Marian Manor Of Taunton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure his/her environment was free of accident hazards as possible, when on 06/28/25, while activity staff were assisting residents onto the elevator after an activity, they did not lock the elevator, which would have kept the door in the open position, as Resident #1 entered the elevator the door began to close and hit him/her causing him/her to fall into the elevator. Resident #1 complained of severe left leg pain and was transported to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation. Resident #1 was diagnosed with a left intertrochanteric fracture (break in the upper part of the thigh bone (femur), was admitted and underwent surgical intervention to repair the fracture.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, dated October 2024, indicated the following:-each resident will be assessed for risk factors and predisposition for falling using the Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Proxy (HCP), the Facility failed to ensure nursing promptly notified his/her Health Care Agent (HCA), when nursing transcribed a physician's order to decrease the dosage of his/her antidepressant medication without notifying the HCA of the change, Resident #1 received the lower dosage of the medication for more than a month before the HCA was made aware.Findings include:Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Change in Resident Condition, dated as revised December 2025, indicated the following:-the resident's responsible party/next of kin are notified of a change in condition;-a licensed nurse in charge is responsible for timely notification of the responsible party/next of kin and notify with his or her consent the resident representative when there is: a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment;-all changes and notifications should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the Physician of medication recommendations for one Resident (#15), out of a sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician and/or Nurse Practitioner, in a timely manner, of the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (PNP)'s recommendations to increase Remeron (an antidepressant medication) dosage and implement a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for Lexapro (an anti-anxiety medication), resulting in a 43-day delay in implementing the recommendations. Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in June 2019 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #15's Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (PNP) progress note/consult, dated 11/25/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Recommend GDR Lexapro (escitalopram). -Increase Remeron (mirtazapine) to decrease depression/enhance appetite. Review of Nurse Practitioner (NP) Encounter Notes, dated 12/11/24, 12/20/24, and 12/31/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for two Residents (#19 and #48) of 15 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure care was provided to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #19, to ensure a prescriber's order for Dycem (a thin, rubberlike material known for its non-slip material, used to reduce the likelihood of sliding or shifting) to wheelchair was implemented to prevent falls; and 2. For Resident #48, to follow the prescriber's orders for 1:1 (one to one) assistance and encouragement with meals. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: -Nurse's Responsibility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee which included the required members at their meetings. Specifically, the facility Medical Director and Director of Nurses (DON) each failed to attend one of five Quarterly QAPI meetings reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance on Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated as revised 4/2024, indicated but was not limited to: -A facility must maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance provision at 42 CFR, Part 483.75 (0) Quality Assessment and Assurance: 1. A facility must maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee consisting of: (i) the Director of Nursing Services; (ii) A physician designated by the facility; and (iii) At least 3 other members of facility's staff Review of the facility's QAPI Attendee sign-in sheets for January 2024 indicated the Medical Director was not in attendance. Review of the facility's QAPI Attendee sign-in sheets for July 2024 indicated the DON was not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored and properly labeled all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff properly labeled all drugs and biologicals stored in 2 of 4 medication carts once opened; and 2. Ensure staff safely and securely stored all medications in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms and 2 of 4 medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not in use or in direct view of persons with authorized access. -All medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy label. -Certain medications or package types, such as multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics, once opened, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, multiple residents voiced concerns regarding the quality and temperatures of the food provided by the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour of the 3rd floor unit on 1/11/24 at 10:30 A.M., multiple residents voiced complaints regarding the palatability of their meals as follows: -Resident #11 described the food as Iffy and not to his/her satisfaction. -Resident #50 said that the Food leaves little to be desired. -Resident #19 complained that the food is not always warm. -Resident #36 said the food's cold. -Resident #41 said The food is not always warm. That's my only complaint. During an interview on 1/10/24 at 4:42 P.M., the Ombudsman said that he frequently received complaints from residents regarding the temperatures and the quality of the food. During the Resident Group Meeting on 1/12/24 at 1:33 P.M., attended by 17 residents, many of the residents voiced complaints that the food was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and potential spread of infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff properly performed hand washing during COVID-19 testing to prevent the potential spread of infection; and 2. Ensure staff prepared and administered medications in a safe and sanitary manner. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Anterior Nasal Swab Collection Competency Skills, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Disinfect the surface where you will open the collection. Remove and lay out content of the kit. - Wash hands with soap and water. If soap and water are not available, use hand sanitizer. - Remove the swab from the package. Do not touch the soft end with your hands or anything else. - Insert the entire soft end of the swab into your nostril no more ¾ of an inch into your nose. - Slowly rotate the swab, gently pressing against the inside of your…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents in one of four dining rooms experienced a comfortable and homelike dining experience. Findings include: During dining observations made on 1/11/24 and 1/12/24, the surveyors observed the following in the dining areas: On 1/11/24 at 8:41 A.M., the surveyor observed five residents seated in wheelchairs in the third-floor dining room. - Two residents were seated at a table facing the wall and a television, which was tuned into a news station. - Two residents were seated at a table on the opposite side of the room, facing the wall. - One resident was seated at a table in the middle of the room, facing out towards the window. - All residents were seated with their backs to each other. - All meals were served on trays to all the residents. - One staff member was observed to be checking their cell phone when the surveyor entered the dining room. On 1/11/24 at 12:05 P.M., the surveyor observed nine residents seated in wheelchairs in the third-floor dining room. - Two residents were seated at a table facing the wall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two Residents (#22 and #55), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #22, to ensure staff developed a care plan for the Resident's use of an external catheter device (condom catheter) (urinary collection device with a tube that goes to a collection bag); and 2. For Resident #55, to ensure staff developed a care plan that addressed a cancerous lesion on the Resident's left forearm. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All homes will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident right that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. -The comprehensive care plan must describe the services that are to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and records reviewed, for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented the Facility Abuse Prohibition Policy when Nurse #2 observed a potentially sexually inappropriate interaction between the two residents, and did not immediately separated them. On 9/15/23, Nurse #2 saw Resident #1 in Resident #2's room, standing at Resident #2's bedside holding up Resident #2's leg. Resident #2 who was in bed, was not wearing an incontinence brief, and the lower half of his/her body was not covered by a sheet or a blanket, therefore leaving him/her exposed. Nurse #2 did not immediately separate Resident #1 and Resident #2, in accordance with Facility Policy, and did not attempt to remove Resident #1 from Resident #2's room at that time, but instead went to the nurses station and asked Nurse #1 for help, therefore leaving Resident #2 at risk for potential for abuse. Findings include: The Facility Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedure, undated, indicated that residents would be immediately protected from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-08-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIOCESAN HEALTH FACILITIES — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $225K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA