Regalcare At Holyoke
282 Cabot Street, Holyoke, MA 01040 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (413) 538-7470 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,153 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-27)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.7% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.2% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.5% | 19.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.2% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.2%CMS range 40.9–59.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 9.7–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.7%CMS range 7.4–16.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 94.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who was readmitted to the Facility with a reddened area to the coccyx (lower back), and was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for skin breakdown, the Facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on his/her individual wound care needs for the promotion of healing or the prevention of worsening of wounds, which included and identified interventions, measurable objectives and desired outcomes was developed, and that interventions that were in place were consistently implemented by nursing, as a result Resident #3's wound deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury (full-thickness skin and tissue loss that is obscured by eschar and slough- dead tissue). Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy, Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Overview, dated as revised March 2022, indicated the following: -Pressure injuries are defined as localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence, and occur as a result of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who was readmitted to the Facility with a reddened area to the coccyx (lower back), and was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for skin breakdown, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice related to the promotion of healing or the prevention of worsening of his/her wound, when treatment orders were not implemented as ordered by the physician, the wound was not adequately assessed by nursing, and the wound deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury (full-thickness skin and tissue loss that is obscured by eschar and slough- dead tissue). Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy, Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Overview, dated 03/2022, indicated the following: -Pressure injuries are defined as localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence, and occur as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure and combination of shear. -Avoidable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including Peripheral Vascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the MDS Assessment, dated 3/19/25, indicated Resident #44 utilized an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication within the seven day look back period (3/13/25 through 3/19/25). Review of Resident #44's March 2025 Physician's orders failed to indicate any orders for an anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident #44's March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) failed to indicate any documentation that Resident #44 was administered an anticoagulant medication during the month of March 2025. During an interview on 6/20/25 at 10:05 A.M., the MDS Nurse said Resident #44 was not on an anticoagulant medication during the look back period for the MDS assessment dated [DATE], and the use of anticoagulant medication was coded incorrectly. 5. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 19 residents, was free from significant medication errors. Specifically, for Resident #34, the facility failed to ensure that the medication Ingrezza (Valbenazine Tosylate- a medication to treat Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) used to help reduce uncontrolled body movements) was transcribed accurately as prescribed by the Provider, resulting in missed medication administration for a total of ten occasions out of 47 opportunities, for May 2025 and June 2025, putting the Resident at risk for involuntary movements not being managed appropriately. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain tumor), adult failure to thrive, Parkinson's Disease, Epilepsy, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, and a history of falling. Review of Resident #34's June 2025 Physician orders on 6/17/25 at 5:22 P.M., indicated no current order for Valbenazine Tosylate/Ingrezza medication. Review of Resident #34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a quarterly review assessment was completed as required to ensure critical indicators of gradual status change were monitored for one Resident (#58) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #58, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was reviewed between comprehensive assessments with respect to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) items specified in the quarterly assessment. Findings include: Review of the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Version 1.19.1 dated October 2024, indicated the following: -The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA (Federal law, known as the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. -It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. -The ARD (Assessment Reference Date) must not be more than 92 days after the ARD of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - preadmission screening to identify residents with mental health disorders or intellectual disabilities) was accurately completed prior to admission for one Resident (#46), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled admission Criteria, revised 4/22, indicated the following: -All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID), or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. [sic] Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with a diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder and a history of alcohol use. Review of the Hospital Discharge/Transfer Note, dated 3/13/25, indicated Resident #46 had a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and had medication changes in the hospital relative to his/her antipsychotic medication. Review of the Medical Doctor's (MD) History and Physical, completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #34, the facility failed to administer the medication Ingrezza (Valbenazine Tosylate - medication used to treat tardive dyskinesia (TD) and help reduce uncontrolled body movements) as prescribed: -for increased involuntary movement symptoms when the medication was ordered to be administered daily. -when the medication was discontinued by facility staff, and was being administered without current Physician orders. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th ed, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accidental hazards and was safe for one Resident (#27), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility failed to ensure that the call bell was placed within reach for the Resident's use and that fall mats were appropriately implemented after the Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Fall and Fall Risk Managing, revised on 3/2022, indicated the following: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the residents' specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. -The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses including paraplegia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#22), of one applicable resident receiving dialysis (process that filters wastes, salts and fluid from your blood when the kidneys are unable to work adequately) services, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #22, the facility failed to ensure: -timely medication administration on the Resident's dialysis scheduled days, when scheduled morning medications were delayed in being administered until after the Resident's return to the facility in the early afternoon on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. -that Sevelamer (medication to lower phosphorus levels in the blood) medication was administered as ordered by the Physician with meals, when the Resident's blood phosphorus level was elevated, and the Resident was missing the breakfast Sevelamer medication dosage on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records were maintained for two Residents (#22, and #91), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #22, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medications scheduled at 8:00 A.M., 8:30 A.M. and 9:00 A.M., were administered, when the Resident was out of the facility receiving dialysis services on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, and the medications were documented as being administered during the time the Resident was away at dialysis. 2. For Resident #91, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation on the Skin Observation/ Assessment Tools and Nursing Evaluations when the Resident had a Stage 3 pressure area present on his/her coccyx. Findings include: 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, revised 1/2025, indicated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one unit (Unit Four), out of three units and for two Residents (#37 and #70) residing on Unit Four. Specifically, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing care on Unit Four: 1. For Resident #37, when the facility staff failed to wear the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing direct care for the Resident on EBP due to foot wound and a recent amputation. 2. For Resident #70, when the facility staff failed to don the appropriate PPE while providing high contact care for the Resident on EBP related to an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), revised 9/2022, indicated the following: -Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection prevention intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who back in June 2024, alleged that during care by a staff member, he/she was physically abused, the Facility failed to ensure they reported the final results of their abuse investigation to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within five working days, when although an allegation of abuse, involving Resident #1 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, was reported on 06/06/24, the final results of the investigation however, were not reported to the DPH until 10/01/24, almost four months later. Findings include: Review of the Agency Policy titled Abuse: Identification and Reporting, dated as revised March 2022, indicated the results of all investigations must be reported to the administrator and to other officials in accordance with state law within five working days of the incident and if the alleged violation is verified, appropriate corrective action must be taken. Review of Reports submitted to the DPH by the facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS) indicated that on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observations, interviews, policy and record review the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to assist residents in attaining and maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psycho-social well-being on three (Unit Two, Unit Three and Unit Four) out of three observed units. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1)Ensure sufficient staff as determined by the Facility Assessment 2)Ensure call bells were responded to timely for Residents #83 & Resident #22 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Emergency Staffing Strategies, dated September 2020, indicated but was no limited to the following: -In the event that sufficient staff is not available from the individual SNF's (Skilled Nursing Facility) workforce, the facilities incident commander shall coordinate other available corporate resources to obtain additional employees from other facilities to staff the stricken facilities during emergencies and disasters. -Assign ancillary staff who possess Registered Nurse (RN)/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-24 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespreadHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations regarding smoking for two Residents (#82 and #244) out of four applicable residents out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure their smoking policy addressed what preventative measures were in place in the event of a fire emergency. 2. The facility failed to ensure they implemented their smoking policy relative to two Residents (#82 and #244) relative to possession of smoking materials. Finding include: Review of the Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum titled, Smoking Safety in Long Term Care Facilities, dated 11/10/11 included but was not limited to: - Facilities must include assessment of smoking areas and provision of emergency equipment in the designated smoking areas. - The facility is obligated to ensure the safety of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure precautions are taken for the resident's individual safety relative to smoking. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure fire prevention equipment was readily available in the smoking area to ensure a safe smoking environment. 2. Ensure the smoking plan of care was implemented for two Residents (#82 and #244) out of four applicable residents out of a total of 21 sampled residents relative to resident possession of smoking materials (Resident #82 and #244) and providing a safety intervention (smoking apron) (Resident #244 and #245) assessed to require one. 3. Ensure staff, who accompanied residents outside to smoke, were educated as to what safety interventions to implement in the event of an emergency relative to resident smoking. Findings include: Review of the Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum titled, Smoking Safety in Long Term Care Facilities, dated 11/10/11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and test tray results, the facility failed to serve palatable food at an appetizing temperature, to all residents, on three Units (Unit Two, Unit Three, and Unit Four) of three units observed as well as in the Main Dining Room. Findings include: On 5/22/24, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council Meeting with 11 residents. Of the 11 residents who were present, 10 actively participated in the meeting and resided Units Three and Four. The following concerns were identified by the participating residents: -Two residents said the food was always cold -One resident said the food was bland but otherwise is good -One resident said the food was either too bland or had too much salt -One resident agreed the food was salty, specifically that the gravy was salty During the initial walkthrough on 5/21/24 at 10:15 A.M., the surveyor received the following comments from two residents on Unit Two: -The food is cold and is never hot enough. -The food is always cold. I don't think they cook it right or they need heat boxes. 1. On 5/23/24 from 11:43 A.M. to 12:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure two Unit (Unit #3 and Unit #4) kitchenettes were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner out of three Unit kitchenettes observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Brought Into Facility, revised 5/22, indicated the following: -Perishable foods must be stored and identified with the resident ' s name, food item, and use by date. These can be stored in the nursing unit kitchen nourishment refrigerator. Review of the Daily Checklist for Dietary Cleanliness, undated, provided by the Food Service Director (FSD), indicated the following: -Make sure Unit Kitchens are stocked, cleaned, and rotated all shifts. This includes Microwave, Refrigerators, Toaster, etc. Unit Three During an observation on 5/21/24 at 8:47 A.M., in the Unit Three Kitchenette the following was observed: -Toaster crumb drawer laden with crumbs and toaster had burnt on material inside. -Frozen item in kitchenette freezer dated 6/1/24 with no name. During an observation on 5/22/24 at 12:38 P.M., in the Unit Three kitchenette the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Administration and/or the Governing Body provided residents in the facility with appropriate care and services in order to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to identify and implement plans to address numerous facility wide concerns, failed to fully assess the facility staffing needs in order to meet resident needs, and failed to ensure supplies for resident care were available and accessible. Findings include: During the re-certification survey conducted by the survey team from 5/21/24 through 5/24/24, the following concerns were identified by residents/resident representatives and staff: -resident supplies including incontinence briefs, washcloths or towels, and clothes were not always available 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 4/17/24, indicated the facility accepts residents with a broad range of diseases and disabilities primarily including common diseases of the elderly for its long-term care unit. These conditions, physical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to implement their grievance policy and assist one Resident (#56) to file a grievance out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to follow up and investigate a report of a missing electric razor. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances, dated 8/2019 indicated the following: -Staff members are encouraged to assist residents in filing a grievance and/or complaint when the resident believes that his/her rights have been violated. -Upon receipt of a grievance, complaint report or the missing items form, the Director of Social services will begin an investigation into the allegation. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors). Review of the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/29/24, indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam score of 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, records review and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures. Specifically; 1) The facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse according to policy and procedure for one Resident (#30), out of a total of 21 sampled residents resulting in potential for psychological harm. 2) The facility failed to implement their employee screening procedures to ensure new employees have no previous abuse, neglect or mistreatment findings for one staff member (CNA #4) out of 5 staff members reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse: Investigation, dated March 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The nursing supervisor will coordinate the interview process during the shift in which the event was reported. Any individual who may have knowledge of the event should be interviewed. This includes the alleged victim, employees working during the shift when the event was discovered/reported, as well as visitors and other residents who may have witnessed something. -Documentation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, records review and policy review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for further abuse for one Resident (#30) out of a total of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their policy and take steps to protect the Resident and prevent him/her from the potential of further abuse during an investigation of an allegation of abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse: Identification & Reporting dated March 2022 indicated but was not limited to the following: -All alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and must prevent further potential abuse while the investigation is in process Review of the facility policy titled Abuse: Investigation dated March 2022 indicated but was not limited to the following: -The nursing supervisor will take appropriate steps to protect the resident, if applicable, from further mistreatment and to ensure appropriate care is provided. Separate accused/suspected employee or resident from alleged victim and other residents. Suspension of employee pending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide recommended specialized services from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal and state-required process that is designed to, among other things, identify evidence of serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual or developmental disabilities (ID/DD) in all individuals (regardless of source of payment) seeking admission to Medicaid- or Medicare-certified nursing facilities) Level II Evaluation (an evaluation conducted to determine if an individual who screened positive for an SMI or ID/DD requires specialized services), for one Resident (#21) out of 21 total residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #21 with individual psychotherapy as recommended by the Department of Mental Health (DMH) based on the PASRR Level II Evaluation. Findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included Bipolar Disorder (a SMI that causes extreme mood swings, from high to low, that affect your energy, thinking, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an intervention was implemented as recommended by the Wound Physician's Assistant (PA) for one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a protective boot was obtained for Resident #48 as recommended by the Wound PA to protect the Resident's foot where he/she had a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA-surgical removal of part of the foot). Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, right TMA, and osteomyelitis (a bone infection). During an observation on 5/21/24 at 8:54 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #48 seated in his/her wheelchair. He/She had a bandage to his/her right foot area, was dangling, and he/she was not wearing a protective boot. During an observation on 5/22/24 from 8:34 A.M. to 9:12 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #48 to be seated in his/her wheelchair. He/She had a bandage to his/her right foot area and was not wearing a protective boot. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review an interview the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#12) out of a total of 21 residents sampled received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities. Specifically, for Resident #12 the facility failed to coordinate follow-up services relative to vision, after communicating his/her vision concerns. Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in February 2022. Review of the 2/22/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15. Review of the Request for Services signed by the Resident on 2/28/22, indicated Eye Care as one of the requested services provided by the mobile contracted agency. During an observation and interview on 5/21/24 at 12:07 P.M., Resident #12 said that he/she had been seen by the eye doctor sometime last July and has not been seen again since. He said that during this visit he/she understood that he/she would be obtaining new glasses to help with his/her worsening vision. The Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#1) out of one applicable resident, out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to coordinate delivery of medications with Resident #1's dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) treatment schedule to ensure the Resident received all medication as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care of a Resident with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-a permanent stage of chronic kidney disease that occurs when the kidneys can no longer function on their own requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant), dated 4/2022 indicated the following: -Staff caring for residents with End Stage Renal Disease, including residents receiving dialysis outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. -Education and training of staff includes, specifically: Timing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and review of the Facility Assessment (an assessment completed by the facility to identify what resources are necessary for competent care of residents on a day-to-day or emergency basis), the facility failed to ensure annual performance appraisals for Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) were completed every 12 months. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that two CNAs (#4 and #5) out of 2 applicable CNAs reviewed had an annual performance appraisal completed and ensured regular in-service education was completed based on the result of the performance appraisals. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 4/17/24, indicated no documented evidence the facility addressed the need for annual performance appraisals of CNAs. CNA #4 was hired to the facility on 3/15/23. A review of CNA #4's Human Resource (HR) record indicated no documented evidence that performance appraisal(s) had occurred. CNA #5 was hired to the facility on 1/21/20. A review of CNA #5's HR record indicated no documented evidence that performance appraisal(s) had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary Behavioral Health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#56), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide Behavioral Health Services for Resident #56 when he/she displayed symptoms of Depression (a common and serious mood disorder that may include symptoms of fatigue, sleep and appetite disturbances, agitation, and expressions of guilt, difficulty concentrating, apathy, withdrawal, and suicidal ideation). Findings include: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) and Depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/29/24, indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam score of 10 out of a possible 15, and took antidepressant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitation services for one Resident (#78) out of 21 total residents sampled. Specifically, for Resident #78 the facility failed to obtain specialized services relative to speech-language pathology for a Resident experiencing ongoing difficulty swallowing putting him/her at an increased risk of experiencing an adverse effect such as aspiration pneumonia (a type of lung infection that is due to a relatively large amount of material from the stomach or mouth entering the lungs) or choking. Findings include: Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] indicated the facility will provide Speech/language services based on the Resident's needs. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 and had the following diagnoses: of GERD (gastro-esophageal reflux disease, a condition that causes heartburn or acid indigestion) and Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing food or liquid). Review of the 3/13/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and records reviewed, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #3 and #1), the facility failed to ensure they maintained a completed and accurate medical record (1) for Resident #3, Nursing documentation in his/her Treatment Administration Record (TAR) related to the application of Optifoam Dressing was inaccurate and the Certified Nurse Aide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Flow sheet during the month of October 2023, was incomplete, (2) for Resident #1 his/her weekly skin observation tools were not completed by Nursing, as ordered by the Physician during the months of May 2023 and June 2023. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's policy, Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment, dated 03/2022, indicated the type of skin care provided and the condition of the resident's skin (i.e. the size and location of any red or tender areas), should be recorded in the resident's medical record. Review of the Facility's policy, Preventative Pressure Ulcer, dated 04/2022, indicated to reposition residents who are dependent on staff for repositioning, at least every two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#4 and #2) in a total sample of five residents were up to date with their Pneumococcal (name for any infection caused by bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae) Vaccinations, according to National standards for Pneumococcal Vaccination and the facility's policy. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Offer a Pneumococcal Vaccination to Resident #4 when the Resident had previously received one dose of the vaccine, but was not up to date with the Pneumococcal Vaccination series. 2. Determine whether Resident #2 was eligible to receive an additional dose of Pneumococcal Vaccine when staff failed to obtain the date Resident #2 received his/her first dose. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Pneumonia Vaccination, dated April 2017 and revised April 2022, indicated: - All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. - Upon admission, residents will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the plan of care for two Residents (#44, and #174) out of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, failure to implement: 1. a) monitoring meal intake while transitioning from NPO (does not receive fluid or solids by mouth) to PO (does receive fluid or solids by mouth), b) monitoring weights, and c) fall safety interventions for Resident #44, 2. initiated the bowel regimen protocol as care planned for Resident #174, and 3. ensure Oxygen (O2) was delivered at the ordered flow rate for Resident #15. Findings include: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Epilepsy, significant weight loss in the last six months, and legal blindness. a) Review of the current Physician's orders indicated to document breakfast, lunch, and dinner percentages while the Resident transitions from NPO to PO starting on 1/10/23. Review of the medical record indicated no evidence that the Resident's meal intake percentage was documented after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff stored and prepared food in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety. Specifically, they failed to ensure a sanitary environment in the facility main kitchen, as well as in three out of three unit kitchens. Findings include: Review of a facility memo to all kitchen staff, dated 8/10/16 indicated: - All personal belongings brought into the kitchen may be stored in the storeroom. - No food or drink is allowed in the main kitchen work area. This means no eating or drinking in the kitchen. -All personal food and beverage is to be stored in the staff refrigerator and consumed during breaks. -Employees may have a glass of water if thirsty but only in the supervisor's office or the dish room. Review of the facility's Safety and Sanitation Best Practice Guidelines, revised 1/2011 indicated: - Ovens: should be cleaned daily, weekly, or as needed. Daily: Wipe up spills as they occur, remove shelves, scrape burned particles from hearth, brush out interior, shelf ledges, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained an infection prevention program to prevent the transmission of a communicable disease for one Resident (#223), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, they failed to: 1) utilize the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to the Resident, and 2) initiate precautions appropriate to the Resident's condition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Isolation - Categories of Transmission Based Precautions, revised April 2022, indicated the following under Contact Precautions: - In addition to Standard Precautions (minimum infection prevention practices which apply to all patient care regardless of suspected or confirmed infection status of the patient, in the setting where health care is delivered), implement Contact Precautions for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility and its staff failed to provide a dignified existence for two Residents (#8 and #174), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. provide a urinary catheter bag privacy cover (covers a catheter bag so urine is not visible) for Resident #8, and 2. provide activities of daily living (ADL) care that included removal of unwanted facial hair for Resident #174. Findings Include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted in April 2022 with a diagnosis of urine retention (the inability for a person to voluntarily release urine from the bladder). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 had an indwelling foley catheter (tubing that is inserted into the bladder to help drain urine). During observations on 2/14/23 at 8:22 A.M., and 2/15/23 at 9:53 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #8 lying in bed. His/her foley catheter bag was hanging at the foot of the Resident's bed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility and its staff failed to provide a notice of rights and services to residents during the residents stay. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised 4/2022, indicated .these rights include the resident's right to be informed about his/her rights and responsibilities. Review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes for 11/30/22, 12/28/22 and 1/21/23 did not indicate that any resident rights had been reviewed. On 2/16/23 at 10:31 A.M., the survey team held a group meeting with 11 residents. The Resident group stated to the survey team that they could not recall when the last in-person meeting was held. They said that the activities department came around to some of them to discuss any concerns. Additionally, the group said that no staff had reviewed their rights with them. During an interview on 2/16/23 at 1:18 P.M., the Activities Director said that she was new and did not know how the facility notified the residents in the past of the residents rights, and the facility had not done so since she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment on one (Unit Four) out of three units. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 2/14/23 at 9:05 A.M., on Unit Four, the surveyor observed Resident #11's carpet next to his/her bed full of crumbs, the area under his/her bed cluttered with items such as clothing in bags, opened soda bottles, a plastic pitcher of juice, an opened bag of potato chips, an open bowl with candy way underneath his/her bed against the wall, and visible dirt all over the floor surrounding the Resident's multiple totes, containers and belongings. The Resident said housekeeping had not been in to clean his/her room since Saturday (three days prior). During observations on 2/14/23 between 9:18 A.M. until 10:12 A.M., on Unit Four, the surveyor observed the following: -room [ROOM NUMBER] - Bathroom with visible dirt/dust over the corners of the floor and the caulk underneath the toilet, dried,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff referred one Resident (#2), out of a total sample of 18 residents, for a Level II evaluation (an evaluation to determine if a resident needs specialized services to address his/her Mental Illness (MI)) once it was identified post admission that the Resident had a diagnosis of MI. Findings Include: Resident #2 was admitted the facility in March 2022. Review of the Resident's Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-an evaluation to determine if a Resident has MI or Intellectual or Developmental Disability (ID/DD) and needs an additional Level II evaluation) dated 4/19/22, indicated Resident #2 did not have any diagnosis of MI. Review of the Physician's Progress Note dated 4/21/22, indicated the Resident had a previous medical history of Schizoaffective Disorder (a MI that is a combination of symptoms of Schizophrenia and mood disorder). Review of the Behavioral Health Care Team's progress note dated 4/27/22, indicated the Resident had a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, and had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided care and services in accordance with professional standards for one Resident (#46) with an intravenous line out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented measures to ensure the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC: an intravenous line that is inserted in the arm, threaded through the veins and ends in the larger vein of the heart) was assessed for migration (movement), flushed to maintain patency and that the needleless connection caps were changed per facility policy and professional standards. Findings include: Review of an online article by the Infusion Nurses Society titled Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th edition, revised 2021, indicated: -The Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice is applicable to any patient population and any setting in which vascular access devices (VADs: intravenous lines) are inserted and/or managed and where infusion therapies are administered -Change the needleless connector…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility and its staff failed to ensure: 1. development of a policy that provided time frames for the different steps of the Medication Regime Review (MRR-review done by the facility Pharmacist that provides recommendations monthly for each resident regarding their medications), and 2. the attending Physician reviewed and documented they accepted and/or declined the MRR for one Resident (#43), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), revised December 2019, indicated the following: -Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber. -Prescriber accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing. -The Director of Nursing or designated licensed nurse addresses and documents recommendations that do not require a Physician intervention . Further review of the facility policy indicated no indication of the time frames for the different steps of the MRR. Resident #43 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff limited a PRN (as needed) antipsychotic medication order to 14 days for one Resident (#43), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings Include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility July 2022 with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and was on Hospice Services. Review of the January 2023 Order Summary Report indicated the following order: -ABH gel (a topical gel used to treat terminal restlessness at the end of life made from the combination of Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication), Diphenhydramine (an antihistamine), and Haloperidol (an antipsychotic) . every four hours PRN with a start date of 10/17/22 and no stop date indicated. Review of the January 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the Resident received the PRN ABH gel eight times during the month of January 2023. During an interview on 2/21/23 at 8:40 A.M., Nurse #2 said when a resident is on a PRN antipsychotic medication it should have a stop date after 14 days so it can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided specialized rehabilitative services relative to Speech and Language Pathology (SLP) for one Resident ( #44) out of a sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Epilepsy (neurological disorder where brain activity becomes abnormal causing seizures or periods of unusual behavior, sensations and sometimes loss of awareness), significant weight loss in the last six months, and oropharyngeal Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the SLP Therapy Note dated 11/21/22, indicated the following: -Resident was alert, but had severely impaired swallow function. -He/she tolerated only several bites of pureed foods, holding each bite for many minutes before swallowing. -He/she was unable to tolerate liquids except via teaspoon on this day. Review of the of the February 2023 Physician's Orders included the following ordered on 11/28/22: -Speech Therapy: ten visits for oral/pharyngeal swallow evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a secure handrail was in place on one Unit (Unit Three) out of three total Units. Findings include: During an observation on 2/16/23 at 11:49 A.M., the surveyor observed an unsecured handrail on the left side of the nurses' station on Unit Three. The left side of the handrail was no longer attached to the wall and there was broken plaster on the wall where the handrail should have been attached. During an observation and interview on 2/16/23 at 2:10 P.M., the Administrator said the handrail was not secured as required and was in need of repair.
- No harm found · B2025-06-25 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed and transmitted within 14 days of completion for two Residents (#26, #45) reviewed, out of a total of three residents reviewed for MDS records over 120 days, and for one Resident (#25) reviewed, out of a total of three resident reviewed for closed records. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #26, to complete a Discharge MDS Assessment. 2. For Residents #45 and #25, to complete Death in the Facility Tracking Records resulting in inaccurate resident tracking. Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 1.19.1 dated [DATE] indicated the following: -Must be completed when the resident is discharged from the facility and the resident is not expected to return to the facility within 30 days. -Must be completed .within 14 days after the discharge date . -Must be submitted within 14 days after the MDS completion date . Review of the RAI Manual Version…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff accurately coded Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for three Residents (#9, #50, and #56) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #9 the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessments were coded accurately related to the use of an anticoagulant medication (medication that thins blood), 2. For Resident #50 the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessments were coded accurately related to the use of a pressure relieving device (mattress that assists in reducing the likelihood of a resident developing pressure ulcers) on the Resident ' s bed and the use of a restraint., 3. For Resident #56 the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessments were coded accurately related to the use of an anticoagulant medication. Findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in October 2020 with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident received an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $13,153 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to REGALCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2022 |
| MIRLIS, ELIYAHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 99% | since 09/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $977K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225232. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.