The Dawn Hill Home for Rehab and Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 120.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of infections relative to disinfecting glucometers (a device used to monitor blood glucose) for 3 of 4 residents observed who require blood glucose monitoring, Resident ID #s 43, 317 and 108. Findings are as follows: 1. According to the facility's policy last revised in March of 2015 titled, diabetes-care of equipment states in part, .5. If a glucometer is to be used for one resident and then reused for another, the device must be cleaned and disinfected between uses. Directions vary between manufacturers and even between models within brands. Follow the glucometer manufacturer's recommendations for cleaning . Review of the glucometer manufacturer's User Instruction Manual Reference titled, Assure Prism Multi Blood Glucose Monitoring System, states in part, .Cleaning and Disinfecting: The disinfection procedure is needed to prevent transmission of blood-borne pathogens. The meter should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-10-31 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain complete admission orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was not administered the prescribed medications after being readmitted to the nursing facility from the hospital, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/29/2024 alleges that the resident was not administered the prescribed amiodarone (a medication that treats a fast or irregular heart rhythm by reducing symptoms and helps avoid life-threatening complications) on his/her readmission to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Additionally, the allegation indicates that the failure resulted in his/her return to the hospital. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, congestive heart failure (CHF, a condition that happens…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an indwelling foley catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and empties the urine into a drainage bag), Resident ID #14.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, obstructive uropathy (a structural or functional hindrance of normal urine flow) and urinary retention.Record review of a hospital discharge document titled, Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident was treated for a catheter associated urinary tract infection with an order for a urology follow-up and consideration of a Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP, a surgical procedure to remove excess prostate tissue through the urethra to relieve urinary problems).Record review revealed that the resident's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality by failing to implement and follow physician orders. Specifically, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for a cancer center referral for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #102, and failed to appropriately manage and follow physician orders related to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line-a thin, flexible tube inserted into a peripheral vein in the upper arm and advanced to a large central vein near the heart-for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a PICC line, Resident ID #138. Findings are as follows:1. According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, which states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 26 opportunities for error observed during the medication administration task, there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 7.69% affecting Resident ID #s 51 and 75.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines dated February 2026, states in part, .Medication Preparation: Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual client on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Compare the medication and dosage schedule on the client's MAR with the medication label.Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber.1. Record review revealed Resident ID #75 has a physician's order for Miralax (a medication prescribed to treat constipation) oral powder 17 Gram two times a day, dilute with at least 4 ounces (oz) of fluid.During a surveyor observation during the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff, and resident representative interview, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's representative of a significant change in condition, which included an injury of unknown origin as the resident was found to have sustained fractures of his/her right ankle for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health, on 3/19/2026 alleged that the resident's representative was not informed of an injury the resident sustained and the possible cause.Review of the facility's policy dated 10/19/2023 and titled Notification of Change in Resident's Condition states in part, .responsible family members or legal representatives shall be notified as soon as possible, or within 24 hours, of any changes in the resident's condition. The nurse on duty shall be responsible for notifying the resident's responsible family members when a change occurs.these changes shall include significant changes in physical.as well as any accidents that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations including injuries of unknown origin, were reported to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the injuries were identified, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who sustained an injury of unknown origin, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to RIDOH on 3/19/2026 alleged that Resident ID #1 sustained an injury of unknown origin and that the resident's family was not notified by the facility at the time of the discovery. The complainant reported that notification was received from the hospice agency.Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. The resident was admitted on and continues to receive hospice services (a specialized care for individuals with a terminal illness and are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who sustained fractures to his/her right ankle, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/19/2026 alleged that the resident sustained an injury of unknown origin and that the resident's representative was not informed of the injury or the possible cause.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. The resident was admitted to the facility while receiving and continues to receive hospice services (a specialized care for individuals with a terminal illness who are approaching the end of life). Record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is non-ambulatory (a person who is unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the clinical record and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality by not following the physician's orders. This failure involved 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was prescribed a medication to prevent an adverse reaction after being served food to which the resident had a known allergy, Resident ID #2.According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/27/2026 alleges that Resident ID #2 experienced an acute medical episode as a result of an allergic reaction.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia.Review of the resident's listed allergies revealed s/he has an allergy to tomatoes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record and staff interview, the facility served food to a resident that s/he had a known allergy to, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/27/2026 alleges that Resident ID #2 experienced an acute medical episode as a result of an allergic reaction.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia.Review of the resident's listed allergies revealed s/he has an allergy to tomatoes. Further review revealed the tomato sauce allergy was entered into his/her electronic health record on 6/24/2025. Additionally, it revealed the severity of the tomato allergy was unknown.Review of a progress note authored by the Nurse Practitioner dated 10/9/2025 at 10:30 AM states in part, .Patient [Resident ID #2] was also noted to have eaten red tomato sauce in [his/her] food this afternoon which [s/he] has an allergy to.continued close monitoring for any signs and symptoms of allergic reaction.During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 2 of 3 residents reviewed receiving an antihypertensive (a medication prescribed to lower blood pressure) medication, Resident ID #s 1 and 2. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 5/27/2025 for Hydralazine 50 milligrams (mg) three times a day, give if the systolic blood pressure (SBP; refers to the top number of a blood pressure reading and indicates the pressure in your arteries when your heart contracts) is greater than 160. Record review of the May and June 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed on the following dates and times the Hydralazine was administered when the SBP was less than 160: -5/27 at 2:00 PM, SBP of 118 -5/27 at 8:00 PM, SBP of 117 -5/28 at 9:00 AM, SBP of 132 -5/28 at 2:00 PM, SBP of 132…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/12/2025 alleged in part that Resident ID #1 was discharged from a hospital at 11:00 AM and admitted to the facility on [DATE] after undergoing extensive back surgery. Additionally, the facility did not have any of his/her medications available, and s/he was subsequently transferred back to the hospital for pain management later that same day. Further, his/her neurosurgeon had ordered Decadron (a steroid medication prescribed to treat inflammation), however the nursing facility was unaware s/he was prescribed it. 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,765 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $12,387 — penalty dated 2024-10-15
• $21,378 — penalty dated 2023-12-27
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-10 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GREEN TREE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI