–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
61.7%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 88.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented per facility policy and ensure appropriate professional standards for infection prevention were implemented for 3 of 27 residents reviewed for infection control (Residents 105, 77, and 1). Findings include:1. On 4/6/26 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 105 was initially observed. He was lying in bed with an intravenous (IV) pole at bedside which ran to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). A Foley catheter (urinary catheter) drainage bag was also noted to the side of his bed with dark yellow urine in it. On 4/8/26 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 105 was observed through his open door. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14 and an unidentified Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) were in his room with him. The CNA indicated she was finishing getting Resident 105 cleaned up and bathed and had called the nurse in to put a treatment on his bottom. LPN 14 was observed as she applied a zinc cream to his coccyx area. She was not wearing a gown. The CNA indicated she had not worn a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident 11).Findings include:On 4/7/26 at 2:26 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 11. She had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, hallucinations, depression, and anxiety disorder.On 4/9/26 at 1:34 p.m., a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II (used to identify the specialized needs of individuals with mental illness (MI), dated 8/9/24, intellectual or developmental disability ID/DD, or both (MI/ID/DD) was provided. Resident 11's, MDS assessment, dated 6/17/25, indicated the resident did not have a PASRR level II.During an interview on 4/9/26 at 2:00 p.m., the Corporate MDS Coordinator indicated Resident 11's MDS was inaccurate. She corrected the MDS and provided a copy of the attestation form on 4/9/26. On 4/10/26 at 12:26 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were implemented for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Residents 105).Findings include:On 4/6/26 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 105 was initially observed. He was lying in bed with an intravenous (IV) pole at bedside which ran to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). A foley catheter drainage bag was also noted to the side of his bed with dark yellow urine in it. Resident 105 indicated he was very tired, cold, and his arm hurt.On 4/6/26 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 105 was observed. He was lying in bed and indicated he was cold, and still had a little pain, or aches over his whole body.On 4/8/26 at 9:25 a.m., Resident 105's door was closed. He was heard calling out from the closed door.During an interview on 4/8/26 at 9:38 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14 exited his room. LPN 14 indicated his calling out during turning and repositioning was normal for him, he had general pain and aches, and experienced discomfort when care, turning, and repositioning.On 4/8/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to correctly administer insulin for 1 of 1 resident observed for insulin administration (Resident 63).Findings include:On 4/7/26 at 12:12 p.m., RN 6 was observed prepping a Humalog insulin pen to administer to Resident 63. The order was for 2 units based on her blood sugar of 153. RN 6 dialed in 2 units of insulin and held up the insulin pen to be seen. RN 6 was intervened due to not priming the insulin pen with 2 units of insulin prior to dialing in the 2 units to administer to the resident. The correction was made and the insulin was administered to Resident 63's left lower abdomen. The Director of Nursing (DON) was present throughout the procedure. On 4/8/26 at 2:08 p.m. during an interview with the DON, she indicated she went through the steps of administering insulin prior to being observed and he did everything correctly. She indicated RN 6 was nervous being observed. On 4/10/26 at 10:20 a.m., RN 6's insulin administration competency checklist was reviewed. On the checklist, item number 8 indicated to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) nail care was provided for residents who were dependent on staff for person hygiene for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for nail care (Residents 51, 61, and 1).Findings include:1. On 4/6/26 at 10:54 a.m., Resident 51 was initially observed. He was lying in bed in a hospital gown, his hair was unbrushed and appeared greasy. His fingernails were long and had debris under them. He indicated his nails were long and jagged and wanted to get them cut down. On 4/7/26 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 51's nails were observed. They remained long, and had debris under them. He indicated no one had cut them yet, but maybe they would for his shower day. On 4/8/26 at 9:20 a.m., Resident 51's tube feeding pump was alarming. Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN) 14 entered his room to check the pump. She observed his nails at that time and indicated they were jagged and needed to be cut, she would let the aide know. On 4/7/26 at 10:42 a.m., Resident 51's record was reviewed. The most recent Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to label over the counter medications and failed to date medications when opened for 3 of 5 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 1 medication room (Residents 103, 7, 24, and 18).Findings include: On 4/7/26 at 12:28 p.m. the 200 hall, 300 hall, and medication room were observed for medication storage.On the 200 Hall Medication Cart, Resident 103 had Tylenol 650 mg (milligrams), B12 1000 mcg (micrograms), and Vitamin D3 without a label to indicate her name, room number, or physician's name.On the 300 Hall Medication Cart, Resident 7 had azelastine 137 mcg (a nasal spray used for allergies) in the cart without a date to indicate when it was opened.In the Medication Room Refrigerator, Resident 24 had a bottle of lorazepam 2 mg/ml (milliliter) without a date to indicate when it was opened.Resident 18 had a bottle of lorazepam 3vmg/ml without a date to indicate when it was opened.A policy titled, Storing Drugs dated 7/2025 indicated, .Any outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated drugs, or those drugs that have containers that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation in a resident's medical record was accurate for 1 of 18 resident records reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include:Resident 4's record was reviewed on 4/8/26 at 12:56 p.m. Census information indicated the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 2/22/26. A progress note from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14, dated 2/19/26 at 5:57 p.m., indicated, Medicare: Resident is A&O [alert and oriented] x4. VSS [vital signs stable]. C/o [complaints of] pain to lower/upper back specifically muscle spasms. Staff makes multiple attempts to reposition with pillows, mostly effective. Continues on scheduled lyrica [nerve pain medication], hydromorphone [pain medication], diazepam [medication for anxiety and muscle spasms], and oxycodone [pain medication], somewhat effective. No increased pain noted at this time. Dependent with all ADL's [activities of daily living], able to consume meals with set up and meds given po [by mouth] crushed.Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were administered per physician orders for a resident with known weight loss and who received all their nutrition by Gastric Tube (G tube) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident B). Findings include:On 2/2/26 at 10:34 a.m. Resident B's room was observed. The resident was not in the room at that time. Next to Resident B's bed there was a pole with a feeding pump set up but it was not running. The formula bag that was hanging was 1000 milliliters (ml) IsoSourse (a brand of high calorie formula used to supplement nutrition) 1.5 k/cal (kilocalorie, which is a unit of energy used to measure the energy content of food and beverages) with 2/2/26 at 2:15 a.m. written on the bag along with initials of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3. There was approximately 800 ml left in the bag. On 2/2/26 at 11:00 a.m. Resident B's medical record was reviewed. He was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury and dysphagia (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to prevent the potential for infection when they failed to change a used suction canister for over a week for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident B). Findings include:On 2/2/26 at 10:34 a.m. Resident B's room was observed. There was a suction canister that was approximately half full of yellow tinged liquid with a layer of yellow sediment that had settled to the bottom. The canister was dated 1/13/26On 2/2/26 at 11:05 a.m. the Executive Director (ED) indicated the canister had been changed on 2/2/26.On 2/2/26 at 4:30 p.m. a copy of a current facility document titled, Supply Change Out, dated 6/2024 was provided. That document indicated Suction Canisters/Tubing should be changed weekly and as needed.This citation relates to Intake 2731013.3.1-18(b)

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were appropriately stored in a medication cart for 1 of 2 narcotic count observations. Findings include:On 8/14/25 at 10:43 a.m. the medication cart on 500 hall was observed for a narcotic count with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 7.Resident B had a bottle of Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) tablets with an order to take 1/2 a tablet twice daily. QMA 7 took the contents out of the bottle. There were three pill crush sleeves stapled together with 20 half tablets in each of the sleeves, one pill crusher sleeve that was stapled with 20 half tablets in it and 1 pill crusher sleeve open with 14 half tablets in it. QMA 7 indicated the three sleeves that were stapled together were from another full bottle of the same prescription, and the other two were from the current bottle. The QMA indicated sometimes the nurse who received the bottle would pre count the pills to make counting easier. They would put 20 pills each into a pill crusher sleeve and then staple them shut.During an interview on 8/14/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to privacy and dignity when staff failed to knock and announce themselves before entering the residents' room for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident 25, 34, and 46), and for 1 of 1 resident council meeting (Residents 9, 20, 48, 11, and 43). Findings include: 1. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 10:25 a.m. with Resident 25, an unknown staff member opened the door without knocking and entered the room. The staff member indicated she was looking for Resident 25's roommate and then left abruptly. Resident 25 indicated a lot of staff members did not knock before they entered the room or the bathroom. Staff would often make demeaning comments about the smell when she had a bowl movement. Resident 25 indicated when staff did not knock before coming into the room or bathroom it made her feel disrespected and undignified.2. During a random observation on 3/26/25 at 8:51 a.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 12 and another unidentified CNA rolled a hoyer lift to Resident 34's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date medications when opened and label over the counter medications for 3 of 6 medication carts reviewed (Residents 34, 47, 5, 64, 49, 11, 44, and 59). Findings include: 1. Resident 34 had an insulin pen lispro in the cart dated [DATE]. It expired 28 days after opening. 2. Resident 47 had latanoprost eye drops in the medication cart with no date to indicate when they were open for 2 of 2 bottles observed. 3. Resident 5 had a bottle of nasal deep-sea spray in the cart with no date to indicate when it was opened. 4. Resident 64 had a bottle of Tylenol in the medication cart, and it lacked a label. 5. Resident 49 had an insulin pen lantus in the medication cart dated [DATE]. It expired 28 days after opening. 6. Resident 11 had a bottle of Tylenol in the medication cart with no label on the bottle. She had a nasal spray, nanogel, in the cart with no date to indicate when it was opened. 7. Resident 44 had a bottle of fish oil with no label on the bottle. 8.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were used during the administration of a nasal spray for a resident for 1 of 1 observation of a nasal spray administration (Resident 13). B. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure consistent and effective infection control practices related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) to ensure staff and visitors were aware of who required EBP and that personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily accessible for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for EBP (Residents 44, 34, 41, 71, 15, and 46). Findings include: A. During a medication administration observation on 3/27/25 at 8:30 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 13 was observed as she prepared a nasal spray for Resident 6. LPN 13 set and administered the resident's oral medications, then returned to the cart to prepare the resident's nasal spray. LPN 13 proceeded to administer the residents nasal spray without performing hand hygiene or donning gloves. After administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to chose when he received routine lab draws that honored his preference not to be woken up too early for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: During an interview on 3/24/25 at 2:11 p.m., Resident 47 indicated, he was doing ok except he was tired of being woken up too early to keep getting blood draws. He indicated last time he woke up around 2:00 a.m. with a needle in his arm, it had startled him and made him mad. When they came that early to get his blood, they turned on the lights, jostle him in bed, stuck him and drew the blood, then he had a hard time falling back asleep. Resident 47 indicated he did not understand why he had to keep getting so much lab work done, and he wished they would do it later in the day. During a follow up interview on 3/27/25 at 8:48 a.m., Resident 47 indicated he did not understand, why they keep getting me up so D--- early for all this blood work. He couldn't go back to sleep then felt grumpy throughout the day. He indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to initiate a new PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review)screening after a new mental health diagnosis was added to the diagnosis listing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR (Resident 3). Findings include: On 3/27/25 at 8:56 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 3. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to bi-polar , dementia, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and major depressive disorder. Resident 3 had a level I (A Level 1 Screening involves completion of an evaluation to determine if an individual has, or is suspected of having, a PASRR condition, i.e., serious mental illness (SMI), intellectual disability (ID), developmental disability (DD), or related condition (RC) completed on 1/24/25. The diagnosis listed on her level I was major depression. On 4/15/24, Resident 3 had a new diagnosis of bi-polar added. Resident 3's record lacked documentation that a new PASRR screening was completed to determine if a level II was required. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive discharge plan was in place and implemented for 1 of 2 closed record reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: On 3/26/25 at 8:46 a.m., Resident 80's closed record was reviewed. She had been a short-term resident who completed a rehabilitation stay from 12/17/24 - 12/29/24 for aftercare following a joint replacement surgery. Resident 80 had a comprehensive care plan, dated 12/18/24, which indicated her desire to discharge home, but her goal was TBD (to be determined). Interventions for this plan of care were not person centered and adaptive equipment needed was left blank as well as home services needed was left blank. A Discharge summary, dated [DATE], was reviewed. The recapitulation of the resident's stay was left blank. A summary at the time of her discharge was left blank. Her discharge plan of care indicated, discharge hom and proceed with home health for nursing, physical and occupational therapy and home health aide. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents related to medications at bedside for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 60 and 33). Findings include: 1. On 3/26/25 at 1:30 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 60. He had the following diagnoses which included but not limited to hypertension, arthritis, weakness, and anxiety. On 3/24/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 60 was sitting in his wheelchair with his back at the door. Behind him on a table was a cup of pills. The color of the pills was white, orange, and red. There were approximately 8 pills in the cup. On 3/25/25 at 1:58 p.m., the Regulatory Consultant indicated the Qualified Medication Assistant (QMA) was instructed not to leave Resident 60's medications at bedside unattended. On 3/27/25 at 10:21 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated he was now allowed to have his medication at bedside.2. During a medication pass on 3/27/25 at 8:20 a.m. Resident 33 indicated to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 13, there was a pill on the floor next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with significant past trauma and/or post-traumic stress disorder (PTSD) received personalized care to address and avoid triggers for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for trauma informed care (Residents 25 and 65). Findings include: 1. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 25 indicated she regularly stayed up late at night because she couldn't shut her mind off and had trouble going to sleep and staying asleep. On 3/25/25 at 1:35 p.m., Resident 25's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic, autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord) and Major Depressive Disorder. A progress note, dated 1/1/2025 at 4:52 a.m., indicated Resident 25 was up in her wheelchair awake. When the nurse asked the resident if she had slept any throughout the night the Resident indicated she had not because she had too much on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up with pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 69). Findings include: On 3/26/25 at 1:02 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 69. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to encounter for palliative care, hypertension, sleep apnea, and pain. He had a pharmacy recommendation on 2/5/25 for a reduction in the amount of aspirin he was receiving. The physician did not respond until 2/12/24, 7 days later. Resident 69 had a pharmacy recommendation on 2/5/25 for a reduction gabapentin and the current dosage. The physician did not respond until 2/12/25. On 3/26/25 at 1:32 p.m., the Regulatory Consultant indicated the facility's policy indicated they have 3 days to get pharmacy recommendations completed. On 3/27/25 at 10:09 a.m., The Director of Nursing (DON) indicated they send the recommendation to the physician and if there was no response in 3 days, she sent it again. She flagged the recommendations and when the physician responded, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair wheels were engaged into the facility van wheelchair-locks properly for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). The deficient practice was corrected on 2/22/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Finding includes: A confidential interview during the survey indicated on 2/20/24 Resident B was being transported in the facility van while seated in her wheelchair. Resident B's wheelchair was not strapped into the van properly. The wheelchair and resident tipped over and the resident hit her head. During an interview, on 3/8/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Corporate Consultant (CC) indicated Resident B had an accident while riding in the facility van. The van made a sudden stop that caused the resident and the wheelchair to tip backwards. The resident her hit head on the wall/floor of the van. A facility nurse went to the van and assessed the resident. The resident had a bump on the back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed within reach for 4 of 4 residents randomly observed for call light placement (Residents 13, 31, 52 and 71). Findings include: 1. On 1/19/24 at 11:38 a.m., Resident 13 was observed during a hall-tray lunch meal service. She was seated in her wheelchair at the foot of her bed. Her bed was neatly made but her call light was observed draped on top of the mattress near her pillow. The call light was out of sight and out of reach. During an interview on 1/19/24 at 11:40 a.m., Resident 13 indicated she did not like the meal because it was fried fish, and she did not like any fish. When asked if she could call and ask for an alternative meal, Resident 13 indicated she thought she had a call button, but did not know where it was, so not to bother with it. On 1/19/24 at 11:50 a.m., CNA 8 and an unidentified Dietary aide returned with a new lunch tray. Resident 13 was provided with a fresh garden salad and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. The staff helped her set up her tray and exited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that expired medications were replaced and failed to ensure a refrigerated medication was stored in the refrigerator for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for medication storage (Residents 5, 38, 58, 68, and 243). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/24/23 at 10:02 a.m., the 400-hall medication cart was observed. The cart contained erythromycin eye ointment lacked a date to indicate when it was opened and a NovoLog insulin pen that was dated 12/19/23 was expired, belonging to Resident 68. 2. During an observation on 1/24/23 at 10:15 a.m., the front 300 hall medication cart was observed. The cart contained several medications that were undated when they were opened. a. Resident 5 had saline nasal (sodium chloride) aerosol spray 0.65% (use for thick or crusty mucus) with no date added to indicate when it was opened. b. Resident 58 had fluticasone proprionate 50mcg/actuation (a medication used to treat sneezing, itching or runny nose and other symptoms caused by hay fever) with no date to indicate when opened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the MDS (Minimum Data Set) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR (Pre-Assessment Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accuracy (Resident 39). Findings include: During a comprehensive record review on 1/29/24 at 12:36 p.m. Resident 39 had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, delirium, and mood disorder. Resident had a Level II evaluation to identify the specialized needs of individuals with mental illness, intellectual or developmental disability ID/DD, or both (MI/ID/DD) related to her diagnoses. It was determined on 7/6/2021 that she required level II services. She had a MDS completed on 4/25/34. The question, Is resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The answer was no indicating resident did not require a level II. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's toenails were cut to prevent discomfort for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living care (Resident 15). Findings include: On 1/18/24 at 11:30 a.m., Resident 15 indicated she could not see the podiatrist (foot doctor) to get her toenails cut. She had diabetes and needed his care. On 1/22/24 at 11:08 a.m., an observation of Resident 15's toes showed very long, clean toenails. She indicated her daughter had been cutting them when the podiatrist did not see her. She had been in the facility for 4 and a half months. The podiatrist had been here three times and did not see her. She preferred the podiatrist to do her toenails because she was diabetic (blood sugar disorder) and did not want an injury on her foot. The facility had kept telling her she was on the list, but she had not seen him yet. On 1/22/24 at 2:28 p.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) provided the podiatrist's resident list for the 8/14/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's equipment was maintained and free from the potential for accidents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 33), and failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 21). Findings include: 1. On 1/18/24 at 11:07 a.m., Resident 33's bed was initially observed. She had two, half siderails installed to her bed. The bedrail on the right side of the bed was observed to have fallen to the side, and when manipulated was observed to be loose and unsteady. The loose bedrail created a large gap between the mattress and rail. At that time, Resident 33 was seated in her wheelchair beside her bed and the plastic/rubber protective endcap of the wheelchair brake extender was observed to be missing so that the blunt metal end was level with her armrest. During an interview on 1/18/24 at 11:07 a.m., Resident 33 indicated her bedrail had been like that for some time, but she was still able to use it to get herself in and out of bed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to date feeding and water bags for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for feeding tubes (Resident 78). Findings include: During an observation on 1/18/24 at 10:57 a.m., Resident 78 was observed sitting in his wheelchair next to his bed. He had a bag of Isosource 1.5 with formula inside the bag and a bag with clear fluids hanging on a pole behind him. The feeding was disconnected from the resident. The formula was dated, and the clear fluid was not dated. During an observation on 1/19/24 at 10:24 a.m., Resident 78 was sitting up in his wheelchair. He had a bag of Isosource 1.5, with formula in it and a bag of clear fluid. Both bags lacked a date. On 1/19/24 at 2:15 p.m., Resident 78 had a bag of Isosource and a bag of clear fluid with no date on them and disconnected from the resident. A comprehensive record review was completed on 1/23/24 at 11:05 a.m. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, malignant neoplasm, weakness, heart failure and type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to exchange oxygen equipment for a resident who received oxygen therapy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 37). Findings include: During an observation on 1/18/24 at 10:55 a.m., Resident 37 was sitting up in his wheelchair next to his bed. He was wearing oxygen per nasal cannula. He had an oxygen bag, tubing, and humidified water attached to a wall unit of oxygen. The tubing, humidified water, and bag were dated 12/23/23. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 2:15 p.m., Resident 37 was sitting up in his wheelchair in his room. An oxygen bag with tubing inside and humidified water attached to a wall unit were dated 12/23/23. During an observation on 1/19/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 37 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. He had an oxygen bag with tubing attached to an oxygen wall unit, along with humidified water dated 12/23/23. During an observation on 1/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., Resident 37 was sitting up in his wheelchair in his room. A wall unit of oxygen had tubing connected to it with humidified water. The tubing was placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure culturally appropriate and person-centered services, routine/preferences, and activities were available and/or implemented for a resident who spoke a different language for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for culturally competent care (Resident 71). Findings include: On 1/18/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident 71 was initially observed. He was seated in a specialized high-back wheelchair (WC) in his room near the foot of his bed. He did not speak English, but there was a 3-ring binder observed on his dresser top. The binder indicated Resident 71 spoke [NAME] and included several pages of clip art pictures with [NAME] words. Most of the pages were tattered, folded, ripped or scribbled on. There were some words spelled phonetically in English but without indication of what the words were. Resident 71 was observed to have long hair pulled back into a ponytail, and a beard with long hair that came to a point at the top of his stomach. On 1/18/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand washing was completed according to policy for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 1 and 51). Finding include: On 1/18/24 at 11:55 a.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 19 was observed to pick up Resident 1's paper lunch ticket from the floor. Without hand washing or gelling her hands, she assisted Resident 1 and Resident 51 with eating. She started with her left hand, providing a bite of food to Resident 51. Then, provided a drink with her left hand and a bite with her right hand for Resident 1. She went back to Resident 51 and wiped her mouth and provided a drink and several bites of food with both her right and left hands. A current policy, titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 10/2014, was provided by the Infection Preventionist (IP), on 1/24/24 at 11:53 a.m. A review of the policy indicated, .Hand hygiene is the single most important measure for preventing the spread of infection .The hand hygiene guidelines are part of an overall CDC [Centers for Disease Prevention and Control] strategy to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT INDIANA — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2021
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2021
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2021
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/21/2024
MAGNOLIA HEALTH MANAGEMENT XXX, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2021
HAFIDH, SAADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
REED, STUARTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2021
WILSON, JESSICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ACCHIARDO, LISAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
RAMSEY, CHRISIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
RAMSEY, NEILIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
REED, MICHAELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
MAGNOLIA HEALTH SYSTEMS 60, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
MAGNOLIA HEALTH SYSTEMS 80, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2025
MAGNOLIA HEALTH SYSTEMS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
T & N PARTNERSHIP, L.P.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014
WARD, JONATHANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+22.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 12%Other / private 18%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,568per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$489per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155814. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next