Peak Resources-Cherryville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 142 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 63.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.40 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-07-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility activity calendar, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure group activities were planned for outside of the facility to meet the needs of residents who expressed that it was important to them to attend group activities outside of the facility for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #32, #34, #58, #63, and #66). The residents expressed that not being able to leave the facility for over a year made them feel sad, at times lonely or depressed and they missed going out with the group to engage in activities, eat at restaurants, shop and socialize. The findings included: A review of the July 2025 through July 2026 activity calendars revealed activities inside of the facility during the week and on the weekends. There were no activities scheduled outside of the facility. Observation on 7/13/26 at 10:00 AM revealed the facility was located in a rural area that was within 10-to-15-minute driving distance to numerous local and commercial shops,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication administration observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 observations of the incorrect method of insulin administration (2 medication errors out of 30 opportunities), resulting in a facility medication error rate of 6.67% for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) observed during medication pass.The findings included:A review of Lantus Solostar insulin pen manufacturer instructions dated 2022 revealed that a safety test should be conducted prior to each injection. The instructions to complete the safety test is to: Dial the dosage dial to 2 units. Hold the pen with the needle pointing up and lightly tap the insulin reservoir so the air bubbles rise to the top of the needle. The dial will automatically go back to zero as you perform the test. Check to see that insulin comes out of the needle. A review of Novolog FlexPen manufacturer instructions dated 02/23 stated in part, Before each injection small…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free of misappropriation of controlled substances for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #4). The findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation policy, last revised on 01/19/23, revealed in part the facility would ensure all residents were free from misappropriation of property. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fractured hip, pain, and malnutrition. Resident #4 was discharged from the facility to the local acute care hospital on [DATE]. A review of the physician's order dated 09/27/24 revealed Resident #4 had an order to receive 1 tablet of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (an opioid that acts on the central nervous system to relieve pain) 10 milligrams (mg)-325 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain. The initial allegation report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident, family member, and staff interview the facility failed to implement their grievance policies and procedures when Resident #222's Resident Representative reported the resident's top dentures were missing and when Resident #20 requested a call bell extension cord to be added in her bathroom for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances (Resident #222 and Resident #20). The findings included: 1. Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of vascular dementia. Review of the Inventory of Personal Items documentation dated 3/22/2024 completed by Nurse #3 revealed Resident #222 was admitted with upper dentures. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #222 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #222 was not coded for dentures. Review of a nursing note dated 3/31/2024 completed by Nurse #1 revealed Resident #222's representative had reported his upper dentures were missing. Review of a handwritten grievance form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, manufacturer's recommendations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to date opened multi-dose insulin pens, failed to discard expired insulin pens and a multi-dose insulin vial, and failed to store a multi-dose insulin vial in the refrigerator for 2 of 2 insulin medication carts (Cherry Street cart and [NAME] Hall cart) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The findings included: 1a. The manufacturer's storage instructions for Levemir insulin indicated to store in-use vials under refrigeration or at room temperature and use within 42 days. The manufacturer's storage instructions for Levemir insulin in-use prefilled pens indicated, the pens should be stored at room temperature and used within 42 days; do not freeze or refrigerate. The manufacturer's storage instructions for Lispro indicated to store prefilled pen in the refrigerator until it is opened, but do not freeze it, prefilled pen is in use and should be stored at room temperature for 28 days. The manufacturer's storage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure bowls, plates, metal bowls, serving pans, and baking sheets were dry before they were stacked, and to ensure dishes were clean. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: a. The initial observation of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 4/15/2024 at 9:58 AM. The initial observation of the serving line and dish washing area revealed the following: - 12 plates stacked in a plate warmer on the serving line were wet. - 1 large serving pan, 2 baking sheets and 1 large metal bowl stacked on a storage rack in the dish washing area were wet. - 12 small red saucer plates with white crumb like particles and 1 small white saucer plate with a dried yellow substance were observed stacked on the storage rack for clean dishes in the dish washing area. b. A second observation of the serving line in the kitchen was conducted with the DM on 4/17/2024 at 11:45 AM and revealed the following: - 11 small white bowls stacked on the serving line were wet. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee had put into place following the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 10/19/2022. This failure included two repeat deficiencies in the areas of Notification of Changes (F580) and Respiratory Services (F695). Additionally, the facility's QAA committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee had put into place following the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 8/20/2021. The failure included two repeat deficiencies that were originally cited in the areas of Label/ Store Drugs & Biologicals (F761), and Resident Allergies/ Preferences/ Substitutes (F806). All of the above areas were subsequently recited on the current recertification survey completed on 4/18/2024. The repeat deficiencies during three federal surveys of record showed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and Physician Assistant interviews the facility failed to notify the physician of low blood pressures that required blood pressure medication to be withheld for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for physician notification (Resident #27). The findings included: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), hypertension (high blood pressure), and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #27's active physician orders revealed an order dated 10/18/23 for Metoprolol Tartrate 75 (milligrams) mg oral twice daily for diagnosis of congestive heart failure. There were no heart rate or blood pressure parameters to hold the medication included as part of the order. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #27's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) for April 2024 was completed on 4/16/24 and revealed Resident #27's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to follow a physician's order to apply compression stockings for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #220) reviewed for edema. The findings included: Resident #220 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis (bacterial infection that can result in swelling and inflammation) of the left lower limb, localized edema (swelling), and lymphedema (swelling as a result of built-up lymph fluid in the body). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #220 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #220's physician orders revealed an order dated 4/5/2024 to apply compression stockings to bilateral lower extremities upon rising and to remove at night before bed daily. A review of Resident #220's care plan dated 4/11/2024 revealed she was admitted with weeping areas of the lower extremities related to a diagnosis of cellulitis and was at risk for further areas of skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident, sitter and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with dressing when requested for 1 of 3 dependent resident (Resident #367) reviewed for provide care with activities of daily living (ADL). The findings included: Resident #367 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and chronic pain. A review of the care plan for Resident #367 dated 04/11/24 indicated the resident had impaired mobility and required partial to maximum assistance with activities of daily living (toileting, dressing and bathing). A review of the Minimum data Set indicated Resident #367 required partial to max assist with toileting, dressing, positing, supervision of feeding, tray set up, chronic pain, occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT), and moderately impaired cognition with short term memory problems. An interview with Resident #367 on 04/15/24 at 11:37 AM, revealed that she had asked to be dressed in regular clothes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PEAK RESOURCES, INC. — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC