Victoria Haven Nursing Facility
137 Nichols Street, Norwood, MA 02062 · For profit - Corporation · 31 certified beds · (781) 762-0858 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $40,641 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-29)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 21.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 46.4% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.9% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.8% | 11.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.88 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.2%CMS range 48.0–72.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 7.5–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.4–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 25.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician of the inability to obtain a urine sample for Resident #11's urinalysis culture and sensitivity (UA C&S) on two occasions: (1) 9/5/23 through 9/18/23 (14 days before the provider was notified and the order was discontinued) and (2) 10/27/23 through 12/8/23 (42 days before the resident was sent to the hospital), resulting in the progression of symptoms and the Resident being hospitalized for five days with pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and nephrolithiasis (kidney stone), requiring a peripherally inserted midline catheter for intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Routine Urinalysis Specimen, dated as last revised October 2010, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Documentation: If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to promote and manage the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Nursing Practice by failing to identify and address a change in condition and provide necessary care and treatment for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor, identify, and notify the physician of a change in condition resulting in Resident #11 being hospitalized for five days with pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and nephrolithiasis (kidney stone), requiring a peripherally inserted midline catheter for intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th edition (2019), Part 2-Unit 6-Chapter 21, indicated but was not limited to the following: Standards of Care Guidelines 21.1 Renal Impairment -Thorough assessment of the urinary tract includes: a. hourly intake and output measurement. b. assessment of color, clarity, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to utilize the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, as required placing all residents at risk for not having their clinical needs met either directly by the RN or indirectly by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) that the RN was responsible for overseeing with provision of resident care. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the services of an RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week when no staffing waivers were in place on 4 of 92 days during the period of 7/1/25 through 9/30/25. Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment, last revised 12/15/25, indicated but was not limited to:-The ratio of registered and licensed practical nurses to aides shall be sufficient to assure professional guidance and supervision in the nursing care of the residents. Facility retains sufficient staffing to maintain a 24-hour licensed nurse (8-hours are RN, 7-days a week). Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-21 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee record review and interview, the facility failed to complete performance reviews of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for five out of five CNA (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) employee records reviewed. Findings include:Review of five out of five personnel files, of CNAs (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) who had been employed by the facility for over 12 months, failed to indicate a performance evaluation was completed in 2025. During an interview on 1/21/26 at 12:19 P.M., the Director of Nursing said he has been employed at the facility just over a year. He said since he has been at the facility, he had not completed any annual performance reviews or in-servicing based off the performance review. He said currently the facility does not have a process for annual performance reviews and it was something he had been looking into doing but had not gotten around to it.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which focuses on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, quality of care, and services to residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to show evidence of implementing a data driven QAPI plan for clinical measures, quality of life, and resident choices identified by the facility to improve the resident's quality of life. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Improvement Plan- [Facility Name], undated, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Our nursing home has a Performance Improvement Program which systematically monitors, analyzes and improves its performance to improve resident/patient outcomes. -Clinical Care-Monitor existing quality improvement/quality measures (QI/QM) results, internal monitors for falls, medication errors, pressure ulcers, incident reports, and infection reports.-QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed:1. During a respiratory illness outbreak, to implement Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP, an infection control measure to be used in addition to Standard Precautions for patients who may be infected) and to maintain infection surveillance;2. To implement and follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for residents, including Resident #33;3. For Resident #12, to ensure sanitary practices were used by nursing while preparing and administering medications; and4. To ensure proper cleaning of resident shared equipment between resident use. Findings include:1.Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infection Prevention and Control Strategies for Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Settings, dated 4/28/25, indicated but was not limited to: -Adhere to Droplet Precautions: Droplet precautions should be implemented for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice for two Residents (#5 and #12), out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician. Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice.Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated:-Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care as ordered and as recommended to one Resident (#8), in a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:a. Carry over wound treatment orders for the bilateral lower extremities to the new electronic medication administration record to ensure treatment was provided for three weeks, andb. Follow the wound consultant recommendations to change the treatment to the lower extremity. Findings include:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in February 2025. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #8 developed wounds to the bilateral lower extremities in June 2025 and began treatments as recommended by the consultant Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP). a. During an interview on 1/20/26 at 4:40 P.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said the facility had documented on paper in November 2025 until their change of electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) were implemented on 12/1/25. Review of the November 2025 TAR for Resident #8 indicated a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations from medication regimen reviews (MRR) were reviewed and addressed timely for two Residents (#2 and #27), out of a total sample of 13 residents. Findings include:1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (elevated fats in the blood). Review of the Pharmacy MRR form indicated on 9/25/25 a recommendation was made to the physician regarding medications for Resident #2. Review of the paper and electronic medical record failed to include what the pharmacist recommended and the physician response to the recommendation. On 1/21/26 at 9:00 A.M. the surveyor was provided with a pharmacy consultant Director of Nursing (DON) Summary Report which indicated for the physician to review if Resident #2 needed to continue on a statin (a medication that lowers fat and cholesterol in blood), and if continuing, to consider adding Coenzyme Q10 (a vitamin-like antioxidant). During an interview on 1/21/26 at 9:15 A.M., the DON said he was unable to locate any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of three nurses observed during a medication pass made three errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 14.29%. Those errors impacted one Resident (#12), out of four residents observed. Findings include:Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated:Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers. Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, last revised December 2012, indicated but was not limited to:-Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.-Medication must be administered in accordance with the orders, including required time frames.-Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified.-The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in a safe and secure manner as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure multidose vials of medications were labeled with a date opened and a use by date per manufacturer's guidelines in one of one medication carts and in one of one medication rooms.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, last revised December 2012, indicated but was not limited:-When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container.-Insulin pens will be clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, last revised in January 2018, indicated but was not limited to:-When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is broken the container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. The nurse shall place a date opened sticker on medication and enter the date opened and/or new date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and liquids were prepared and served in a form designed to meet the individual needs for three Residents (#34, #25, and #5), out of a total of 13 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Residents #34, to follow the physician ordered therapeutic diet of minced moist (ground) and follow the downgrade from thin liquids to nectar thick liquids resulting on three occasions to be served the wrong diet consistency: a. Resident was served a whole hot dog while on a minced moist diet. b. Resident was served thin liquids at breakfast after the Resident's diet was downgraded the previous day to nectar thick liquids. c. Resident was served regular (thin) water resulting in Resident stating he/she choked.2. For Resident #25, who was on a mechanical soft diet related to swallowing difficulties, to serve him/her the therapeutic alternative to a whole baked potato; and3. For Resident #5, to serve nectar thick liquids during medication administration putting him/her at risk for aspiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen and 2nd floor kitchenette maintained sanitary conditions. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Substitute pasteurized eggs (in-shell or liquid eggs gently heated between 130 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 140 F to kill salmonella and bacteria without cooking them, making them safe for raw or undercooked recipes) for raw shell eggs when serving undercooked poached eggs to residents, placing them at risk for Salmonella Enteritidis (a virulent organism that may be present in raw shell eggs);2. Ensure open-refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature controlled for safety, foods were labeled with the date of opening; and3. Ensure the second-floor kitchenette was regularly cleaned and did not contain expired foods. Findings include:1. Review of ServSafe Manager, 6th edition, indicated if you mainly serve high-risk populations, such as those in hospitals and nursing homes, use pasteurized eggs or egg products when serving dishes that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the Physician in a timely manner recommendations for a medication change from the consulting Psychiatric (Psych) Nurse Practitioner (NP) for one Resident (#27), out of a sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician of recommendations to increase Cymbalta (an antidepressant medication) from 60 milligrams (mg) to 90 mg. This delay resulted in Resident #27 not receiving an increased dose for 41 days.Findings include:Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses of anxiety and depression. Review of the Psych NP's progress note, dated 10/20/25, indicated but was not limited to:-Chief complaint- Please document using patient's own words why they are Here: Sad-Mood: Depressed-Recommendations: Mood. Cymbalta 60 mg daily. Sad mood. Consider increasing to 90 mg daily.-Psych NP is in a consultative role; recommendations are given to facility prescriber. Review of an email from the Psych NP to the Director of Nursing (DON) and Director of Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0772 — isolatedHave an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided for one Resident (#2), out of a sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity were obtained according to the physician's orders. Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with a diagnosis of failure to thrive. Review of the Nursing Progress Note, dated 11/12/25, indicated Resident #2 was seen by the physician the previous evening with an order to collect urine and send for culture and sensitivity. Review of the Physician Progress Note, dated 11/11/25, indicated Resident #2 was complaining of urinary tract infection symptoms again. Review of the Interim Physician's Order Sheet included an order, dated 11/11/25, for a urinalysis and a urine culture and sensitivity. Review of the paper and electronic medical record on 1/15/26 failed to include results from a urinalysis in November 2025. Review of the Physician Progress Note, dated 11/29/25, indicated Resident #2 complained of dysuria (painful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of an abnormal X-ray for one Resident (#1), out of 13 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility waited eight days to inform the physician of an X-ray result of osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone) to the right heel. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with deep tissue pressure injuries (intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft) to the bilateral heels. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #1 was seen by the consultant Wound Nurse Practitioner on 12/26/25 following a recent hospitalization. The Wound Note indicated the heels had worsened and there was a concern for osteomyelitis with a recommendation to X-ray both heels. Review of the Interim Physician's Order Sheet included an order to X-ray both heels on 12/29/25. Review of the results, dated 12/29/25 at 8:35 A.M., indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#2), out of 13 sampled residents, was referred to hospice services for an evaluation.Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses of failure to thrive and a lung mass. Review of the medical record indicated on 12/10/25 a nurse received a call from a hospice agency indicating they were looking for a physician's order for Resident #2 to be evaluated by hospice, and the nurse contacted the physician. Review of the paper medical record included an order written on 12/10/25 by the physician for Resident #2 to be evaluated by hospice and to treat if indicated based on the Resident's diagnoses of failure to thrive and having a lung mass. Review of the paper and electronic medical record on 1/15/26 failed to include any information regarding Resident #2 being referred to hospice services as indicated. During an interview on 1/20/26 at 10:36 A.M., the Director of Nurses said he did not know if there was a hospice referral completed in December 2025. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education and/or offer the COVID-19 vaccination as required or appropriate per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for one of one employee records reviewed for immunizations. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) COVID-19 Vaccination for Long-term Care Residents, dated 6/11/25, indicated but was not limited to:-Vaccine recommendations: -CDC recommends an updated COVID-19 vaccine for most adults ages 18 years and older, including people who live and work in long-term care (LTC) settings, get 1 dose of an updated COVID-19 vaccine. -CDC recommends everyone ages 65 years and older, including people who live and work in LTC settings, get 2 doses of an updated COVID-19 vaccine 6 months apart. Review of the Facility Assessment, last updated 12/15/25, indicated but was not limited to:-We offer flu, Covid, and RSV vaccinations for all residents and staff including contracted staff if needed.-Staff are in-serviced and educated annually at a minimum on the prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain records of certified nurse aide (CNA) training for continuing competency that included no less than 12 hours of mandatory training per year for each CNA employed by the facility for one CNA (#1), out of five employee training records reviewed. Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment, last revised 12/15/25, indicated but was not limited to:-Staff training/education and competencies: -All employees complete training and competencies upon hire and annually thereafter. -Nurse Aides are provided 12 hours of annual training/education in house.-Nurse Aides: Annual in-service training for nurse aides is a minimum of 12-hours per year. During an interview on 1/21/26 at 12:19 P.M., the Director of Nursing said he and the Administrative Assistant were responsible for educating staff. He said there was not a system to track the number of hours of education provided or quantify the number of hours of education provided in a year for CNAs. He said CNAs had a yearly competency fair, dementia training, and if he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that infection control measures were implemented in order to prevent the potential development and spread of disease for two Residents (#1, #9), out of a total sample of 12 residents and three Residents during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to ensure that transmission-based precautions (TBP) were implemented when the Resident was suspected to have a contagious respiratory illness; 2. For Resident #9, to ensure that TBP were implemented when the Resident refused COVID-19 testing during facility outbreak testing; and 3. To ensure staff donned gloves when touching the inside of the medication cup and/or its contents during medication administration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Staff and Resident Testing Procedures, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Outbreak testing: Test all staff and residents in response to an outbreak (any single new infection). Continue to test all staff and residents that tested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure residents/residents' representatives were educated on benefits and potential side effects of immunizations, ensure the medical record contained documented consent or refusal of the immunization, and offer and administer the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations in a timely manner for two Residents (#3, #10), out of five sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #3, to educate the Resident and/or the Resident's representative on the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine, offer the immunization, and document on the Informed Consent the Resident's consent to receive or refusal of the vaccine and place in the Resident's medical record; 2. For Resident #10, to educate the Resident and/or the Resident's representative on the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, offer the immunizations, and document on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer COVID-19 vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for five Residents (#1, #3, #10, #23, #327), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines, revised 1/7/25, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Everyone ages 6 months and older should get the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. This includes people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine, people who have had COVID-19, and people with long COVID. -People ages 65 years and older: You are up to date when you have received: 2 doses of any 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine 6 months apart. 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 and was over [AGE] years old. Review of the Consent for Immunizations, signed by the Resident on 4/16/23, failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#327, #2) were informed of and actively participated in his/her baseline plan of care within the first 48 hours following admission, out of a total sample of 12 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Baseline Care Plans, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: (1) The facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must: -be developed 48-72 hours of a resident's admission [sic] to the facility -include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident (2) The facility may develop a comprehensive care plan in place of the baseline care plan if the comprehensive care plan is developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. (3) The facility must offer the resident and their representative a copy with a summary of the baseline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a treatment order was in place for a dressing to Resident #327's left lower extremity. Findings include: Review of Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role must ensure an infrastructure is in place, consistent with current standards of care, to minimize error.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) care was provided to maintain good personal grooming for one Resident (#10), in a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nail care was performed for Resident #10. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care of Nails, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -Objective: 1. to provide cleanliness 2. to prevent infection -Procedure: 1. Trim Nails Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/24, indicated Resident #10 required substantial/ maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for personal hygiene and that he/she scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of the care plans indicated Resident #10 was totally dependent with ADLs and would not initiate or follow through due to cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) reports for two Residents (#9, #23), out of a total sample of 12 residents, were included in the medical record and acted upon in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #9, to ensure the monthly MRR reports were included in the medical record or readily available for review to indicate the Physician's response to the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist; and 2. For Resident #23, to act promptly upon recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly MRR for consideration of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of Clozapine (an antipsychotic medication). Findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in October 2019 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) and depression. Review of Resident #9's Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to the following: -Amitriptyline (antidepressant) 25 milligrams (mg) Give 2 tabs (50 mg) by mouth at bedtime (8/13/24) Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#23) drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of the antipsychotic medication Clozapine was attempted, unless clinically contraindicated and documented in the medical record, in an effort to discontinue the drug. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised 2/24/24, included but was not limited to the following: -Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review; -Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective; -The attending Physician will identify, evaluate and document, with input from other disciplines and consultants as needed, symptoms that may warrant the use of antipsychotic medications. Resident #23 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, medications were stored, unlabeled, in a small box in the top right-hand side of the top drawer of the facility's only medication cart. Findings include: On 2/12/25 at 2:57 P.M., the surveyor inspected the medication cart, located on the first floor, with Nurse #3. The surveyor observed multiple unit dose medications in the top drawer, on the right side, of the medication cart. The medications were observed to be loose and sitting in a small cardboard box. There was no label or identifying information to indicate that it had come from the facility's pharmacy, they lacked resident names, and there was no administering/cautionary information or directions for administering the medication. The unit dose medications observed unlabeled in the medication cart were as follows: -Cefpodoxime (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) #6 -Carbamazepine (anticonvulsant) 100 mg chewable tabs #2 -Doxycycline (antibiotic) 100 mg #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#1, #3, and #14), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to schedule a cardiology appointment as ordered after hospitalization for heart failure; 2. For Resident #3, to obtain a speech therapy evaluation as ordered; and 3. For Resident #14, to follow physician's orders for the daily use of a splint to the right arm with geri sleeve (stocking sleeves that protect from friction and shearing). Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Medical Appointment Guideline, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of the facility to assist with appointment making with outside consultants. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August 2020 with diagnoses which included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and asthma. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/23, indicated Resident #1 had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to ensure that medications stored in the medication storage room, including but not limited to, single-use parenteral medications, were labeled with the appropriate information including the resident's name, dose, route, time and frequency of administrations, when dispensed by the pharmacy; and 2. The facility failed to ensure staff properly labeled all medications stored in one of one medication cart reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled IIA3 Vials and Ampules of Injectable Medications, effective date February 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Vials and ampules dispensed by the pharmacy are maintained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure residents/residents' representatives were educated on benefits and potential side effects of immunizations, ensure the medical record contained documented consent or refusal of the immunization, and offer and administer the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations in a timely manner for 5 out of 5 Residents sampled (#1, #3, #8, #11, and #14). Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #1, to educate the Resident and/or the Resident's representative on the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine, offer the immunization, and document on the Informed Consent the Resident's consent to receive or refusal of the vaccine and place in the Resident's medical record; 2. For Resident #3, to educate the Resident and/or the Resident's representative on the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, offer the immunizations, and document on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer COVID-19 vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy for five residents (#1, #3, #8, #11, and #14), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines, revised January 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: People aged 12 years and older who are unvaccinated should get either: -1 updated Pfizer-BioNTech or updated Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, OR 2 doses of updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccine. People aged 12 years and older who got previous COVID-19 vaccine(s): -People aged 12 years and older who got COVID-19 vaccines before September 12, 2023, should get 1 updated Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Novavax COVID-19 vaccine. Review of the facility's policy titled Vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed for two Residents (#2 and #11) to develop and implement comprehensive care plans to reflect the individual needs of the Residents, out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #2, to develop and implement a genitourinary system care plan related to urinary incontinence, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms, chronic kidney disease stage three (CKD-Stage 3), and hyperkalemia (high potassium); and 2. For Resident #11, to develop and implement a genitourinary system care plan related to chronic urinary tract infections (UTIs), history of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis (kidney infection), and calculus of the kidney (kidney stone). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as last revised December 2016, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater when one of one nurse made two errors in 29 opportunities, totaling a medication error rate of 6.9%. These errors impacted two Residents (#11 and #6), out of seven residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated February 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: Preparation: -Five (5) Rights - Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. A triple check of these 5 rights is recommended at three (3) steps of the process of preparation of a medication for administration: (1) when the medication is selected, (2) when the dose is removed from the container, and finally (3) just after the dose is prepared and the medication put away. -Check #1: Select the medication - label, container and contents are checked for integrity, and compared against the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a policy to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and reheating of food brought to the facility for residents from family and visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage Second Floor Refrigerator, undated, indicated there were identified procedures for storage of food items. Further review of the policy indicated an absence of procedures or directions for reheating food to ensure safe consumption by the resident. During an observation of the 2nd floor nourishment kitchen/dining area on 2/28/24 at 1:45 P.M., the surveyor observed a piece of tattered and torn paper taped to the top of the microwave which indicated foods must be reheated to a minimum internal temperature of 165 degrees and maximum of 180 degrees. There were no further reheating instructions or procedures posted for staff. During an interview on 2/28/24 at 1:44 P.M., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 said she was unaware of any procedure or guidelines for reheating of resident food. CNA #1 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 12 residents, to maintain an accurate medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's refusal to wear a splint and sling to their right arm was documented accurately. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Assistive Devices and Equipment, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Assistive devices are provided by the facility (including splints and braces) -Staff don (put on) and doff (take off) equipment and devices according to MD orders. -The care plan will reflect use of device/equipment. Review of the facility's policy titled Preferred Therapy Solutions: Splinting, dated as last revised January 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Splints are used to provide proper support, prevent unwanted motion, contracture management, or reduction, pain management, and to facilitate motor activity. -Therapists…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-02-18 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days after a resident assessment was completed for three Residents (#5, #19, and #328), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, Version 3.0, indicated assessments must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the assessment reference date (ARD) and transmitted and encoded within 7 days of assessment completion. Review of Resident #5's medical record indicated an Annual MDS was initiated with an ARD of 1/18/25 and status indicated Production Batch; 17 days overdue. Review of Resident #19's medical record indicated a Quarterly MDS was initiated with an ARD of 1/2/25 and status indicated Production Batch; 33 days overdue. Review of Resident #328's medical record indicated an Entry MDS was initiated with an ARD of 1/30/25 and status indicated Production Batch; five days overdue. During an interview on 2/18/25 at 1:39 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-29 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents and/or their Representatives were provided with transfer/discharge notices prior to a hospital transfer for three Residents (#7, #1, and #11), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses which included metastatic cancer, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the medical record indicated the Resident was transferred to the hospital on 1/9/24 due to a change in condition. Further review of the paper and electronic records failed to indicate the transfer or discharge notice was provided to Resident #7 or their representative before/upon transfer to the hospital on 1/9/24. During an interview on 2/28/24 at 2:20 P.M., Social Worker #1 said the social service department usually completed the necessary paperwork during regular work hours and nursing would complete the paperwork during off hours and weekends. Social Worker #1 said she reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-29 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to the Resident and/or Resident Representative prior to discharge to a hospital transfer for three Residents (#7, #1, and #11), out of total sample of 12 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Hold Policy, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - A resident may need to be absent from [NAME] Haven Nursing Facility temporarily for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. - A resident may request hold open bed during the time away from the facility. This is known as a Bed Hold. The resident and family member or legal representative shall be given notice of the bed hold option at the time of admission and later upon hospitalization or therapeutic leave, or if regulations pertain to Bed Hold should change. 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses which included metastatic cancer, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$40,641 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $40,641 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to REHABILITATION ASSOCIATES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THISSE, MARION | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/14/2024 |
| THISSE, PETER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/03/1990 |
| REHABILITATION ASSOCIATES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/1985 |
| THISSE, GILBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/06/2025 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $405K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225608. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.