Peak Resources - Pinelake

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 101.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner during incontinence care that resulted in a fall with a right hip fracture (Resident #17). This was for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, seizure disorder and a history of a stroke resulting in left-sided weakness. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on one staff member for personal hygiene and toileting tasks. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 was dependent on one staff member for toileting tasks. Resident #17 was care planned on 7/21/23 for an actual fall. The interventions included: - emergency room visit and staff education implemented on 7/21/23. - Concave mattress implemented on 7/26/23. A nursing note dated 7/20/23 at 7:22 PM read a Nurse Aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and resident, Family Member, Nurse Practitioner (NP), Medical Director, local law enforcement officer, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident abuse when a severely cognitively impaired male resident (Resident #86) grabbed a cognitively intact male resident's (Resident #19's) arm as he was coming out of the bathroom. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse (Resident #19). The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, chronic fatigue, bipolar II disorder, and depression. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #19's cognition was intact, he had no behaviors and was independent with using his wheelchair or walker. Resident #19's care plan dated 9/18/2025 indicated the resident had problem areas that included verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others; and the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify the need for a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident with declines in weight, skin condition and activities of daily living. This was for 1 (Resident #37) of 20 residents reviewed for comprehensive MDS completion. The findings included: Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with Dementia, Diabetes and Congestive Heart Failure. He was diagnosed with Osteomyelitis on 7/25/24. His previous quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #37 was not coded for any weight loss, a weight of 220 pounds, no skin conditions, requiring supervision for bed mobility, lying to sit to stand , stand to sit to lying, toileting transfers, ambulation and not coded for the use of a wheelchair. Review of a wound consult note dated 6/12/24 read Resident #37 developed a diabetic ulcer to his right first and second toes. Review of another wound consult note dated 7/24/24 read Resident #37 was diagnosed with Osteomyelitis of his right first and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to communicate the facility's efforts to address group concerns verbalized during Resident Council meetings and to resolve repeat concerns for 4 of 4 consecutive months (May 2022, June 2022, July 2022, and August 2022). Findings included: Resident Council minutes dated 05/25/22 indicated residents had voiced concerns related to items listed on the meal ticket was not served, and condiments not provided on the meal trays. There was no evidence of the facility's response to the concerns voiced during the previous meeting had been reviewed or discussed. Resident Council minutes dated 06/23/22 indicated residents had voiced concerns related to Nursing Assistants (NAs) not returning to assist with requests and having more diabetic snacks available. There was no evidence of the facility's response to the concerns voiced during the previous meeting had been reviewed or discussed. Resident Council minutes dated 07/20/22 revealed a repeated concern of items listed on the meal ticket was not served. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alternating pressure reducing mattresses were set according to the residents' weights for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #236, #78 and #68) reviewed for pressure injuries. The findings included: 1. Resident #236 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stage 3 pressure injury to the sacrum, deep tissue injury (DTI) to the right great toe, and non-pressure related injury to the left great toe. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was not available. Resident #236's baseline care plan dated 9/12/2022 had a focus for pressure injury, stage 3, to the sacrum. The resident's medical record included a visit summary by the Wound Care Physician dated 9/14/2022. The summary indicated Resident #236 had a full thickness injury to the sacrum that measured .05 x .05 x 0.2 centimeters (cm). The etiology of the injury was pressure, and it was stage 3. During a wound care observation on 9/20/2021at 11:50 AM the resident was on an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the vent filters and sprinkler pipe under the kitchen exhaust hood were free of grease buildup. The failure had the potential to affect food served to the residents. The findings included: An initial kitchen tour was completed on 9/19/22 at 9:15 AM with Dietary Manager (DM) #1. She stated she was filling in for DM #3 who was out on medical leave. The exhaust hood over the cooking surfaces revealed amber to dark brown grease build up on the vent filters. Also observed on the sprinkler pipe located to the far right of the hood over the fryer was what appeared to be several suspended drops of dark brown grease suspended from the pipe. There was a label on this end of the exhaust hood. DM #1 stated the label indicated the hood was last professionally cleaned in May 2022 and due again November 2022. Another interview was completed on 9/19/22 at 12:15 PM with DM #1. She stated she took down the vent filters and cleaned them since our previous observation. She stated in her facility, she took the vent filters down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and Physician, resident and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain implemented procedure and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the 4/8/21 recertification and complaint survey, 2/24/21 complaint survey and 8/22/19 recertification and complaint survey. This was for 5 deficiencies that were cited in the areas of Resident self-administration of medication, previously cited on 4/8/21 recertification and complaint survey, and recited on the current recertification and complaint survey of 9/22/22. In addition, Care Plan timing and revision, Respiratory/Tracheostomy care and Food Precurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary were also cited during the recertification and complaint survey on 8/22/19 and Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal pressure ulcers was cited on the complaint survey of 2/24/21 and recited on current recertification and complaint survey of 9/22/22. The duplicate citations during the 3 federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and record review, the facility failed to assess and obtain Physician orders for the self-administration of an as needed (prn) inhaler and a scheduled inhaler for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 residents reviewed for the self-administration. The findings included: Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Her quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #23's care plan edited on 7/25/22 read she request to keep her prn inhaler at the bedside. Interventions included to evaluate for her continued ability to self-administer the inhaler at least quarterly. An observation was completed on 9/19/22 at 11:32 AM. Resident #23 was in bed and lying on her over the bed table were observed 2 inhalers ( Combivent and Ventolin). They were not in original box indicating the prescribers directions for use. Resident #23 stated she was allowed to keep both inhalers at her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide treatments as ordered by the physician for a non-pressure related surgical wound on the left hip for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident #236). The findings included: Resident #236 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stage 3 pressure injury to the sacrum, deep tissue injury (DTI) to the right great toe, and non-pressure related surgical wound to the left hip. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was not available. Resident #236's baseline care plan dated 9/12/2022 had a focus for pressure injury, stage 3, to the sacrum, deep tissue injury to the right great toe, and non-pressure related surgical wound to the left hip. The resident's active physician's orders revealed an order dated 9/8/2022 to clean surgical wound to right hip with normal saline, pack with Dakins soaked gauze, and cover with dry dressing twice daily. Resident #236's September 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's order for a resident's use of continuous oxygen (Residents #33 and #68). This was for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings included: 1. Resident #33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission date of 9/9/22. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary artery disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/7/22, indicated Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the nursing progress notes revealed on 8/21/22, Resident #33 had low oxygen saturations and was started on oxygen at 2 liters flow by nasal cannula. On 8/22/22 Resident #33 was sent to the emergency room (ER) for further evaluation of shortness of breath and increased fatigue and was admitted to the hospital and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the August 2022 physician orders included an order for oxygen at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to display accurate Posted Nurse Staffing Information for 4 out of 30 days reviewed. The findings included: A review of the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheet for 07/19/24 revealed 10 Nursing Assistants (NA)s worked from 7:00 AM until 7:00 PM. A review of the Posted Nurse Staffing for the 7:00 AM-7:00 PM shift on 7/19/24 revealed 11 NAs worked. On 07/21/24 during the 7:00 AM until 7:00 PM shift, the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheet revealed 8 NAs worked and the Posted Nurse Staffing revealed 10 NAs worked. Additionally, the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheet revealed 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN)s worked and the Posted Nurse Staffing revealed 4 LPNs worked. The Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheet revealed 1 Registered Nurse (RN) worked and the Posted Nurse Staffing revealed 2 RNs worked. During the 7:00 PM until 7:00 AM shift, the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheet revealed 5 NAs worked and the Posted Nurse Staffing revealed 7 NAs worked. The Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheet revealed 4 LPNs worked and the Posted Nurse Staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,901 — penalty dated 2023-11-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PEAK RESOURCES, INC. — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC