Desoto Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 239 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 95.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of 11 residents sampled, Resident #1. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, CNA # 2 and CNA #3 failed to follow the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan to use a mechanical lift for Resident #1 and transferred her during the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift on 12/28/23, manually transferring her twice and with the sit to stand lift once. Resident #1 began to display signs of pain on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift and was given an as needed Acetaminophen. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered in-house X-rays on 12/29/23 due to continued pain. The in-house X-rays were negative for fractures, but it did note that Resident #1 was uncooperative during the X-rays. On 12/30/23, when the resident began guarding her lower right extremity, the NP ordered Resident #1 be sent to the hospital for assessment, evaluation, and X-rays. The X-rays on 12/30/23 revealed a closed nondisplaced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (1) of 11 residents sampled, Resident #1. During the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift on 12/28/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, CNA #2 and CNA # 3 transferred Resident #1, using a manual transfer twice and the sit to stand lift once. Resident #1 began to display signs of pain on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift and was given an as needed Acetaminophen. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered in-house X-rays on 12/29/23 due to continued pain. The in-house X-rays were negative for fractures, but it did note that Resident #1 was uncooperative during the X-rays. On 12/30/23, when the resident began guarding her lower right extremity, the NP ordered that Resident #1 be sent to the hospital for assessment, evaluation, and X-rays. The X-rays on 12/30/23 revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement residents' care plans for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) site care (Resident #2 and Resident #9) and nail care for dependent residents' (Resident #7 and Resident #48) for four (4) of 19 care plans reviewed. Resident #2, #7, #9, and #48Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Plan of Care, revised 2/17/25, revealed under Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of practice . Resident #2 A review of Resident #2's Care Plan Report revealed under Focus: The resident requires tube feeding related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide nail care for residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 2 (two) of nineteen sampled residents. Resident #7 and Resident #48.Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Fingernail and Toenail Care with revision date of 05/02/22, revealed, All residents of (Proper Name) facilities shall receive nail care, on a regularly scheduled basis .2. Routine cleaning, inspection, and nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule and as needed. Resident #7 An observation of Resident #7 on 9/15/25 at 2:59 PM revealed she was sitting in a Geri-chair in her room. Her left hand was contracted, with fingers turned inward toward the palm. The fingernails on her left hand were excessively long, jagged, and measured approximately three-eighths (3/8) of an inch. An observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 on 9/16/25 at 2:32 PM confirmed Resident #7 had long fingernails on her contracted left hand. LPN #4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that treatment and care were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders by not utilizing and changing a drainage sponge at the insertion site of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube as ordered for two (2) of three (3) residents with a PEG tube. Resident #2, and Resident #9Findings Include: A typed statement on company letterhead dated 9/17/25 and signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the facility did not have a specific policy related to the care of PEG tubes. The facility staff are to follow the physician's orders concerning PEG tubes. Resident #2 Observation of medication administration for Resident #2 on 9/16/25 at 2:29 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, revealed no drainage sponge present around the PEG tube site. During an interview on 9/16/25 at 2:29 PM with LPN #3, she confirmed there was not a drainage sponge present.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for Resident #1 who was one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions taken on 10/11/24, this was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC). Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation with revision date of 10/10/22 revealed, Policy: This facility's policy is to protect each resident's health, welfare, and rights by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. On 11/25/24 at 9:15 AM an interview with the Administrator (ADM) revealed that on the night shift (3-11) of 10/10/24, the Registered Nurse (RN) #1 notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) by phone that Resident #1's debit card was lost. The ADM revealed that the next morning, Social Worker (SW) talked to Resident #1, encouraged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of cross contamination to food, as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene after picking up a soiled item off the floor during steam table temperature checks for one (1) of three (3) kitchen observations. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control with a revision date of 6/8/2023 revealed Policy: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines . During an observation of the lunch meal steam table temperature checks on 7/17/2024 at 11:58 AM, Dietary Staff #1 dropped a pen on the floor. She retrieved the pen from the floor and continued to check and record the food temperatures without washing her hands. An interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 7/17/2024 at 12:08 PM, revealed she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for two (2) of 2 quarters reviewed. First and Second Quarters of 2024. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff revised 10/12/22 revealed . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 7. The facility is responsible for submitting timely and accurate staffing data through the CMS (Centers for Medicaid/Medicare Services) Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system . Record review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 2 2024 (January 1-March 31) revealed Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered. Triggered =Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. Record review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY Quarter 1 (October 1 - December 31) revealed Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered. Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. On 07/16/24 at 9:20 AM, an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physicians order for a bolster sheet that was being used to prevent a resident from getting out of bed for one (1) of 27 residents on sample. Resident #81 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Restraints with a revision date of 11/28/17 revealed . Restraint Order .orders for restraint should specify: the rationale (medical necessity) for the use of restraint, the type of restraint . An observation on 07/15/24 at 10:50 AM, revealed there was a concave mattress on Resident #81's bed and the resident was gone to dialysis. An interview on 7/16/24 at 9:00 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed Resident #81 had several falls and the facility had implemented several different measures to prevent them. She stated that the residents' mind has worsened, and she thinks she can still walk sometimes, especially if she wakes up at night. She revealed they had put her bed in the lowest position and used the concave mattress, because she would forget to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for one (1) of 26 residents care plans reviewed. Resident #93 Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Plan of Care revised 10/10/22 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment . Record review of Resident #93's care plan, date initiated 4/11/24 revealed Focus: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit .Interventions . Resident is usually extensive assistance x (times) 1 with bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, and dressing . During an interview on 7/15/24 at 10:55 AM, an interview with Resident #93 revealed she had been at this facility about three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided daily as evidenced by a resident did not receive daily oral care for one (1) of 26 residents reviewed. Resident #93. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL) revised 09/15/22 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . On 07/15/24 at 10:55 AM, an interview with Resident #93 revealed she was admitted to the facility about three (3) months ago. She revealed the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) gave her good baths, but she had a concern about her teeth not getting brushed. She revealed the CNAs had helped her brush her teeth a few times since she had been there and wasn't sure if they were supposed to help her with this. She stated, If I ask, they will sometimes do it, but if I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Resident Representative (RR) and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility of an accident as evidenced by a physician ordered medication being found in a resident's bed for one (1) of 27 sampled residents. Resident #52 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration with a revision date of 6/8/23 revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .#16. Observe the resident consumption of medication. An interview and observation on 07/15/24 at 11:22 AM, with the RR for Resident #52 revealed she was making her mother's bed and found a blue pill in the sheets. This observation revealed she was holding the blue pill. She stated she had called for the nurse. She stated this is not the first time she has found medicine in her mother's bed, but it has been a while. An observation and interview on 7/15/24 at 11:25 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed the blue pill found in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,318 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS