Royal Wood Mill Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 60.3 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had dementia, was known to wander and put objects in his/her mouth, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision and an environment that was free from safety hazards, when on 03/29/24 nursing staff failed to secure medications delivered from the pharmacy, left them unattended at the Nurses' Station, and Resident #1 gained accessed to and was believed to have ingested multiple Seroquel (antipsychotic) and Risperidone (antipsychotic) tablets. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation and monitoring, later that evening he/she required intubation and admission to the Hospital Intensive Care Unit. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated 11/2017, indicated the Facility would maintain an environment as free from accident hazards as possible, and resident safety, supervision, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was known to wander, rummage, and eat food he/she found, the Facility failed to ensure that medications were kept locked up (secured) or under direct supervision of nursing staff, when on 03/29/24, Nurse #1 left a medication package delivered from the Pharmacy unattended on the desk at the Nurses' Station, and as a result, Resident #1 was later found with the opened package and was believed to have ingested multiple Seroquel (antipsychotic) and Risperidone (antipsychotic) tablets. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation and monitoring, and later required intubation and admission to the Hospital Intensive Care Unit. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Storage of Medications, dated 05/2023, indicated the Facility would store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Review of the Facility's Investigation Report, undated, indicated that on 03/29/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality as evidenced by failing to implement physician's orders for one Resident (#30), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #30, the facility failed to implement a physician's order to administer Pyridostigmine Bromide (a medication to treat orthostatic hypotension/low blood pressure).Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019 indicated the following: - The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had dementia, with known behaviors of being intrusive and rummaging, the Facility failed to ensure they provided an environment free from accident hazards, when Resident #1 was able to get a hold of and consumed an object not meant for human consumption.Findings include:The Facility Policy, titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated as revised 05/2025, indicated the Facility would strive to provide an environment as free from accident hazards as possible, and resident supervision was a core component of the systems approach to safety.The Facility Policy, titled Meal Supervision and Assistance, dated 01/2025, indicated residents would be provided meals in the location of his/her preference and with adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in November 2012, diagnoses included stroke, schizophrenia, anxiety, and dementia.Review of Resident #1's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Care Plan, dated as initiated 03/27/24 and renewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated August 2024, failed to indicate that the nurse is to check the medications against the physician's orders. During medication pass on 4/7/25, at 8:48 A.M., Nurse #3 told the surveyor that her medication cart computer was broken. Nurse #3 then said that she was stationing her medication cart near the nurse's station because she was using the computer at the nurse's station to pass medications. The surveyor then observed Nurse #3 read from the computer at the nurse's station. Nurse #3 then returned to the medication cart where she dispensed four medications into a medication cup from memory. The surveyor then observed Unit Manager (UM) #1 print out a list of 3 more medications and hand the list to Nurse #3. Nurse #3 dispensed the medications from the list. UM #1 then told Nurse #3 that she could not print out the remaining medications scheduled to be dispensed, wrote them out on a piece of paper and handed the hand written list to Nurse #3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biological's in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to ensure medication and treatment carts were locked while a nurse was not present and failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on top of the medication cart when a nurse was not present. 2. The facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside for one Resident (#64) out of a total of 20 sampled Residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated August 2024 indicated that during the administration of medications, the medication cart will be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the nurse. Further review indicated that no medications are to be left on top of the cart and all medications must be inaccessible to residents and other passers by. Review of the facility policy titled Storage of medications, not dated, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 4 residents, (#40, #30, #2 and #268) out of total of 20 sampled Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #40, the facility failed to accurately document an order and implementation related to oxygen use. 2. For Resident #30 the facility inaccurately documented that they took blood pressures on the correct arm. 3. For Resident #2, the facility inaccurately documented that they applied both seizure pads in the Resident's bed. 4. For Resident #268, the facility inaccurately documented that the air mattress settings were set correctly. Findings include: Review of the Charting and Documentation policy, undated, indicated: Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete and accurate. 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and type II diabetes. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented abuse policies and procedures for one Resident (#28) out of a total of 20 sampled Residents. Specifically, for Resident #28 staff failed notify facility administration of an accusation that a Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) wrapped a remote cord around his/her neck. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, undated, indicated that any employee who suspects an alleged violation shall immediately notify the executive director or his/her designee. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including stroke with left sided hemiplegia/hemiparesis, dementia and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #28 is totally dependent for all activities of daily living and scored an 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the progress notes dated 3/23/25 at 21:28 indicated that at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an incident of resident to resident abuse to the state agency for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Policy, undated, indicated the following: - The ED (executive director) shall also notify the appropriate state agency in accordance with the state law. - The results of all investigations must be reported immediately to the ED or his/her designee and the appropriate state agency, as required by state law. Resident #11 was admitted in November 2010 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #11 scored a three out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS indicated Resident #11 has verbal and physical behaviors. Review of the incident report, dated 9/29/24, indicated Resident #11 walked into another Resident's room and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of uknown origin for one Resident (#18) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, Resident #18 was found to have a dislocated shoulder and the facility interviewed the staff on the morning shift of the incident, but no other staff that had taken care of Resident #18. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Abuse Policy, undated, indicated the following: -The facility shall take the following steps to prevent, detect, and report abuse, neglect, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. - Where the circumstances of the alleged violation warrants, the DNS or his/her designee, shall initiate a physical and mental assessment of the resident and document the findings. Factual information only shall be documented, no assumptions. - Interview staff members implicated. - Interview other staff members. Employee should document incident in a written statement. - Interview with resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0626 — isolated
  Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, for one of two sampled discharge residents (Resident #67), the facility failed to permit Resident #67 to return following an evaluation in the emergency department (ED) when on 02/10/25, the Facility considered Resident #67 discharged at the time of the transfer. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA), dated revised January 2025, indicated that an emergent section 12 discharge authorizes temporary involuntary hospitalization for up to 72 hours. Further review indicated that the resident will be permitted to return to the facility upon discharge from the acute care setting if the resident's needs can be met by the facility. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses including disorganized schizophrenia, high blood pressure and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the progress note dated 2/7/25, indicated that Resident #67 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating intact cognition. Review of the progress notes dated 2/10/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the plan of care after an incident of physical abuse for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Abuse Policy, undated, indicated the following: - The facility shall take the following steps to prevent, detect, and report abuse, neglect, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. - ABUSE: unjustified physical contact, intentional or careless, which is likely to result in physical or psychological harm. - If the suspected perpetrator is another resident, the DNS (director of nursing services) or his/her designee, shall separate the residents so they do not have access to each other until the circumstances of the alleged incident can be determined. - Where the circumstances of the alleged violation warrants, the DNS or his/her designee, shall initiate a physical and mental assessment of the resident and document the findings. Factual information only shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROYAL HEALTH GROUP — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $575K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA