Rest Haven Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 49.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect was honored for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled. Resident #1.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights and Dignity Management, review date 9/2025, under Standard revealed that It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality An interview with Administrator (ADM) on 01/15/26 at 9:25 AM, revealed that Resident #1 came into his office on 12/30/25 at approximately 1:40 PM and reported that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 had been rude and disrespectful to her and told her to shut up. Administrator revealed that he watched the video camera footage and confirmed that it was true.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was maintained in a homelike and sanitary manner as evidenced by the presence of a black substance in the grout lines of the shower stall wall tile, missing wall paint behind beds (Resident #17 and Resident #27) and torn bathroom flooring (Resident #4) for four (4) of 35 resident and facility rooms observed. The facility received F584 on the last annual survey therefore the scope and severity was raised to E. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled “Shower and Tub Room Cleaning” revised 1/16 revealed under, “Procedure Description: This procedure will remove soap scum, dirt and debris from these areas providing a safe and sanitary place for the residents to bathe.” Also revealed under, “Procedure: … 2. Shower stall walls need to be cleaned daily using cloth and spray bottle of disinfectant solution. It may be necessary to use a scrub brush and diluted all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. (Resident #17) F656 was cited during the last annual survey, therefore the scope and severity was raised to E. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Centered Care Planning: Baseline Care Plan, dated 4/2025 outlines the standard: The facility shall develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. Record review of Resident #17's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Care Plan date initiated 11/30/23 revealed, Interventions/Tasks did not include nail care.An observation and interview on 9/2/25 at 10:53 AM, with Resident # 17 revealed her fingernails were one-half inch in length, jagged, and had a brown substance underneath. Resident #17 expressed a desire to have her nails trimmed, stating she preferred them to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to maintain personal hygiene for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. (Resident #17) F677 was cited during the last annual survey, therefore the scope/severity was raised to E. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Hygiene: Care of Fingernails/Toenails, with a review date of 6/22 outlines the purpose of providing nail care: To clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed and to prevent infections. During an observation and interview on 9/2/25 at 10:53 AM, Resident # 17 revealed her fingernails were one-half inch in length, jagged, and had a brown substance underneath. Resident #17 expressed a desire to have her nails trimmed, stating she preferred them to be trimmed short. During an interview on 9/3/25 at 11:09 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated Resident #17's fingernails should have been trimmed by the nursing staff. She further verbalized the resident was at an increased risk for infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) as per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #16) observed during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) medication administration. The nurse did not don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before handling the PEG tube, creating the potential for cross-contamination and infection spread. F880 was cited during the last annual survey, therefore the scope and severity was raised to E. Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with a revision date of 5/2024, revealed, Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff and family interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to identify a bed rail as a physical restraint, failed to accurately assess the resident for the use of a bed rail, and failed to ensure that the bed rail did not pose a risk of injury from falls for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. Resident #35Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Physical Restraints revealed under, Physical Restraint Standards: The goal of this facility is to ensure that each resident attains and maintains his/her highest practical level of function and well-being in an environment that limits restraint use to circumstances in which the medical symptoms of the resident warrant the use of the least restrictive restraint . An observation of Resident #35 on 9/2/25 at 2:45 PM revealed she was lying in bed with her eyes closed, and the bed was against the wall on her left side, with a full-length bed rail that was located on her right side, and a bed alarm was also in use. The resident was lying on a concave with raised edges…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely complete quarterly minimum data sets (MDS) within the time frame specified by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for three (3) of 21 minimum data sets reviewed. Resident #20, #41, #53Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled “MDS/RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Standard” unrevised, revealed under, “Standard: This facility makes a comprehensive assessment of each resident’s needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences using the RAI specified by CMS.” Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20’s Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/26/25 revealed under section Z0500, the assessment had not been completed. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #20 on 7/10/25 with a medical diagnosis of hyperkalemia. Resident #41 Record review of Resident #41’s Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 8/2/25, revealed under section Z0500, the assessment had not been completed. Record review of the admission Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely encode and transmit a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines for one (1) of twenty-one (21) MDS reviewed. Resident #58.Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled MDS/RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Standard unrevised, revealed under, Standard: This facility makes a comprehensive assessment of each resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS.Record review of Resident #58's Discharge MDS with an Assessment Reference Data (ARD) of 6/6/25 revealed under section Z0500, an assessment completion date of 8/6/25, which indicated the assessment was completed late.Record review of the MDS Final Validation Report revealed Resident #58's Discharge MDS was accepted by CMS on 8/20/25 with a warning message that read, Assessment completed late: Z0500B (assessment completion date) is more than 14 days after A2300 ARD. An interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with dignity and respect for seven (7) of 16 residents sampled. Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #9, and #10. Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights and Dignity Management - Dignity dated 5/22, revealed, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. 1. All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights at all times. 5. When interacting with a resident, pay attention to the resident as an individual. 9. Speak respectfully to residents . 10. Respect the resident's living space and personal possessions. 14. 'Treated with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility of accidents and hazards for a resident who was an elopement risk by failing to monitor placement and function of a wander guard (Resident #1) and failure to secure smoking supplies for one (1) of three (3) days of survey. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled, Wandering/Elopement Risk with a revision date of 11/2017 revealed STANDARD It is the standard of this facility to identify those residents at risk for wandering/elopement and to take the appropriate steps to minimize the risk of elopement . The facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement or unsafe wandering . of 10/2017 revealed STANDARD This facility provides a safe and healthy environment for residents .including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking residents .Standard Explanation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VANGUARD HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $353K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS