No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Solomons Nursing And Rehab Center

13325 Dowell Road, Solomons, MD 20688 · For profit - Individual · 95 certified beds · (410) 326-0077 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$225,946 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $225,946 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
14090 Hg Trueman Rd Ste 1300 · (410) 394-2800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
13300 Hg Trueman Rd · (410) 394-6236 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13300 H G Trueman Rd · (410) 394-6236 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13300 Dowell Rd · (410) 474-0888 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
 

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.3%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.2%22.8%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.1%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.5%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.8%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.5%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%9.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.311.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.161.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 456 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 191 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.7%CMS range 59.8–67.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.9%CMS range 11.7–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 4.2–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
53.0%
Total nursing turnover
61.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 94.6 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-02)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, review of facility grievance logs, and resident medical records it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from physical and verbal abuse. This finding was evident for 3 out of 9 residents (#58, #291, and # 18) reviewed for abuse. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that this concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy, and the facility was notified in writing of this determination at 6:00 PM on 8/23/24. The facility submitted an abatement plan to remove the immediacy while surveyors were on site. The abatement plan was accepted by the OHCQ at 11:30 PM on 8/23/24. The findings include: 1. On 8/19/24 at 11:00 AM, an interview with the Ombudsman revealed that Resident #58, reported that GNA/CMA #19 screams at him/her (Resident #58) a lot. The resident could not recall the correct pronunciation of GNA/CMA #19's name but he/she could identify her. The Ombudsman stated that they got permission from Resident #58 to speak to the surveyors. On 8/19/24 at 11:40 AM the surveyor observed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-08-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment for an identified foot concern that resulted in harm to the resident. This was found evident in 1 (Resident # 296) out of 1 resident reviewed for foot care. The findings include: On 8/14/24 at 12:22 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #296's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #296 was admitted to the facility in early 2017 and had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage), hyperlipidemia (too many lipids/fats in blood which can clog arteries) and dementia. Further review of the medical record revealed on 2/24/21 a Podiatrist (a healthcare provider who specializes in treatment of the feet) treated Resident #296 and described the treatment and recommendations in a note. The note documented that the right great toe was erythematous (abnormally reddened/inflamed) at the visit. If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were delivered to residents at safe and palatable temperatures. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 1 resident during test tray and tray service line temperature observations. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who receive meals prepared by the facility. The findings include: Hot food must be served at 135 F (57 C) or above. Cold food must be served at 41 F (5 C) or below. All foods must be stored, held, and served at these temperatures to ensure safety, prevent bacterial growth, and maintain palatability. Staff must monitor and document temperatures according to facility policy and food safety regulations.On 01/28/2026 at 11:58 AM, during a kitchen tray service line observation with facility [NAME] #17, the surveyor observed the following food and beverage temperatures: pork loin at 100 F, apple juice at 43 F, and a milkshake at 42 F.On 01/28/2026 at 12:00 PM, an interview was conducted with [NAME] #17 regarding food temperatures.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner consistent with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident in 2 of the 3 kitchen observations conducted during the recertification survey.The findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen conducted on 01/22/2026 at 8:028 AM the Surveyor and Food Service Director (FSD) observed the following expired food items in the dry storage area: 1 bottle Imperial Ground Allspice, expired 11/10/2020; 1 bottle Imperial Fancy Spanish Paprika, expired 9/14/2024; 2 bottles Imperial Ground Allspice, expired 1/12/2022; 1 bottle Italian Seasoning, expires 9/15/2025; 1 bottle Crushed Red Pepper, expired 1/31/2024; 6 packages Lemon Pudding Mix, expired 5/10/2024; 1 box Animal Crackers, expired 8/8/2025; 1 box Oreo Cookies, expired 3/21/2025; 1 box Cheez-It Snack Crackers, expired 9/4/2025; 1 box [NAME] Shortbread Cookies, expired 8/22/2025; 1 box Nabisco [NAME] Crackers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents dignity. This was evident for 2 (Resident #9 and #69) out of 2 residents observed for dignity and privacy during the recertification survey.The findings include: A urinary catheter is a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine. The catheter is connected to a drainage bag, which collects the urine. A catheter privacy bag, often called a catheter bag cover or holder, is a discreet pouch designed to cover and conceal urine collection bags. It promotes dignity, reduces embarrassment in public, and securely holds drainage bags to wheelchairs, walkers, or bedside rails using straps. 1. On 01/22/2026 at 10:42 AM, an observation was made of Resident #9 in his/her room. The Resident's urinary catheter bag was hooked to the side of the wheelchair, and the catheter did not have a privacy bag. On 02/02/2026 at 9:54 AM, a record review of the facility's Catheter Care Policy showed that it requires, Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident rooms and laundry room were kept in a clean homelike environment. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #7, #17, & #91) out of 9 Resident rooms and 1 out of 1 soiled laundry room observed for a clean homelike environment during the re-certification survey. The findings include: During a random observation conducted on 01/22/2026 at 10:35 AM, the Surveyor observed holes that went across the wall at the baseboard in Resident #7's bathroom. During an interview conducted on 01/22/2026 at 10:53 AM the Surveyor observed peeling paint on the wall behind Resident #17's bed. During an interview conducted on 01/22/2026 at 11:19 AM, the Surveyor observed peeling paint and holes on the wall behind the Resident's bed. During an observation conducted on 01/30/2026 at 8:23 AM, the Surveyor observed multiple brown stains on the ceiling tiles in the soiled laundry area above the washer and dryers. On 02/02/2026 at 8:32 AM the Surveyor and Maintenance Director (MD) toured the facility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident representative received the completed bed hold notification form in writing. This was evident for 1 (Resident #101) of 2 residents reviewed for transfers during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:Bed-hold: Holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from thefacility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization.On 01/23/2026 at 11:14 AM, a review of Resident #101 medical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was a completed and signed copy of the notice to transfer form in the medical record dated 11/11/2025. There was a copy of a bed hold form that had the resident's name written on the form and the rest of the form was left blank. On 01/23/2026 at 11:30 AM, a copy of the bed hold form for Resident #101's transfer on 11/11/25 was requested from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was invited and provided quarterly care plan meetings. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 7 and #61) out 2 Residents reviewed for care plan meetings during the recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan meeting is a required, periodic, interdisciplinary review where nursing home staff, residents, and families discuss and update a resident's personalized care goals, medical needs, and quality of life. These meetings occur at least quarterly or upon a significant change in condition, aiming to ensure the resident receives the highest practicable level of well-being. 1. During an interview conducted on 01/22/26 at 11:10 AM, Resident #7 reported that he/she had never received an invitation to attend their Care plan meetings. During a record review conducted on 02/01/26 at 2:55 PM of Resident #7's care conference (care plan meeting) notes, it was discovered that the resident had not received quarterly care plan meetings. The facility held a care plan meeting on 02/20/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #5& #1) out of 2 Resident reviewed for professional standards of practice during the complaint survey. The findings include: 1)During an interview conducted 01/22/26 at 12:49 PM, Resident #5 was observed grimacing. The Resident reported that he/she had stomach cramps but had not reported it to the nurse. On 01/22/26 at 1:14 PM the Surveyor reported to Registered Nurse (RN) # 2 that Resident #5 complained of stomach cramps. The RN stated that she would see if the Resident had any meds and would check on the resident. During an interview conducted on 01/22/26 at 2:16 PM, Resident #5 reported he/she had not seen the nurse and still had stomach cramps. During an interview conducted on 01/22/26 at 2:19 PM, RN #2 reported that she notified the physician with what the surveyor reported but had not checked on the resident and assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were provided to a Resident in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #84) out of 1 Resident reviewed for ADL care during the recertification survey. The findings include: According to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating. If a sample person has difficulty performing an activity by himself/herself and without special equipment or does not perform the activity at all because of health problems, the person is deemed to have a limitation in that activity. Chuck pads are highly absorbent, waterproof, and disposable or washable under pads designed to protect mattresses, furniture, and car seats from incontinence, spills, or bodily fluids. They feature advanced moisture-locking technology, often with five-layer protection and,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident by 1 (Resident #13) out of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care.The findings include: A sit-to-stand device is a mechanical or motorized assistive device designed to help individuals with limited mobility move safely from a sitting to a standing position, or to transfer between a chair, bed, or wheelchair, while reducing physical strain on both the caregiver and the resident.A Hoyer lift is a motorized device designed to lift and transfer residents from a bed to a chair or wheelchair, or vice versa. The resident is placed in a sling, which the device then lifts, allowing for a safe transfer. This equipment helps reduce the risk of injury to both the resident and the caregiver. On 01/22/2026 at 10:19 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #13. During the interview, the Resident reported having a recent fall. The resident stated that a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) came into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent the development of new pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #13) out of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers.The findings include:Moon Boots are specialized protective boots designed to prevent or treat pressure ulcers on the heels. They help relieve pressure from the heels, reducing the risk of skin breakdown while the resident is in bed or seated for extended periods.A pressure ulcer is an injury to the skin and underlying tissue, usually over a bony area, caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shearing. It can range from redness of intact skin to deep wounds affecting muscle or bone and requires proper prevention and treatment to avoid complications such as infection or delayed healing.On 01/22/2026 at 10:05 AM, an observation of Resident #13 was made in his/her room. The Resident's moon boot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with facility staff, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards. This was evident for 2 (Residents #16 and #26) out of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification survey process.The findings include:On 01/22/2026 at 3:46 PM during unit rounds, the surveyor observed Resident #16 and Resident #26 receiving oxygen therapy in their rooms without an Oxygen in Use sign posted on the residents' doors.On 01/22/2026 at 4:00PM the surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator (a device that provides oxygen from room air) at the bedside of Residents #16 and #26. The oxygen concentrator humidification bottle and oxygen tubing were not labeled to indicate the date placed in use or the required replacement date.On 01/23/2026 at 7:04 AM during unit rounds, the resident#16 called the surveyor's attention and stated that the humidifier bottle contained no water and that his/her nose felt dry. The surveyor confirmed that the humidifier bottle was empty,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately reconciled. This was evident for 1 of 2 medication carts observed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include:On 01/28/2026 at 10:58AM, during an observation of medication cart #1 it was determined that there was a discrepancy with the narcotic count for Resident #56 liquid morphine. The narcotic book was documented as having a count of Morphine 6.5 ml (milliters) and the morphine bottle contained approximately 12 ml when observed by this surveyor. On 01/28/2026 at 11:10 AM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN ) #7 verified the narcotic count for Resident #56 morphine count was approximately off by 5.5ml. LPN #7 stated she goes by the narcotic book count and subtracted administered doses from the documented count in the narcotic book. LPN #7 confirmed she had not looked at the bottle to validate if the count was accurate. During an interview conducted on 01/28/26 at approximately 12:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) brought 2 bottles of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and wasted. This was evident for 1of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed during the annual recertification survey. The findings include:A facility is required to secure all medications in a locked storage area and to limit access to authorized personnel. Storage areas may include, but are not limited to, drawers, cabinets, medication rooms, refrigerators, and carts. When medications are not stored in separately locked compartments within a storage area, only appropriately authorized staff may have access to the storage area.1/28/2026 at 11:23 AM, Surveyors observed the locked medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER] with RN Unit Manager #2 the room was observed to have multiple items that were not medications stored in there:unlabeled bag for resident that contained 2 unopened beer bottles, 1 bottle of unopened alcohol, 2 unopened soda cans , and 2 magazinestin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident#1) out of 1 Resident reviewed for therapeutic diet during the recertification survey. The findings include: During a random observation conducted 02/02/26 at 8:00 AM, the Surveyor observed Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) #21deliver Resident #1's breakfast tray. The Resident complained to the GNA that he/she did not get double portions, the extra milk and cold cereal that was requested. The GNA observed the Resident's breakfast tray and agreed with the Resident. She removed the tray and stated that she would get a new tray from the kitchen. The Resident reported to the Surveyor that this happens almost every day. The Resident reported that once the tray is taken back the wait time is about 30 minutes before the correct tray is provided. A review of the resident meal ticket revealed a therapeutic diet order for mechanical soft ground and double portions. On 02/02/2026 8:19 AM this surveyor returned and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) of 20 residents reviewed for accurate medical record documentation.The findings include:During a review of the Medication Administration Record for Resident #69 on 1/30/2026 at 6:38 AM it was discovered that Resident #69 had an order for: Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 milligram, Give 2 tablet by mouth every 3 hours for anxiety/shortness of breath which was signed of as given on 1/30/2026 at 2:00 AM and 5:00 AM. An additional order was for Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 Milligram (mg) per milliliter, (mL), Give 0.5 mL by mouth every 3 hours for agitation, air hunger 0.5 mL = 1 mg which was signed off as given on 1/30/2026 at 2:00 AM and 5:00 AM. During a continued review of the orders for Resident #69 it was discovered that there was an order placed on 1/29/2026 to discontinue Lorazepam pills when liquid arrives. Do not give both the pills and liquid. It was revealed that the order for the Lorazepam pills was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have a designated Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) member for their hospice services. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #7) out of 1 Resident reviewed for hospice services during the recertification survey. The findings include: Hospice is a specialized, holistic, and palliative care approach for individuals with terminal illnesses typically with a prognosis of 6 months or less to live, designed to provide comfort, dignity, and pain management rather than curative treatment. It focuses on the patient's quality of life, offering physical, emotional, and spiritual support to both patients and their families, often in the comfort of home. During an interview conducted on 01/22/26 at 11:07 AM, Resident #7 advised that he/she received hospice services. During a record review conducted on 02/01/2026 at 3:19 PM, Resident #7's medical records revealed that the resident was placed on hospice on 02/17/25 with Chesapeake Hospice for heart failure. According to the Resident's medical records, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff practiced infection control. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #9 and #69) out of 2 Residents observed for infection control during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1. During a random observation conducted on 01/22/26 at 11:39 AM, the Surveyor observed Activities Aide #25 push Resident #9 in a wheelchair down the hallway from the activities room. The Surveyor heard a dragging sound and observed the Resident's foley catheter bag dragging across the floor as the Activities Aide pushed the resident in the wheelchair down the hallway past the nursing station and to the resident's room. During an interview conducted on 01/22/26 at 11:40 AM, Activities Aide #25 reported that he had not noticed that the foley catheter bag was dragging on the floor. The Activities Aide looked at the foley catheter bag and stated oh it's on the floor, they usually hang it higher, so it does not touch the floor. During an interview conducted on 01/22/26 at 11:49 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure education was provided to staff for the current Covid-19 vaccinations. This was found to be evident for 110 out of 110 staff employed at the facility reviewed for infection control during the recertification survey. The findings include: During a review of the staff Covid-19 vaccinations status with the Infection Control Preventionist conducted on 01/30/26 at 11:30 AM, the Surveyor was unable to locate the education for the current Covid-19 status. During an interview conducted on 01/30/26 at 11:33 AM, the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) reported that there were only 2 staff members who had received the current Covid-19 vaccination. The ICP explained that she conducts a flu clinic for the staff that included an option for the staff to go to Walgreens to receive the current Covid-19 vaccination. When asked if the staff were provided education for the current Covid-19 vaccination, the ICP replied no, she had not provided education but going forward she would make sure she offered education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess, document, and notify the physician, oncoming staff, and the responsible party of a fall for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, revised 12/2025 indicated 9. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: a. Assess the resident. b. Complete a post-fall assessment. c. Complete an incident report. d. Notify physician and family. e. Review the resident's care plan and update as indicated. f. Document all assessments and actions. g. Obtain witness statements in the case of injury. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 09/19/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included heart failure, polyneuropathy disorders of the bone density, protein-calorie malnutrition, and anemia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/21/2025, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in resident rooms. This was evident for 7 of 7 resident rooms reviewed during the environmental survey. The findings include: On 3/4/25 at 9:20 AM, a tour was conducted of rooms 79, 10, 18, 17, 32, 33, and 16, all of which were being reviewed for an increase in occupancy. The tour was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Maintenance. The tour revealed the following concerns: - room [ROOM NUMBER]: no towel hanger in the bathroom - room [ROOM NUMBER]: no towel hanger in the bathroom. Damage noted to the footboard of the bed - the protective outer layer of the footboard was damaged and peeling away, exposing the inner particle board. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: no towel hanger in the bathroom. Damage noted to the footboard of the bed nearer the door - the protective outer layer of the footboard was damaged and peeling away, exposing the inner particle board. - room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident bathrooms had effective mechanical ventilation. This was evident for 5 of 7 resident rooms reviewed during the environmental survey. The findings include: On 3/4/25 at 9:20 AM, a tour was conducted of rooms 79, 10, 18, 17, 32, 33, and 16, all of which were being reviewed for an increase in occupancy. The tour was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Maintenance. All rooms included a bathroom attached to the room that included a sink and a commode. As part of the tour, effective mechanical ventilation in the bathroom was tested by observing if a thin piece of paper was drawn towards and held against the ventilation intake on the ceiling. This test was performed by the Director of Maintenance. This test showed effective ventilation in the bathrooms of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], but failed to show effective ventilation in the bathrooms of rooms 18, 17, 32, 33, and 16. The Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make an effort to resolve residents' grievances. This was found to be true for 2 of 2 grievances for Resident #58, 1 of 1 grievance for Resident #18, and 6 out of 8 grievances for Resident #291. The findings include: 1a) Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, heart failure, chronic obstructive kidney disease, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Additional review of Resident #58's medical record showed a care plan created on 1/11/23 that stated Resident #58 has activities of daily living (ADL) limitations/deficits requiring staff assistance of 1 person for toilet use and transfers between surfaces. On 8/19/23 12: 45 PM Surveyors reviewed the grievance logs from 2023 through 2024. During review of the 2023 grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to: 1) ensure that residents' allegations of theft were reported to in a timely manner and 2) respond to and report allegations of abuse. This was evident for 5 (Resident #68, Resident #42 and Resident #291, Resident #58, and Resident #18) of 10 residents reviewed for timely reporting and abuse. The findings: 1a) On 08/19/24 at 10:27 AM the surveyor reviewed a facility reported incident (FRI), #MD00206250, sent to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) on 6/3/24 which stated that Resident #68 reported $100 was taken from his/her wallet. The surveyor observed that the report was submitted on 6/3/24 and the date of the incident documented as 6/26/24. The discrepancy was pointed out to the Director of Nursing (DON) who confirmed it was an error and that the incident was reported to the facility by the resident on 5/25/24 and not 6/26/24. Additional review of the FRI investigation revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's investigation files, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and maintain the records of their investigation. This was found evident for 6 (Resident #291, #283, #58, #18, #28 and #38) out of 10 residents investigated for abuse. The findings include: 1a) On 8/22/24 at 9 AM, the surveyor reviewed the investigation the facility conducted into the allegation that GNA #11 hit Resident #283 on the head three times while providing care. The summary of the investigation described that an interview was conducted with Resident #291 and Resident #291's roommate, a witness. It also described a statement was taken from GNA #11, the alleged perpetrator, who denied the allegation. The reports stated that 4 other Residents that GNA #11 was assigned to were interviewed, however it did not state the results of the interviews or have copies of the interviews that were conducted. No GNA assignment documentation was in the file to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine administration of medications timely. This was found evident in 1 (Resident # 298) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The finding include: On 8/15/24 at 1:16 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #298's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #298 was admitted to the facility early April of 2021 with a past medical history that included, but is not limited to, type 2 diabetes, disorientation, epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes seizures), and acute cystitis (infection/inflammation of the urinary tract system). The surveyor reviewed a progress note written on 4/17/21 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 that stated at 10:40 AM, upon initial assessment, Resident #298 was found nearly unresponsive and per report from the aide was not responsive enough to eat breakfast this morning. The surveyor next reviewed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April of 2021. The record revealed that Resident # 289 was given a scheduled 6 AM medication at 6:18 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was delivered to residents at an appropriate and palatable temperature. This was evident for 1 out of 1 observation of test tray temperatures. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who eat food prepared by the facility. The findings include: On 8/08/24 at 10:00 AM, the Surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #74. During the interview, the resident stated that the food is lukewarm and not palatable. In addition, the Surveyors received complaints from resident families stating that the food is cold by the time it reaches their loved one. On 8/15/24 at 11:40 AM, the Surveyor observed preparation for the lunch tray line. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #6 was present during the Surveyor's observation of the tray line. The first tray was prepared at 12:00 PM. Trays were prepared accordingly, placed in a meal cart, and immediately taken to the appropriate unit. The Surveyor was informed that the meal trays are delivered to each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents who eat the food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include: During a tour of the facility's kitchen conducted on 8/13/24 at 8:30 AM, the Surveyor inspected the main walk-in refrigerator. The Surveyor observed a shelf containing an opened and unlabeled 1-gallon tub of Sysco mayo, a 1-gallon tub of Sysco mustard with a received date of 3/1 on the lid, and 1 gallon tub of Kens Homestyle Ranch with a received date of 7/29. During a continued tour of the kitchen, the Surveyor observed the dry goods storage pantry. The Surveyor noted an opened and unlabeled 28 oz box of Quaker Cream Of Wheat with a use first label, Ralson Foods Quick oats with a use first label, tub of Goldmetal Chocolate Fudge icing with a use first label, 26 oz pack of Idahoan classic mashed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards. This was evident for 3 (Resident #64, Resident #34, and Resident #44) out of 56 resident records reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life-sustaining treatment options. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a lifesaving technique used in emergencies in which someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) is an order placed in a person's medical record by a doctor informs the medical staff that CPR should not be attempted. Do Not Intubate (DNI) is an order placed in a person's medical record by a doctor informs the medical staff that chest compressions and cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Resident's health care Responsible Party (RP) of a change to the Resident's plan of care. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #290) of 4 Residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: On 8/14/24 at 9:52 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #290's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #290 was admitted to the facility in mid 2013. Further review revealed admitting paperwork dated 6/24/23 for Resident #290 that has a spouse/friend listed first and next a Responsible Party (RP) with a comment (representative payee). Additionally in the paper record, there was a typed note from the spouse/friend RP that stated, this RP makes medical decision for Resident #290 and to please see Maryland Health Care Decision Act paper signed on 12/15/04. On further review the surveyor noted that the designated financial RP (representative payee) was in attendance at the care plan meeting dated 2/21/19 and 2/27/20. On review of all the other care plan meeting held for Resident #290 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to inform a Resident's Responsible Party (RP) in advance of a change in the residents' plan of care. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #285) of 10 residents reviewed for Resident Rights. The findings include: On 8/27/24 at 1 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #285's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #285 had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, muscle weakness, malnutrition, dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On further review of the record on a progress note dated 9/21/23 written at 7:17 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 described an incident where LPN #18 found Resident #285 on the floor. No injuries were noted after assessment and Resident #285's Responsible Party (RP) was notified. The surveyor next reviewed Resident #285's orders. An order was placed on 9/21/23 for Resident #285 to be changed from mechanical soft diet to pureed texture and chopped meats. No where in the medical record was a reason given for the diet change or that the RP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with staff, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure a resident has a call bell within reach and is able to use it if desired and, 2) provide reasonable accommodations for a resident to assist with mobility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #44) observed during a tour of the facility and 1 (Resident #300) out of 2 residents reviewed for accommodations. The findings include: 1) On 8/8/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #44 laying in their bed and the call bell on the floor at the foot of the bed. The Surveyor expressed this concern with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16, who stated she would take care of it. On 8/9/2024 at 8:00 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #44 laying in their bed. The Surveyor asked Resident #44 where his/her call bell was in case he/she needed to call for assistance. The resident stated he/she did not know. The Surveyor observed the call bell on the floor at the foot of the bed. On 8/9/2024 at 8:10 AM, the Surveyor informed LPN #16 of the second observation. The Surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and family council meeting minutes, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate their prompt response and rationale on concerns from the family council group. This was evident for 5 of the 7 months of family council meeting minute notes reviewed. The findings include: The surveyor reviewed a complaint received at the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) on 10/27/2023. The complaint stated that the Nursing Home Administrator did not respond to the family council group's (FCG) concerns for the months of July, August, and September of 2023. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 10:05 AM with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) the surveyor asked what the process in place regarding family council meetings is. The NHA stated the family council group meets monthly and then sends the meeting minute notes to him monthly by email. The NHA also stated that he responds to monthly meeting minutes every month before the next meeting occurs. The surveyor requested a copy of all monthly meeting minutes from April 2023 to October 2023. In an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0575 — isolated
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure information related to the Resident's [NAME] of Rights, including but not limited to the name and contact information of the Maryland's Long-Term Care Ombudsman program and a statement informing residents that they may file a complaint with Maryland's Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, was posted in easily viewed and accessible locations. This was found to be evident on all units/halls with resident care areas. The findings include: On 08/20/24 at 12:05 PM the surveyor toured all units with resident care areas in the facility. Observation of the Chesapeake, Patuxent, The Lodge, and Rehab area revealed that there were no signs posted showing the Residents [NAME] of Rights, information on how to contact and/or make a complaint to the state survey agency and the ombudsman office at the Department of Aging. During an interview with Staff #10 on 08/20/24 01:10 PM, the surveyor asked Staff #10 if there were any Resident Rights or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to display the results of the annual recertification survey and plan of correction in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives. This was evident in 1 of 1 survey results book posted in the facility. The findings include: Surveyor observation of the lobby on 8/6/24 at 9 AM and 8/7/24 at 7:15 AM revealed no evidence of the survey inspection results in an open and readily accessible area for residents, staff, and visitors to review and a tour of the facility did not reveal any signs posted telling residents where the state survey results were located. On 8/7/24 at 7:30 AM an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the Survey Results binder was located in the Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) office. The DON confirmed the book would be provided to the survey team upon the NHA's arrival to the facility. On 8/7/24 at 8: 00 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator provided the survey team with the Survey Results binder. The NHA stated the book may have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that copies of the resident's Advanced Directives have been obtained and maintained in the resident's medical record. This was evident for 3 (Resident # 8, #70 and #291) out of 4 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The findings include: An Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. 1) On 8/8/2024 at 12:05 PM, a review of Resident #70's electronic and paper medical record, revealed no documents that indicated the resident's written Advanced Directive. On 8/13/2024 at 11:31 AM, the Surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Social Services, Social Worker (SW) #17. SW #17 informed the Surveyor that she interviews the resident and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide written transfer notice to the resident and/or the responsible representative. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #8 and #20) of 2 residents reviewed for Hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) On 08/15/24 at 10:00 AM a review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/06/24, Resident #8 was transferred to the hospital and returned 1/10/24, then transferred again to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 06/28/24. On both occasions, there was no documentation and/or evidence in the medical record to indicate that the facility staff notified Resident#8 /Resident #8's representative (RP) in writing of the reason for the transfers to the hosptal. 08/16/24 at 11:25 AM the Administrator gave surveyor documents which revealed that the Ombudsman was notified of Resident #8's transfers to the hospital. No document was given to verify that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) conduct care plan meetings after each Resident Assessment, 2) hold quarterly care plan meetings for residents, and 3) failed to include interventions for a resident's activity care plan. This was found evident in 3 (Resident #290, #8, and #72) out of 4 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team including: the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative (as practicable). 1) On 8/14/24 at 9:52 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent Residents. This was found evident in 2 (#291 & #45) out of 8 Residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) cares. The findings include: 1a) On 8/20/24 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident # 291's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #291 was admitted in late January 2023. Further review revealed that Resident #291 had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dysphonia (disorder of the voice), muscle weakness, unsteadiness of feet and need for assistance with personal cares. On further review a progress note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 stated Resident #291 requires extensive assistance with ADLs and uses a wheelchair and walker while in the facility. On 8/21/24 at 12:20 the surveyor requested shower records for Resident #291 from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 8/22/24 at 7:16 AM, the surveyor reviewed the shower and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record facility policy review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) adequately document responses to treatment of skin conditions and 2) provide 2-person assistance to ensure resident safety during transfers. This was found evident for 2 (Resident #291 an #29) of 4 residents reviewed for wounds and resident- assisted transfers. The findings include: 1) On 8/20/24 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident # 291's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #291 was admitted in late January 2023. Further review revealed that Resident #291 had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, dysphagia, dysphonia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness of feet and need for assistance with personal cares. The surveyor reviewed the progress notes for Resident #291 and discovered on 2/20/23 that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 documented that Resident #291 had an open area to the coccyx and that the area was cleaned, a foam dressing was applied and the doctor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, review of medical records and interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment to maintain an individual's limited range of motion. This finding was evident for 1 (Resident# 6) of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion. The findings include: On 8/8/24 at 8:15 AM the surveyor observed Resident #6 sitting in a wheelchair in his/her room using the left hand to stabilize the right arm which was flaccid. On 8/13/24 at 9:31 AM while in the hallway, the surveyor again observed Resident #6 sitting in a wheelchair using her/his left hand to support the right arm which was pressed against the inside of the wheelchair. The surveyor enquired from Staff #18 whether Resident # 6 should have an arm support. Staff # 18 replied yes and proceeded to the resident's room, retrieved a splint and placed it on Resident #6's right arm. A review of Resident #6's medical record on 08/13/24 at 08:31AM revealed that the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the daily staffing sheets and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) providing services for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This was found to be evident 4 out of 19 days reviewed for sufficient and competent nursing staff during the annual survey. The findings include: During the entrance conference on 8/6/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility did not have any Federal or State nursing staffing waivers. On 8/22/24 at 8:34 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the daily staffing sheets from 7/22/24 through 8/5/24. On 7/28/2024, there was no RN coverage for 24 hours. On 8/27/24 at 11:05 AM, the Surveyor conducted an interview with Staff Scheduler #30. During the interview, the Surveyor was informed that finding RN coverage for the weekend shifts are a challenge and that most of the time there is no RN coverage on the weekends. Staff Scheduler #30 also informed the Surveyor that there is a weekend supervisor that will start soon, and that person is an RN. During additional review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. This was evident for 2 (Resident #72 and Resident # 22) out of 56 residents observed for Infection Control. The findings include: Droplet precautions are a set of measures used to prevent the spread of infections caused by germs that spread through coughing, sneezing or talking. 1) Review of record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Muscle Weakness, Unsteadiness on Feet. Resident #72 had a history of falls, and his/her plan of care included an intervention dated 08/05/24 which stated - during periods of significant restlessness and attempting to get out of chair without assistance, offer period of mats on the floor for (NAME) to rest on or engage in activities with supervision. On 7/27/24 Resident #72…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the walk-in freezer was in safe operating condition that prevented ice build-up including ice frozen to the floor. This was found to be evident for the walk-in freezer in the kitchen. The findings include: On 8/13/24 at 8:30 AM, the Surveyor conducted a follow up tour of the kitchen. During the tour, the Surveyor observed the walk-in freezer. Located at the back of the freezer, just below the ceiling, was a two-condenser fan unit. There were tiny mounds of ice on the ceiling of the freezer in front of the left condenser fan. Behind the right condenser fan, was a pipe with ice buildup and icicles. At the back of the freezer, directly below the condenser fan unit and the pipe, was several large mounds of ice across the floor which made that area slippery. On 8/13/24 at 9:45 AM, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #6 confirmed the Surveyors findings in the walk-in freezer. CDM #6 stated that, he has to remove the ice buildup a couple times a week. He informed the Surveyor that a repair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug regimen reviews performed by a consulting pharmacist identified irregularities in residents' medication regimens. This was evidenced by a resident with an order for an as-needed psychotropic medication that was not time-limited being cleared without medication irregularities for the four reviews that took place since the psychotropic was prescribed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #56) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Psychotropic medications affect a person's mental state or mood, and include antipsychotics and antianxiety medication, as well as, other categories of medication. Because elders are particularly susceptible to the effects of psychotropic medicaiton, federal regulation prohibits the use of psychotropic medication in nursing homes that is deemed unnecessary. This includes the use of psychotropic medication used on an as-needed basis for longer than a 14-day trial period without due explanation for such use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' drug regimens remained free of unnecessary psychotropic medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #56) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Psychotropic medications affect a person's mental state or mood, and include antipsychotics and antianxiety medication, as well as other categories of medication. Because elders are particularly susceptible to the effects of psychotropic medicaiton, federal regulation prohibits the use of psychotropic medication in nursing homes that is deemed unnecessary. This includes the use of psychotropic medication used on an as-needed basis for longer than a 14-day trial period without due explanation for such use. The findings include: Resident #56's medical record was reviewed on 9/11/19 at 1:53 PM. During the review, it was noted that Resident #56 was written for an antianxiety medication with a start date of 5/6/2019. The text of the order read, Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-09-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse staffing data was posted daily. This was evident for nurse staff information posted in both nursing units. The findings include: During an observation that took place on 9/12/19 at 2:25 PM, a document titled daily staffing sheet was found posted behind both nurses stations. The staffing sheet contained the names of the licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), certified medication aids (CMAs), and geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) who were working for the current shift. A section at the bottom was labeled, 'census activity,' and was not filled out. It allowed space for the number of working hours all of the above nursing roles were scheduled for as well as the current census. During a follow up observation that took place at 2:35 PM, the Staff Development Coordinator was seen filling out the information in the Census Activity section and a copy of the filled-out form was requested by the survey team. The Staff Development coordinator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$225,946 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

  • $188,013 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $13,674 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $3,798 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $3,176 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $7,409 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GREEN TREE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HERMISOL HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2020
MENDLOWITZ, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF24%since 09/01/2020
STERN, AHARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 09/01/2020
STERN, SIMONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
10-26 NATIONWIDE TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 26%Other / private 20%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$401per resident / day
operating cost
$12,198per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$432per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215270. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next