Homewood Living Williamsport

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 328 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 78.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interview; it was determined that the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident (resident #900) from physical abuse from a facility staff member. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. After the incident, the facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures.The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction is 2/20/23 The following terms are defined for comprehension of the investigative findings: Minimum Data Set (MDS): The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a comprehensive assessment of a resident completed by facility staff. The MDS is a multi-discipline tool that allows many facets of the resident's care [cognition, behavior, mobility, activities of daily living, accidents, activities, weight, pain, and medications to name a few] to be addressed. The MDS assessment is part of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interview; the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident (resident #901) from a fall with major injury when facility nursing staff failed to delete an incorrect order for sleep medication (Ambien) from the resident ' s medical record. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Surveyor review of resident #901's medical record on 8/8/24 at 12:00pm revealed resident #901 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation after orthopedic surgery. Further review of the resident ' s medical record on 8/8/24 at 12:05pm revealed the resident had a witnessed fall on 9/11/22 at 8:30am. The resident was transferred to a local hospital and was diagnosed with a fracture of the bones near the left eye. Surveyor review of the fall incident report on 8/8/24 at 12:34pm revealed resident #901 fell while being assisted by his/her assigned GNA to the bathroom. The resident was ambulating with a rolling walker when the resident lost his/her balance and fell toward his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, administrative record review, policy review and staff interview; the facility failed to protect vulnerable residents (resident #901 & #174) from a significant medication error. This was evident for 2 of 30 residents reviewed during the survey. This deficient practice resulted in harm to resident # 901 who had a fall incident (accident) with major injury. The findings include: 1.) Surveyor review of resident #901's medical record on 8/8/24 at 12:00pm revealed resident #901 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation after orthopedic surgery. Further review of the resident's medical record on 8/8/24 at 12:05pm revealed the resident had a witnessed fall on 9/11/22 at 8:30am. The resident was transferred to a local hospital and was diagnosed with a fracture of the bones near the left eye. Surveyor review of the fall incident report on 8/8/24 at 12:34pm revealed resident #901 fell while being assisted by his/her assigned GNA to the bathroom. The resident was ambulating with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2019-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility report review, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that safety interventions were followed and that the physician was provided sufficient notification regarding a recent fall with injury This is evident for 1 (#272) of 2 residents reviewed for provision of quality of care. These failures resulted in a finding of actual harm for Resident #272. The findings include: Review of the facility's investigation report MD#00139351 revealed that, on 4/12/19 at 8:30 AM, Charge Nurse and Unit Manager observed Resident #272 on the floor, blood on the head and a bruised rug burn noted on forehead. Review of the investigation revealed that the resident's floor mat was not in place at the time of the fall. Review of the progress note, written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on 4/12/19 at 10:05 AM, revealed that Resident #272 was found on the floor in a pool of blood that had come from his/her nose. At 10:56 AM, LPN #2 noted a bruise to the resident's right eye during a follow up assessment. At 11:09 AM, LPN #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity, as evidenced by the failure to knock and request permission before entering a resident's room. This was evident for 1 (Resident #68) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. The findings include:An observation on 1/6/2026 at 8:52 AM showed that Resident #68 had activated the call light for help. Staff #7, a geriatric nurse aid, entered Resident #68's room in response to the call light. However, the observation did not show that Staff #7 knocked on the resident's door or requested permission before entering the room.During an interview at that time, Staff #7 was asked whether she knocked on Resident #68's door before entering the Resident's room. Staff #7 confirmed that she did not and added that she simply wanted to answer the light.A record review later that day indicated that Resident #68 was alert, oriented, able to communicate his/her needs, and able to understand others.In an interview on 1/8/2026 at 1:57 PM, the director of nursing (DON) was informed of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call devices were kept within residents' reach. This was evident in 1 (Resident #9) of 24 residents reviewed in the initial pool of the survey.The findings include:A call device is a communication tool that allows residents to alert staff when they need help.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions.A record review for Resident #9 included an MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS noted that Resident #9 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for most self-care needs. An observation on 1/5/2026 at 9:43 AM showed Resident #9 lying in bed with a call device clipped to the side of the bed. The Resident was asked about the call device; s/he attempted to reach for it but was unable to. The Resident added that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' grievances were identified, investigated, documented, and responded to. This was evident during the annual recertification survey when reviewing the facility resident council. The findings include: 1/08/2026 9:29 AM after an interview with R#3, permission was given to the surveyor to review the resident council meeting minutes, and Staff #12 provided the resident council meeting minutes for January - December 2025 for review. 1/08/2026 11:50 AM The surveyor asked Staff #13, identified as the facility's grievance officer, for copies of the grievance logs for the previous 12 months to correlate with the resident council meeting minutes that had been reviewed. Staff #13 provided the surveyor with the grievance log and the facility policy stating, We have not had any grievances for all of 2025. A binder was provided to the surveyor that contained 2024, 2025, and 2026 grievance logs. 1 entry existed for 12/14/2025 stating that unit manager submitted a grievance, with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Resident Council meeting minutes, grievance logs, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility interfered with residents' right to file grievances by failing to maintain and implement a functional grievance process. This was evident during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: Cross-referencing related findings from F565:Resident complaints documented in Resident Council meetings were screened by the activities staff and handled informally without being recognized or processed as grievances. The absence of a functional grievance system prevented residents' concerns from being formally filed, investigated, documented, or responded to. On 1/08/2026 at 11:59 AM, review of Resident Council meeting minutes from January-December 2025 identified resident complaints regarding call bell response times, food temperature and preferences, frequency of bed linen changes, and staff entering resident rooms without identifying themselves.On 1/08/2026 at 11:50 AM, review of the facility's grievance logs revealed no grievances for 2025, except for one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities to residents based on their comprehensive assessment to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for activities.The findings include:Resident #3 had been a resident of the facility since early 2022. The resident was interviewed on 1/5/26 at 9:34 AM. During the interview, the resident stated, we are trapped like prisoners, we never get to go out.A review of Resident #3's most recent annual comprehensive assessment with a reference date of 9/3/25 was conducted on 1/6/26 at 12:25 PM. The review indicated that the resident had a normal cognitive status, and that it was very important for the resident to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. The resident's care plan for activities was also reviewed and revealed interventions that include please invite and encourage me to go outside when the weather permits dated 8/16/22. In Resident #3's electronic health record, the daily charting for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow an attending physician's order to administer oxygen to a resident. This was evident in 1 (Resident #94) of 1 resident reviewed for Respiratory Care during the survey. The findings include:On 1/5/2026 at 1:55 PM, Resident #94 was observed lying in bed and receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator set to 4 L/min (liters per minute).During a subsequent observation on 1/6/2026 at 9:01 AM, Resident #94 was in bed and continued to receive oxygen via nasal cannula at 4 L/min.A review of Resident #94's medical record contained an attending provider's order initiated on 12/23/25 for oxygen at 2L/min every shift for hypoxia.During an interview on 1/6/2026 at 10:07 AM, staff #10, the head nurse for the second-floor unit, was present in Resident #94's room with the surveyor. Staff was asked to confirm Resident #94's oxygen flow rate at that time; she reported it was set to 4 L/min. Staff #10 then stated that Resident #94 should receive 2 L of oxygen and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to the resident based on professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted into the facility in 2022 with diagnosis that includes but is not limited to lumbar radiculopathy, left shoulder pain, and rupture/tear of the left shoulder rotator-cuff. A review of Resident #3's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for December 2025 was conducted on 1/7/26 at 1:56 PM. The review revealed an order for a narcotic pain medication scheduled to be taken as needed for pain. This medication was administered 14 times. The notes section of the eMAR revealed documentation from the nurses that indicated the resident's pain score, before med administration and the follow up pain score. However, the 12/7/25 at 10 AM administration did not indicate the before and follow-up pain score, the 12/12/25 at 4:56 PM administration had no follow-up pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement infection prevention and control policies and procedures, as evidenced by staff not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before providing direct care to residents. This was evident in 2 (Resident #13 and #12) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.The findings include:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are infection-control interventions designed to reduce the transmission of infection in nursing homes. They involve wearing gowns and gloves during high-contact Resident care activities, such as dressing, bathing or showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting for residents with a central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, or any skin opening requiring dressing. 1.) An interview with Resident #13's representative on 1/5/26 revealed that the Resident had a facility-acquired wound to the sacrum (tailbone) area. A review of Resident #13's medical record included a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility's administration failed to implement its Resident Immunization policy related to current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations to provide residents the opportunity to receive the Prevnar (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) 20) or the PCV15. Eight out of eight residents ((R) 14, R21, R10, R32, R35, R2, R19, and R36) reviewed for immunizations were not offered pneumococcal vaccinations in compliance with CDC recommendations, the facility had never had PCV20 available, and the facility failed to identify the potential for deficient practice in quality assurance. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of residents contracting pneumonia. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Resident Immunization dated 11/08/23 indicated . The facility will offer residents immunization against vaccine-preventable diseases that may be encountered in the facility and as recommended by the CDC Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices . Upon admission or shortly thereafter, each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, review of the facility documentation, and policy review, the Quality Assessment (QA) committee failed to identify quality deficiencies related to the facility's infection control program and take corrective action to ensure that Prevnar (PCV) 20 was offered and provided in accordance with recognized national standards. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who were eligible for the PVC20 vaccine who currently live in the facility. Findings include: Review of a facility document titled Quality Assurance, dated 03/25/22, indicated the Consultant Pharmacist provided the QA committee members with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations of Prevnar20. During an interview on 08/07/24 at 10:17 AM, the Consultant Pharmacist confirmed she participated in the quarterly QA meetings. The Consultant Pharmacist stated during one QA meeting in 2022 she provided the QA members information on the Prevnar20 vaccination and the CDC recommendations. The Consultant Pharmacist was asked why the facility never implemented the CDC…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$42,266 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $42,266 — penalty dated 2024-08-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HOMEWOOD RETIREMENT CENTERS — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD