Westminster At Lake Ridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 294 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 141 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 39.7 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 1.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe environment for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). Four oxygen cylinders were observed unsecured constituting the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) at Level Four, Isolated scope and severity and substandard quality of care. Upon verification of the removal of the IJ, the scope and severity were lowered to Level Two, Isolated. The findings include:On 1/20/26 at 12:46PM, during initial rounds, four oxygen e-tanks were observed stored freestanding in an upright position, not contained in a stand or holder in Resident #1's room on the secured Memory Care Unit. (An E tank (or E-cylinder) is a common medical oxygen cylinder, typically holding around 680 liters (about 23-24 cubic feet) of oxygen, with dimensions of roughly 4.4 inches in diameter and 24-28 inches in height, weighing around 10 lbs. empty, and used for home, travel, and emergency oxygen needs.) On 1/20/26 at 1:00PM, a second observation of Resident #1 was conducted by the survey…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-22 · tag F0843 — widespread
  Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure there was a written transfer agreement with a local hospital which had the potential to affect all residents residing on 3 of 3 units. Findings included:On 1/21/2026 at 1:15 p.m. as a part of the extended survey, an interview was conducted with the Administrator who was asked provide evidence of a transfer agreement with the hospital. The Administrator stated he would look for a copy of the agreement. On 1/22/2026 at 9:20 a.m., the Administrator stated he could not find any evidence of a transfer agreement with the hospital. He stated he was sure the facility would have an agreement but could not find it. There was no evidence of a transfer agreement in the facility's documentation.On 1/22/2026 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Clinical Nurse Consultant who stated the Administrator had checked but could not find a transfer agreement. She stated a transfer agreement was necessary and the hospital had been contacted. During the end of day debriefing on 1/22/2026, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-23 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop a procedure for unvaccinated and vaccinated staff who refuse or are unable to be tested for COVID-19 in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. The findings included: There were no COVID positive staff nor Residents present in the facility during the course of the survey, from 6-21-22 through 6-23-22. Staff were observed wearing eye protection and face masks during the survey in accordance with community transmission rates, and according to CDC guidance. Staff were interviewed and asked what the procedure was for those staff who are unable or unwilling to be tested. Two direct care staff members, and one house keeping staff member, were interviewed. Each of them stated they did not know, and would ask the Director of Nursing (DON). On 6-22-22 at 10:00 a.m., the DON was asked for policies regarding testing of staff. The document title was Universal COVID-19 Testing Policy. The policy was reviewed and revealed under General Considerations, Staff who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for screening employees for 8 employees (Employee#1, Employee #4, Employee #5, Employee #8, Employee #9, Employee #10, Employee #16, Employee #23) in a sample size of 25 employees. The findings included: On [DATE], the facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Abuse Prevention Program. In Section 2(a), it was documented, Conduct employee background checks and will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has (a) been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law . Section 2(b) documented, .had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property . On [DATE] at approximately 10:45 A.M., this surveyor and Employee E, the Human Resources Manager, reviewed 25 employee files which revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident interview, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed within 30 days of admission (prior to admission is being waived due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency) for 1 resident (Resident #11) in a sample of 19 residents. For Resident #11, facility staff failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed within 30 days of admission. The Findings included: Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Schizophrenia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder. On 6-22-22 an observation, Resident interview, and review of Resident #11's record was conducted. Resident #11 was noted to have diagnoses including schizophrenia, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Geriatric psychiatry notes, resident history, and admission information revealed that the illnesses were long standing. No previous to admission PASARR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to accommodate needs and preferences for 7 residents (Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #5, Resident #28, Resident #190, Resident #20, Resident #6) in a sample size of 25 residents. 1. For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to answer the call light in a timely fashion to provide needed care and services for 2 of 14 opportunities the call light was activated. 2. For Resident #15, the facility staff failed to answer the call light in a timely fashion to provide needed care and services for 3 of 15 opportunities the call light was activated. 3. Resident #5 was not provided a hoyer lift sling to get out of bed in the morning on 5-14-19 due to lack of equipment. 4. For Resident # 28 the facility staff failed to answer call bells in timely manner for a Resident who requires assistance with transfer and ambulation. 5. For Resident #190 the facility staff failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 Residents (Residents # 7, # 190, #5) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. 1a. For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to administer medications per physicians order and; 1b. failed to document that an entry was a late entry. 2. For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to administer 2 consecutive doses of insulin on 05/12/2019 as indicated by sliding scale per physician's orders. 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to ensure insulin was administered on 5-11-19 as ordered by a physician. The findings include: 1a. For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to administer medications per physicians order and; 1b. failed to document that an entry was a late entry. Resident # 190, a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] the Resident had no (Minimum Data Set) MDS information available…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of seven Residents (Resident #20, Resident #190, Resident #28, Resident #189, Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #6) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. 1. For Resident #20, the facility staff failed to have adequate staff to respond to the Resident's call bell and request for assistance for three hours. 2. For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate staff available to answer call bell in a timely manner. 3. For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate staff available to answer call bell in a timely manner. 4. For Resident #189, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient staff to safely lift Resident using Hoyer. 5. For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to answer the call light in a timely fashion to provide needed care and services for 2 of 14 opportunities the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to prevent significant medication errors. The facility failed to administer insulin on 5 separate occasions for 3 of 25 sampled residents. 1. For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to administer 2 consecutive doses of insulin on 05/12/2019 as indicated by sliding scale per physician's orders. 2. For Resident # 190 the facility staff omitted giving insulin at 4:30 PM on two consecutive days. 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to ensure insulin was administered on 5-11-19 as ordered by a physician. The findings included: 1. For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to administer 2 consecutive doses of insulin on 05/12/2019 as indicated by sliding scale per physician's orders. Resident #7, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, aphasia following cerebral infarction, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to follow infection prevention protocols. The dietary manager was observed not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in the room of a resident on contact isolation for clostridium difficile. The dietary manager then exited the room without washing hands and entered two other resident rooms without performing hand hygiene. The findings included: On 05/16/19 at 08:35 AM, the dietary manager was observed in the room of Resident #92. There was personal protective equipment stationed outside the room door and a Stop sign posted next to the door. The dietary manager was observed standing inside the room talking with Resident #92 (seated in a chair) and a family member (standing next to Resident #92). The dietary manager and the family member were not wearing PPE. The dietary manager was observed shaking the family member's hand then stooped down next to Resident #92, leg touching the side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure one Residents was free from neglect for 1 of 25 sampled Residents (#34). For Resident #34 who had a recent history of falls with fracture, the facility staff left the Resident on the toilet without supervision, neglecting the Resident's known needs, and the Resident fell. The findings included: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; Dementia, glaucoma, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and fall with fracture of the tibia, and fibula, and was non-weight bearing at the time of admission from the hospital for surgery related to that fracture on 12-26-18. The Resident was also hard of hearing and wore hearing aids. Resident #34's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3-20-19. Resident #34 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 7, indicating moderate cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,405 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,405 — penalty dated 2026-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INGLESIDE ENGAGED LIVING — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA