The Encore Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive plan of care for 3 (#9, #73, #75) out of a final sample of 37 residents as evidenced by:1. Failing to develop a plan of care for Resident #9's hospice status, and;2. Failing to develop a resident centered comprehensive care plan for Resident #73 and #75.On 07/23/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy and Procedure with a last reviewed date of 02/09/2025 read in part; A comprehensive person-centered care plan will be completed according to the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual upon admission, significant change, annual and as needed. Resident #9A review of Resident #9's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed an admission date of 07/23/2020 with diagnoses that included, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction, Acute Kidney Failure, and Hypertensive Heart Disease. Review of Resident #9's MDS (Minimal Data Assessments) assessments revealed a comprehensive assessment indicating hospice services completed on 06/05/2025.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to promote resident's dignity during dining by standing over residents while assisting them to eat for 1 (Resident #67) of 37 sampled residents.Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Dining and Meal Service Policy and Procedure with a last review date of 02/09/2025, read in part, The dining experience will be person centered with the purpose of enhancing each individual resident's quality of life and being supportive of each individual's needs during dining. The policy also indicated general guidelines, Appropriate staff will assist as needed to assure adequate intake of food and fluids at the meal while maintain the resident's dignity (staff to sit eye level with resident while assisting to feed).A review of Resident #67's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, Alzheimer's Disease, Dysphagia, and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease,A review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents were safe to perform self-administration of medication for 1 (#61) out of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled Meds-Self Administration Policy and Procedure which was last reviewed on 02/09/2025, read in part, Policy: To maintain the residents' high level of independence, residents who desire self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the residents and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. 1. If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility during the care planning process. 2. For those residents who self-administer, the interdisciplinary team verifies the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 (#25) out of 37 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #25's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis included, but not limited to, Vascular Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Anxiety and Major Depression.Review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/24/2025 revealed her BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 5, indicating her cognition was severely impaired. Review of Resident #25's current Care Plan Report read in part, I require staff assistance for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) due to Impaired Cognition. Assist me with hygiene and grooming tasks. On 07/22/2025 at 8:57 a.m., Resident #25 was observed in the Beauty Shop. She had multiple hairs growing on her chin approximately 1/2 inch long.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including accurate administration of all drugs and accurately documenting controlled medication reconciliation as evidenced by:1 (#9) of 4 (#9, #36, #41, and #61) residents observed for administration of drugs, the facility failed to ensure Resident #9's Nifedipine was administered per manufacturer's recommendations, andin Med Cart C the facility failed to ensure Resident #79's controlled medication reconciliation was accurately maintained.Findings: Resident #9: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines which was last reviewed on 02/09/2025, read in part, Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. vi. Tablet Crushing/Capsule Opening: Crushing tablets may require a physician's order. 1. Long-acting or enteric-coated dosage forms should not be crushed; an alternative should be sought. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 33 opportunities were observed with 2 medication errors, which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.06%. FindingsA review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines which was last reviewed on 02/09/2025, read in part, Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. vi. Tablet Crushing/Capsule Opening: Crushing tablets may require a physician's order. 1. Long-acting or enteric-coated dosage forms should not be crushed; an alternative should be sought. 2. Administration: b. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Review of Pfizer Medical.com (Procardia XL Manufacture website), in part: Dosage and Administration. Procardia XL extended release tablets should be swallowed whole and should not ne bitten or divided.Resident #9Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to discard an expired medication in 1 (Med Cart C) of 2 (Med Cart B and Med Cart C) medication carts sampled for medication storage. Findings:On 07/23/2025 at 1:15 p.m., observation was conducted of Med Cart C with S10LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) which revealed the following: 1 Aspirin 325 mg (milligram) bottle with an expiration date of 06/2025On 07/23/2025 at 1:21 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with S10LPN who confirmed the expiration date on the Aspirin 325 mg bottle was 06/2025, and it should have been discarded and not in the med cart.On 07/23/2025 1:24 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). She confirmed that no expired medications should be in any med carts.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement its policy for incident investigation and reporting when staff failed to immediately report alleged staff-to-resident physicall abuse to administrative staff and failed to notify the resident's responsible party (RP) for 1 (#3) out of 7(#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3 and #R4) sampled residents. Findings: On 09/16/2024 at 1:45 p.m., a review of the facility's undated policy, Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, the following: To provide a safe environment for all residents free of abuse .Administrator or designee will complete a thorough investigation .If the resident is not interviewable, the resident's family may be questioned. 7. Reporting/Response- The facility employee or agent, who becomes aware of abuse .shall immediately report the matter to the facility administrator or Director of Nurses .The administrator or designee will notify the resident's representative of the matter. Follow up contact must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure reportable incidents of an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 (#3) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3 and #R4) sampled residents. Findings: On 09/16/2024 at 1:45 p.m., a review of the facility's undated policy, Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure revealed, in part, the following: The facility administrator or designee shall complete a report to be made to the mandated state agency according to state guidelines upon notification of alleged abuse .Immediately means as soon as possible .but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse . Review of Resident #3's electronic health record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Malignant Neoplasm of Endometrium, Unspecified Dementia, Aphasia, Other Schizoaffective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely for 1(Resident #38) out of 35 sampled residents investigated. Findings: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cord Compression, Aural Vertigo, Spinal Stenosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Displaced Fracture of Right Femur. Review of Resident #38's medical record, revealed Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/19/2024. Review of Resident #38's Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a transmission date of 06/20/2024. On 06/20/2024 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S9MDSLPN. S9MDSLPN reviewed Resident #38's record and confirmed that an MDS discharge assessment should have been completed and transmitted within the 120 days after the resident was discharged from the facility and was not.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELDER OUTREACH NURSING & REHABILITATION — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $263K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA