Persimmon Ridge Rehabilitation Centre

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 83.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by CNA 10 for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C) This deficient practice was corrected on 7/19/25, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include:Review of a facility reported incident, dated 7/19/25, indicated CNA 10 took a picture, using her personal cell phone, of Resident C's peri-area. The resident had marked herself with a bingo dauber. The CNA said she took the picture to show to the nurse on duty, but it was later discovered she had shown the picture to multiple staff members.Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 7/30/25 at 10:03 a.m. Diagnoses included Down syndrome, muscle weakness, osteogenesis imperfecta (a condition where bones are fragile and easily broken), cardiac murmur, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and a cognitive communication deficit. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/25/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact, did not experience hallucinations, delusions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported abuse allegations to the Administrator or designee for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C). This deficient practice was corrected on 7/19/25, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include:Review of a facility reported incident indicated CNA 10 took a picture using her cell phone of the resident's peri-area where the resident had marked herself with a bingo dauber. The CNA said she took the picture to show to the nurse on duty, but it was later discovered she had shown the picture to multiple staff members.Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 7/30/25 at 10:03 a.m. Diagnoses included Down syndrome, muscle weakness, osteogenesis imperfecta (a condition where bones are fragile and easily broken), cardiac murmur, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and a cognitive communication deficit. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/25/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, did not experience hallucinations, delusions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Dietary Manager. This deficiency had the potential to impact 77 of 77 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an interview, on 6/6/25 at 9:50 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated she did not have a certification qualifying her to act as the Dietary Manager. She was hired in March 2025 and had not passed her certification test. During an interview, on 6/10/25 at 12:24 p.m., the Administrator indicated the former Dietary Manager (CNA 4), was currently employed as a CNA, and had a Manager's ServSafe certification. CNA 4 worked full-time, five days a week as a CNA, and also covered in the kitchen. During an interview, on 6/11/25 at 9:43 a.m., CNA 4 indicated she had a ServSafe certification. She estimated she worked 30% of her scheduled shift in the kitchen while the other 70% she was on the floor as a CNA. A current facility policy, titled Director of Food Service, provided by the Administrator on 6/11/25 at 12:08 p.m., indicated the following: .must possess a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food under safe and sanitary conditions related to kitchen equipment and cleanliness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 77 of 77 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During a kitchen observation, on 6/5/25 at 11:01 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), the following was observed: Pieces of lettuce were on the floor in front of the prep table. Numerous food particles were on the floor between the prep table and the stove. A serving tray, sitting on the shelf under the food prep table, across from the warming table, had what appeared to be ketchup smeared on the tray, along with a torn salt packet. There was a honey-colored food particle on the bottom handle of the warmer doors. A zip lock bag was on the floor, underneath the pots and pans storage rack, along with three white plastic storage lids. A trash can, positioned next to the storage pot and pan rack, had dried white and dark reddish/purple food crumbs on top of the lid. A dried brown ring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions and provide supervision to prevent falls for residents with cognitive impairment for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents 59 and 72) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/5/25 at 10:14 a.m., Resident 59 was sitting on a loveseat in the dining/activity area, a bedside table in front of her and a blanket over her lap. Resident 59's clinical record was reviewed on 6/10/25 at 12:00 p.m. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (involuntary movements), dementia, unsteadiness on feet, and a need for assistance with personal care. Current physician's orders included donepezil (used to treat dementia) 5 mg once daily at bedtime, buspirone (antianxiety) 5 mg three times a day, carbidopa-levodopa (to treat Parkinson's) 25-100 mg three times a day, lorazepam (antianxiety) 0.5 mg once daily, sertraline (antidepressant) 25 mg once daily, and trazodone (sedative) 50 mg daily at bedtime. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/19/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change out, label, and date oxygen supplies for 3 of 17 residents reviewed. (Residents 42, 61, and 75) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/5/25 at 12:35 p.m., Resident 61's oxygen bag and tubing were dated 5/4. On 6/6/25 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 61's oxygen bag and tubing were dated 5/4. Resident 61's clinical record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 11:56 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels). Current orders included supplemental oxygen, 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula, at bedtime for hypoxia (4/16/25). 2. During an observation, on 6/5/25 at 10:22 a.m., Resident 75's oxygen bag and tubing were dated 5/17. On 6/6/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 75's oxygen bag and tubing were dated 5/17. Resident 75's clinical record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 11:14 a.m. Diagnoses included restrictive lung disease. Current orders included supplemental oxygen, 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula, at bedtime for hypoxia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic count and reconciliation was completed for 3 of 5 medication carts reviewed for controlled medication reconciliation. (500 hall, 300 hall, and 200 hall) Findings include: During a medication storage observation of the 500 hall 1st half medication cart, on 6/10/25 at 9:20 a.m., accompanied by RN 4, the Shift To Shift Narcotic Sheet and Card Verification Log was reviewed. RN 4 signed the log during the observation. RN 4 indicated she should have signed the log at the start of her shift. During a record review, on 6/10/25 at 10:33 a.m., the 300 hall 2nd half, Shift To Shift Narcotic Sheet and Card Verification Log lacked shift to shift count and reconciliation signatures on controlled medications for the following dates: June 2025 - lacked shift-to- shift narcotic reconciliation signatures: 6/9 - 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. 6/9 - 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. During a record review, on 6/10/25 at 10:40 a.m., the 500 hall 2nd half, Shift To Shift Narcotic Sheet and Card Verification Log lacked shift to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of unlabeled and unused medications for 1 of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. (Medication Cart 300, 2nd half) Findings include: During a medication storage observation of the 300 hall 2nd half medication cart, on 6/10/25 at 5:13 p.m., accompanied by the DON, two loose pills were found at the bottom of the lowest drawer in the medication cart. The DON indicated that the pills needed to be disposed of. During an interview, on 6/11/25 at 8:25 a.m., the DON identified the two loose pills observed on 6/10/25 were ibuprofen (non-steroidal analgesic) and Ativan (anxiety medication). The DON indicated that the 300 hall 2nd half medication cart contained one resident who had an order for Ativan. During an interview, on 6/11/25 at 10:32 a.m., the DON indicated medication and treatment carts were deep cleaned weekly and the floor nurses were expected to address cart cleanliness daily during their shifts. A current facility policy, titled STORING DRUGS, provided by the DON on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was free from staff-to-resident verbal abuse and physical abuse resulting in a skin tear for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 2/24/25, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: Review of a facility reported incident, dated 2/18/25 at 10:30 p.m., indicated the following: Brief Description of Incident: On 2/18/25 the DON and Administrator were notified of allegations of abuse to Resident B during a transfer. CNA 3 was suspended pending an investigation. Preventative measures taken included: a resident assessment per the abuse policy and all alert and oriented residents and all staff members were scheduled for interviews. A follow up on 2/24/25 included the following: During an abuse investigation it was noted that there were two witnesses present during the interaction between the resident and CNA 3. The two witness interviews indicated CNA 3 wanted the resident to go to bed when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse to the appropriate agencies for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Findings include: Review of an Indiana State Department of Health facility reported incident, dated 2/18/25 at 11:34 p.m., indicated the facility initiated an investigation for alleged abuse against Resident B. The incident was identified on 2/18/25 at 10:30 p.m. CNA 3 was the staff member involved and suspended pending investigation. Local law enforcement and APS (Adult Protective Services) were not notified. The brief description indicated Resident B was allegedly abused during a transfer. During an interview with the Administrator on 4/15/25 at 3:18 p.m., she indicated she had not notified law enforcement because the resident did not have any serious bodily injury. During a phone interview with QMA 4 on 4/15/25 at 4:12 p.m., she indicated QMA 6 was right outside the room after the incident and she immediately reported it to her, who reported it to RN 8 and subsequently the DON and Administrator. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT INDIANA — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN