Silver Cross Health & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and homelike environment for residents in a common area, Specifically, the facility failed to repair missing floor tiles in the dining room, a high-traffic area for four (4) out of 4 days of survey.Findings include:A review of the facility's Resident Rights policy revealed, The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.On 12/08/2025 at 12:10 PM, chipped and partially missing floor tiles were observed in the front right section of the dining room.On 12/09/2025 at 12:05 PM, during the lunch dining period, the chipped and missing tiles remained unrepaired.On 12/10/2025 at 2:11 PM, chipped and missing tiles were again observed in the dining room common area for the third consecutive day of the recertification survey.On 12/10/2025 at 12:24 PM, in an interview with the Maintenance Director, he stated that chipped tiles could cause a tripping hazard and that he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored under sanitary conditions by not removing expired food from the dry storage area for one (1) of three (3) observation days. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents consuming food from the kitchen. Findings Include:A record review of the facility's First IN First Out (FIFO) policy undated revealed a product rotation is important for both quality and safety reasons. FIFO means that the first batch product prepared in storage should be used first. Identify the food items use by or expiration date. Throw out food that has passed its manufacturers use or expiration date.On 12/8/25 at 10:20 AM an initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following items were expired and found in the dry storage room: Honey grade A five (5) ounces opened 12/9/24 expiration 10/10/25. There were 5 bottles of lemon juice that expired on 4/5/25. There were two gallons of Monarch Italian dressing expiration 10/2/25.On 12/8/25 at 11:08 AM in an interview with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #25) was treated with dignity and respect by staff during care and communication. Findings Include:A record review of the facility Resident's Rights policy revealed the resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity.On 12/10/25 at 4:30 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 4, she stated there had been concerns raised regarding a nurse, LPN #3, who was reported for interactions with multiple residents, including Resident #25 and Resident #11, and who often works the A hall. LPN 4 described the issue as related to tone and arguing with residents.On 12/11/25 at 9:01 AM, in an interview with Resident #25, he stated that LPN # 3, who works the night shift, talks to him in a loud and gruff tone, which he compared to a police officer. He reported she does not threaten residents but does not speak to them in a respectful or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #8) assessed as moderately cognitively impaired was properly evaluated for the safe self-administration of medication. Findings Include:A record review of the facility's policy, Self-Administration of Medication and Bedside Medication with a revised date of 3/10/25 revealed this facility's policy is that residents may self-administer their medications given the approval of the interdisciplinary or care planning team. A resident may administer his/her own medications if the disciplinary team determines that this practice is safe. A Self-Administration evaluation should be completed in the Electronic Health Record. (EHR)On 12/08/2025 at 4:13 PM an observation and interview revealed Resident #8 with a 3.5-ounce jar of Vapor Rub on his bedside table . Resident #8 stated he uses it as he needs it and he brought it from home. He stated he rubs it under his nose. He stated staff do not know when he uses it but he was using it at home.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation of advance directive status for one (1) of seventeen (17) sampled residents, Resident #5. Findings include: A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 3/25/25 and she had diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A record review of the Acknowledgement of Advance Directives Decisions, Rights, and Information, signed by the resident representative (RR) and dated 3/25/25, indicated, I have formulated the following advance directives before admission to this facility. There was no indication as to what type of advance directive was formulated and there was also an x indicating I decline to formulate an Advance Directive at this time. On 12/09/2025 at 10:42 AM, in an interview with the Admissions Coordinator/Staff Scheduler, she stated she had searched for to see if any type of Advance Directive was provided to the facility. She was unable to find a copy and stated that she believed the RR initialed the form indicating an Advance Directive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan interventions related to hearing needs and activity of daily living (ADL) needs for one (1) of 17 sampled residents (Resident #10). Specifically, the facility failed to follow up on a June 2025 audiology appointment that documented the need for further evaluation, failed to ensure the resident had functional hearing aids per her preferences and needs, and failed to coordinate care in accordance with the resident's care plan and physician orders.Findings Include:A record review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Plan of Care with a revision date of 2/17/25, revealed it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with residents rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing.needs and all services that are identified in the residents comprehensive assessment and professional standards of quality.A record review of Resident #10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grooming needs were met in accordance with the resident's preferences and needs for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #10). Specifically, the facility failed to provide facial shaving per resident request and failed to document refusal of care when shaving was not provided, resulting in unaddressed personal hygiene needs and potential negative impact on resident dignity. Findings Include:A record review of the facility's policy, Activities of Daily Living revised 9/16/22 revealed, .Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care.3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral care.On 12/08/2025 at 2:11 PM observation and interview of Resident #10 revealed a moderate amount of grey hair under her chin and upper lip. She confirmed that she does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up and coordination of care related to hearing needs for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for sensory impairment (Resident #10). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident's hearing aids were functional, to act on evaluation results that indicated further follow-up was needed, and to implement or revise care plan interventions related to hearing loss. These failures resulted in the resident experiencing prolonged difficulty hearing and unmet sensory needs.Findings Include:A record review of the facility's Physician Order Review policy dated 1/9/15 revealed, Purpose: To ensure safety and comply with standards of care. To verify the necessity to initiate, continue or change appropriate treatments as ordered. To maintain appropriate continuity in resident care.On 12/08/2025 at 2:00 PM Resident #10 stated she needs her new hearing aids. She stated she went to a doctor five months ago and still does not have new hearing aids. She stated they took…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice and physician orders for the treatment of a pressure ulcer for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #38). Findings Include:Record review of Resident #38's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/10/25 to cleanse the Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx with normal saline, pat dry, apply Medi-Honey to the wound bed, place calcium alginate over the honey, and cover with border foam dressing daily.On 12/10/2025 at 10:58 AM, wound care was observed being administered to Resident #38 by Registered Nurse (RN) #1 with the assistance of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. During the procedure, RN #1 applied Zinc Oxide ointment around the edges of the wound after completing the ordered wound care.On 12/10/2025 at 11:15 AM, during an interview RN #1 verified that Zinc Oxide was not listed as an active order for Resident #38 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that professional nursing standards were followed during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube care for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #44) reviewed for enteral nutrition. Findings Include:On 12/10/2025 at 10:00 AM in an observation of Registered Nurse #1 (RN)/Wound care provide peg tube care to Resident #44, she cleaned the PEG site with a gauzed soaked in wound cleaner. She cleaned the site using the same gauze in a circular motion four times without discarding and replacing it with a new gauze for each wipe, as per infection control standards. On 12/10/2025 at 10:12 AM in an interview with RN #1 stated she should have discarded the gauze and got another one while cleaning the site. She stated it could cause Resident #44 to get an infection. If infection is at the site, it could have spread the infection.On 12/10/2025 at 3:35 PM in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that RN#1 should have wiped once and discarded gauze with each wipe. She should not have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS