Ingleside At King Farm

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 35.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.33 to 1.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff and the public. This was evident during the initial kitchen tour of the annual survey. The findings include:At 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed steam escaping from both ends of the high temperature conveyor dish machine and scattering throughout the dish machine room. In addition, the surfaces and the open seams of the two vent stacks were found to be covered in an excessive buildup of black substances. Furthermore, there was significant buildup of black substances along the edges of the dropdown ceiling tiles and the drywalls in the mechanical dish room.At 10:35 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff #3, Staff 4, and Staff #6 all of whom confirmed that the dish machine room will be scheduled for deep cleaning, and a work order will be submitted to the maintenance staff to evaluate the vent stacks and the adjustable dampers to ensure proper ventilation.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were seen by an attending provider at least every 60 days. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice care.The findings include:A review of Resident #5's medical record on 3/26/26 at 1:11 PM revealed attending provider visit notes for 3/4/25, 3/5/25, 3/10/25, 3/12/25, 3/31/25, 4/1/25, 4/8/25, 4/11/25, 4/21/25, 4/28/25, and 6/18/25. However, there were no documented visits by an attending provider for August 2025 until the next visit on 12/1/25, indicating that Resident #5 was not seen by an attending provider for 166 days between visits.During an interview on 3/31/26 at 10:30 AM, the director of clinical operations stated that residents must be seen by an attending provider at least every 60 days after admission.In an interview on 3/31/26 at 11:14 AM, the attending provider for Resident #5 stated that his residents received visits every 60 days after admission. However, the visits were alternated between him and a nurse practitioner,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that attending physicians reviewed and acted on Irregularities identified by the pharmacist in a timely manner. This was evident for one (Resident #4) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:A medical record review on 3/30/26 at 7:33 AM showed that Resident #4 had been residing in the facility since 2019 and received multiple drugs, including an antidepressant.The ongoing review included monthly medication review (MRR) notes for Resident #4 from March 2025 to the present. On 8/8/2025, there was a recommendation stating, This resident has been using DULOXETINE 60mg QD [every day] since 9/11/20. If this therapy is required to prevent future depressive episodes, please document that effect in your progress notes. Please consider if it may be possible to conduct a trial GDR [gradual dose reduction-an approach to tapering or discontinuing medications] at this time, perhaps to DULOXETINE 40mg QD.The review showed that Resident #4's attending provider signed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating conditions. This was evident for 2 of 2 pieces of equipment reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:All essential kitchen equipment, including but not limited to walk-in coolers, steam tables, dishwashers, convection ovens, stoves, and warming cabinets, must be maintained in safe operating condition in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and remain accessible throughout kitchen operations.On 03/26/2026 at 9:50 AM, an initial kitchen tour was conducted with Staff #4 and Staff #6. The surveyor observed a sign posted on a nonfunctional hand sink located by the food preparation area which indicated that the hand sink faucet had not been working since 3/18/2026. At 9:52 AM, an interview with Staff #4 and Staff #6 confirmed that a work order had been submitted on that date. At 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed that a Continental undercounter freezer was turned off. An interview with Staff #4 confirmed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintained professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents who eat the food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include: On 2/13/2025 at 8:05 AM, during a tour of the main kitchen, the Surveyor observed the produce refrigerator. The Surveyor observed an opened and unlabeled bag of carrots, bag of lettuce, and bag of spinach. During a continued tour of the kitchen, the Surveyor observed the meat/fish cooler. The Surveyor observed an uncovered large tub of apple cider and uncovered pan of greens on a short metal rolling cart. There was an uncovered large tub of chicken stock and an uncovered container of BBQ sauce on a shelving unit. There was an opened and unlabeled 4.4lb jug of kalamata olives, 1 liter carton of lemon juice, 32oz container of chopped garlic in water, two 32oz containers of basil pesto, 105oz jug of Frenches Dijon mustard, 1 gallon jug of Cattlemens BBQ sauce, 1 gallon jug…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a homelike environment as evidenced of marring on the wall behinds residents' beds. This deficient practice was evidenced in 3 (Resident #4, #11, #28) of 6 resident rooms entered during the medication administration assessment conducted during the survey. The findings include: On 02/14/25 at 8:44 AM, during Resident #11 medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #7, the surveyor observed damaged drywall behind the resident's bed. RN #7 confirmed the surveyor's observation. At 9:12 AM, during a continuation of the medication administration observation of Resident #28 medications, the surveyor observed marring on the wall behind the bed. RN #7 confirmed the surveyor's observation. At 9:31 AM, during Resident #4 medication administration observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 the surveyor observed damaged drywall behind the resident's bed. LPN #8 confirmed the surveyor's observation and verbalized the resident's bed may have caused the damage although the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the review of a facility reported incident and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of physical restraints. This was evident for 1 (MD00182052) out of 4 facility reported incidents reviewed during the annual and complaint survey. The facility implemented corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this Survey. The facilities plan and actions were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 8/15/2022. The findings include: A physical restraint is any manual method, physical or mechanical device/equipment or material that limits a resident's freedom of movement and cannot be removed by the resident in the same manner as it was applied by staff. A gait belt or transfer belt is an assistive device put on a person who has mobility issues, by a care giver, prior to moving the person and can be used to help a person transfer from one surface to another, stand, or walk around. On 2/19/2025 at 9:30 AM, during a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of a facility reported incident (FRI) and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within 2 hours and submit the results of the investigation within 5 days as required to the Office of Health Care Quality. This was evident for 1 (MD00210330) out of 4 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI's) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 2/19/2025 at 9:15 AM, during a review of the investigative file for facility reported incident MD00210330, the Surveyor discovered that during activities of daily living (ADL) care on 9/28/2024 at 11:50AM Resident #11 was noted with a swollen left leg and bruise to the left shin. The Director of Nursing was made aware on 9/28/2024 at 12:05PM and started an investigation. BIMS stands for Brief Interview for Mental Status, a cognitive screening tool used to assess a person's mental status and is scored from 0-15, with lower the scores indicating a decline in cognitive performance. An additional review of the investigative file revealed that at the time of the incident,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include the resident care plan with the required documentation during a transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #35) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: On 02/14/25 at 08:09 AM, review of Resident #35's medical record revealed he/she was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 02/18/25 at 10:17 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (Staff #5) revealed that staff would not send the care plan goals as part of the documentation sent with the resident upon transfer. On 02/19/25 at 04:45 PM, the surveyor reviewed the concern at the time of exit.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman when a resident was transferred to the hospital, and provide written notification of transfer and to ensure the resident and the responsible representative were provided a copy. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35 and #37) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 02/18/25 at 1:56 PM, a review of Resident #37 electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was sent to a local hospital on [DATE] for further medical evaluation. Further review of the EMR notes, the surveyor was unable to find a note indicating the ombudsman was made aware of the resident's transfer to the hospital. On 02/18/25 at 3:29 PM, during an interview with Social Services Director #6, the surveyor asked whether the ombudsman receive a copy of Resident #37 transfer notice. Social Services Director #6 verbalized they normally do not send a copy of the transfer notice to the Ombudsman when a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INGLESIDE ENGAGED LIVING — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD