Emmanuel Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 49.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.52 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.80 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure modified diet orders were served in accordance with physician's orders for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3) who were at risk of aspiration and choking. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy for R1 and R3 when R1 was served food despite a strict order for nothing by mouth (NPO) and R3 who had a history of dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and was served non pureed meat, not in accordance with the prescribed diet. The IJ began on 1/19/26, when dining assistant (DA) served R1 a regular textured meal consisting of a sandwich against physician's orders for NPO. R1's oxygen saturation level was 71% (a normal blood oxygen level is between 95% and 100%, regardless of age) and was taken to the emergency department (ED) by ambulance. In addition, on 1/27/26 at 12:32 p.m., R3 was seated at a table in the dining room. R3 was eating from a plate that contained a hotdish made from stuffing with chunks of turkey in it. DA-A stated the regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were followed while waiting for emergency medical services for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care. This resulted in harm when a trained medication aide (TMA) and a police officer were awaiting EMS arrival when R1's change in condition worsened and the nurse was not notified. Findings include: R1's care plan since admission dated [DATE] to print date [DATE], identified R1's advanced directive: full code and directed staff follow POLST guidelines. R1 had CHF and directed staff to check breath sounds and monitor/document for labored breathing, use of accessory muscles while breathing, and monitor oxygen settings. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and no behaviors. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), arthritis, upper impairment of bilateral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for accidents when staff failed to stay next to R3 while in the stand lift and staff walked away from the stand lift to move wheelchair out of the way. Findings include:R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3's cognition was moderately impaired with no behaviors. R3 required substantial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living including all transfers. Once standing R3 was dependent upon staff to walk 10 feet with walker and used manual wheelchair for mobility. R3's active diagnoses included progressive neurological condition, osteoporosis (causes bones to become weak and brittle), dementia, Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time and may cause stiffness, slowing of movement and trouble with balance that raises the risk of falls), malnutrition, anxiety disorder, depression, and history of falls without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer medications were administered safely for 1 of 3 resident s (R30) who were observed to self-administer a nebulizer and had not been assessed as safe to self-administer medications.Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer medications were administered safely for 1 of 3 resident s (R30) who were observed to self-administer a nebulizer and had not been assessed as safe to self-administer medications. R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had severe cognitive impairment and had diagnosis which included Alzheimer's depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD/chronic lung disease that cause airflow and breathing problems). Further, R5 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. R30's care plan revised 1/25/26, identified R30 had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing r/t COPD.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the use of a restrictive device as a potential restraint for 2 of 2 resident (R21, R5) reviewed for restraints. Findings Include: R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R21 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses which included: stroke, dementia and arthritis. R21's MDS identified R21 required partial/moderate assistance with rolling left to right and lying to sitting. R21 required substantial/maximal assistance with sitting to standing and transfers. In addition, R21's MDS identified R21 has two or more falls with no injury and restraints were not used. R21's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/14/25, identified R21 was at risk for falls related to her impaired mobility and cognitive functions and need for activities of daily living (ADL) assistance. R21's CAA did not identify R21 used any restraints. R21's care plan revised 1/26/26, identified R21 was at risk for falls due to spinal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that routine shaving was provided for one of two (R18) individuals reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) who were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R18's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) revealed R18 had severe cognitive impairment. R18 functional abilities and goals (GG) evaluation dated 2/6/26, indicated R18 needed moderate assistance for ADLS and was set up for oral hygiene. R18's functional abilities and goals assessment dated [DATE], indicated R18 needed moderate assistance for ADLs. R18's signed order summary report dated 2/11/26, revealed R18 had a diagnosis of kidney failure, malignant neoplasm of the bladder (bladder cancer), and palliative care. R18 received hydromorphone hydrochloride (HCL) 2 milligrams (mg) two times a day for pain. R18's care plan dated 1/27/26, indicated R18 needed assistance for ADLs. R18's progress notes dated 2/5/26 to 2/10/26 did not identify R18 as refusing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to disinfect a multi-use glucometer (a machine that is used for blood glucose monitoring) after use for 1 of 2 residents (R41) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. Further the facility failed to implement appropriate donning/doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 3 residents ( R62) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). Review of Manufactures guidelines for Assure Platinum multi Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) revised 9/24, identified disinfecting the glucometer was to be completed using a commercially available EPA-registered disinfectant detergent or germicide wipe, after every resident use. Identified ,what would happen when a blood glucose meter was not cleaned and disinfected after use.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility's administrator failed to provide oversight, develop policies and procedures to ensure emergency responders had access to enter the building when called for emergent resident needs for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed. A police officer (PO) and emergency medical services (EMS) arrived at the facility following a 911 call, were not able timely access the resident by entry to the building and the resident room. Findings include: Review of R1's Provider Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form signed on [DATE] at 8:34 a.m. identified R1 was a full code, CPR would be started, and the ambulance would be called for transport to the hospital. The 911 call from [DATE] was listened to on [DATE] at 11:19 a.m. at the police department with the chief of police (COP) and identified: the facility nurse identified who she was, name of nursing home and a resident needed to go to ER, full code. Please send someone right away. room [ROOM NUMBER] long term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner that promoted dignity for 3 of 4 (R2, R3, R4) reviewed. Findings include: R2's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors. He required supervision/touch assist with all transfers and ambulation up to 10 feet, partial/moderate assistance with toileting, personal/toileting hygiene, and sit to stand, substantial/maximum assist with bathing, and used a walker and/or wheelchair for mobility. He was occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Diagnoses included stroke, arthritis, dementia, anxiety, and depression. R2's care plan dated 1/29/25, identified he was at risk for falls related to mobility deficits and psychotropic drug use and directed staff to anticipate and meet the needs of the resident, call light place within reach, encourage to use call light for assistance as needed and prompt response…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) (refers to how far you can move or stretch a part of your body) services to prevent a potential decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed who required range of motion for restorative nursing exercises. Findings include: R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R21 was cognitively intact. R21 had a diagnoses which included hemiplegia (a condition caused by brain damage that leads to paralysis on one side of the body,) cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side (stroke), heart failure, and hypertension (high blood pressure). R21 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R21's Significant Change Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/30/24, indicated R21 was able to voice concerns and preferences and make daily choices. R21 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) which included dressing, bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately assess and implement safe smoking interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM), anemia (a condition where there are lower than normal number of red blood cells in the body), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Identified R6 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADL's) which included transfers and toileting. R6's significant change in status Care Area assessment dated [DATE], identified interventions were in place to address safety needs. R6's care plan dated 4/11/24, identified the facility had determined R6 was safe to smoke independently. Care plan identified a goal that R6 refrained from smoking in inappropriate places. R6's smoking assessment dated [DATE], indicated R6 was safe to light the cigarette,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement appropriate donning/doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 4 residents ( R34) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). In addition, the facility failed to implement hand hygiene for 3 of 3 residents (R3, R4, R5) observed during medication administration. Findings include: PPE Review of CDC guidance dated 4/1/24, Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) indicated Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions include: Dressing, Bathing/showering, Transferring, Providing hygiene, Changing linens, Changing briefs or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$53,847 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $53,847 — penalty dated 2026-01-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ECUMEN — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 123 rows in the source record cover these 49 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $144K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN