Eastridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidence by:1. Storing expired foods;2. Not cleaning small appliances after each use; and3. Not covering food before being transportedThis had the potential to affect 83 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen.Findings:1.A review of the facility policy titled: Kitchen Food Storage Areas Policy and Procedure with a review date of 02/14/2025, read in part: Care of the Storeroom: 1.The staff will maintain care of the storeroom according to the following directions. C. Foods with expirations dates are used prior to the date on the package. An observation on 12/15/2025 at 09:30 a.m. revealed a container of peanut butter stored on a shelf in the dry food storage room with an expiration date of 11/15/2025. A container of cottage cheese was stored in the standup kitchen refrigerator with an expiration date of 11/22/2025.An interview was conducted on 12/15/2025 at 09:32 a.m. with S2DM (Dietary Manager).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded to reflect the residents' status for 3 (#4, #23, #38) of 35 sampled residents, as evidenced by:1. Failing to code Resident #4 for Level II PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review);2. failing to code Resident #38 for receiving dialysis treatment; and3. failing to code Resident #23 for bed mobility and transfers Findings: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and type 2 diabetes. On 12/17/2025, a review of Resident #4's modified Annual MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/2025, revealed the following in part: Section A1500. Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? 0 was checked indicating no. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for 3 (#23, #36, and #71) out of 3 (#23, #36, #71) residents who required puree diets. Findings:A. On 12/15/2025 at 2:30 p.m., a review of the facility's policy titled, Pureed Policy and Procedure with a review date of 06/18/2025 read in part: Pureed Preparation: 1. Follow standardized recipes for accurate serving sizes and servings per batch; 3. Place desired number of portions to be pureed into food processor; 11. Determine proper scoop/ serving size. On 12/15/2025 at 10:55 a.m., a review of the recipe spreadsheet revealed a puree diet recipe of 4 ounces of red beans and 2 ounces sausage per resident for lunch. An observation on 12/15/2025 at 11:00 a.m. revealed S4CK (Cook) scooped unmeasured potatoes and sausage from a single pot and placed them in one container. An interview was conducted on 12/15/2025 at 11:03 a.m. with S4CK. S4CK stated that she did not measure the amount of potatoes or sausage. She stated I just eye ball it. She stated that she did not follow the recipe spreadsheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) by wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing high-contact care to 1 (Resident # 12) of 1 resident observed for facility staff adherence to EBPs. There was a finalized sample of 35 residents. FindingsReview of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure with a last reviewed date of 12/03/2025, revealed in part:Purpose to prevent the spread of potential infection by implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when contact precautions do not apply. This approach recommends the use of EBP during high contact care activities for residents with indwelling medical devices.Procedure 1. EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following:1b. Indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with an MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism) .ii. Indwelling medical device examples include .feeding tubes .4. For residents for whom EBP are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect was reported to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours upon learning of the allegation for 1 (#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) sampled residents. Findings: On 03/25/2025 at 9:30 a.m., a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure with a reviewed date of 12/31/2024 read in part .7. Reporting/Response - the facility employee or agent, who becomes aware of abuse of neglect, including injuries of unknown source or alleged misappropriation of resident property, shall immediately report the matter to the facility administrator or Director of Nurses. The facility administrator or designee shall complete a report to be made to the mandated state agency according to state guidelines upon notification of an alleged abuse. Immediately means as soon as possible, in the absence of a shorter State time frame requirement, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. Review of the facility's investigative report revealed the following, in part:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the likelihood of foodborne illnesses; 2. Store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; and 3. Wear an appropriate hair restraint; This had the potential to effect the 83 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. The facility's census was 86. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Dry Storage Areas and Policy and Procedure, with a last review date of 04/09/2024, revealed the following in part: Policy: Dry storage areas will be kept in a condition which protects stored foods from infestation. Care of the Store Room: 1.c. Foods with expiration dates are used prior to the date on the package. Canned and dry foods without expiration dates are used within six months of delivery or according to manufacturer's guidelines. Review of the facility's policy, Employee Sanitary Practices Policy and Procedure, with a last review date of 04/10/2024, revealed the following in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipe in order to meet the nutritional needs of the residents as evidenced by kitchen staff failing to: 1) Use the appropriate recipe to prepare a pureed food item 2) Ensure the appropriate sized scoops were used to serve pureed and mechanically soft food. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to an unpleasant dining experience, decreased intake, altered nutritional needs and weight loss for the 8 residents who consumed pureed meals and mechanical soft meals from the kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility's policy Pureed Policy and Procedure, with a last review date of 04/10/2024, revealed in part: Purpose: The Pureed texture is a mechanical modification of the Regular Diet or any therapeutic diet, designed for people with moderate to severe swallowing difficulty and a poor ability to protect their air way. This texture allows pureed food that is smooth and easily stays together. Policy: Pureed Preparation 1. Follow standardized recipes for accurate serving sizes and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified with a qualified mental disorder was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1(#8) of 1 resident sampled for PASARR, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings: On 10/2/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Policy and Procedure with a revision date of 06/18/2024 read in part: Purpose: To ensure completion of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review level two evaluations to assess the need for nursing facility placement and service, including planning and facilitation of behavioral health services. Pre-admission screening and Resident Review is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care . A review of Resident #8's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standard of practice for 2 (Resident #12 and #19) out of 3 (Resident #12, #19, and #37) residents investigated for respiratory care. The facility failed to: 1. Store Resident #12's oxygen equipment in a sanitary manner, and 2. Provide continuous oxygen therapy for Resident #19. Findings: On 10/02/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Concentrator and Equipment Cleaning Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 05/09/2024, revealed in part: Purpose: To keep Oxygen concentrator and equipment clean .Procedure .2. Store Oxygen tubing, cannula, and mask in bag when not in use. Review of Resident #12's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypoxemia, and Shortness of Breath. A review of physician's orders revealed an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility failed to document a fall in the resident centered plan of care for 1 (#1) out 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents investigated for falls. Findings: On 07/09/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy and Procedure with a last reviewed date of 01/25/2024 read in part .Policy: Each resident's care plan will remain current and inform staff of resident's needs, strengths, goals, and approaches . a. It is the policy of this facility to utilize an advanced care planning approach to review and determine patient centered care plans based on the follow areas; . x. Fall . Review of Resident #1's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Other Muscle Spasm, Pain, Ataxia and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELDER OUTREACH NURSING & REHABILITATION — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $342K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA