Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge II

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 280 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 37 beds and averages 26.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.69 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.08 to 1.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with resident wishes and physician orders for full code status of CPR to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation when R1 was found not breathing, had no pulse, CPR was not initiated timely, and R1 passed away at the facility. The IJ began on 8/29/24, at 12:30 a.m. when R1 was noted to have no respirations or pulse, and no immediate action was taken by Registered Nurse (RN)-A, including CPR, which resulted in a missed opportunity to resuscitate R1, resulting in certain death. On 9/6/24, at 5:15 p.m. the administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ. The IJ was removed on 9/7/24, following verification of an acceptable removal plan however, noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level D, which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring and documentation related to psychotropic medication use to include side effect monitoring and resident-specific target behaviors for 3 of 5 residents (R3, R25 and R42) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R3's face sheet dated 4/16/26, indicated R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizophrenia and anxiety. R3's Order Summary Report dated 4/16/26, included the following orders: Buspirone (antianxiety medication) HCL 5 milligrams (mg), take 2 tablets, three times a day for schizoaffective disorder. Risperidone (an antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia) 0.5 mg, take 1 tablet twice a day po for schizophrenia. Clozapine (an antipsychotic medication) 100 mg, take 400 mg once a day for schizoaffective disorder. Venlafaxine (an antidepressant medication) HCL ER oral capsule 24-hour relief, take 75 mg capsule…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure written discharge/transfer notices were given as soon as practicable for 1 of 1 residents (R35) reviewed for hospitalization and 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for discharge. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the written notice of transfer included a statement of the resident's appeal rights and the name, address, and telephone number of the entity that receives appeal requests for 1 of 1 residents (R35) reviewed for hospitalization.Findings include:R2R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/3/26, indicated R2 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors.R2's Census information dated 2/25/26, indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4/3/26.R2's care conference note dated 3/5/26, indicated R2 would return to his assisted living facility upon discharge and would receive home health services. The note indicated R2 received intravenous antibiotics until 4/2/26, and R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were in place for 2 of 5 residents (R25, R50) reviewed for baseline care plans. Findings include: R25 R25's face sheet, printed 4/15/26, indicated R25 was originally admitted to the care center on 3/16/26 with a readmission on [DATE]. R25 progress note, dated 3/28/26 indicated R25 was scheduled to discharge home that day, however, was sent to the emergency room for continued pain after a fall and was diagnosed with a pubic bone fracture. The note indicated R25 did not hold her bed at the facility. R25's progress note, dated 3/30/26, indicated R25 readmitted to the care facility after being hospitalized for a pubis and sacral bone fracture post fall. R25's entire care plan, was initiated and dated 4/13/26. R25 had a completed care plan that was canceled on 4/6/26. During an interview on 04/14/2026 at 2:28 PM, the director of nursing (DON) stated the minimum data set (MDS) nurse stated that the process is believed to occur…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during meals for 1 of 1 residents (R42) with a known swallowing impairment who had a physician order for supervision related to holding food in the oral cavity (pocketing), and who was left unsupervised during meals despite documented risks. Findings include:R42's face sheet indicated R42 was admitted to the care facility on 4/6/26 with a primary diagnosis of pleural effusion. R42's nutrition screen, dated 4/8/26, indicated R42 was on a regular diet with regular textured foods and thin liquids. The screening further indicated that R42 could not use a straw because of a past stroke and would self-select soft foods.R42's progress note, dated 4/8/26 indicated R42 was noted to have food resident in her mouth at 7:22 p.m., and R42 required help eating due to spilling food on the floor. R42's diet order, dated 4/13/26, indicated R24 was to receive a minced and moist texture diet and required supervision while eating. R42's orders also directed staff to perform oral care after oral intake…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of medication side effect monitoring for 1 of 1 resident (R42) reviewed for anticoagulant use with a known risk of bleeding. Findings include: R42's face sheet, printed 4/15/26, indicated R42 was admitted to the care facility on 4/6/26. R42's Diagnoses, dated 1/31/25, indicated R42 had a diagnosis of unspecified atrial fibrillation. R42's Orders, indicated an order, dated 4/6/26, for Eliquis (a blood thinning/anticoagulant medication) 2.5 milligram (MG) two times a day. The most common serious side effect is bleeding (i.e., gum, nose, urine, or stools). R42's electronic medical record (EMR), to include the medication and treatment administration record, active orders and care plan lacked evidence that R42's was being monitored for side effects of anticoagulation medication. During an interview on 4/14/26 at 10:03 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-B stated that medication side effect monitoring should show up on each residents' medication and treatment administration record to be documented on every shift.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement and ensure adherence to infection prevention and control practices, including appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and proper cleaning and disinfection of shared equipment for residents on contact precautions. This deficient practice placed 2 of 2 residents (R49 and R50) observed on contact precautions at increased risk for the transmission of infectious organisms. Findings include:R49's face sheet, printed 4/15/26, indicated R49 was admitted to the care facility on 4/8/26, and was on contact precautions for a history of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) (enzymes produced by certain bacteria that make them resistant to a variety of commonly used antibiotics).R50's face sheet, printed 4/15/26, indicated R50 was admitted to the care facility on 4/9/26, and was on contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (a type of staph bacteria that's become resistant to many of the antibiotics used to treat ordinary staph infections). During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) use for 1 of 3 residents (R4) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) reviewed for proper PPE use during survey. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) was maintained to include an ongoing analysis of collected data to help identify and reduce the risk of infection spread and outbreak. This had potential to affect all 30 residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R4 was dependent on facility staff for bathing, toileting and dressing and had a Foley catheter in place. During observation on 1/22/25 at 9:05 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-E and NA-F entered R4's room. A sign was posted on R4's door indicating R4 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) indicating staff must wear gown and gloves when providing high contact resident care activities including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included development of protocols and a system to monitor appropriateness of antibiotic use to prevent antibiotic resistance and help prevent the spread of infectious diseases. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 1/22/25 at 1:46 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated she was currently the acting facility infection preventionist and was responsible for overseeing the infection control program. DON verified the facility was currently not tracking resident antibiotic use to ensure proper use and follow up. DON verified there are currently no tracking of prophylactic antibiotics to ensure proper use and follow up. DON stated she was unaware if any antibiotic time-outs were occurring. During a follow up interview on 1/23/25 at 8:49 a.m., DON verified there are currently no antibiotic time-outs occurring at the facility. A facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, revised 1/2025, indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the acting infection preventionist had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/22/25 at 1:26 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated she was currently the acting facility infection preventionist and was responsible for overseeing the infection control program. DON verified that she had not completed specialized training for infection prevention and control. DON verified they were not currently enrolled in any specialized training at this time nor had any specialized infection control education scheduled. DON verified no other staff in the facility had specialized training in infection prevention and control. A facility policy titled Infection Preventionist, revised 1/2025, indicated the following: The IP will be a Registered Nurse or have primary professional training in nursing, medical technology, microbiology, epidemiology, or other related field; will be qualified by education,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure private and confidential resident information was secure and not visible to residents and visitors when multiple care sheets were left out in public view. This had the ability to affect eleven residents on the 400 hallway including R4. Findings include: During observation on 1/21/25 at 12:17 p.m., a medication cart down the 400 hallway was left unattended with a care sheet out in public view which identified five patient rooms which included the residents full name, diagnoses, special programs such as hospice, how alert and oriented they were, transfer and ambulation status, bowel and bladder continence, diet, precautions, skin conditions, and notes such as oxygen use, and devices used, new orders, etc. Multiple residents were seen wandering by the unattended medication cart with resident private information in sight. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 12:27 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-D stated he was working from the medication cart that day and due to the private resident information on the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,914 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,914 — penalty dated 2024-09-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIVIE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $513K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN