Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 390 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 244 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.34 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were consistently completed, provide and implement interventions to prevent recurrent pressure ulcers (PU) for 1 of 1 residents (R13) who had a history of facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcers. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm when R13 developed a recurrent pressure ulcer to the right heel. Findings include: R13's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia following intracranial hemorrhage (difficulty understanding or expressing speech following a brain bleed), morbid obesity, muscle weakness, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and arthritis. R13 required maximal assistance with mobility in bed and was dependent on staff for sitting up, lying down, and transfers. The MDS identified R13 as at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries with three current stage 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, treat, monitor, and manage 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pain to the extent possible in accordance with R1's care plan, goals, and preferences. R1 stated pain and was observed having pain. R1 had available morphine sulfate every two hours as needed (PRN), which was not administered to him for his breakthrough pain. Findings include: Upon observation and interview on 11/12/25 at 9:54 a.m. R1 laying in his bed wearing a hospital gown. On his wall was a sign indicating for staff to be gentle and go slow with R1. R1 stated the care was bumpy, R1 referred to himself as an old, skinny man with soft skin. He stated it hurt every time he was moved. R1 stated he took Tylenol, a narcotic, and a steroid. R1 was not aware that he could ask for pain medication when he was having pain. Why didn't they tell me that? Upon observation on 11/12/25 at 10:58 a.m. nursing assistant (NA)-A entered R1's room to start his morning cares. NA-A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure services were provided in a dignified manner to promote quality of life during incontinence care for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for dignity, Findings include:R10's face sheet printed 8/21/25, indicated R10 was admitted to the facility 3/12/25 and had the following diagnoses: hypertensive heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, monoplegia of upper limb following cerebral vascular infarct (loss of voluntary muscle movement related to a stroke), adjustment disorder with depressed mood, pain and need for assistance with personal cares.R10's care plan with last completion date of 8/6/25, indicated a need for activities of daily living (ADL's) assistance with interventions to include assistance with placement of bedpan and extensive staff assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. The care plan identified R10 triggered for altered elimination with interventions to include assistance with placement of urinal, assist with perineal hygiene after toileting, and change incontinent briefs as needed.During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication ordered as needed (PRN) was limited to 14-days or extended to a specific date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for psychotropic medication use.Findings include:R2's quarterly review minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's), and had the following diagnoses: Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, and Dementia. Review of R2's physician signed medication review dated 7/26/25, indicated the following order: Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5MG. Give 0.5MG by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety, give PO/SL. The order had a start date of 7/9/25, but no end date noted. Review of monthly pharmacist recommendation and review dated 8/5/25 indicated the following: ' R2 has a PRN order for an anxiolytic, which has been in place greater than 14…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurately documented and, readily accessible medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 3 of 5 residents (R25, R9, R2) reviewed for advanced directives documentation. This deficient practice gave staff access to inaccurate information. Findings include: R25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R25 was admitted to the facility 9/29/21, had a BIMS of 15 indicating cognitively intact and had the following diagnoses, Diabetes, Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and Multiple Sclerosis (an autoimmune disease that affects the spinal cord).Review of R25's electronic medical record (EMR) on 8/18/25, indicated the code status as DNR, and current orders indicated DNR. However, the Advance Directive link in R25's EMR revealed an outdated POLST which indicated FULL CODE. R9's re-admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a BIMS of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn to prevent the spread of infection for for 2 of 2 residents (R8, R9) observed for COVID-19 transmission based precautions (TBP) and for 1 of 2 residents (R10) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 112 residents who resided in the facility. Findings Include: Review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance dated 4/1/24, Implementation of PPE Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) indicated Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) included: Dressing, Bathing/showering, Transferring, Providing hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain proper holding food temperatures for 18 of 19 residents observed to receive the noon meal on the Reflections unit. Further, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner to prevent potential food-borne illness for 39 residents who currently received ice from the ice machine in the Transitional care unit and Cardiac care unit area, and 36 residents who currently received ice from the ice machine in the Riverbend and cornerstone unit area. Findings include: FOOD TEMPERATURE During an interview on 1/21/25 at 1:20 p.m., family member (FM)-A stated several times when she was at the facility visiting R1, the food was cold and R1 refused to eat the food. FM-A further stated she began bringing food in for R1 to ensure R1 had food to eat. During a continuous observation on 1/21/25 at 11:49 a.m., dietary aide( DA)-A entered the Reflections unit with a covered cart of food trays in a heated cart from the second floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include a resident discharge summary that included a reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with resident's post-discharge medication (both prescribed and over-the-counter) at discharge for seven of ten residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R9, and R12). R1 received R2's Mirtazapine (a medication to treat depression) at discharge. Findings include: According to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, revised and issued 8/8/24: -Reconciliation of Medications: A process of comparing pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications by creating an accurate list of both prescription and over the counter medications that includes the drug name, dosage, frequency, route, and indication for use for the purpose of preventing unintended changes or omissions at transition points in care. R1's Facesheet indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of multiple fractures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 unit ice and water dispensers for resident use were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner on the Cornerstone unit kitchenette. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 unit refrigerators were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to effect 60 residents served by the Cornerstone unit kitchenette. Findings include: On 10/2/24 at 12:43 p.m., family member (FM)-A stated in August of 2024, the family council had shared concerns with management regarding the condition of the Cornerstone unit ice and water dispenser. There was excessive build up of hard water residue on the dispenser, leaving the family members concerned that the residents were ingesting bacteria. On 10/2/24 at 4:10 p.m., FM-B stated she had concerns about debris in the ice and water dispenser on the Cornerstone unit that served her family member. She had approached management about this concern in August 2024. On 10/2/24 at 4:37 p.m., the Cornerstone unit ice and water dispenser was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, labeled, dated, and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to reduce and/or prevent the risk of food borne illness this practice had the potential to affect all 112 residents, staff and guests who consumed foods from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During initial kitchen tour on 7/15/24 at 11:26 a.m., with certified dietary manager (CDM) the following concerns were observed: - Three dietary staff were observed without hairnets as they placed plastic wrap over plates of cooked food. - A reach in refrigerator to the immediate left of the stove top contained the following items of concern: 1) An unsealed bag of shredded cabbage dated 7/8/24. 2) Two open unsealed undated bags of bagels of bagels. 3) A small metal dish containing an undated, unidentified liquid, partially covered with plastic wrap. 4) An undated plate containing 2 baked biscuits loosely covered with plastic wrap. - The metal shelving units across from the stove had unidentified dried food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R14, R74, R36, and R95), reviewed and observed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 was cognitively intact, and required assistance/supervision with activities of daily living (ADL's). The self-administration of medications assessment completed on [DATE], indicated R3 did not wish to self-administer medications or to keep them bedside. During observation and interview on [DATE] at 4:13 p.m., a bottle of prescription fluticasone propionate (nasal spray) was sitting on over-bed table. A tube of prescription arthritis pain relieving cream was sitting on stand in front of television. R3 stated he used the nasal spray whenever he needed due to his nose being dry all the time. R3 also stated he applied the pain-relieving cream to his knees, hands,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,297 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $24,297 — penalty dated 2024-03-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-27 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SENIOR LIVING — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN