Hillside Manor Nursing Home
1109 E National Highway, Washington, IN 47501 · For profit - Corporation · 48 certified beds · (812) 254-7159 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,740 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-25)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 42% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 1.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 25.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.9% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.2% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.4% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.2% | 23.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 35.9% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 33.6 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent a resident with a history of exit-seeking behavior and elopement from exiting the facility and leaving the property for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an elopement that occurred on the evening of August 30, 2025. The resident was located with the assistance of the local police department, approximately 0.6 miles from the nursing facility, hiding behind an air conditioning unit near the intersection of National Highway and State Road 57. This Immediate Jeopardy began on August 30, 2025, when the facility failed to ensure Resident C did not exit the facility property by climbing a gazebo and jumping over a fence that enclosed an outside courtyard. Another resident observed Resident C and notified nursing staff, who notified the local law enforcement. Resident C was located between two buildings, hiding behind an outdoor air conditioning unit. When approached, the Resident ran from the officer. Resident C was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not develop new pressure ulcers and ensure services were provided for treatment of pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident B and Resident C). Resident B developed a Stage III pressure ulcer, and routine wound care orders were not followed. Full wound assessments were not completed routinely, and wound treatments were not documented as completed. Findings include:1. A record review on 5/18/26 at 10:30 A.M., indicated Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to acquired absence of right and left leg below knee, type II diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/28/26, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment, no unhealed pressure ulcers, had bilateral lower extremity impairment, and required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with transfers. A Braden scale assessment (tool used to predict the risk for developing pressure ulcers),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with food safety standards to maintain a sanitary environment and prevent foodborne illness during 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Frozen food was stored uncovered, kitchen staff rested a pair of tongs against a cleaning towel during meal service, the backsplash behind the three-compartment sink appeared unclean and discolored, and a live roach was observed in the kitchen. Finding includes: During a kitchen observation on 3/25/26 at 10:30 A.M., the kitchen backsplash behind a three-compartment sink appeared to be unclean, discolored, and contained several dried splattering's. A downstairs standing freezer contained a bag of individual cookie dough balls that was open to air. During a kitchen observation on 3/25/26 at 11:35 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) was using a pair of tongs to plate chicken. Between plates, the DM set the tongs down to the side on a tabletop. The serving end of the tongs rested up against a cleaning towel, then was picked up and used to plate the next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was serving as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis (40 hours per week) for 1 of 1 DON reviewed. The facility had an interim DON that was not working on a full-time basis. (DON)Finding includes:On 12/8/25 at 1:00 P.M., the employee records were reviewed and indicated the DON was interim. On 12/10/25 at 9:54 A.M., the Administrator provided copies of the posted nurse staffing form from 11/1/25 through 12/7/25 which indicated the DON worked the following hours per week:November 1-7=36 hoursNovember 8-14=36 hoursNovember 15-21=34 hoursNovember 22-30=31 hours December 1-7=39 hours The facility assessment, last revised 11/26/25, indicated facility staff would include 1 full-time DON. During an interview on 12/9/25 at 9:30 P.M., the DON indicated she did not clock in or out but was there 1-2 days a week and she works mostly on MDS assessments. She was not aware of any hiring processes or plan for a full-time DON at that time. She indicated she retired a year and a half ago and did not want…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were certified to fill the role of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) for 1 of 5 CNA licenses reviewed. An employee was working as a CNA without being certified. (CNA 24)Finding includes: On 12/8/25 at 1:00 P.M., the employee records were reviewed. There was not a license found on CNA 24. She was hired 8/28/24 and her 120 days would have been up 12/26/24.During an interview on 12/9/25 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator provided a certificate of completion for the 105 hour nurse aide training from the Indiana State Department of Health and said that was what was provided to them. She wanted to double check with the employee to see if she was under a different name because she was working as a CNA in the facility.During a 12/9/25 at 2:45 P.M., the Administrator indicated she was not aware that CNA 24 was not licensed. The license was not verified upon hire. She usually worked eight hours on night shift and had 35 shifts working alone as a CNA since September of 2025.On 12/10/25 at 8:31 A.M., a current non dated CNA job…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate certification of the Kitchen Manager for 1 of 1 employee identified as Kitchen Manager. The current Kitchen Manager was not certified in food safety or food service management. (Kitchen Manager)Finding includes:On 12/1/25 at 9:50 A.M., the Kitchen Manager indicated she did not have a certification in kitchen management. She indicated she started in the facility about 3 months ago and had experience in the kitchen, but did not have any type of certification. On 12/10/25 at 12:10 P.M., the Administrator indicated the Kitchen Manager was hired on 9/16/25. She indicated the plan was to train in the kitchen first, then obtain certification the first of the year. On 12/10/25 at 7:23 A.M., the Administrator provided a non-dated Food and Nutrition Services Staff policy. The policy did not indicate the specific training required of the Kitchen Manager. 3.1-20(e)
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Food items were open to air and not labeled, refrigerator temperatures were not recorded, and debris was observed in the refrigerators.Findings include: On 12/1/25 at 9:50 A.M., the kitchen was observed with the following:Three clear containers that contained cereal were under the food preparation counter not dated. Refrigerator #1:A baggie of cheese slices in the door not labeled. A pitcher of applesauce not labeled.A pitcher of clear liquid not labeled.An open package of deli meat in the door not labeled.A tray of bacon strips on the bottom shelf not labeled. Freezer #2:An open package of meat patties not labeled.An open package of breadsticks not labeled. Refrigerator/Freezer #3:One of the two drawers in the bottom of the refrigerator cracked with a large portion missing with exposed jagged edges.Debris in the freezer. An air conditioning unit was observed surrounded by silver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters for 2 of 2 random observations. Staff observed to place garbage bags on top of the dumpster lid, and trash was observed on the ground around the dumpster.Findings include:On 12/1/25 at 1:30 P.M., during a random observation, the dumpster in the back parking lot was observed with several trash bags sitting on top of the front lids. At that time, a staff member was observed to place a bag of trash with the other bags sitting on the lids. Another staff member then went to the back of the dumpster, lifted the back lids, and placed a trash bag inside the dumpster. At that time, trash was observed on the ground surrounding the dumpster.On 12/8/25 at 2:02 P.M., during a random observation, the dumpster was observed overflowing with trash. Bags of trash were observed sitting on top of the lids, and empty boxes were observed on the ground surrounding the dumpster. On 12/10/25 at 12:10 P.M., the Administrator indicated trash pickup days were Tuesday and Friday. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate one or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist with qualifying training or certification for 7 of 7 days of the survey. The facility did not have a current certified Infection Preventionist.Finding includes:During an interview on 12/1/25 at 9:56 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she was unsure who the Infection Preventionist was.During an interview on 12/9/2025 12:17 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 indicated she was the Infection Preventionist, but was not yet certified.On 12/10/25 at 8:25 A.M., the Administrator provided an Infection Preventionist job description that indicated, .Minimum Qualifications .Completion of a CMS-approved Infection Prevention and Control Training Course .
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident centered activity program for 2 of 2 halls in the facility. The activity calendar was not followed and resident's interviews indicated there weren't enough activities. (Front Hall, Back Hall)Finding includes:During anonymous interviews, the following comments were made about the activity program:I'm a busy body and there really isn't anything to do around here. We have asked them for more activities but they say they are limited. The director is gone a lot with transportation because all our appointments are out of the building. So if she isn't here, there usually aren't any activities. Sometimes if the activity director isn't available to hold the activity, a couple of residents will do it instead. A copy of the December 2025 activity calendar was observed hanging in the hallway between the Back and Front Hall. The facility assessment, last revised 11/26/25, indicated the facility would offer activities based on resident preference and would have one full time staff member for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Activity Director was certified for 1 of 1 Activity Director reviewed. (Activity Director)Finding includes:On 12/8/25 at 1:00 P.M., the employee records were reviewed. On 12/9/25 at 9:40 A.M., the Activity Director indicated she was not certified at this time. On 12/9/25 at 4:05 P.M., the Administrator indicated she was hired for another position and took over the Activity Director position on 8/22/25. She was currently enrolled in the Activity Director course but had not taken the test to be certified. She was aware that she needed certification. On 12/10/25 at 12:38 A.M., a non dated current Activity Director Policy was provided by the Administrator and indicated, . PERSONNEL SPECIFICATION: High School graduate, aptitude and some training in arts and crafts, and ability to plan and organize recreation al activities . 3.1-33 (e)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 1 of 1 medication carts observed. Medication cups with loose pills and a narcotic was observed in a medication cart. (Resident 7, Resident 15, Resident 24, Resident 30)Findings include:During an observation on 12/1/25 at 10:09 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 opened the second drawer of the medication cart that was not under a double lock and pulled out a medication cup that was unlabeled and indicated the medications were for Resident 15. At that time, she indicated she was unsure of what the specific medications were and entered Resident 15's room. During the medication pass, QMA 5 indicated 1 of the 11 pills was a pain pill to Resident 15.During an interview on 12/1/25 at 10:15 A.M., QMA 5 indicated the pain pill was a 5 milligram (mg) oxycodone (narcotic).During an observation on 12/4/25 at 10:37 A.M., QMA 5 opened a medication drawer and an unlabeled medication cup had a yellow substance in it with a tablet. At that time, QMA 5 indicated it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure diets were provided that met nutritional and special dietary needs for 12 of 35 residents that ate facility provided meals. All residents were served a regular diet despite other therapeutic diet orders. (Resident 4, Resident 9, Resident 11, Resident 13, Resident 20, Resident 3, Resident 29, Resident 8, Resident 30, Resident 22, Anonymous Resident A, Anonymous Resident B)Findings include:During the survey, two anonymous residents indicated the facility did not provide a diabetic menu. One resident indicated their blood sugars had been three times higher than they needed to be since a diabetic meal was not provided. The other resident indicated it was up to the residents to know what they could and couldn't have from their meals and to not eat the items that were contraindicated with their diet. On 12/8/25 at 1:04 P.M., the Kitchen Manager indicated although several residents did have therapeutic diet orders, there were no alternative meals or selections for any diets other than regular that were provided. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a diet ordered by a prescribing practitioner for 3 of 15 residents reviewed for diet orders. The resident orders did not include an order for a diet. (Resident 7, Resident 23, Resident 10)Findings include:1. On 2/5/25 at 1:17 P.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and cancer of kidney and prostate. Resident 7 was admitted [DATE]. The most recent admission MDS assessment, dated 9/15/25, indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Current Physician's Orders lacked a diet order. A current Nutritional Care Plan, last revised 9/8/25, included, but was not limited to, an intervention to provide and serve diet as ordered. 2. On 12/4/25 at 1:00 P.M., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. Resident 23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 observations of the basement and laundry room. The basement floor was full of dirt and debris, vent covers were caked with dust, and the laundry room had debris and dust. (Basement, Laundry Room)Findings include:1. On 12/1/25 at 10:00 A.M., the basement was observed with dirt and debris on the floor in the area where the refrigerators and freezers for the kitchen were stored. Two of two vent covers in the hallway from that room to the ice machine room were observed with a thick layer of dust between the vent slats. On 12/8/25 at 1:06 P.M., the same was observed. 2. On 12/8/25 at 10:05 A.M., the laundry room area had debris scattered throughout the floor where clean clothing was kept. Multiple pieces of debris accumulated where the wall and floor meet. There was multiple wires exposed on the ceiling with a thick layer of dust caked on the wires. The electrical panel box lacked a door to cover it, and had exposed wires caked with dust. A window air condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was informed in advance by the prescribing practitioner of the risks and benefits of proposed treatment and treatment alternatives for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A prescribing practitioner ordered an antipsychotic for a resident they had not seen and the clinical record lacked documentation of education provided to the resident prior to the medication being given. (Resident 23)Finding includes:During an interview on 12/3/25 at 10:23 A.M., Resident 23 indicated that before she came, she was not on any medications, and now she was on several, but she didn't know why. At that time, the resident was observed in the dining room walking with her hand along the wall and shuffling her gait. The resident indicated she thought it was from the different medications. On 12/4/25 at 1:00 P.M., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate representation of advanced directive status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives. A resident's actual code status was not reflected accurately in all documentation. (Resident 32)Finding includes:On 12/4/25 at 10:43 A.M., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, anxiety.The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/27/25, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment.Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:Full code, dated 5/2/25.A POST (physician order for scope of treatment) form, dated 12/10/24, indicated Resident 32 had a DNR (do not resuscitate) code status. On 12/5/25 at 1:35 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 indicated all resident's code status were located in a binder at the nurses station. At that time, the binder was observed with Resident 32's face sheet. At the top of the face sheet, DNR was written. RN 3 indicated in the event of a code situation, Resident 32 would not be resuscitated due to the DNR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was discharged with sufficient preparation for 1 of 1 closed records reviewed. A discharged resident was not educated to follow up with a specialist as needed, and a current list of medications was not provided. (Resident 38)Finding includes: On 12/8/25 at 9:45 A.M., Resident 38's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension.Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on 9/25/25.An admission minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a moderate cognitive impairment.Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Losartan Potassium-HCTZ (hydrochlorothiazide) oral tablet 100-12.5mg (milligram), give one tablet a day for hypertension, dated 6/21/25.Progress notes lacked information related to Resident 38's discharge.Resident 38's clinical record lacked any discharge assessments.Resident 38's clinical record lacked a referral or any other information related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for MDS Assessments. Residents taking anticonvulsant medications, antianxiety, and hypoglycemic medications were not marked as administered. (Resident 3, Resident 8, Resident 2)Findings include:1. On 12/4/25 at 12:59 P.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, diabetes mellitus. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/28/25, indicated no cognitive impairment and no use of a hypoglycemic medication. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Jardiance (a hypoglycemic) oral tablet, one daily, related to diabetes mellitus, dated 9/23/25. Humalog (insulin), inject 12 units with meals related to diabetes mellitus, dated 6/10/25. Tresiba FlexTouch (insulin) 50 units once daily related to diabetes mellitus, dated 6/4/25. Resident 2's medication administration record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services for a suprapubic catheter were given for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care. Staff was not measuring output and not cleaning the insertion site of a resident with a suprapubic catheter. (Resident 7)Finding includes: During an interview on 12/1/25 at 2:17 P.M., Resident 7's wife indicated the doctor did not want the facility to change his catheter, he wanted to do it in his office. She was not sure what care the staff performed with the catheter. During an observation on 12/4/25 at 10:05 A.M., Resident 7's catheter bag and tubing were dragging on the hallway on floor while he was walking from his room to nurse's station, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 55 picked it up and hung it back on his pant's pocket. On 12/4/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 7's catheter site was observed in his room with small amount of yellow drainage, slight redness/irritation, no odor, and brownish crust around it. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to receive registry verification before filling the role of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) for 1 of 5 CNA licenses reviewed. An employee was working as a CNA without the facility verifying registration. (CNA 24)Finding includes:On 12/8/25 at 1:00 P.M., the employee records were reviewed. There was not a license found on CNA 24. She was hired 8/28/24 and her 120 days would have been up 12/26/24.During an interview on 12/9/25 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator provided a certificate of completion for the 105 hour nurse aide training from the Indiana State Department of Health and said that was what was provided to them. She wanted to double check with the employee to see if she was under a different name because she was working as a CNA in the facility.During a 12/9/25 at 2:45 P.M., the Administrator indicated she was not aware that CNA 24 was not licensed. The license was not verified upon hire. She usually worked eight hours on night shift and had 35 shifts working alone as a CNA since September of 2025.On 12/10/25 at 8:31 A.M., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure person-centered dementia treatment and services were provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 7)Finding includes:During an observation on 12/3/25 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 7 was sitting by the front door asking to play Connect Four. Staff told the resident his wife would be here soon to play. During an observation on 12/4/25 at 10:09 A.M., Resident 7 came out of room and asked the nurse when his wife would be here. She indicated Anytime. Why don't you wait in your room for her.On 12/5/25 at 1:17 P.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and cancer of kidney and prostate. Resident 7 was admitted [DATE].The most recent admission MDS assessment, dated 9/15/25, indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired.The clinical record lacked an activities care plan about likes, dislikes, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). A resident was given medications that caused severe sedation when taken together resulting in unresponsiveness and a subsequent hospitalization. (Resident 6)Finding includes:On 12/5/25 at 9:40 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia, polyneuropathy, anxiety, and depression. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/25, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment, no behaviors, and use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident 6 was dependent on staff for toileting and bathing. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:Cipro (an antibiotic) oral tablet 500mg (milligrams), give 2 tablets a day, started 11/17/25 and ended 11/21/25. tizanidine 2mg three times a day for muscle spasm, give with 4mg tablet totaling 6mg, dated 5/5/25 and current. tizanidine 4mg three times a day for muscle spasm, give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) lacked documentation of medications and treatments that were received. (Resident 3, Resident 7, Resident 23)Findings include:1. On 12/5/2025 at 11:17 A.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, diabetes mellitus, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and stroke. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/5/25 indicated Resident 3 had severe cognitive impairment. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to the following: Baclofen tablet 10 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet by mouth 1 time a day for muscle spasms. Baclofen tablet 20 mg, 1 tablet by mouth in the evening for muscle spasms. Oxybutynin Chloride extended-release tablet 5 mg, 1 tablet by mouth in the evening for neuromuscular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Residents were not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when indicated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 6)Findings include: On 12/4/25 at 10:45 A.M., Resident 7's catheter site was observed in his room with small amount of yellow drainage, slight redness/irritation, no odor, and brownish crust around it. There was no signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) observed.On 12/5/25 at 1:17 P.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behaviors, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and cancer of kidney and prostate. Resident 7 was admitted [DATE] with a suprapubic catheter.The most recent admission MDS assessment, dated 9/15/25, indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired, he took a diuretic, had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program was used to monitor appropriate use of antibiotics for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Resident antibiotic orders were not followed. (Resident 6, Resident 7)Findings include: 1. On 12/5/25 at 9:40 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paraplegia, polyneuropathy, anxiety, and depression. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/25, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment, no behaviors, and use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident 6 was dependent on staff for toileting and bathing. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Cipro (an antibiotic) oral tablet 500mg (milligrams), give 2 tablets a day, started 11/17/25 and ended 11/21/25 (resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]). Macrobid (an antibiotic) oral capsule (nitrofurantoin monohyd macro), give 100mg twice a day, started…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 1 of 2 resident shower rooms, 1 of 2 dining rooms, and 1 of 2 halls observed and clean linens were not covered during transport in resident halls. Overhead air vents contained a build up of dust in and around the vent, a dining room floor was uneven and flooring was raised or warped, and a shared shower room contained multiple broken floor tiles, appeared unclean, and contained a small swarm of gnats and flies near the commode. (North Unit, South Unit, North Unit dining room, and Middle-hall shower room, Resident D)Findings include:1. During an observation on 9/3/25 at 3:25 P.M., the North Unit dining room had a towel draped on the floor under an in-wall air conditioning unit. The flooring between the air conditioning unit and the entrance to the dining room was uneven, warped, and cracked. During an observation on 9/8/25 at 10:10 A.M., the North Unit dining room flooring between the air conditioning unit and the entrance to the dining room was uneven,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pharmaceutical services were available to provide physician prescribed routine medications to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Following a change in a resident's routine medications, the facility failed to obtain an ordered routine medication which resulted in multiple missed doses of the medication. (Resident C) Finding includes:During record review on 9/3/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, unspecified psychosis, schizophrenia, and pedophilia. Resident C's most recent annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 6/20/25, indicated the resident was rarely to never understood. The resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills related to daily function. The resident received antipsychotic medication routinely. Resident B's physician orders included, but were not limited to, Geodon oral capsule 40 milligrams (MG), give 40 mg by mouth two times a day related to schizophrenia and anxiety (continued 8/13/25). Resident B's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 1 of 2 resident rooms observed for water temperatures and 1 of 2 resident shower rooms observed for water temperatures, for 1 of 2 dining rooms observed for air temperatures and disrepair, and 2 of 4 resident room observed for disrepair. A shared resident restroom's water temperature reached 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F), a shared resident shower room's water temperature reached 140 degrees F, the North Unit Dining room reached 89 degrees F, floors were uneven and wet from a leaking air conditioning (AC) unit, two resident rooms' flooring was in disrepair, and one resident room's ceiling contained water damage. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident F, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER],. North Unit dining room, North Unit shower room) Findings includes: 1. During an interview on 6/24/25 at 10:10 A.M. Resident B indicated that the air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate facility assessment based on the resident population and identification of resources needed to provide the necessary care and services required for their residents. Finding includes: On 8/30/24 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator provided a facility assessment form revised 1/17/24. The form listed facility personnel but lacked a staffing plan to ensure sufficient staff were in the building to meet the needs of the residents, such as number of each staff. The form lacked training topics and competencies specific to the facility, transportation information including use of a facility van, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, resident equipment, use of oxygen therapy, pharmacy information, and the facility's plan for communication related to residents and staff with communication barriers. On 9/4/24 at 10:18 A.M., the Administrator indicated she was unaware that the facility assessment could have specific detailed information about the facility. She indicated a template was used to fill out the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP had not received specialized training in infection prevention and control, and did not currently dedicate at least part time to the role of IP for 1 of 1 staff members reviewed for IP. Finding includes: On 9/4/24 at 12:10 P.M. LPN 13 indicated that she was the current IP and responsible for the infection prevention and control program in the facility. She indicated she did not have any specialized training or certification for the role, and was able to dedicate approximately 3-4 hours per week on the infection control program. On 9/4/24 at 12:34 P.M., the facility's Administrator (via the Activity Director) indicated there was no policy or job description for the Infection Preventionist, that someone was just assigned to the role.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 10 of 32 residents reviewed for narcotic use. The facility had implemented a facility-wide rule to crush all narcotics for every resident without resident input or obtaining a physician order to do so. (Resident 2, Resident 21, Resident 3, Resident 13, Resident 4, Resident 15, Resident 29, Resident 5, Resident 17, Resident 11) Findings include: On 8/27/24 at 2:40 P.M., Resident 5 complained of pain beyond a level of 10 on a 1-10 pain scale in her knees and back, and indicated no pain medications were currently ordered because she couldn't take it crushed in applesauce so it was discontinued. On 9/4/24 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, pain. A nurse's note dated 2/19/24 at 9:00 P.M. indicated Resident 5 was yelling and screaming at staff due to having to crush her narcotics. Resident indicated she should not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed for 5 of 14 residents reviewed for MDS Assessments. Residents taking antiplatelet medication, diuretics, and oxygen were not marked as administered. (Resident 16, Resident 15, Resident 7, Resident 25, and Resident 6). Findings included: 1. On 8/28/24 at 10:54 AM, Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed. Resident had diagnoses that included, but was not limited to, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), anemia, and and atrial fibrillation. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/29/24 indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact. The Resident required limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The MDS indicated Resident 16 was not taking an antiplatelet and had not been on oxygen. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, aspirin (an antiplatelet medication) 81 MG (milligrams) 1 tablet 2 times per week, dated 7/24/24. The MAR (medication administration record) for August 2024 included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Residents on antipyschotic, antidepressant, antianxiety, and diuretic medications and a resident on oxygen did not have care plans developed. (Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 7, Resident 25, Resident 6, Resident 28) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 4:05 P.M., the Administrator indicated Resident 15 had a history of substance abuse and that was how he ended up in his condition. On 8/28/24 at 1:40 P.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/25/24, indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact, totally dependent on 2 staff to assist him for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and was taking opiod and antipyschotic medication. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to have an order for oxygen use, follow physician oxygenation orders, date oxygen tubing, and clean the oxygen filters for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 5, Resident 23, Resident 14, Resident 6) Finding includes: 1. During an interview and observation on 8/26/24 at 1:47 P.M., Resident 6's oxygen tank was observed with debris on it and the filter was caked with dust. At that time, Resident 6 was in bed and indicated she only used the oxygen at night and the filter had not been cleaned by the facility. During an observation on 8/29/24 at 10:38 A.M., the same was observed. On 8/28/24 at 11:10 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly and State Optional MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 8/9/24 indicated Resident 6 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician's orders were obtained from the pharmacy for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility lacked August 2024 physician orders for insulin and oxygen. (Resident 14, Resident 5, Resident 23, Resident 2) Findings include: 1. On 8/28/24 at 1:03 P.M., Resident 2's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis, included, but were not limited to unspecified intracranial injury and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/28/24 indicated Resident 2 had a severe cognitive impairment. Resident 2 lacked a current physician order for Tresiba Flextouch 100 u/ml (units/milliliter) 6 u subcu (subcutaneous) once a day. At that time, RN (Registered Nurse) 5 indicated Resident 2 was on insulin daily. On 8/28/24 at 11:30 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) provided a copy of the August Blood sugar log which indicated Resident 2 received Tresiba 6 units subcu at bedtime from 8/1/24 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 2 of 2 medication carts observed and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Medications with no open date were observed in the medication carts, and refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out completely in the medication room. (Back Hall Medication Cart, Back Hall Medication Storage Room, Front Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: On 8/26/24 at 1:15 P.M., the following medications were observed during review of the Back Hall Medication Cart with RN 5: Resident 11 Albuterol Sulfate inhaler-no open date Resident 7 Breyna 160-4.5 mcg (microgram) inhaler-no open date Resident 20 Neo/Poly/HC (Neomycin-Polymyxin-Hydrocortisone) otic drops-started on 8/16/24, ended on 8/22/24, still in the drawer Resident 10 ferrous sulfate pill in medication cup with no identification Resident 28 Trelegy Ellipta with an open date of 5/21/24 Resident 28 allergy relief nasal spray-no open date Resident 28 a second Trelegy Ellipta with a tag to discard after 6 weeks-no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchens observed. Staff did not wear hairnets that covered all their hair, appropriate footwear was not worn, food was not labeled, the dishwasher was not monitored daily for safe sanitation, staff did not wash hands for appropriate length of time, and scoops were left in containers. (Kitchen) Findings include: 1. On 8/26/24 at 1:00 P.M., the following was observed during a tour of the kitchen: Kitchen on main floor: No soap in the dispenser at the hand washing sink. The Dietary Manager did not have a hairnet on and was wearing Crocs (shoes with holes on the top). When she put a hairnet on, it did not cover the hair at the nape of her neck. Kitchen Staff 1's hairnet covered the crown of her head only, leaving hair out at her temples and nape of the neck. Freezer/refrigerator #8: Opened frozen pancakes, no label Opened frozen waffles, had 6/24 handwritten on them Opened frozen Hashbrowns, no date A brown liquid and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks, hands were not sanitized between changing gloves, a resident was not completely cleaned, and staff did not offer a resident the opportunity to wash hands after toileting for 4 of 5 resident observations of incontinence care. Staff did not cover clean clothing when transporting clean clothes to residents, and carried clean clothes against their uniform top when carrying for 2 of 2 observations of linen handling. Residents were not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when indicated for 6 of 6 residents with wounds, 2 of 2 residents with urinary catheters, and 1 of 1 residents with a stoma. (Resident 28, Resident 3, Resident 23, Resident 21, Resident 16, Resident 15, Resident 11, Resident 2, Resident 184, Resident 4) Findings include: 1. On 8/30/24 at 12:34 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for 1 of 1 resident communal restrooms and 3 of 3 shower rooms observed. A three-quarter inch gap was observed on 1 of 2 doors to the courtyard. A random couch was observed to have fabric peeled off of it in 1 of 2 common areas. A brown substance was observed around the bottom of toilets, doors had chips, toilet paper holders were rusted, gnats were on the floor, tile was missing in the shower, spiderwebs were on the ceiling, and grout was soiled. (Front Hall Shower Room, Middle Hall Shower Room, Back Hall Shower Room, Communal Restroom) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/28/24 at 10:37 A.M., the communal restroom for residents on the front hall was observed with a brown substance around the bottom of the toilet, the toilet paper holder was rusted, and the door to the restroom had chips on the bottom of it. On 8/30/24 at 11:19 A.M., the same was observed. 2. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of pests and rodents. (Downstairs Dry Storage Room) Finding includes: On 8/26/24 at 1:20 P.M., a sticky pad for catching insects and rodents was observed full of insects and a dead mouse in a trap was attached to it downstairs in the dry storage room behind the staff refrigerator. On 8/29/24 at 11:04 A.M., the same was observed. Also, a live mouse was stuck to the sticky pad, and flying insects, some dead and 2 flying, were observed in the other refrigerator in the dry storage room downstairs. The refrigerator door was not closed all the way and had 1 closed gallon jug of coleslaw dressing in it. On 8/28/24 at 11:05 A.M., the contract for pest control company was reviewed and indicated they were to come to the facility monthly (except January when they were to come twice a month) to monitor for spiders, mice, and german cockroaches specifically. At that time, the Administrator indicated they have had issues in the past with mice but have had no recent trouble…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with medication in their room. A resident had an Albuterol inhaler in her room without an order to keep at the bedside or a self-administer assessment. (Resident 5) Finding includes: On 8/29/24 at 11:40 A.M., an Albuterol inhaler (used for asthma to assist in opening airways) was observed lying on a table next to the recliner in Resident 5's room. At that time, RN 5 indicated the inhaler could be kept at the bedside. On 8/29/24 at 9:08 A.M., Resident 5's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma. The most current Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 7/4/24, indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact. Physician orders included, but were not limited to the following: Albuterol Aerosol HFA (hydrofluoralkane) inhaler, inhale 2 puffs every 4 hours as needed for SOB (shortness of breath)/Asthma, ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. A care plan was not revised to include bed rails as a fall intervention, and care plans were not revised after medications were discontinued. (Resident 2, Resident 16, Resident 15) Findings include: 1. On 8/26/24 at 2:10 P.M., Resident 2 was observed lying in bed with his eyes open, a 1/2 bed rail was up in the middle of the mattress, call light was lying on the bed and one side of the bed was against the wall. On 8/28/24 at 1:03 P.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, unspecified intracranial injury, anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/28/24, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use and limited assistance of one for eating. Current physician orders included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective services were provided to prevent the development of a facility-acquired stage three pressure injury and multiple stage two pressure injuries for Resident 28, who was admitted to the facility without pressure injuries, and were identified by the facility upon admission to be at risk to develop pressure injuries. (Resident 28) Findings included: On 8/28/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 28 indicated that his buttocks was hurting, and had been for 2 or 3 weeks. He indicated he had told staff about it. On 8/30/24 at 10:43 A.M., Resident 28's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (damage to the brain from lack of blood flow due to a blood clot), anemia, and heart failure. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/1/24, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 28 was dependent or required extensive assistance with bed, transfer, and toileting mobility. Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 random observations of residents having vapes (electronic cigarette) in their possession. (Resident 15, Resident 24) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 8/29/24 at 10:17 A.M., 2 vapes (electronic cigarettes) were laying on Resident 15's bedside table while he was laying in his bed. At that time QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 3 went into his room and back out leaving the vapes in the same place. Then the Dietary Manager brought ice water into the room and did not ask about the vapes. QMA 3 went back into the room and back out without asking the resident to return the vapes to the staff. On 8/28/24 at 1:40 P.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety. Resident 15 was admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical record documentation was complete and accurate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for general skin conditions. (Resident 15, Resident 23) Findings include: 1. On 8/28/24 at 1:40 P.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, chronic pain syndrome, epilepsy, and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/25/24, indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact, totally dependent on 2 staff to assist him for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Non dated neuro (neurological) checks were found in the resident's clinical record and indicated he was sent out to the hospital. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 4:05 P.M., the Administrator indicated Resident 15 has a history of substance abuse and that was how he ended up in his condition. She was not sure what the exact date was or why it wasn't indicated on the neurocheck form, but they were ordered because of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff based on the needs of the resident population in the facility for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for having a diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). (Resident 15, Resident 24) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 4:05 P.M., the Administrator indicated Resident 15 had a history of substance abuse. On 8/28/24 at 1:40 P.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety. Resident 15 was admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/25/24, indicated Resident 15 was cognitively intact, totally dependent on 2 staff to assist him for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient behavioral health care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement. A resident with documented behaviors was not provided additional monitoring or services during a behavioral episode that resulted in the resident eloping from the facility, unwitnessed. (Resident B) Finding includes: During a review of facility reported incidents on 3/21/24 at 10:45 A.M., an incident dated 2/25/24 at 8:20 P.M., included that Resident B was requesting nursing staff to buy him cigarettes throughout the day. Resident B was upset and demanded to go to the gas station across the street for cigarettes. While staff was down the hall, Resident B went outside into the courtyard and exited the courtyard gate. During record review on 3/21/24 at 12:00 P.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to undifferentiated schizophrenia, acquired absence of right leg below knee, partial traumatic amputation of left midfoot and nicotine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that complete and accurate records were maintained for 2 of 4 resident records reviewed. A resident's record contained no documentation of an elopement occurrence, nor were the behaviors that reportedly led up to the incident or any monitoring following the elopement documented. A resident's wound treatment orders were not updated in the resident's record and wound treatment documentation was not completed accordingly. (Resident B, Resident C) Findings include: 1. During a review of facility reported incidents on 3/21/24 at 10:45 A.M., an incident dated 2/25/24 at 8:20 P.M., included that Resident B was requesting nursing staff to buy him cigarettes throughout the day. Resident B was upset and demanded to go to the gas station across the street for cigarettes. While staff was down the hall, Resident B went outside into the courtyard and exited the courtyard gate During record review on 3/21/24 at 12:00 P.M., Resident B's diagnoses included, but were not limited to undifferentiated schizophrenia, acquired absence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 1 of 2 resident rooms observed for water temperatures and 2 of 2 shared resident shower rooms observed for water temperatures. Resident rooms and restrooms were not cleaned and/or needed repairs for 3 of 6 rooms observed and 1 of 2 shared shower rooms observed. Residents indicated their shared bathrooms are not cleaned daily, flooring was damaged around a commode and plumbing was leaking onto the bathroom floor, a wall cover was loose and exposing a hole used for plumbing, commodes appeared to be unclean, a soap dispenser was dripping soap onto a towel placed on the floor, and a shared shower room had broken tiles, a towel left on the floor, and a wall behind the commode had not been cleaned. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident G, Resident F, Resident H, Resident J, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] B, room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 3 of 7 reviewed during initial record review and 1 of 3 observed during care. Two residents had medications that were not signed off in the MAR (Medication Administration Record) as given for 7 days in the MDS. The MDS for four residents indicated they had a medication being given when one was not ordered. One resident was independent with transfers when the MDS indicated he needed extensive assistance of 2 staff for transfers. (Residents 4, 9, 13, 17, 29, 30, 35, and 39) Findings include: 1. On 9/20/23 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 4's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, arthritis, right below the knee amputation, and behavioral dementia. He was admitted on [DATE]. The most recent Annual MDS Assessment, dated 7/16/23, indicated Resident 4 had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications in their rooms. The facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order to self administer medications. (Resident 18) Findings include: During an observation on 9/18/23 at 11:04 A.M., Resident 18 was observed lying in bed. A medication cup was on her bedside table and had an orange liquid in it. Resident 18 also had 2 nasal spray bottles and a dry mouth bottle on the bedside table. At that time QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 14 indicated Resident 18 did not have a self administration order and she should have stayed at the bedside while Resident 18 took the liquid protein in the medication cup. During an interview on 9/18/23 at 11:16 A.M., Resident 18 indicated staff always left the medications in her room. During an observation on 9/20/23 at 11:43 A.M., Resident 18 had the following on her bedside table: antifungal powder, chloraseptic spray, two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for oxygenation. (Resident 18) Findings include: During an observation on 9/18/23 at 11:13 A.M., Resident 18 was observed lying in bed. Resident 18 had oxygen on at 3.5 LPM (liters per minute) via nasal cannula. During an observation on 9/20/23 at 11:43 A.M., Resident 18 had oxygen on at 3.5 LPM via nasal cannula. During an observation on 9/21/23 at 9:22 A.M., Resident 18 had oxygen on at 3.5 LPM via nasal cannula. On 9/20/23 at 8:43 A.M., Resident 18's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The most recent admission MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 6/14/23, indicated Resident 18 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 18 was on oxygen while a resident. Resident 18's current orders lacked an order for oxygen. Care plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 insulin administration. The nurse failed to prime the insulin pen before administering insulin to a resident. (Resident 139) Finding includes: On 9/20/23 at 11:50 A.M., RN (Registered Nurse) 10 was observed administering insulin to Resident 139. RN 10 took Resident 139's blood sugar reading and it was 345. RN 10 wiped the tip of the Lispro Kwikpen with an alcohol swab, applied the needle, and dialed the Kwikpen to 10 units without priming the pen. RN 10 put on gloves and administered the insulin into Resident 139's abdomen. On 9/22/23 at 10:06 A.M., Resident 139's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus type II. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/10/23, indicated Resident 139 was severely cognitively impaired and was an extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfer, and toileting. Current Physician's Orders included, but not limited to, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 3 of 3 residents during observation of perineal care. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during peri care, staff failed to wash hands or sanitize between dirty and clean tasks. (Resident 4, Resident 17, Resident 35) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 9/21/23 at 9:14 A.M., CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) 25 and CNA 28 provided incontinence care for Resident 35. CNA 24 and CNA 28 donned gloves and then picked up the resident's fall mat and moved it against the wall, removed the blankets, and removed the resident's dirty brief. CNA 28 used two wipes on Resident 35's bottom and removed her gloves. After she donned new gloves, CNA 28 removed the soiled brief from under the resident and placed it in the trashcan. At that time, CNA 28 placed a clean brief under Resident 35 with her dirty gloves. Resident 35 was placed on her back and CNA 28 used a wipe to clean the front of the resident before she changed gloves. CNA 28 failed to remove…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Posted Nurse Staffing form was posted on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift for 3 of 6 days reviewed for the survey. The Posted Nurse Staffing form was not updated on a daily basis. (12/4/25, 12/5/25, 12/8/25)Findings include:On 12/4/25 at 10:01 A.M., the Posted Nurse Staffing form was observed dated 12/3/25. On 12/5/25 at 9:09 A.M., the Posted Nurse Staffing form was observed dated 12/4/25. On 12/8/25 at 9:06 A.M., the Posted Nurse Staffing form was observed dated 12/5/25.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 12:00 A.M., the Administrator indicated she was in charge of posting the form with the correct date each day first thing in the morning. It should be up to date.On 12/9/25 at 4:02 P.M., a current non dated Posted Nurse Staffing Policy was provided by the Administrator and indicated, It is the policy of [facility name] to keep the daily staffing schedule posted at the back hall. This schedule will be visible at all times for all staff to view. This schedule will be updated by the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-22 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all direct care staffing data was submitted into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for the reported period of April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023. Finding includes: During a review of the facility's PBJ information on 9/21/23 at 10:24 A.M., the facility failed to submit all direct care staffing data and received a 1 star staffing rating for the third reporting quarter of April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023. During an interview on 9/21/23 at 10:39 A.M., the Administrator indicated they did not submit PBJ information because they didn't think it was mandatory to submit until October 2023. At that time, she indicated the 1 star staffing that also triggered was because they did not report data for quarter 3. During an interview on 9/21/23 at 1:51 P.M., the Administrator indicated they did not have a policy regarding PBJ data submission, but she would follow CMS (Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services) guidelines for submitting data. 3.1-17(a)
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,740 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MAJOR HOSPITAL — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| HILLSIDE MANOR, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2013 |
| HELM CHAPMAN, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2013 |
| HOLSOPPLE, MERLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 42% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155708. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.