Fountainbleau Lodge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 33 beds and averages 27.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.16 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.37 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one (Resident #1) of four sampled residents, when facility staff left the facility's medication overflow cart unlocked and unattended. Resident #1 gained access to the cart and took two medication cards of gabapentin (a medication used to treat seizures disorder and used for nerve pain) and one card of Metoprolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) to his/her room. He/She reported taking 6 pills of Gabapentin and 6 pills of Gabapentin were missing which placed the resident in danger of potential overdose. The facility census was 27. The administrator was notified on 06/11/24 at 10:30 A.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) past non-compliance which began on 06/09/24. On 06/10/24, the facility performed education to licensed and certified staff on proper safety of medication carts and the need to keep the cart locked at all times. The IJ was corrected on 06/10/24. Review of the facility policy Security of Medication Cart, dated April 2007, showed: - The nurse must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable, attractive food at safe and appetizing temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 30.Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, revised November 2022, showed:- Food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices;- Danger zone means temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) and below 135 F that allow the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness;- Did not address holding/serving temperatures of food. During an interview on 09//02/25 at 2:40 P.M, Resident #8 said the food could be better and it was often served cold.During a group interview on 09/02/25 at 3:10 P.M., Resident #8, Resident #11, Resident #22, Resident #23, Resident #28, Resident #29, and Resident #36 said that their food was served cold when they ate in their room. During an interview on 09/04/25 at 10:46…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, for three residents (Residents #3, #14, and #23) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment, revised October 2023, showed: - Assessments are completed by staff members who have the skills and qualifications to assess relevant care areas and who are knowledgeable about the resident's strengths and areas of decline; - Information in the MDS assessments will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care, and resident observations/interviews. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2024, showed: - Code all high-risk drug class medications according to their pharmacological classification, not how they are being used. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed: - admission date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices for two residents (Residents #6 and #35) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated August 2022, showed: - Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents; - EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply; - Examples of high-contact resident care activities are dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use, and wound care; - EBPs are indicated for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO colonization. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, dated October 2010, showed: - Use a disposable cloth to establish a clean field…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross contamination and food-borne illnesses. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised November 2022, showed: - Food and nutrition service employees follow appropriate hand hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses; - All employees who handle, prepare or serve food are trained in the practices of safe food handling and preventing food-borne illnesses; - Employees must wash their hands whenever entering or re-entering the kitchen; - Before coming in contact with any food surfaces; - After handling soiled equipment or utensils; - After engaging in other activities that contaminate hands; - The use of disposable gloves does not substitute for proper handwashing; - Gloves are not required when distributing food to residents at dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Nurse Aide (NA) Registry checks were completed prior to the employment start date for seven employees out of a sample of ten employees and failed to ensure their policy addressed checking the NA Registry for all employees prior to employment. The facility also failed to follow their policy to ensure the Criminal Background Check (CBC), Employee Disqualification List (EDL) or Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) were completed prior to the employment date for one employee out of a sample of ten employees. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's Compliance and Ethics-Screening Employees, Contractors and Volunteers policy, dated December 2020, showed: - Employees, contracted individuals and volunteers are screened for violations of fraud, abuse and/or ethics violations prior to employment or engagement; - Background screening and investigations are conducted prior to employment or engagement to ensure that employees, contractors and/or volunteers meet at least the following criteria: Competency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer to the hospital, including the reason for transfer, and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #15) out of 12 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #13) outside the sample. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's Transfer/Discharge policy, dated October 2022, showed: - Residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, such as a hospital, are permitted to return to the facility; - The Transfer/Discharge notice is given as soon as practicable but before the transfer or discharge when the health and/or safety of the individuals in the facility would be endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident, or an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; - Notices are provided in a form and manner that the resident can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident's representative, in writing, of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for one resident (Resident #1) out of 12 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #13) outside the sample. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's Bed-Hold and Return policy, dated October 2022, showed: - Residents/Representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence; - Residents are provided written notices about these policies in advance of any transfer (admission) and at the time of transfer (if an emergency, within 24 hours); - The written bed-hold notices provided to residents/representatives, explain in detail, the duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the residents permitted to return and resume residence in facility. Review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan with specific interventions to meet individual needs for one resident (Resident #26) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, revised March 2022, showed: - The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; - The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timeframes, describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; - Care plan interventions are chosen only after date gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of infection during incontinent care for two residents (Resident #22 and #24) out of two sampled residents. The facility failed to develop and implement a risk management process specific to Legionnaires disease (a type of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria), which had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's policy, Standard Precautions, revised September 2022, showed: - Standard precautions apply to the care of all residents in all situations regardless of suspected or confirmed presence of infectious disease; - Hand hygiene is performed with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or soap and water before and after contact with resident; - Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site, on same resident; - After contact with items in resident rooms; - After removing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This practice affected three residents (Resident #10, #17 and #19) out of 12 sampled residents and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 29. Review of the facility's policy, Pest Control, revised May 2008, showed: - The facility shall maintain an effective pest control program; - The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents; - Only approved insecticides are permitted in facility and stored in areas away from food storage; - Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. Observation on 08/06/24 at 10:50 A.M. of Resident #17's room showed a fly landed on the resident's hand, bedspread, and nose. During an interview on 08/06/24 at 10:50 A.M., Resident #17 said the flies were always bad. Observation of the dining room on 08/06/24 at 12:29 P.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-06-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SHAFIQ MALIK — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO