Ripley Crossing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 80.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.85 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a shower bed was comprehensively inspected for safety or function by the Maintenance staff or by the CNA prior to its use, failed to ensure a resident was repositioned on a shower bed using two staff in accordance with the plan of care, and failed to ensure the resident was rolled toward the CNA providing care in accordance with the CNA training record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in Resident B falling from a shower bed and sustaining a subdural hematoma with midline shift (a potentially fatal traumatic brain injury), a fracture of the left humerus (the largest bone of the upper extremity), and a facial laceration. The immediate jeopardy began on 08/05/24, when the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety during a shower when a CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) did not follow proper procedure guidelines while turning a resident in a shower bed. The facility did not assess…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate safety measures when assisting a resident in their wheelchair, resulting in the resident falling and sustaining injuries that required hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B)Findings include: A Health Status Note, dated 09/08/2025 at 11:17 A.M., indicated a nurse was pushing the resident in his wheelchair up to the front lobby to leave for a dialysis treatment. The resident's feet fell to the floor causing the resident to fall forward out of the wheelchair. The resident fell face first onto the floor and immediately began to bleed from the nose. The resident was assessed for injuries, and his nose was bleeding a large amount. Pressure was applied to the resident's nose, and the resident was assisted by two staff members to a sitting position back into the wheelchair. Staff applied ice and pressure to the bridge of the resident's nose. The facility Nurse Practitioner was notified, and the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in a resident's condition for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 82)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 82 was reviewed on 12/11/2025 at 10:04 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, diabetes, depression, respiratory failure, and food in the respiratory tract. A Progress Note, dated 09/22/2025 at 8:30 A.M., indicated the nurse was called to the dining room by a Certified Nurse Aide (C NA) who reported the resident was choking. The Heimlich maneuver was attempted when the resident's face went pale in color. After three to five attempts, the resident began talking and color returned to her face. The resident eventually coughed up a soggy piece of waffle. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was called to the unit to help assess the resident. The resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a pressure ulcer in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 1) Findings include:During an interview and observation, on 12/11/2025 at 10:25 A.M., RN 7 indicated Resident 1 had a pressure ulcer on her coccyx. The resident was sitting in their wheelchair and refused to be transferred to bed for the wound to be observed further.The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 12/12/2025 at 1:20 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/03/2025, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, hypertension, heart failure, pneumonia, dementia, and schizophrenia. The resident was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and transfers.The current physician's order, with a start date of 08/06/2024, indicated the resident was to have weekly skin assessments completed on every Wednesday. The weekly skin assessments, for July 1 through August 3, 2025 indicated the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper placement of urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters . (Resident 37) Findings include:On 12/09/2025 at 11:55 A.M., Resident 37 was observed sitting in her recliner in her room. She had recently finished working with therapy in her room. The urinary catheter drainage collection bag was hanging from the side of the recliner with three inches of the bag touching the floor. On 12/09/2025 at 1:57 P.M., Resident 37 was sitting in her recliner in her room. The urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging from the side of the recliner with three inches of the bag touching the floor. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at10:14 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 3 indicated the urinary catheter collection bag should be hung lower than the resident's bladder and not touching the floor. The resident needed assistance transferring from the bed to the recliner. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/2025, indicated the resident was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to appropriately store medications for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (Wing 2 Medication Cart)Findings include: On [DATE] at 2:52 P.M., the Wing 2 Medication Cart was observed with RN 3. The Medication Cart contained a 1/4 full Humalog insulin pen for Resident 10. A sticker indicated the pen was opened on [DATE] and should be discarded by [DATE]. During an interview, on [DATE] at 2:53 P.M., RN 3 indicated the resident received insulin every day before meals. RN 3 used the pen to administer insulin to the resident before breakfast and before lunch that day. The resident probably got insulin from it yesterday too. The medication was expired and should have been discarded on [DATE].The current facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, with a revision date of [DATE], was provided by the Assistant Director of Nursing on [DATE], at 2:49 P.M. The policy indicated, .facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during a dressing change and touching the floor related to hand hygiene for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident B) Findings include: During an observation, on 03/10/25 at 9:26 A.M., RN (Registered Nurse) 3 preformed hand hygiene and donned a gown and gloves to begin a wound dressing change on Resident B. She began removing the dressing from Resident B's right breast. The dressing was saturated upon removal. An egg sized wound was visualized on Resident B's right breast. A piece of the gauze, fully saturated in drainage, fell onto the floor. RN 3 picked up the saturated gauze off the floor and discard it with the used dressing in a bag. RN 3 then began cleaning the resident's wound. No hand hygiene was completed or removal of gloves. After cleansing the wound RN 3 began applying the new dressing to Resident B's right breast. RN 3 proceeded to a second dressing change on Resident B's right foot. No hand hygiene was completed in-between dressings or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe water temperatures between 100 degrees and 120 degrees Fahrenheit per the federal guidelines for 10 of 11 residents' bathroom water access observed. (Rooms 201, 301, 302, 303, 304, 307, 308, 402, 403, and 404) Findings include: During an interview and observation on 10/17/24 at 10:35 A.M., Resident 61 indicated the water was hot but she had never been burned. The resident was standing at the sink in her room combing her hair and was able to safely walk around her room unassisted. The water stream was too hot to keep a hand under the water flow without discomfort. During an interview and observation on 10/17/24 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 33 indicated she had not had any problems with the water being too hot. The resident was able to propel herself in her wheelchair unassisted and walk with her walker. The water stream was too hot to keep a hand under the water flow without discomfort. During an interview and observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon record review and interview the facility failed to accurately to complete Minimum Data Set assessments for 3 of 18 residents reviewed. (Residents 5, 57, and 61) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 10/17/24 at 3:35 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/18/2024, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and depression. Section O, Special Treatment and Programs, indicated the resident was receiving Hospice care. Section J, Health Conditions, indicated the resident did not have a terminal diagnosis. During an interview on 10/18/24 at 11:04 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated a local Hospice company provided care to the resident. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 2:21 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated she received information related to Hospice care from the resident's paper chart. The resident did have a terminal diagnosis and the MDS assessment should have been marked as such.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor a dialysis access site for 1 of 1 resident that received dialysis treatments. (Resident 42) Findings include: During an interview on 10/16/24 at 1:29 P.M., Resident 42 indicated he received dialysis treatments three days a week. He had an arteriovenous (AV) shunt (an abnormal connection between an artery and a vein used for dialysis) in his left arm. The nurses at the facility did not assess the shunt, they did put a numbing cream on his arm before he went out to dialysis. The resident's left arm was observed on 10/22/24 at 2:07 P.M. there was no swelling, drainage, or signs of infection at the shunt site. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 9:56 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 indicated the resident went out for dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. He had a shunt in his arm for dialysis. On dialysis days the nurses were to fill out a form that went with the resident to dialysis. They would check and document the resident's vital signs, weigh him, and assess the dialysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident F) Findings include: During an observation on 09/23/24 at 8:48 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 3 was observed standing beside Resident F's bedside and the CNA stated, I'm not dealing with people telling me to shut up . Well then someone else can deal with you then! and then exited the resident's room into the community living room. The CNA noticed she was being observed, then she turned around and walked back into Resident F's room and began asking what the resident would like to wear today. During an interview with Resident F on 09/23/24 at 12:59 P.M., she indicated that some of the staff are mean to her, but she can't remember their names. They come into her room and say what she needs to do in a nasty way. During an interview on 09/23/24 at 1:09 P.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 4 indicated that Resident F was pretty alert and that she talked to family daily. Resident F has dementia, but it was more…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of resident's medications did not occur for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Residents B, D, and E) Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 09/20/24 9:48 A.M. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/13/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, anxiety and depression. A current physician's order, with a start date of 12/05/22, indicated the staff were to administer Norco (a pain medication), 5-325 mg (milligrams), 1 tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. A controlled drug record for Resident B, dated 07/12/24, shows documentation for the resident's Norco medication being signed out by RN (Registered Nurse) 2 on 08/25/24 at 8:00 A.M. and at 2:00 P.M. The facility as worked schedule, provided by the Administrator on 09/23/24 at 11:30 A.M., showed that RN 2 was not working on 08/25/24. The electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for Resident B on 08/25/24 showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,265 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,265 — penalty dated 2024-08-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJOR HOSPITAL — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN