No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Center For Extended Care at Amherst

150 University Drive, Amherst, MA 01002 · For profit - Partnership · 134 certified beds · (413) 256-8185 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (413) 256-8185 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Apr 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$28,915 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,915 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-04)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
165 University Dr · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
165 University Dr · (413) 256-0421 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Big Y0.1 mi
175 University Dr · (413) 253-0416 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1 Hitchcock Rd · (413) 542-2274 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
451 Russell St · (413) 461-1228

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.7%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.0%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.4%15.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.5%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.0%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.5%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.661.881.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.861.501.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.4%CMS range 39.4–61.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.6%CMS range 5.7–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge11.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge17.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified83.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.7–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
39.3%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 126.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-04)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had right sided weakness from a stroke and whose care plan interventions included that he/she required the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, including turning and repositioning in bed, the Facility failed to ensure that staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her plan of care. When on [DATE] at 1:15 P.M., while attempting to change his/her bed sheets, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 turned and repositioned Resident #1 on his/her left side in bed, without having another staff member present to assist her, Resident #1 rolled out of the bed and landed on his/her knees on the floor. Resident #1 sustained bilateral (right and left) distal femur (lower part of the thigh bone near the knee joint) fractures and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) where he/she presented with hemorrhagic shock (major blood loss after trauma) and died the next day. Findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had right sided weakness from a stroke and required the assistance of two staff members for turning and repositioning in bed, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting serious injury and death. On [DATE] at 1:15 P.M., while attempting to change his/her bed sheets, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, without another staff member to assist her, positioned Resident #1 on his/her left side away from her, and Resident #1 rolled out of the bed, landing on his/her knees on the floor. Resident #1 sustained bilateral (right and left) distal femur (lower part of the thigh bone near the knee joint) fractures and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) where he/she presented with hemorrhagic shock (major blood loss after trauma) and died the next day. Findings include: Review of the Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who was non-ambulatory and per his/her care plan required the assistance of two staff members with a mechanical lift for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed his/her care plan interventions for transfers, when on 03/14/26, Certified Nurse Aide #1 transferred Resident #1 by herself using a stand pivot transfer technique, Resident #1 was later diagnosed with a left ankle fracture. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised March 2022, indicated that care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The Policy indicated that care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who was non-weight bearing and required two staff members and a mechanical lift for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance and assistive devices, to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident/accident resulting in an injury, when on 03/14/26, Certified Nurse Aide #1 transferred Resident #1 alone, without a mechanical lift, using a stand pivot type transfer. Resident #1 was later found with bruising and swelling to his/her left ankle and was diagnosed with a left ankle fracture, (which was consistent with the type of injury that could occur with the twisting motion of a stand-pivot a pivot transfer). Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated as revised July 2017, indicated that in order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, the Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent deterioration of a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one Resident (#41), of five applicable residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #41, the facility failed to implement the Physician's order for the use of prophylaxis booties for a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- pressure induced damage to underlying tissues, including muscles, bones, and subcutaneous layers, while the skin surface may remain intact.) pressure ulcer resulting in the Resident ' s Pressure Ulcer deteriorating with related swelling, redness and severe pain at the Pressure Ulcer location. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, included but was not limited to the following: -A comprehensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident meal trays were served timely for three Units (West 1, [NAME] 2 and Dharma), out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that resident meals were delivered timely and coordinated with medication administration times for residents that required meals in order for medications to be appropriately administered. Findings include: Review of the Food Truck Delivery Schedule, undated, indicated the following meal delivery times: >Breakfast: West 2-A: 7:55 A.M. West 2-B: 8:05 A.M. West 1-A: 8:15 A.M. West 1-CDR: 8:25 A.M. West 1-B: 8:30 A.M. Skole (Dharma Unit): 8:35 A.M. Gluckin (Dharma Unit): 8:40 A.M. [NAME] 1 (Dharma Unit): 8:45 A.M. >Lunch: West 2-A: 11:55 A.M. West 2-B: 12:00 P.M. West 1-A: 12:05 P.M. West 1-CDR: 12:20 P.M. West 1-B: 12:30 P.M. Skole (Dharma Unit): 12:35 P.M. Gluckin (Dharma Unit): 12:45 P.M. [NAME] 1(Dharma Unit): 12:50 P.M. >Dinner: West 2-A: 4:50 P.M. West 2-B: 5:00 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -storage for resident food/fluids remained clean and free of foul odors -shelves that maintained clean pots/pans/dishware used for resident meals were clean and free from debris -fans in the facility kitchen were free of dust/debris Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Sanitation, undated, indicated the following: >Equipment and Utensils: -utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned and sanitized -tableware shall be washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use -non-food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep the equipment free of accumulation of dust, dirt, food particles, and other debris On 6/2/25 from 7:25 through 7:41 A.M., during an initial kitchen tour, the surveyor observed the following: -shelf/tray that house containers of spices were dirty and had debris present -large utility fan in the storage area was thickly covered with dirt/dust. -milk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services per professional standards of practice related to monitoring the use of Vitamin D (vitamin that helps regulate calcium and phosphorus in the body, crucial for bone health and immune system) medication for one Resident (#116) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #116, the facility failed to obtain Physician orders to monitor serum laboratory results to determine appropriate decrease of the dosage of Vitamin D medication, when the Resident was administered high doses of Vitamin D medication weekly, putting him/her at risk for adverse effects of the medication. Findings include: Review of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) article titled: Vitamin D, Fact Sheet for Health Professionals, last updated 7/26/24, https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminD-HealthProfessional/ indicated the following in part: -Serum (blood) concentration of 25(OH)D is currently the main indicator of Vitamin D status. -Because Vitamin D is fat soluble, its absorption depends on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled employee personnel files, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse policies related to background checks when Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) and Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) checks were not conducted on CNA #1 as required, prior to employment at the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, undated, indicated the Facility will conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has: a. been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law, b. had a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property; or c. a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 10/13/24 at 9:00 A.M., two staff members witnessed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 directing profanity at Resident #1 and treating him/her in a demeaning, insulting manner during care. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights, dated as revised 02/20/21, indicated that employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in September 2016, diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/09/24, indicated Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired with a score of 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, scores indicate: 0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, and 13-15 cognitively intact). Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with ambulation and was usually continent, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy related to the need to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator and/or designee, when on 03/14/24 at approximately 5:00 A.M., Resident #1 reported to the Nurse Supervisor that a Certified Nurse Aide (later identified as CNA #1) told him/her that he/she was not allowed to get out of bed to use the bathroom until the morning. Although the Nurse Supervisor was made aware of the allegation, Facility Administration was not made aware of the incident until 9:30 A.M. (over four hours later), when the Director of Nurses (DON) discovered a progress note about the allegation, and subsequently CNA #1 also worked through to the end of the shift, for a minimum of two more hours, therefore placing other residents at risk for abuse/neglect. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident - Care Items and Equipment, revised September 2022, indicated the following: -Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents (e.g., stethoscopes, durable medical equipment [DME]). On 4/8/24 at 8:23 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #3 using the portable vital signs machine to obtain measurements from a resident. The surveyor observed Nurse #3 apply the blood pressure cuff to the resident's upper arm and the pulse oximeter (device that measures a person's blood oxygen saturation [the amount of oxygen that is in the blood]) to the resident's finger. Nurse #3 proceeded to obtain the resident's vital signs from the machine. The surveyor observed Nurse #3 take the equipment off the resident and return it to her medication cart without cleaning and/or disinfecting the portable vital sign equipment. On 4/8/24 at 9:50 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #3 using the portable vital signs machine to obtain vital signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintained a clean and sanitary facility kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to: -ensure that a rinse temperature issue with the facility dish machine was addressed according to professional standards when the minimum temperature and sanitation requirements were not being met as required. -ensure the use of a commercial grade chlorine-based sanitizer and not household bleach was used in the dish machine to sanitize the facility dish ware. Findings include: Review of the facility policies indicated no policy for management of dishware in the event the facility dish machine became compromised. On 4/9/24 at 12:10 P.M., the surveyor observed Dietary Staff #1 loading soiled dishes onto a rack and through the running dish machine. The surveyor observed the temperature gauges on the dish machine with the following readings: -Wash Temperature: 170 degrees -Rinse Temperature: 170 degrees -Final Rinse Temperature: 170 degrees The surveyor further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence for the facility residents in one dining room ([NAME]) out of three dining rooms observed on the Dharma Unit (Dementia Special Care Unit - DSCU). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. the staff spoke respectfully of residents. 2. staff were seated while assisting residents with their meals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity, revised February 2021, indicated the following: -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. -Staff speak respectfully to residents at all times, including addressing the resident by his or her name of choice, and not labeling or referring to the resident by his or her room number, diagnosis, or care needs. Review of the facility policy titled Assistance with Meals, revised March 2022, indicated the following: -Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity, for example: a. not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP/ Nurse Practitioner) of a significant change in condition for two Residents (#54 and #74) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician/NPP: 1. To determine the need to alter medication treatment when Resident #54 had recurrent seizure activities. 2. When Resident #74 experienced an unplanned, significant weight loss in one month. Findings include: 1. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in November 2017 with diagnoses including: Idiopathic Epilepsy (a type of epilepsy with a strong genetic basis that affects people of all races and sexes), Epileptic Syndromes (a group of signs and symptoms that tend to occur together in seizure activity) with Seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity in the brain that cause temporary changes in muscle tone, behaviors, sensations or awareness) of localized onset and Conversion Disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review the facility failed to ensure that a homelike environment was maintained for residents in one dining area ([NAME]) out of three dining areas observed on the Dharma Unit (Dementia Special Care Unit). Specifically, the facility and staff failed to ensure that the dining experience for residents was a homelike environment by adding tablecloths to the dining room tables and removing meals from the meal trays prior to serving the residents. Findings include: On the following days and times: -4/7/24 at 10:15 A.M., -4/8/24 at 9:06 A.M., -4/8/24 at 12:47 A.M., -4/9/24 at 9:00 A.M., the surveyor observed in the [NAME] dining area, multiple residents seated at tables with no tablecloths covering the tables and all resident meals were being served on the delivery trays, that no meals had been removed from the delivery trays before being placed in front of the residents. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 9:31 A.M., Unit Manager (UM) #2 said the dining in the [NAME] dining area would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurately coded for two Residents (#101 and #122), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessment: 1. For Resident #101, was accurately coded relative to receiving hospice services. 2. For Resident #122, was accurately coded relative to the use of antibiotic medications. Findings include: 1. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the body or remove enough carbon dioxide from the body, identified with symptoms of trouble breathing and fatigue), Heart Failure (HF: when the heart is unable to pump blood as it should, resulting in fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs and other organs) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS: a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting movement, sensation, and bodily functions). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to achieve or maintain bladder function for one Resident (#122) out of three applicable residents, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #122, the facility staff failed to obtain Physician's orders for the care and services of an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to allow for urine flow) to prevent complications and urinary tract infections. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Physician's Order Set for the care of Indwelling Urinary Catheters, undated, included: -Foley Catheter (brand name of an indwelling urinary catheter) Care every shift. -Foley Catheter ___F (F/Fr: French - unit of measurement for the size of the diameter of the tubing), ___cc (cubic centimeters a unit of measurement: indicating the capacity of the catheter's balloon/bulb) bulb (Insertion and PRN (as needed) change) Diagnosis: _______ as needed for Occlusion (blockage),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately implement a psychotropic medication (medication that affects brain activity) gradual dose reduction (GDR) as recommended by the Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) for one Resident (#94) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -For Resident #94, ensure that the recommendation made by the Psychiatric CNP for a GDR of Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) morning dose from 5 milligrams (mg) to 2.5 mg was accurately implemented, when the morning dose of Zyprexa was increased back to 5 mg without any further recommendations, thereby cancelling the GDR process. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised July 2022, indicated the following: -Residents on psychotropic medications receive gradual dose reductions . Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in March 2022, and had diagnoses including anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to re-evaluate a performance improvement plan (PIP) when the identified interventions were no longer making progress toward the identified goal for improving lunch meal tray arrival times for one unit (Dharma Unit) out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an effective system was maintained for implementing changes, monitoring performance, and obtaining feedback from residents and family representatives, related to consistently late lunch time meals. Findings include: Review of the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan signed 1/17/24, indicated the following: -Areas of the plan are measures by clinical outcomes, aspects of performance, and resident satisfaction with the goal . -Information gathered is analyzed and compared to set benchmarks. Benchmarks may be adjusted based on the data outcomes. -Current performance improvement projects include Tray arrival time. Review of the PIP titled Dietary Department Improvements dated 1/2/24, indicated the following problem had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the required members were included in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence: -that the Infection Preventionist (IP) was a required member of the QAPI committee and the IP attended two out of the four quarterly meetings. -that the Medical Doctor (MD) attended one out of the four quarterly meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 1/17/24, indicated members of the committee may include but is not limited to: -Administrator -Director of Nursing (DON) -Medical Director Further review of the facility policy failed to indicate that the Infection Preventionist (IP) was a designated member of the QAPI Committee. During a meeting on 4/10/24 at 1:12 P.M., the surveyor reviewed the quarterly QAPI Committee sign-in sheets provided by the facility with the Director of Nurses (DON) and the Administrator. The quarterly QAPI Committee sign-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff 1. assessed residents for eligibility to offer a pneumococcal vaccination and 2. administered a pneumococcal vaccination when a resident and/or their resident representative consented to the vaccination for two Residents (#3 and #4) out of five sampled residents. Specifically, 1. for Resident #3 the facility failed to assess the need for additional pneumococcal vaccination once the Resident was one year past their last vaccination per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and 2. for Resident #4 the facility failed to ensure a requested pneumococcal vaccination was administered. Findings include: Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Policy, reviewed on 9/2023, indicated the following: -Residents admitted to or residing in the facility will be offered the Pneumococcal Polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and re-vaccination (if recommended) based on .the individual's previous vaccination history. -Residents admitted to or residing in the facility will be offered the Pneumococcal Conjugate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure recommended COVID-19 vaccination was offered to one Staff Member (#1) out of one staff member sampled. Specifically, for Staff Member #1 the facility failed to ensure they maintained documentation that any additional COVID-19 vaccination was offered to the staff member after he/she had received their initial COVID-19 series. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled COVID-19 Vaccine Policy and Procedure, effective 11/6/23, indicated the following: -COVID-19 vaccinations will be offered to all staff and residents (or their representative if they cannot make health care decisions) per CDC and/or FDA guidelines unless such immunization is medically contraindicated, the individual has already been immunized during this period or the individual refuses to receive the vaccine. -All staff and residents/representatives will be educated on the COVID-19 vaccine they are offered, in a manner they can understand, including information on the benefits and risks consistent with Centers for Disease Control and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1. performed the proper sanitation of kitchen utensils in the main kitchen, and 2. adhered to safe and sanitary food storage practices on two of three units, to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to keep the disinfectant level in the disinfecting sink at the manufacturer's recommended guidelines, failed to keep the refrigerators and microwaves clean, and discard unlabeled food brought into the facility per facility protocol for safe and sanitary food storage practices. Findings include: 1. Review of the Santec Eight manufacturer's bulletin, undated, indicated that when the product is used as directed, it is an effective sanitizer at an active quaternary concentration of 200-400 parts per million (ppm) when diluted in water. During the initial tour of the kitchen with Food Service Worker (FSW) #2 on 3/8/23 at 8:01 A.M., the surveyor observed a triple sink (wash/rinse/sanitize) with the third sink filled with sanitizing solution in water that FSW #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained laundry equipment according to the manufacturer's guidelines, and proper storage of both clean and soiled linens. Specifically, failure to: 1. clean two filters on one out of three washing machines to prevent contamination, and 2. ensure staff stored and secured soiled and clean linen carts to prevent access to clean and potentially contaminated linens by one Resident (#36) on the DSCU. Findings include: Review of the daily maintenance section of the Alliance Laundry System guidelines, undated, for the UniMac washing machine, indicated to remove the foam filter from the cover, wash the filter with warm water and allow to air dry. 1. On 3/13/23 at 11:41 A.M., the surveyor observed one of the three washing machines to have two filters located on the left side of the machine. Both filters were completely full with white lint. At the time of the observation, the Director of Laundry Services said that she was not aware that the filters needed to be cleaned daily but that they clearly needed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained the dignity during a meal for one Resident (#264), out of a sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Assistance with Meals, revised July 2017, indicated that a resident who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity and gave the example of not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. Resident #264 was admitted to the facility in February 2023. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #264 had severe cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for eating. On 3/9/23 at 8:48 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #264 in the dining room seated in a tilt chair at a table as a staff member stood at the Resident's side and fed him/her. The surveyor observed that there were no chairs in close proximity of the resident for the staff member to sit on while assisting the Resident during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff obtained orders for monitoring an incision site after return from the hospital one Resident (#43), out of a sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in September 2019. Review of the hospital discharge paperwork dated 2/3/23 indicated the Resident had sustained a fall at the facility, hit his/her forehead, and had a large laceration (deep cut) on his/her forehead, and had been transferred to the hospital emergency room for treatment. Further review indicated the Resident had sutures/stitches placed while in the emergency room to close the laceration on his/her forehead and was discharged back to the facility on 2/3/23. Review of the care instructions included in the hospital discharge paperwork dated 2/3/23 indicated the following: -Keep cut dry for 24 to 48 hours .your doctor will let you know when it is safe to get the cut wet. -If you notice any problems or new symptoms get medical treatment right away -Call your doctor or seek medical care if you have any of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its staff provided the Resident and/or Resident's Representative with a copy of the Resident's baseline care plan for one Resident (#102) out of a sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans-Baseline, Revised December 2016, indicated the following: -The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan . Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in January 2023. Review of the document titled Baseline Care Plan, effective date 1/19/23 indicated no documentation that the Resident and/or the Resident's Representative was provided with a summary of the Baseline Care Plan. Review of the document indicated there was a signature line for the Resident and the Resident's Representative to sign and date when they had received a copy of the care plan but these sections were left blank. Further review of the Resident's medical record indicated no additional documentation that the Resident and/or the Resident's Representative had been provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for one Resident (#38), out of a sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to obtain blood pressure (BP) and pulse/ heart rate (HR) measurements prior to the administration of Metoprolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure that affects the heart and circulation), as ordered by the Physician and per facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated December 2012, indicated the following: -Medications must be administered in accordance with the Physician's orders. -The following information must be checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: vital signs (VS), if necessary. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-a condition in which the heart does not pump as well as it should and blood often backs up in the lungs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. ensure its staff provided sufficient Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for its residents, in accordance with the Facility Assessment, (an assessment used by facilities to determine what resources are necessary to competently care for residents during regular operations and emergencies), for three out of three units observed, and 2. provide grooming assistance for one Resident (#261), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment last reviewed on 1/23/23, indicated the following in part: CNA ratio for [NAME] One: Day shift 1:10 (1 CNA for 10 residents) Evening shift 1:10 (1 CNA for 10 residents) Night shift 1:23 (1 CNA for 23 residents) CNA ratio for [NAME] Two: Day shift 1:10 (1 CNA for 10 residents) Evening shift 1:10 (1 CNA for 10 residents) Night shift 1:19 (1 CNA for 19 residents) CNA ratio for Dharma (Dementia Special Care Unit) Day shift 1:10 (1 CNA for 10 residents) Evening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence that preventative skin treatments and repositioning were consistently implemented to prevent the development of a left heel pressure injury for one Resident (#261), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, revised July 2017, indicated the following: -staff to inspect the skin daily when performing Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- include all the activities involved in personal care) to identify any new areas, -and reposition the resident as indicated on the care plan. - if a resident refused a treatment, the refusal should be documented in the clinical record along with education provided to the resident, and the family notification and physician notification should also be documented in the note. -an avoidable pressure ulcer means that the resident developed a pressure ulcer and one or more of the following was not completed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-10 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment, according to the required Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process, for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to assess Resident #77's cognitive status through the resident interview process and instead proceeded to the staff interview process on three consecutive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments. Findings include: Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including Psychosis (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a mental and behavioral disorder that developed from having experienced a traumatic event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety). Review of Resident #77's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments dated 8/10/23, 11/7/23, and 1/23/24, indicated the following: -The Resident had adequate hearing. -The Resident had clear speech. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-03-15 · tag F0641 — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its staff completed the necessary Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) to accurately convey a resident's level of cognitive function for five Residents (#23, #94, #35, #2, and #53), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to complete Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-a tool used to assess cognitive status) assessments within the seven day look back period (period of time facility staff have to complete assessments to be utilized in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment), for Residents who were understood verbally, at least some of the time. Findings Include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in June 2022. Review of the Resident's MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident was sometimes understood and sometimes understands indicating a resident interview for the BIMS assessment should have been completed. Further review of the MDS assessment indicated a resident interview for the BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-03-15 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff identified the need for a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one Resident (#104), out of a sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual (a guide for how to complete a MDS Assessment), dated October 2019, indicated the following: -The SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the interdisciplinary team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline -A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: 1. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, the decline is not considered self-limiting, 2. Impacts more than one area of the resident's health status, and 3. Requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,915 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $28,915 — penalty dated 2025-06-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SHIMON LEFKOWITZ — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEFKOWITZ, SHIMONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 11/03/2015
LOFFLER, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 11/03/2015
LOFFLER, ISRAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/03/2015
LOFFLER, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/03/2015
SHIMON, MIRIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR18%since 11/03/2015
SIMHA, DAVIDIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2015
MAVADO MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/04/2025
MINTZ, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
RACKLIFFE, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
AMHERST LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 6%Other / private 16%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$330per resident / day
operating cost
$10,038per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$344per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225420. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next